Perioperative Toripalimab Plus Chemotherapy for Patients With Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: The Neotorch Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Adjuvant and neoadjuvant immunotherapy have improved clinical outcomes for patients with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the optimal combination of checkpoint inhibition with chemotherapy remains unknown. Objective: To determine whether toripalimab in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy will improve event-free survival and major pathological response in patients with stage II or III resectable NSCLC compared with chemotherapy alone. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial enrolled patients with stage II or III resectable NSCLC (without EGFR or ALK alterations for nonsquamous NSCLC) from March 12, 2020, to June 19, 2023, at 50 participating hospitals in China. The data cutoff date for this interim analysis was November 30, 2022. Interventions: Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive 240 mg of toripalimab or placebo once every 3 weeks combined with platinum-based chemotherapy for 3 cycles before surgery and 1 cycle after surgery, followed by toripalimab only (240 mg) or placebo once every 3 weeks for up to 13 cycles. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcomes were event-free survival (assessed by the investigators) and the major pathological response rate (assessed by blinded, independent pathological review). The secondary outcomes included the pathological complete response rate (assessed by blinded, independent pathological review) and adverse events. Results: Of the 501 patients randomized, 404 had stage III NSCLC (202 in the toripalimab + chemotherapy group and 202 in the placebo + chemotherapy group) and 97 had stage II NSCLC and were excluded from this interim analysis. The median age was 62 years (IQR, 56-65 years), 92% of patients were male, and the median follow-up was 18.3 months (IQR, 12.7-22.5 months). For the primary outcome of event-free survival, the median length was not estimable (95% CI, 24.4 months-not estimable) in the toripalimab group compared with 15.1 months (95% CI, 10.6-21.9 months) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.40 [95% CI, 0.28-0.57], P < .001). The major pathological response rate (another primary outcome) was 48.5% (95% CI, 41.4%-55.6%) in the toripalimab group compared with 8.4% (95% CI, 5.0%-13.1%) in the placebo group (between-group difference, 40.2% [95% CI, 32.2%-48.1%], P < .001). The pathological complete response rate (secondary outcome) was 24.8% (95% CI, 19.0%-31.3%) in the toripalimab group compared with 1.0% (95% CI, 0.1%-3.5%) in the placebo group (between-group difference, 23.7% [95% CI, 17.6%-29.8%]). The incidence of immune-related adverse events occurred more frequently in the toripalimab group. No unexpected treatment-related toxic effects were identified. The incidence of grade 3 or higher adverse events, fatal adverse events, and adverse events leading to discontinuation of treatment were comparable between the groups. Conclusions and Relevance: The addition of toripalimab to perioperative chemotherapy led to a significant improvement in event-free survival for patients with resectable stage III NSCLC and this treatment strategy had a manageable safety profile. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04158440.

Expert consensus on indocyanine green fluorescence imaging for thoracoscopic lung resection (The Version 2022).

The use of the white-light thoracoscopy is hampered by the low contrast between oncologic margins and surrounding normal parenchyma. As a result, many patients with in situ or micro-infiltrating adenocarcinoma have to undergo lobectomy due to a lack of tactile and visual feedback in the resection of solitary pulmonary nodules. Near-infrared (NIR) guided indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence imaging technique has been widely investigated due to its unique capability in addressing the current challenges; however, there is no special consensus on the evidence and recommendations for its preoperative and intraoperative applications. This manuscript will describe the development process of a consensus on ICG fluorescence-guided thoracoscopic resection of pulmonary lesions and make recommendations that can be applied in a greater number of centers. Specifically, an expert panel of thoracic surgeons and radiographers was formed. Based on the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations, the consensus was developed in conjunction with the Chinese Guidelines on Video-assisted Thoracoscopy, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines on the management of pulmonary lesions. Each of the statements was discussed and agreed upon with a unanimous consensus amongst the panel. A total of 6 consensus statements were developed. Fluorescence-guided thoracoscopy has unique advantages in the visualization of pulmonary nodules, and recognition and resection of the anterior plane of the pulmonary segment. The expert panel agrees that fluorescence-guided thoracoscopic surgery has the potential to become a routine operation for the treatment of pulmonary lesions.

Stratified treatment of localized cervical esophageal squamous cell carcinoma induced by neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (SCENIC).

Background: Definitive chemoradiation is the preferred treatment for cervical esophageal carcinoma (CEC), per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. However, in treatment failures, salvage surgery poses significant technical challenges. If non-responders could be identified, prior to chemoradiation, these patients may benefit from primary esophagectomy. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor is widely used and recognized as an effective treatment method in various cancers including esophageal cancer. Therefore, we propose to screen for treatment response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy to select patients who are radiosensitive and potential candidates for laryngeal preservation. While non-responders are likely to be insensitive to chemoradiation would be offered radical esophagectomy. Methods: A total of 36 patients with histopathologically-confirmed locally advanced CEC have been enrolled in our study. All participants will receive 2 cycles of induction therapy, which was tislelizumab combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Patients will be classified into 3 groups according to their response to induction therapy: a remarkable response (RR) group, limited partial response (LPR) group, and poor response (POR) group. Stratified patients will receive the following follow-up treatments: those in the RR group will receive dCRT, and those in the LPR and POR groups will undergo radical surgery. Then, participants in the RR group will be administrated with tislelizumab alone for 1 year. The choice of postoperative treatment for patients in the LPR and POR groups will depend on the patient's condition, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or follow-up. The primary endpoint of the study is the 2-year event-free survival (EFS). The secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS), regression-free survival (RFS), objective response rate (ORR), and 5-year overall survival (OS). At the same time, we will assess the patient's quality of life (QoL). Conclusions: Screening CEC patients after immune-induction therapy combined with chemotherapy using different treatment strategies might lead to improvements in their QoL and OS time. No relevant double-endpoint studies have been reported until now. Our study is the first multicenter, prospective, exploratory study to seek the optimal treatment for locally advanced CEC patients. The results may offer high-level evidence for future CEC treatment. Trial Registration: Chictr.Org identifier: ChiCTR2200057732.

Effect of Early Full-Calorie Nutrition Support Following Esophagectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Early use of enteral nutrition (EN) is indicated following surgical resection of esophageal cancer. However, early EN support does not always meet the optimal calorie or protein requirements, and the benefits of supplementary parenteral nutrition (PN) remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early supplementary PN following esophagectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 80 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy. Resting energy expenditure and body composition measurements were performed in all patients preoperatively and postoperatively. EN was administered after surgery, followed by randomization to either EN+PN or EN alone. The amount of PN administered was calculated to meet the full calorie requirement, as measured by indirect calorimetry, and 1.5 g protein/kg fat-free mass (FFM) per day was added as determined by body composition measurement. The clinical characteristics were compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Patients in the EN+PN group but not in the EN group preserved body weight (0.18 ± 3.38 kg vs -2.15 ± 3.19 kg, P < .05) and FFM (1.46 ± 2.97 kg vs -2.08 ± 4.16 kg) relative to preoperative measurements. Length of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity rates, and standard blood biochemistry profiles were similar. However, scores for physical functioning (71.5 ± 24.3 vs 60.4 ± 27.4, P < .05) and energy/fatigue (62.9 ± 19.5 vs 54.2 ± 23.5, P < .05) were higher in the EN+PN group 90 days following surgery. CONCLUSION: Early use of supplemental PN to meet full calorie requirements of patients who underwent esophagectomy led to better quality of life 3 months after surgery. Moreover, increased calorie and protein supplies were associated with preservation of body weight and FFM.