Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Plant Mol Biol ; 103(1-2): 91-111, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32043226

ABSTRACT

KEY MESSAGE: Auxin treatment of grape (Vitis vinifera L.) berries delays ripening by inducing changes in gene expression and cell wall metabolism and could combat some deleterious climate change effects. Auxins are inhibitors of grape berry ripening and their application may be useful to delay harvest to counter effects of climate change. However, little is known about how this delay occurs. The expression of 1892 genes was significantly changed compared to the control during a 48 h time-course where the auxin 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) was applied to pre-veraison grape berries. Principal component analysis showed that the control and auxin-treated samples were most different at 3 h post-treatment when approximately three times more genes were induced than repressed by NAA. There was considerable cross-talk between hormone pathways, particularly between those of auxin and ethylene. Decreased expression of genes encoding putative cell wall catabolic enzymes (including those involved with pectin) and increased expression of putative cellulose synthases indicated that auxins may preserve cell wall structure. This was confirmed by immunochemical labelling of berry sections using antibodies that detect homogalacturonan (LM19) and methyl-esterified homogalacturonan (LM20) and by labelling with the CMB3a cellulose-binding module. Comparison of the auxin-induced changes in gene expression with the pattern of these genes during berry ripening showed that the effect on transcription is a mix of changes that may specifically alter the progress of berry development in a targeted manner and others that could be considered as non-specific changes. Several lines of evidence suggest that cell wall changes and associated berry softening are the first steps in ripening and that delaying cell expansion can delay ripening providing a possible mechanism for the observed auxin effects.


Subject(s)
Cell Wall/drug effects , Indoleacetic Acids/pharmacology , Plant Cells/drug effects , Plant Growth Regulators/pharmacology , Vitis/drug effects , Cell Enlargement/drug effects , Cell Wall/genetics , Fruit/drug effects , Fruit/growth & development , Gene Expression Regulation, Plant/drug effects , Naphthaleneacetic Acids/pharmacology , Plant Cells/physiology , Time , Vitis/growth & development
2.
Plant Cell Environ ; 41(9): 2195-2208, 2018 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29532951

ABSTRACT

Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) is an important nutritionally rich legume crop that is consumed worldwide. Prior to cooking, desi chickpea seeds are most often dehulled and cleaved to release the split cotyledons, referred to as dhal. Compositional variation between desi genotypes has a significant impact on nutritional quality and downstream processing, and this has been investigated mainly in terms of starch and protein content. Studies in pulses such as bean and lupin have also implicated cell wall polysaccharides in cooking time variation, but the underlying relationship between desi chickpea cotyledon composition and cooking performance remains unclear. Here, we utilized a variety of chemical and immunohistological assays to examine details of polysaccharide composition, structure, abundance, and location within the desi chickpea cotyledon. Pectic polysaccharides were the most abundant cell wall components, and differences in monosaccharide and glycosidic linkage content suggest both environmental and genetic factors contribute to cotyledon composition. Genotype-specific differences were identified in arabinan structure, pectin methylesterification, and calcium-mediated pectin dimerization. These differences were replicated in distinct field sites and suggest a potentially important role for cell wall polysaccharides and their underlying regulatory machinery in the control of cooking time in chickpea.


Subject(s)
Cell Wall/chemistry , Cicer/cytology , Cicer/genetics , Flour/analysis , Cell Wall/genetics , Cellulose/analysis , Cooking , Cotyledon/chemistry , Genotype , Monosaccharides/analysis , Pectins/analysis , Polysaccharides/analysis , Polysaccharides/chemistry , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL