Inspiratory muscle training is feasible and safe for patients with acute spinal cord injury.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the feasibility and safety and, to a lesser extent efficacy, of inspiratory muscle training (IMT) for patients with acute complete cervical or thoracic spinal cord injury (SCI). DESIGN: Prospective, observational pilot study comprising a series of case reports. SETTING: Tertiary care, public hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Seven adult subjects with an acute complete cervical or thoracic SCI. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received IMT as soon as their respiratory condition was stable. A high-resistance, low-repetition program of IMT using a POWERbreathe KH1 device was instituted. Training comprised 3-6 sets of 6 breaths, commenced at 50% maximum inspiratory pressure with the training load progressively increased. OUTCOME MEASURES: Feasibility (number of sessions when the criteria to participate in IMT were met/not met), safety (symptoms and physiological stability) before, during and after IMT sessions and efficacy (lung function) were measured. RESULTS: There were 50 sessions in total where participants met the criteria to receive IMT, with a mean (range) of 7.1 (3-11) IMT sessions per participant delivered over 10.7 (4-17) days. IMT was feasible, with all 50 planned sessions of IMT able to be delivered, and safe, with stable physiological parameters and no adverse symptoms or events recorded before, during or after IMT. Maximal inspiratory pressure increased for four participants and forced vital capacity increased for three participants over the duration of their IMT sessions. CONCLUSION: A high-resistance, low-repetition program of IMT was feasible and safe in adults with an acute complete cervical or thoracic SCI whose respiratory status was stable. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN 12614000975695).

The physiotherapy management of patients undergoing thoracic surgery: a survey of current practice in Australia and New Zealand.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Physiotherapy is considered an essential component of the management of patients after thoracotomy, yet the type of interventions utilized, and evidence for their efficacy, has not been established. The aim of the present study was to ascertain the current physiotherapy management of patients undergoing thoracotomy and the factors influencing practice among different providers. METHOD: A purpose-designed postal questionnaire was distributed to senior physiotherapists in all thoracic surgical units throughout Australia and New Zealand (n=57). RESULTS: A response rate of 81% was obtained (n=46). Pre-operatively, 16 respondents (35%) reported assessing all thoracotomy patients. The majority of respondents (n=44; 96%) indicated that all patients were seen by physiotherapists after surgery, with 29 respondents (63%) performing prophylactic physiotherapy interventions to prevent post-operative pulmonary complications. Respondents reported that physiotherapy treatment was usually commenced on day one post-operatively (n=37; 80%) with the most commonly used treatment interventions being deep breathing exercises, the active cycle of breathing techniques, cough, forced expiration techniques and sustained maximal inspirations. Most respondents reported that patients first sat out of bed (n=41; 89%), commenced shoulder range of movement (n=23; 50%) and walking (n=32; 70%) on day one post-operatively. The majority of respondents reported that they offered no post-operative pulmonary rehabilitation (n=25; 54%), outpatient follow-up (n=43; 94%) orpost-thoracotomy pain management (n=40; 87%). Respondents indicated that personal experience, literature recommendations and established practice were the factors which most influenced physiotherapy practice. Conclusion. Most patients after thoracotomy receive physiotherapy assessment and/or treatment in the immediate post-operative period, but only one-third were routinely seen pre-operatively and relatively few were reviewed following discharge from hospital. Further studies are required to guide physiotherapists in determining the efficacy of their practices for patients undergoing thoracotomy.

The prevalence of thumb problems in Australian physiotherapists is high: an observational study.

QUESTION: What is the lifetime and current prevalence of thumb problems in Australian physiotherapists and what are the factors associated with thumb problems? DESIGN: Survey of a random cross-section of physiotherapists. PARTICIPANTS: 1562(approximately 10% of the total) registered Australian physiotherapists. OUTCOME MEASURES: General questions covered demographic information, area of practice, hours worked per week, and years worked as a physiotherapist. Specific questions about thumb problems covered thumb affected, symptoms, onset of symptoms, treatment sought, relevance of work-related factors, and joint hypermobility. RESULTS: 1102 (71%) questionnaires were returned and 961 (68%) completed. The lifetime prevalence of thumb problems was 65% and the current prevalence was 41%. Factors that were significantly associated with thumb problems included: working in orthopaedic outpatients (OR 3.2, 95% CI 1.8 to 5.8); using manual therapy (OR 2.3 to 3.4, 95% CI 1.7 to 5.1), trigger point therapy (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.7 to 3.0) and massage (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.6 to 2.8); having thumb joint hypermobility (OR 2.2 to 2.6, 95% CI 1.4 to 4.5); or an inability to stabilise the joints of the thumb whilst performing physiotherapy techniques (OR 4.2, 95% CI 2.9 to 5.9). Of those respondents who reported thumb problems, 19% had changed their area of practice and 4% had left the profession as a result of their thumb problems. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of thumb problems in Australian physiotherapists appears to be high and can be of sufficient severity to impact on careers.