ABSTRACT
Objectives: The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of acupressure on fatigue severity, sleep quality, and psychological status in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving hemodialysis (HD) treatment. Design: A single-blinded parallel-group randomized controlled trial. Settings/Location: A medical center in central Java, Indonesia. Subjects: One hundred and six patients who had been receiving HD for at least 3 months were enrolled in this study and randomly assigned to two groups. Interventions: The experimental group received acupressure at K1, ST36, and SP6 acupoints. In contrast, the control group received sham acupressure at 1 cun from these three acupoints. Subjects received acupressure thrice per week for 4 weeks, and pressure on each acupoint was applied for 3 min bilaterally. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was fatigue severity, while sleep quality and psychological status (depression/anxiety) were evaluated as secondary outcomes. Outcomes were assessed using the Brief Fatigue Inventory, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Results: Acupressure induced a significant medium to large effect on improvement in fatigue (b = -1.71, confidence interval [95% CI]: -1.90 to -1.51, ΔR2 = 0.744), sleep quality (b = -5.81, 95% CI: -6.80 to -4.81, ΔR2 = 0.525), and anxiety (Estimate = -3.213, 95% CI: -4.238 to -2.188, pseudo R2 = 0.292)/depression (Estimate = -3.378, 95% CI: -4.432 to -2.325, pseudo R2 = 0.268) in experimental group patients compared to controls. No adverse events of acupressure were reported during the study process. Conclusions: Acupressure significantly and independently improved fatigue, depression/anxiety, and sleep quality in ESRD patients receiving HD. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05571007.
Subject(s)
Acupressure , Kidney Failure, Chronic , Humans , Renal Dialysis/adverse effects , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Kidney Failure, Chronic/complications , Sleep Quality , Fatigue/etiology , Fatigue/therapy , Fatigue/psychologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The spiritual well-being of terminally ill cancer patients is an important indicator of the quality of their lives and of the quality of hospice care, but no validated tools are available for assessing this indicator in Taiwan. METHOD: The present cross-sectional study validated the Spiritual Well-Being Scale-Mandarin version (SWBS-M) by testing its psychometric properties in 243 cancer patients from five teaching hospitals throughout Taiwan. Construct validity was tested by factor analysis and hypothesis testing. Patients' spiritual well-being and quality of life were assessed using the SWBS-M and the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQoL), respectively. RESULTS: Overall, the SWBS-M had an internal consistency/reliability of 0.89. Exploratory factor analysis showed that the SWBS-M had an underlying two-factor structure, explaining 46.94% of the variance. SWBS-M scores correlated moderately with MQoL scores (r = 0.48, p < 0.01). Terminally ill cancer patients' spiritual well-being was inversely related to their average pain level during the previous 24 hours (r = -0.183, p = 0.006). Cancer patients' spiritual well-being also differed significantly with their experience of pain (t = -3.67, p < 0.001); terminally ill cancer patients with pain during the previous 24 hours had a lower sense of spiritual well-being than those without pain. SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: Our findings support a two-factor model for the SWBS-M in terminally ill Taiwanese cancer patients. We recommend testing the psychometric properties of the SWBS-M in different patient populations to verify its factorial structure in other Asian countries.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms/psychology , Psychometrics/instrumentation , Psychometrics/standards , Spirituality , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychometrics/statistics & numerical data , Reproducibility of Results , Surveys and Questionnaires , Taiwan , TranslatingABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The study aim was to compare the long-term effect of Western medicine and combined treatment with Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) and Western medicine on the prognosis (survival rate, symptom distress, physical function, and quality of life) of patients with lung cancer. DESIGN: Longitudinal study. SETTING/LOCATION: Two medical centers, one each in Northern and Southern Taiwan. PATIENTS: Patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer and treated with Western medicine (n = 54) or TCM plus Western medicine (n = 30). OUTCOME MEASURES: Symptom distress, physical function, and quality of life were measured by using the Symptom Distress Scale, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-Performance Status Rating, and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-LC13), respectively. Data on these measures were collected at baseline (before treatment) and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after starting treatment. Survival was estimated by Kaplan-Meier curves. Group differences in outcomes were analyzed by generalized estimating equations. RESULTS: Treatment groups did not differ significantly at baseline for demographic information; disease severity; symptom distress; or EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 scores, except for pain and dyspnea. After adjustment for these baseline effects, the combined-treatment group had better physical function and role function than the Western medicine group at 6 months (p < 0.05). The combined treatment group had better cumulative survival, but this difference did not reach significance. CONCLUSIONS: To more precisely estimate the long-term effectiveness of combined treatment on the prognosis of patients with lung cancer, future studies should standardize the number of TCM visits; increase the number of participants by continuous recruitment; and ask patients to complete daily logs with single-item measures of outcomes, such as symptom distress, quality of life, and physical function. Similar studies are suggested in patients with different cancers to develop a collaborative model using Western medicine and TCM.
Subject(s)
Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Medicine, Chinese Traditional , Aged , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Lung Neoplasms/epidemiology , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Quality of Life , Taiwan/epidemiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study explored the effects of acupressure on fatigue of lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For this experimental study, 57 subjects were randomly assigned to three groups: acupressure with essential oils (n=17), acupressure only (n=24), and sham acupressure (n=16). Acupoints were Hegu (LI4), Zusanli (ST36), and Sanyingjiao (SP6). All subjects received acupressure once every morning for 5 months, with each acupoint pressed for 1 min. Fatigue, functional status, anxiety, depression, and sleep quality were measured before initial chemotherapy (T0), on Day 1 of third chemotherapy (T1), and on Day 1 of sixth chemotherapy (T2). Outcome differences between groups were analyzed at T0, T1, and T2 by general estimating equations. RESULTS: After controlling for baseline outcome values, age, and adherence to acupressure, subjects who received acupressure with essential oils and acupressure had significantly less fatigue in daily living activities and sleep better quality at T1 than subjects who received sham acupressure. Subjects who received acupressure with essential oils had significantly better sleep quality at T2 than the sham acupressure group. Subjects who received acupressure with or without essential oils had greater odds of better functional status at T1 than the sham group. CONCLUSION: It is plausible that acupressure with or without essential oils helps lung cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy reduce cancer-related fatigue and increase activity level. Further study is wanted to test this hypothesis.
Subject(s)
Acupressure/methods , Fatigue/epidemiology , Fatigue/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pilot Projects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is used worldwide as a complementary and alternative medicine, but little is known about cancer patients' experience when using combination therapy of TCM and conventional medicine. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to understand the experiences of Taiwanese cancer patients undergoing conventional chemotherapy and using TCM at the same time. METHODS: For this qualitative descriptive study, 9 cancer patients (42-63 years old) were interviewed individually and in depth using a semistructured guide. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data were concurrently collected and analyzed using a constant comparative method to develop major themes and categories. RESULTS: Data analysis revealed 3 themes: (1) biomedical aspect: TCM as a supplementary force to conventional medicine, (2) psychological aspect: different beliefs about TCM create different TCM uses, and (3) social aspect: interactions among patients, physicians, and economic issues. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that the phenomenon of using TCM is captured in a biopsychosocial model. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: When assessing the issue of TCM use among cancer patients, healthcare providers must take into consideration its biological, psychological, and social aspects.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Attitude to Health , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Combined Modality Therapy/psychology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Qualitative Research , Socioeconomic Factors , Taiwan , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Family caregivers' quality of life (QOL) is an important indicator for end-of-life care, but appropriate assessment tools are unavailable in Taiwan. This correlational study therefore tested the psychometric properties of the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer Mandarin version (CQOLC-M) in 359 dyads of cancer patients with terminal illness and their family caregivers from 5 teaching hospitals throughout Taiwan. Caregivers' QOL, spiritual well-being, social support, pain intensity, and economic situation were assessed using the CQOLC-M and 4 established scales. The CQOLC-M had internal consistency reliability of .87. Construct validity was supported by factor analysis, hypothesis testing, and known-group comparison. Exploratory factor analysis showed 7 underlying factors explaining 48.15% of the variance. Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer Mandarin version scores correlated moderately with caregivers' social support (P < .01) and spiritual well-being (P < .01). Caregivers' QOL was inversely related to both patients' (F = 4.90; P = .008) and caregivers' average pain (t = -4.22; P < .001) in the past 24 hours. We suggest removing 4 items with factor loading of less than 0.4. Since caregivers' QOL depends on patients' and caregivers' physical dimensions, we recommend adding physical-related items to the CQOLC-M. Clinicians can improve caregivers' QOL not only by maintaining their health, social support, and spirituality but also by better managing the pain of patients with terminal illness.
Subject(s)
Attitude to Health , Family , Neoplasms , Nursing Assessment/methods , Quality of Life/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Adult , Analysis of Variance , Attitude to Health/ethnology , Caregivers/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Family/ethnology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Multilingualism , Neoplasms/ethnology , Nursing Assessment/standards , Nursing Evaluation Research , Psychometrics , Social Support , Socioeconomic Factors , Spirituality , Taiwan , Terminal Care/psychology , TranslatingABSTRACT
To better understand quality of life (QOL) and its important correlates among patients with terminal illness, a cross-sectional correlational design was used in a study based on Stewart, Teno, Patrick, and Lynn's conceptual model of factors affecting QOL of dying patients and their families. Sixty participants were recruited from two local hospice programs in the midwestern region of the United States. Data were collected at the participants' homes. The participants had an above average QOL. Living with the caregiver, spirituality, pain intensity, physical performance status, and social support as a set explained 38% of the variance in their QOL. Among these five predictors, living with the caregiver, spirituality, and social support statistically were significant predictors of the QOL of these participants. Participants who did not live with their caregivers experienced less pain intensity, perceived higher spirituality, had more social support, and had a significantly better QOL. Important contributions of these findings are discussed.