Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Phys Ther ; 101(5)2021 05 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742678

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate if mobilization out of bed, within 2 hours after abdominal surgery, improved participants' respiratory function and whether breathing exercises had an additional positive effect. METHODS: Participants were 214 consecutively recruited patients who underwent elective open or robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecological, urological, or endocrinological abdominal surgery with an anesthetic duration of >2 hours. They were recruited to a randomized controlled trial. Immediately after surgery, patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: mobilization (to sit in a chair) and standardized breathing exercises (n = 73), mobilization (to sit in a chair) only (n = 76), or control (n = 65). The interventions started within 2 hours after arrival at the postoperative recovery unit and continued for a maximum of 6 hours. The primary outcomes were differences in peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2, as a percentage) and arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2, measured in kilopascals) between the groups. Secondary outcomes were arterial carbon dioxide pressure, spirometry, respiratory insufficiency, pneumonia, and length of stay. RESULTS: Based on intention-to-treat analysis (n = 214), patients who received mobilization and breathing exercises had significantly improved SpO2 (mean difference [MD] = 2.5%; 95% CI = 0.4 to 4.6) and PaO2 (MD = 1.40 kPa; 95% CI = 0.64 to 2.17) compared with the controls. For mobilization only, there was an increase in PaO2 (MD = 0.97 kPa; 95% CI = 0.20 to 1.74) compared with the controls. In the per-protocol analysis (n = 201), there were significant improvements in SpO2 and PaO2 for both groups receiving mobilization compared with the controls. Secondary outcome measures did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Mobilization out of bed, with or without breathing exercises, within 2 hours after elective abdominal surgery improved SpO2 and PaO2. IMPACT: The respiratory effect of mobilization (out of bed) immediately after surgery has not been thoroughly evaluated in the literature. This study shows that mobilization out of bed following elective abdominal surgery can improve SpO2 and PaO2. LAY SUMMARY: Mobilization within 2 hours after elective abdominal surgery, with or without breathing exercises, can improve patients' respiratory function.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/surgery , Breathing Exercises/methods , Early Ambulation/methods , Oxygen/blood , Time-to-Treatment , Aged , Blood Gas Analysis , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
2.
Diabetes Care ; 29(7): 1471-7, 2006 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16801564

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The effect of exercise training and acarbose on glycemic control, insulin sensitivity, and phenotype was investigated in mild type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Sixty-two men and women with type 2 diabetes were randomized to 12 weeks of structured exercise training with or without acarbose treatment or to acarbose alone. Glycemic control was determined by HbA(1c) (A1C), insulin sensitivity (M value) by euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp, and regional fat distribution by computerized tomography and dual X-ray absorptiometry. Physical fitness was determined as maximal oxygen uptake (Vo(2max)). All investigations were performed before and after the intervention. RESULTS: Forty-eight subjects completed the study. Exercise improved M value by 92% (P = 0.017) and decreased total and truncal fat (P = 0.002, 0.001) and systolic blood pressure (P = 0.01) but had no significant effect on Vo(2max) or A1C level. The combination of exercise and acarbose significantly decreased fasting plasma glucose, A1C, lipids, and diastolic blood pressure and increased Vo(2max), whereas effects on M value and body composition were comparable with that of exercise alone. Acarbose alone had no significant effect on either M value or A1C but decreased systolic (P = 0.001) and diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.001) and fasting proinsulin level (P = 0.009). Multiple regression analysis showed that addition of acarbose to exercise improved glycemic control. CONCLUSIONS: In subjects with mild type 2 diabetes, exercise training improved insulin sensitivity but had no effect on glycemic control. The addition of acarbose to exercise, however, was associated with significant improvement of glycemic control and possibly cardiovascular risk factors.


Subject(s)
Acarbose/therapeutic use , Blood Glucose/metabolism , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/therapy , Exercise/physiology , Hypoglycemic Agents/therapeutic use , Apolipoproteins/blood , Blood Pressure , Female , Humans , Insulin Resistance/physiology , Lipids/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor 1/blood , Risk Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL