Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guidelines 2010 for antiemesis in oncology: executive summary.

The purpose of this article is to disseminate the standard of antiemetic therapy for Japanese clinical oncologists. On the basis of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument, which reflects evidence-based clinical practice guidelines, a working group of the Japanese Society of Clinical Oncology (JSCO) reviewed clinical practice guidelines for antiemesis and performed a systematic review of evidence-based domestic practice guidelines for antiemetic therapy in Japan. In addition, because health-insurance systems in Japan are different from those in other countries, a consensus was reached regarding standard treatments for chemotherapy that induce nausea and vomiting. Current evidence was collected by use of MEDLINE, from materials from meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and from European Society of Medical Oncology/Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer guidelines for antiemesis. Initially, 21 clinical questions (CQ) were selected on the basis of CQs from other guidelines. Patients treated with highly emetic agents should receive a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine; 5HT3) receptor antagonist, dexamethasone, and a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist. For patients with moderate emetic risk, 5HT3 receptor antagonists and dexamethasone were recommended, whereas for those receiving chemotherapy with low emetic risk dexamethasone only is recommended. Patients receiving high-emetic-risk radiation therapy should also receive a 5HT3 receptor antagonist. In this paper the 2010 JSCO clinical practice guidelines for antiemesis are presented in English; they reveal high concordance of Japanese medical circumstances with other antiemetic guidelines that are similarly based on evidence.

A multicenter prospective study to evaluate bone fracture related to adjuvant anastrozole in Japanese postmenopausal women with breast cancer: two-year interim analysis of Saitama Breast Cancer Clinical Study Group (SBCCSG-06).

BACKGROUND: Because of its superior efficacy to tamoxifen, anastrozole has been widely used in Japan as an adjuvant treatment for postmenopausal, hormone-responsive breast cancer patients. However, anastrozole may affect bone in Japanese patients similar to its effects in Western patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the rate of bone fracture and bone mineral density (BMD) during anastrozole treatment in Japanese patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, 350 postmenopausal women with hormone-responsive, stage I to IIIA breast cancer were enrolled and scheduled to receive adjuvant anastrozole treatment for up to 5 years. Patients underwent clinical examination for bone fractures and annual measurement of BMD during treatment. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 33.0 months, bone fractures occurred in 1.8 %. Annual fracture rates were 0.3 and 1.2 % during the first and second year, respectively. The overall median BMD significantly decreased, measuring 87.5, 84.3, and 83.5 % at baseline and after 1 and 2 years, respectively. Musculoskeletal disorders were the most common (26.1 %), and hot flashes were the second most common adverse event (7.9 %). Severe adverse events occurred in 5.5 % of all the cases. CONCLUSIONS: In this interim analysis, the bone fracture rate was lower than that in the Western population despite a significant reduction of BMD after 2 years of treatment with anastrozole. Adjuvant anastrozole treatment was well tolerated in Japanese postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Long-term follow-up data is necessary to elucidate the racial disparities of the safety profile of anastrozole.