Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers and the Role of Genetic Testing.

Beyond the few established hereditary cancer syndromes with an upper gastrointestinal cancer component, there is increasing recognition of the contribution of novel pathogenic germline variants (gPVs) to upper gastrointestinal carcinogenesis. The detection of gPVs has potential implications for novel treatment approaches of the index cancer patient as well as long-term implications for surveillance and risk-reducing measures for cancer survivors and far-reaching implications for the patients' family. With widespread availability of multigene panel testing, new associations may be identified with germline-somatic integration being critical to determining true causality of novel gPVs. Comprehensive cancer care should incorporate both somatic and germline testing.

Characteristics of Mismatch Repair-Deficient Colon Cancer in Relation to Mismatch Repair Protein Loss, Hypermethylation Silencing, and Constitutional and Biallelic Somatic Mismatch Repair Gene Pathogenic Variants.

BACKGROUND: Mismatch repair-deficient colon cancer is heterogeneous. Differentiating inherited constitutional variants from somatic genetic alterations and gene silencing is important for surveillance and genetic counseling. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the extent to which the underlying mechanism of loss of mismatch repair influences molecular and clinicopathologic features of microsatellite instability-high colon cancer. DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS: Patients with microsatellite instability-high colon cancer of stage I, II, or III were included. INTERVENTION: Patients underwent a curative surgical resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The main outcome measures were hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter, biallelic inactivation, constitutional pathogenic variants, and loss of specific mismatch repair proteins. RESULTS: Of the 157 identified tumors with complete genetic analysis, 66% had hypermethylation of the MLH1 promoter, 18% had constitutional pathogenic variants, (Lynch syndrome), 11% had biallelic somatic mismatch repair gene pathogenic variants, and 6% had unexplained high microsatellite instability. The distribution of mismatch repair loss was as follows: MLH1 and PMS2 co-loss, 79% of the tumors; MSH2 and MSH6 co-loss, 10%; MSH6 alone, 3%; PMS2 alone, 2%; other combinations, 2%; no loss, 2%. Tumor mutational burden was lowest in MLH1- and PMS2-deficient tumors. MSH6-deficient tumors had the lowest levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, lowest MSI scores, and fewest frameshift deletions. Patients with MLH1 promoter hypermethylation were significantly more likely to be older and female and to have right-sided colon lesions than patients with biallelic inactivation. Mutation was the most prevalent second hit in tumors with biallelic inactivation and tumors of patients with Lynch syndrome. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by potential selection or referral bias, missing data for some patients, and relatively small sizes of some subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical characteristics of mismatch repair-deficient colon cancer vary with the etiology of microsatellite instability, and its molecular characteristics vary with the affected mismatch repair protein. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B984 . CARACTERSTICAS DEL CNCER DE COLON CON DEFICIENCIA EN LA REPARACIN DE ERRORES DE EMPAREJAMIENTO EN RELACIN CON LA PRDIDA DE PROTENAS MMR, SILENCIAMIENTO DE LA HIPERMETILACIN Y LAS VARIANTES PATGENAS SOMTICAS DE GENES MMR CONSTITUCIONAL Y BIALLICO: ANTECEDENTES:El cáncer de colon deficiente en la reparación de errores de emparejamiento es heterogéneo. La diferenciación de las variantes constitucionales heredadas de las alteraciones genéticas somáticas y el silenciamiento de genes es importante para la vigilancia y el asesoramiento genético.OBJETIVO:Determinar hasta qué punto el mecanismo subyacente de pérdida de reparación de desajustes influye en las características moleculares y clinicopatológicas del cáncer de colon con alta inestabilidad de microsatélites.DISEÑO:Análisis retrospectivo.ESCENARIO:Centro integral de cáncer.PACIENTES:Pacientes con cáncer de colon con inestabilidad de microsatélites alta en estadio I, II, o III.INTERVENCIÓN:Resección quirúrgica con intención curativa.PRINCIPALES RESULTADOS Y MEDIDAS:Hipermetilación del promotor MLH1, inactivación bialélica, variante patógena constitucional y pérdida de proteínas específicas reparadoras de desajustes.RESULTADOS:De los 157 tumores identificados con un análisis genético completo, el 66 % tenía hipermetilación del promotor MLH1, el 18 % tenía una variante patogénica constitucional (síndrome de Lynch), el 11 % tenía variantes patogénicas somáticas bialélicas de algún gen MMR y el 6 % tenía una alta inestabilidad de microsatélites sin explicación. La distribución de la pérdida según la proteína de reparación del desajuste fue la siguiente: pérdida conjunta de MLH1 y PMS2, 79 % de los tumores; co-pérdida de MSH2 y MSH6, 10%; MSH6 solo, 3%; PMS2 solo, 2%; otras combinaciones, 2%; sin pérdida, 2%. La carga mutacional del tumor fue más baja en los tumores deficientes en MLH1 y PMS2. Los tumores con deficiencia de MSH6 tenían los niveles más bajos de linfocitos infiltrantes de tumores, las puntuaciones más bajas del sensor de IMS y la menor cantidad de deleciones por cambio de marco. Los pacientes con hipermetilación del promotor MLH1 tenían significativamente más probabilidades de ser mayores y mujeres y de tener lesiones en el colon derecho que los pacientes con inactivación bialélica. La mutación fue el segundo golpe más frecuente en tumores con inactivación bialélica y tumores de pacientes con síndrome de Lynch.LIMITACIONES:Sesgo potencial de selección o referencia, datos faltantes para algunos pacientes y tamaños relativamente pequeños de algunos subgrupos.CONCLUSIONES:Las características clínicas del cáncer de colon deficiente en reparación de desajustes varían con la etiología de la inestabilidad de microsatélites, y sus características moleculares varían con la proteína de reparación de desajustes afectada. Vea Resumen de video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B984 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Survival After Induction Chemotherapy and Chemoradiation Versus Chemoradiation and Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) improves tumor response in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients compared to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy alone. The effect of TNT on patient survival has not been fully investigated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective case series of patients with LARC at a comprehensive cancer center. Three hundred and eleven patients received chemoradiotherapy (chemoRT) as the sole neoadjuvant treatment and planned adjuvant chemotherapy, and 313 received TNT (induction fluorouracil and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting). These patients then underwent total mesorectal excision or were entered in a watch-and-wait protocol. The proportion of patients with complete response (CR) after neoadjuvant therapy (defined as pathological CR or clinical CR sustained for 2 years) was compared by the χ2 test. Disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test. Cox regression models were used to further evaluate DFS. RESULTS: The rate of CR was 20% for chemoRT and 27% for TNT (P=.05). DFS, local recurrence-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and overall survival were no different. Disease-free survival was not associated with the type of neoadjuvant treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 1.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.93-1.80; P = .12). CONCLUSIONS: Although TNT does not prolong survival than neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy plus intended postoperative chemotherapy, the higher response rate associated with TNT may create opportunities to preserve the rectum in more patients with LARC.

An Emerging Paradigm for Germline Testing in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma and Immediate Implications for Clinical Practice: A Review.

Importance: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a malignant neoplasm with a rising incidence and is a leading public health challenge. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma has been well characterized genomically, with findings of therapeutic actionability that have substantive implications for clinical practice based on recent high-level evidence. Observations: Pathogenic germline alterations (PGAs) are relatively common in individuals with PDAC, as evidenced in multiple recent data sets, with a frequency of approximately 10%. The most common PGAs are in BRCA1, BRCA2, and ATM and more rarely in PALB2, MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2, CDKN2A, and TP53, among others, with an aggregate frequency of 3.8% to 9.7%. These PGAs are of key interest owing to therapeutic actionability and the downstream identification of at-risk family members and possible hereditary cancer syndromes. Approximately 3% to 7% of individuals with PDAC harbor a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation, which are among the most frequently mutated genes in PDAC. Recent updates to the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend risk assessment for all individuals with PDAC irrespective of personal or family history or ethnicity. Treatment implications include the use of checkpoint inhibitor therapy for mismatch repair-deficient PDAC and the validation of poly-ADP (adenosine diphosphate)-ribose polymerase inhibitor (PARPi) therapy as a maintenance strategy in platinum-sensitive PDAC. Conclusions and Relevance: With increasing evidence and slow improvement of outcomes, PDAC has entered the era of precision medicine. Germline mutations have been identified in key genes with an aggregate frequency of 3.8% to 9.7%, several of which are therapeutically actionable with platinum, PARPi, and checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Potential therapeutic targets need to be actively sought and identified.

Adoption of Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Importance: Treatment of locally advanced rectal (LARC) cancer involves chemoradiation, surgery, and chemotherapy. The concept of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), in which chemoradiation and chemotherapy are administered prior to surgery, has been developed to optimize delivery of effective systemic therapy aimed at micrometastases. Objective: To compare the traditional approach of preoperative chemoradiation (chemoRT) followed by postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with the more recent TNT approach for LARC. Design, Setting, and Participants: A retrospective cohort analysis using Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) records from 2009 to 2015 was carried out. A total of 811 patients who presented with LARC (T3/4 or node-positive) were identified. Exposures: Of the 811 patients, 320 received chemoRT with planned adjuvant chemotherapy and 308 received TNT (induction fluorouracil- and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy followed by chemoRT). Main Outcomes and Measures: Treatment and outcome data for the 2 cohorts were compared. Dosing and completion of prescribed chemotherapy were assessed on the subset of patients who received all therapy at MSK. Results: Of the 628 patients overall, 373 (59%) were men and 255 (41%) were women, with a mean (SD) age of 56.7 (12.9) years. Of the 308 patients in the TNT cohort, 181 (49%) were men and 127 (49%) were women. Of the 320 patients in the chemoRT with planned adjuvant chemotherapy cohort, 192 (60%) were men and 128 (40%) were women. Patients in the TNT cohort received greater percentages of the planned oxaliplatin and fluorouracil prescribed dose than those in the chemoRT with planned adjuvant chemotherapy cohort. The complete response (CR) rate, including both pathologic CR (pCR) in those who underwent surgery and sustained clinical CR (cCR) for at least 12 months posttreatment in those who did not undergo surgery, was 36% in the TNT cohort compared with 21% in the chemoRT with planned adjuvant chemotherapy cohort. Conclusions and Relevance: Our findings provide additional support for the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines that categorize TNT as a viable treatment strategy for rectal cancer. Our data suggest that TNT facilitates delivery of planned systemic therapy. Long-term follow-up will determine if this finding translates into improved survival. In addition, given its high CR rate, TNT may facilitate nonoperative treatment strategies aimed at organ preservation.