The Impact of Positron Emission Tomography Imaging and Tumor Molecular Profiling on Risk Stratification, Treatment Choice, and Oncological Outcomes of Patients with Primary or Relapsed Prostate Cancer: An International Collaborative Review of the Existing Literature.

CONTEXT: The clinical introduction of next-generation imaging methods and molecular biomarkers ("radiogenomics") has revolutionized the field of prostate cancer (PCa). While the clinical validity of these tests has thoroughly been vetted, their clinical utility remains a matter of investigation. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the evidence to date on the impact of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging and tissue-based prognostic biomarkers, including Decipher, Prolaris, and Oncotype Dx, on the risk stratification, treatment choice, and oncological outcomes of men with newly diagnosed PCa or those with biochemical failure (BCF). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We performed a quantitative systematic review of the literature using the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases (2010-2022) following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement guidelines. The validated Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 scoring system was used to assess the risk of bias. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of 148 studies (130 on PET and 18 on biomarkers) were included. In the primary PCa setting, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET imaging was not useful in improving T staging, moderately useful in improving N staging, but consistently useful in improving M staging in patients with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) unfavorable intermediate- to very-high-risk PCa. Its use led to a management change in 20-30% of patients. However, the effect of these treatment changes on survival outcomes was not clear. Similarly, biomarkers in the pretherapy primary PCa setting increased and decreased the risk, respectively, in 7-30% and 32-36% of NCCN low-risk and 31-65% and 4-15% of NCCN favorable intermediate-risk patients being considered for active surveillance. A change in management was noted in up to 65% of patients, with the change being in line with the molecular risk-based reclassification, but again, the impact of these changes on survival outcomes remained unclear. Notably, in the postsurgical primary PCa setting, biomarker-guided adjuvant radiation therapy (RT) was associated with improved oncological control: Δ↓ 2-yr BCF by 22% (level 2b). In the BCF setting, the data were more mature. PSMA PET was consistently useful in improving disease localization-Δ↑ detection for T, N, and M staging was 13-32%, 19-58%, and 9-29%, respectively. Between 29% and 73% of patients had a change in management. Most importantly, these management changes were associated with improved survival outcomes in three trials: Δ↑ 4-yr disease-free survival by 24.3%, Δ↑ 6-mo metastasis-free survival (MFS) by 46.7%, and Δ↑ androgen deprivation therapy-free survival by 8 mo in patients who received PET-concordant RT (level 1b-2b). Biomarker testing in these patients also appeared to be helpful in risk stratifying and guiding the use of early salvage RT (sRT) and concomitant hormonal therapy. Patients with high-genomic-risk scores benefitted from treatment intensification: Δ↑ 8-yr MFS by 20% with the use of early sRT and Δ↑ 12-yr MFS by 11.2% with the use of hormonal therapy alongside early sRT, while low-genomic-risk score patients did equally well with initial conservative management (level 3). CONCLUSIONS: Both PSMA PET imaging and tumor molecular profiling provide actionable information in the management of men with primary PCa and those with BCF. Emerging data suggest that radiogenomics-guided treatments translate into direct survival benefits for patients, however, additional prospective data are awaited. PATIENT SUMMARY: In this review, we evaluated the utility of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography and tumor molecular profiling in guiding the care of men with prostate cancer (PCa). We found that these tests augmented risk stratification, altered management, and improved cancer control in men with a new diagnosis of PCa or for those experiencing a relapse.

Real-world evidence of outcomes of oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer patients treated with metastasis-directed therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate characteristics and outcomes of oligometastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients undergoing metastases-directed therapy (MDT) with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify mHSPC patients who underwent EBRT as MDT between 12/2019 and 12/2022. Main outcomes consisted of progression to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and overall mortality (OM). Oligometastatic was defined as ≤3 metastases and bone and/or lymph node deposits were treated with conventional doses up to 54 Gy or with hypofractionated stereotactic regimes of median 24 Gy (20-27 Gy). RESULTS: Overall, 37 patients treated with EBRT as MDT were identified. The median follow-up was 13 months. Median age at MDT was 71 years and 84% exhibited ECOG performance status 0. The median baseline PSA at diagnosis was 10 ng/mL. Overall, primary local therapy consisted of radical prostatectomy (65%), followed by external beam radiation therapy to the prostate (11%), focal therapy (8%), and palliative transurethral resection of the prostate (5%). Overall, 32% exhibited de novo oligometastatic mHSPC. Bone metastases were present in 78% versus 19% lymph node metastases versus 3% both. The distribution of targeted oligo-metastases was 62% versus 38% for respectively one metastasis versus more than one metastasis. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) was combined with MDT in 84%. Moreover, 19% received combination therapy with apalutamide/enzalutamide and 12% with abiraterone or docetaxel. The median time to mCRPC was 50 months. In incidence analyses, 13% developed mCRPC after 24 months. OM after 24 months was 15% in mHSPC patients receiving MDT. Significant OM differences were observed after stratification into targeted metastatic burden (<0.05). No high-grade adverse events were recorded during MDT. CONCLUSION: Our real-world data suggest that MDT represents a safe treatment option for well-selected oligometastatic mHSPC patients.

External Tertiary-Care-Hospital Validation of the Epidemiological SEER-Based Nomogram Predicting Downgrading in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy.

We aimed to externally validate the SEER-based nomogram used to predict downgrading in biopsied high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) in a contemporary European tertiary-care-hospital cohort. We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify biopsied high-risk prostate cancer patients in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) who underwent RP between January 2014 and December 2022. The model's downgrading performance was evaluated using accuracy and calibration. The net benefit of the nomogram was tested with decision-curve analyses. Overall, 241 biopsied high-risk prostate cancer patients were identified. In total, 51% were downgraded at RP. Moreover, of the 99 patients with a biopsy Gleason pattern of 5, 43% were significantly downgraded to RP Gleason pattern ≤ 4 + 4. The nomogram predicted the downgrading with 72% accuracy. A high level of agreement between the predicted and observed downgrading rates was observed. In the prediction of significant downgrading from a biopsy Gleason pattern of 5 to a RP Gleason pattern ≤ 4 + 4, the accuracy was 71%. Deviations from the ideal predictions were noted for predicted probabilities between 30% and 50%, where the nomogram overestimated the observed rate of significant downgrading. This external validation of the SEER-based nomogram confirmed its ability to predict the downgrading of biopsy high-risk prostate cancer patients and its accurate use for patient counseling in high-volume RP centers.

External Beam Radiation Therapy With or Without Brachytherapy Boost in Men With Very-High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Large Multicenter International Consortium Analysis.

PURPOSE: Very-high-risk (VHR) prostate cancer (PC) is an aggressive subgroup with high risk of distant disease progression. Systemic treatment intensification with abiraterone or docetaxel reduces PC-specific mortality (PCSM) and distant metastasis (DM) in men receiving external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Whether prostate-directed treatment intensification with the addition of brachytherapy (BT) boost to EBRT with ADT improves outcomes in this group is unclear. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This cohort study from 16 centers across 4 countries included men with VHR PC treated with either dose-escalated EBRT with ≥24 months of ADT or EBRT + BT boost with ≥12 months of ADT. VHR was defined by National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria (clinical T3b-4, primary Gleason pattern 5, or ≥2 NCCN high-risk features), and results were corroborated in a subgroup of men who met Systemic Therapy in Advancing or Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Evaluation of Drug Efficacy (STAMPEDE) trials inclusion criteria (≥2 of the following: clinical T3-4, Gleason 8-10, or PSA ≥40 ng/mL). PCSM and DM between EBRT and EBRT + BT were compared using inverse probability of treatment weight-adjusted Fine-Gray competing risk regression. RESULTS: Among the entire cohort, 270 underwent EBRT and 101 EBRT + BT. After a median follow-up of 7.8 years, 6.7% and 5.9% of men died of PC and 16.3% and 9.9% had DM after EBRT and EBRT + BT, respectively. There was no significant difference in PCSM (sHR, 1.47 [95% CI, 0.57-3.75]; P = .42) or DM (sHR, 0.72, [95% CI, 0.30-1.71]; P = .45) between EBRT + BT and EBRT. Results were similar within the STAMPEDE-defined VHR subgroup (PCSM: sHR, 1.67 [95% CI, 0.48-5.81]; P = .42; DM: sHR, 0.56 [95% CI, 0.15-2.04]; P = .38). CONCLUSIONS: In this VHR PC cohort, no difference in clinically meaningful outcomes was observed between EBRT alone with ≥24 months of ADT compared with EBRT + BT with ≥12 months of ADT. Comparative analyses in men treated with intensified systemic therapy are warranted.

Rates of metastatic prostate cancer in newly diagnosed patients: Numbers needed to image according to risk level.

BACKGROUND: The numbers needed to image to identify pelvic lymph node and/or distant metastases in newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa) patients according to risk level are unknown. METHODS: Relying on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (2010-2016), we tabulated rates and proportions of patients with (a) lymph node or (b) distant metastases according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk level and calculated the number needed to image (NNI) for both endpoints. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: Of 145,939 newly diagnosed PCa patients assessable for analyses of pelvic lymph node metastases (cN1), 4559 (3.1%) harbored cN1 stage: 13 (0.02%), 18 (0.08%), 63 (0.3%), 512 (2.8%), and 3954 (14.9%) in low, intermediate favorable, intermediate unfavorable, high, and very high-risk levels. These resulted in NNI of 4619, 1182, 319, 35, and 7, respectively. Of 181,109 newly diagnosed PCa patients assessable for analyses of distant metastases (M1a-c ), 8920 (4.9%) harbored M1a-c stage: 50 (0.07%), 45 (0.1%), 161 (0.5%), 1290 (5.1%), and 7374 (22.0%) in low, intermediate favorable, intermediate unfavorable, high, and very high-risk. These resulted in NNI of 1347, 602, 174, 20, and 5, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our observations perfectly validated the NCCN recommendations for imaging in newly diagnosed high and very high-risk PCa patients. However, in unfavorable intermediate-risk PCa patients, in whom bone and soft tissue imaging is recommended, the NNI might be somewhat elevated to support routine imaging in clinical practice.

Nomogram Predicting Downgrading in National Comprehensive Cancer Network High-risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: Some high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients may show more favorable Gleason pattern at radical prostatectomy (RP) than at biopsy. OBJECTIVE: To test whether downgrading could be predicted accurately. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database (2010-2016), 6690 National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) high-risk PCa patients were identified. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSES: We randomly split the overall cohort between development and validation cohorts (both n = 3345, 50%). Multivariable logistic regression models used biopsy Gleason, prostate-specific antigen, number of positive prostate biopsy cores, and cT stage to predict downgrading. Accuracy, calibration, and decision curve analysis (DCA) tested the model in the external validation cohort. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Of 6690 patients, 50.3% were downgraded at RP, and of 2315 patients with any biopsy pattern 5, 44.1% were downgraded to RP Gleason pattern ≤4 + 4. Downgrading rates were highest in biopsy Gleason pattern 5 + 5 (84.1%) and lowest in 3 + 4 (4.0%). In the validation cohort, the logistic regression model-derived nomogram predicted downgrading with 71.0% accuracy, with marginal departures (±3.3%) from ideal predictions in calibration. In DCA, a net benefit throughout all threshold probabilities was recorded, relative to treat-all or treat-none strategies and an algorithm based on an average downgrading rate of 50.3%. All steps were repeated in the subgroup with any biopsy Gleason pattern 5, to predict RP Gleason pattern ≤4 + 4. Here, a second nomogram (n = 2315) yielded 68.0% accuracy, maximal departures from ideal prediction of ±5.7%, and virtually the same DCA pattern as the main nomogram. CONCLUSIONS: Downgrading affects half of all high-risk PCa patients. Its presence may be predicted accurately and may help with better treatment planning. PATIENT SUMMARY: Downgrading occurs in every second high-risk prostate cancer patients. The nomograms developed by us can predict these probabilities accurately.

Radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer: 20-year oncological outcomes from a German high-volume center.

INTRODUCTION: Long-term outcomes of prostate cancer (CaP) patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) from European cohorts are under-reported. We report on 22,843 RP patients from the Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Centre treated between 1992 and 2017. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Biochemical recurrence (BCR) free survival, metastasis free survival (MFS), and cancer specific survival (CSS) were stratified according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk categories, pT, and pN stages, RP Gleason Grade Groups (GGG), and surgical margin status (R0/R1). For time to event analyses, uni- and multivariable Cox's proportional hazards models and univariable Kaplan-Meier analyses were applied. RESULTS: Median follow up was 68 months. Most favourable 20-year survival rates were exhibited in NCCN low risk (78.7% BCR-free, 96.8% MFS, 90.1% CSS) and pT2, GGG 1 to 2, R0 patients (83.1% BCR-free, 96.7% MFS, 92.6% CSS). 20-year follow up was not constantly reached in patients with aggressive CaP features. For example, NCCN very high-risk patients exhibited 15-year BCR-free survival of 30.5%, while 20-year MFS and CSS in these individuals was reached (64.1% and 60.8%, respectively). Lowest 10-year BCR-free survival (35.6%) was exhibited in pT3b, GGG 4 to 5, R0. Lowest 10-year MFS (49.5%) was exhibited in pT2, GGG 4 to 5, R1. Lowest 10-year CSS (69.8%) was exhibited in pT3b, GGG 4 to 5, R1 patients. In separate pN1 analyses, lowest 10-year BCR-free survival (14.5%), MFS (56.9%), and CSS (71.9%) were exhibited in patients with 3 or more positive lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: Oncological outcomes after RP can be excellent for individuals with favorable CaP characteristics, also after 20 years of follow up.

Increasing rates of NCCN high and very high-risk prostate cancer versus number of prostate biopsy cores.

BACKGROUND: Recently, an increase in the rates of high-risk prostate cancer (PCa) was reported. We tested whether the rates of and low, intermediate, high and very high-risk PCa changed over time. We also tested whether the number of prostate biopsy cores contributed to changes rates over time. METHODS: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (2010-2015), annual rates of low, intermediate, high-risk according to traditional National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) and high versus very high-risk PCa according to Johns Hopkins classification were tabulated without and with adjustment for the number of prostate biopsy cores. RESULTS: In 119,574 eligible prostate cancer patients, the rates of NCCN low, intermediate, and high-risk PCa were, respectively, 29.7%, 47.8%, and 22.5%. Of high-risk patients, 39.6% and 60.4% fulfilled high and very high-risk criteria. Without adjustment for number of prostate biopsy cores, the estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) for low, intermediate, high and very high-risk were respectively -5.5% (32.4%-24.9%, p < .01), +0.5% (47.6%-48.4%, p = .09), +4.1% (8.2%-9.9%, p < .01), and +8.9% (11.8%-16.9%, p < .01), between 2010 and 2015. After adjustment for number of prostate biopsy cores, differences in rates over time disappeared and ranged from 29.8%-29.7% for low risk, 47.9%-47.9% for intermediate risk, 8.9%-9.0% for high-risk, and 13.6%-13.6% for very high-risk PCa (all p > .05). CONCLUSIONS: The rates of high and very high-risk PCa are strongly associated with the number of prostate biopsy cores, that in turn may be driven by broader use magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Evaluation of Risk Factors for Adverse Functional Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy in Patients with Previous Transurethral Surgery of the Prostate.

INTRODUCTION: A history of transurethral surgery of the prostate is generally considered as a risk factor of adverse functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy (RP). We tested whether the risk of postoperative urinary incontinence (UIC) and erectile dysfunction (ED) after RP could be further substantiated in such patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We tested the effect of the following variables on UIC and ED rates 1 year after RP: residual prostate volume after transurethral desobstruction, the time from transurethral desobstruction to RP, the type of transurethral desobstruction (TURP vs. laser enucleation), age, and nerve-sparing surgery (yes vs. no). UIC was defined as usage of any pad except a safety pad. ED was defined as no sexual intercourse possible. RESULTS: Overall, 216 patients treated with RP between 2010 and 2019 in a tertiary care center were evaluated. All patients had previously undergone transurethral desobstruction. Regarding UIC analyses, only time from transurethral desobstruction to RP significantly influenced UIC rates (p = 0.003). Regarding ED rates, none of the tested variables reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The risk of UIC and ED after RP is substantial in men who had previously undergone transurethral desobstruction. The time from transurethral desobstruction to RP significantly impacts on the postoperative UIC rates. This observation should be further explored in future studies.

Circulating Vitamin D and Selenium Levels and Outcome in Prostate Cancer Patients: Lessons from the MARTINI-Lifestyle Cohort.

BACKGROUND: Dietary agents, in particular vitamin D (Vit D) and selenium, are widely used by prostate cancer (PCa) patients to improve cancer outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether plasma Vit D and selenium levels prior to radical prostatectomy (RP) are associated with worse pathologic tumor characteristics and increased risk of disease recurrence. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3849 men with PCa scheduled for RP in the Martini-Klinik at the University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, between January 2014 and December 2018 were included in this study. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Age, and clinical and laboratory values were collected prior to RP. Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥0.2 µg/l and rising after RP. Kaplan-Meier plots depicted BCR-free survival. Cox regression models (adjusted for age, preoperative PSA, pT stage, pN stage, pGG, surgical margin status, and year of surgery) tested the relationship between oncologic outcomes and Vit D and selenium levels. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Median plasma Vit D and selenium levels were 19.3 and 71 µg/l, respectively. Circulating Vit D and selenium levels correlated inversely with PSA values. Histologic grade, pT stage, and pN stage were not associated with Vit D and selenium levels at the time of RP. In the overall cohort, BCR-free survival at 3 yr of follow-up was 82.9%. When stratified according to median Vit D levels, BCR-free survival at 3 yr of follow-up was 82.7% and 83.0% (p ≤ 0.59). Upon stratification according to median selenium levels, BCR-free survival was 82.2% and 83.7% (p = 0.19). In a multivariable Cox regression model predicting BCR, lower Vit D and selenium levels were not independent predictors of BCR. CONCLUSIONS: Plasma Vit D and selenium levels prior to RP were not associated with BCR-free survival. PATIENT SUMMARY: The results of the MARTINI-Lifestyle cohort could not show a correlation between the occurrence of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy and the serum levels of vitamin D and selenium. A recommendation should therefore be made to compensate for a potential deficiency and not with the expectation of a reduction in the risk of progression.

Improving the Stratification of Patients With Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Intermediate-risk prostate cancer (IR PCa) phenotypes may vary from favorable to unfavorable. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) criteria help distinguish between those groups. We studied and attempted to improve this stratification. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 4048 (NCCN favorable: 2015 [49.8%] vs. unfavorable 2033 [50.2%]) patients with IR PCa treated with radical prostatectomy were abstracted from an institutional database (2000-2018). Multivariable logistic regression models predicting upstaging and/or upgrading (Gleason Grade Group [GGG] IV-V and/or ≥ pT3 or pN1) in IR PCa were developed, validated, and directly compared with the NCCN IR PCa stratification. RESULTS: All 4048 patients were randomly divided between development (n = 2024; 50.0%) and validation cohorts (n = 2024; 50.0%). The development cohort was used to fit basic (age, prostate-specific antigen, clinical T stage, biopsy GGG, and percentage of positive cores [all P < .001]) and extended models (age, prostate-specific antigen, clinical T stage, biopsy GGG, prostate volume, and percentage of tumor within all biopsy cores [all P < .001]). In the validation cohort, the basic and the extended models were, respectively, 71.4% and 74.7% accurate in predicting upstaging and/or upgrading versus 66.8% for the NCCN IR PCa stratification. Both models outperformed NCCN IR PCa stratification in calibration and decision curve analyses (DCA). Use of NCCN IR PCa stratification would have misclassified 20.1% of patients with ≥ pT3 or pN1 and/or GGG IV to V versus 18.3% and 16.4% who were misclassified using the basic or the extended model, respectively. CONCLUSION: Both newly developed and validated models better discriminate upstaging and/or upgrading risk than the NCCN IR PCa stratification.

Definition of high-risk prostate cancer impacts oncological outcomes after radical prostatectomy.

BACKGROUND: To examine the impact of different pretreatment definitions on biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival, metastasis-free survival, and cancer-specific survival after radical prostatectomy. METHODS: Overall, 26,364 patients with clinically localized disease who underwent radical prostatectomy at a single institution (1992-2017) were retrospectively analyzed. Seven pretreatment definitions of high-risk CaP (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] ≥20 ng/ml, clinical stage ≥T2c, clinical stage T3 [cT3], biopsy Gleason score [GS] 8-10 [Grade Group {GG} IV-V], biopsy GS 9 to 10 [GG V], D'Amico risk definition, National Comprehensive Cancer Network risk definition) were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier, as well as multivariable Cox regression analyses were used. RESULTS: Depending on the definition, patients with high-risk CaP comprised between 0.9% (cT3) and 20.3% (D'Amico high-risk) of the population. Ten-year BCR-free survival rates varied from 36.0% (≥cT2c) to 47.4% (National Comprehensive Cancer Network high-risk). Ten-year metastasis-free survival rates varied from 56.6% (GS 9-10/GG V) to 77.5% (PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml). Ten-year cancer-specific survival rates varied from 86.6% (cT3) to 94.5% (PSA ≥ 20 ng/ml). In multivariable analysis, all high-risk definitions were associated with significantly higher risk of BCR (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.4-3.9), metastatic progression (HR: 3.9-8.8), and cancer-specific mortality (HR: 2.8-11.2). CONCLUSIONS: Variety in outcomes exists, depending on the pretreatment definition of high-risk CaP. Among the tested, GS 9 to 10 (GG V), cT2c, and cT3 were the strongest predictor for higher BCR risk, cT3 was the strongest predictor for higher metastatic progression risk and GS 9 to 10 (GG V) was the strongest predictor for higher cancer-specific mortality risk in multivariable analyses.

Salvage Lymph Node Dissection for Nodal Recurrent Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Identification of early nodal recurrence after primary prostate cancer (PCa) treatment by functional imaging may guide metastasis-directed therapy such as salvage lymph node dissection (SLND). OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to assess the oncological role and the safety of SLND in the era of modern imaging in case of exclusive nodal recurrence after primary PCa treatment with curative intent. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search in the PubMed and Cochrane databases was performed up to August 2018 according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. Overall, 27 SLND series have been selected for synthesis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Prostate-specific membrane antigen or choline positron emission tomography/computed tomography was the reference detection technique. SLND was performed by open or laparoscopic approach with <10% of grade 3 or more complication rate. Mean follow-up was 29.4 mo. Complete biochemical response after SLND was achieved in 13-79.5%of cases (mean 44.3%). The 2- and 5-yr biochemical progression-free survival rates ranged from 23% to 64% and from 6% to 31%, respectively. Fiver-year overall survival was approximately 84%. Main drawbacks limiting the interpretation of the effectiveness of SLND were the retrospective design of single-center series, heterogeneity between series in terms of adjuvant treatment, endpoints, definitions of progression and study population, as well as the absence of long-term follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: A growing body of accumulated data suggests that SLND is a safe metastasis-directed therapy option in nodal recurrence after primary treatment. However, to date, high level of evidence is still missing to draw any clinically meaningful conclusion about the oncological impact of SLND on long-term endpoints. PATIENT SUMMARY: When imaging identifies exclusive nodal recurrent prostate cancer, surgery directed to the positive lesions is safe and can offer at least a temporary biochemical response. The oncological role assessed by strong clinical endpoints remains uncertain.

North American population-based validation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Practice Guideline Recommendations for locoregional lymph node and bone imaging in prostate cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines provide recommendations for staging of prostate cancer patients in the objective regarding presence of locoregional lymph node metastases (LNM) and bone metastases. We tested the performance characteristics of these recommendations in a community setting. METHODS: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2014), we identified patients with available Gleason, clinical stage and prostatic specific antigen. Performance characteristics endpoints consisted of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NVP), overall accuracy and the number needed to image (NNI). RESULTS: Totally, 191,308 patients were assessable for the validation of the LNM staging recommendations. Sensitivity ranged from 80.6 to 86.3%, specificity from 74.7 to 79.3%, PPV from 7.8 to 8.0%, overall accuracy from 75.0 to 79.3% and NPV was 99.5%. The respective NNI values were 12.5 and 12.8. 197,408 patients were assessable for the validation of bone scan recommendations. These recommendations resulted in 90.8% sensitivity, 76.3% specificity, PPV of 5.7%, NPV of 99.8% and overall accuracy of 76.5%. The NNI was 17.5. CONCLUSION: The NCCN recommendations for locoregional LNM miss few patients with clinical LNM (0.3-0.4%) and provide a virtually perfect NPV of 99.5%. Also, the recommendations for bone scan miss a marginal number of patients with established bone metastases (0.14%) and yield a virtually perfect NPV of 99.8%.

Radical prostatectomy after previous TUR-P: Oncological, surgical, and functional outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To examine oncological, surgical, and functional outcomes of radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with history of transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 18,681 RP-patients including 470 patients with previous TUR-P at a single institution (2002-2015). Kaplan-Meier as well as multivariable Cox and logistic regression analyses compared surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes between TUR-P and non-TUR-P patients after propensity score matching (nearest neighbor in a 1:3 fashion). RESULTS: After propensity score adjustment, pathological and surgical results were similar between both groups. Specifically, rates of positive surgical margins and nerve-sparing (NS) procedure did not differ between groups (positive surgical margins: 18.5% vs. 17.2%, P = 0.7; nerve-sparing: 89.4% vs. 91.6%, P = 0.5). In addition, there was no difference in mean operating room time (185 vs. 184 minutes, P = 0.6), blood loss (710 vs. 666 ml, P = 0.1), and catheterization time (12 days, P = 0.3). In multivariable analyses, TUR-P patients did not exhibit higher risk of biochemical recurrence, metastatic progression, or mortality (all P > 0.05). However, TUR-P patients exhibited higher risk for urinary incontinence at third month (OR: 1.47; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.12, P = 0.04) and first year (OR: 2.06; 95% CI 1.23-3.42, P = 0.006) and worse 1-year erectile function recovery (OR: 0.48; 95% CI 0.27-0.86, P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: This large series of TUR-P RP patients demonstrated that RP could be safely performed in patients with history of TUR-P without compromising oncological results. However, functional outcomes were worse for patients with previous TUR-P.

Are clinical guidelines designed according to guidelines? Cross-sectional assessment of quality and transparency of clinical guidelines in urology.

PURPOSE: Guidelines and recommendations become increasingly important in clinical urologic practice. This study aims to inform clinicians using guidelines on how to evaluate the quality of the methodology and transparency of these documents. METHODS: The guidelines on management of castration-resistant prostate cancer of the American Urology Association, European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, European Society of Medical Oncology were reviewed using the AGREE-II tool (Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation). We reported and compared the domain scores for the domains 1 scope and purpose, 2 stakeholder involvement, 3 rigor of development, 4 clarity of presentation, 5 applicability, and 6 editorial independence (100% indicates highest-best quality score). RESULTS: The domains evaluated highest and with lowest variability were 'editorial independence' (92% {88-95%}) and 'clarity of presentation' (83% {72-90%}), while the domains with the lowest scores and most variability were 'stakeholder involvement' (56% {36-79%}) and 'applicability' (40% {30-63%}). Length and extent of detail of guidelines vary considerably, each with its own strengths and limitations and adapted to target users. Standard external review using AGREE criteria may be preferable. A formal search strategy was not performed. Findings may be outdated by guidelines' updates. CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians using practice guidelines need to be aware of the different domains of methodology and transparency used to assess the quality of guidelines contents and recommendations. Urologists increasingly use guidelines for support in evidence-based recommendations in clinical practice. It is very important to know how to assess these documents. This study applies standard criteria to compare the design and background of different available guidelines on prostate cancer no longer responding to hormonal treatment.

Oncologic and Functional Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy for High or Very High Risk Prostate Cancer: European Validation of the Current NCCN® Guideline.

PURPOSE: We validated the current NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network®) classification of very high risk patients, and compared the pathological, functional and oncologic outcomes between surgically treated high risk and very high risk patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 4,041 patients stratified into high risk or very high risk groups who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1992 and 2016. Kaplan-Meier as well as multivariable logistic and Cox regression analyses were used to compare outcomes between the groups. RESULTS: After radical prostatectomy the rate of adverse pathological features was higher in 1,369 very high risk vs 2,672 high risk cases. Functional outcomes were similar between the groups, with 1-year continence and potency rates of 81.0% and 43.6% in the very high risk compared to 81.9% and 45.2% in the high risk group, respectively (p = 0.7 and p = 0.9). In a subset of 1,835 patients who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1992 and 2011 (median followup 58.8 months, IQR 36.5-84.6), those with very high risk disease had significantly worse 5 and 8-year biochemical recurrence-free survival, metastatic progression-free survival, prostate cancer specific mortality-free survival and overall survival rates compared to those with high risk disease. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the relatively poor prognosis of patients with high risk prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy results in favorable 5 and 8-year metastatic progression-free survival, prostate cancer specific mortality-free survival and overall survival rates. Relative to high risk cases, their very high risk counterparts have significantly worse pathological and oncologic outcomes, and more frequently require additional therapies. These observations validate the stratification between high risk and very high risk in European patients with prostate cancer. Interestingly, very high risk patients treated with radical prostatectomy did not have a worse functional outcome than their high risk counterparts.

Influence of clinical information on the interpretation of urinary cytology in bladder cancer: how suggestible is a cytologist?

OBJECTIVE: to determine the influence of the knowledge of the endoscopic findings and the influence of the patient's history on the cytologist's judgement, as urinary cytology is known to be subjective and has several limitations, in particular a high inter- and intra-observer variability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: we analysed the cytological and histological findings of patients who underwent transurethral resection of a bladder tumour, and determined whether the cytologist was aware of the endoscopic findings or not. The sensitivity and specificity of cytology were calculated with or without this knowledge, and that of the patients' bladder cancer history. RESULTS: the findings of 1705 patients were reviewed; in 641 the histological examination confirmed a malignant tumour and 1046 were classified as benign. The sensitivity of cytology was 66.0% and the specificity was 78.4%. The cytologist was aware of the endoscopic finding and patient history in 742 cases, and unaware of the endoscopic findings in 963. The specificity was higher in the latter group (80.2% vs 73.0%; P= 0.006). The specificity in patients with the endoscopic findings described as 'negative', 'inflammation', 'scar tissue', 'flat lesion', 'suspicious for tumour', and 'exophytic tumour' was 89.8%, 89.9%, 85.0%, 77.1%, 63.2% and 48.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). In 898 patients the history was negative for bladder tumours. Among these patients the sensitivity and specificity of cytology was 67.3% and 79.7%; the sensitivity and specificity was 65.4% and 74.8% for the 807 patients with a positive history of bladder cancer (P= 0.054). CONCLUSION: both being aware of the endoscopic findings and a positive patient history for bladder cancer lowers the specificity of cytology. Consequently, the cytologist should be unaware of the endoscopic findings.

Plasma vaporisation of the prostate: initial clinical results.

BACKGROUND: Laser vaporisation of the prostate has had a considerable impact in recent years. In an attempt to achieve tissue vaporisation with bipolar high-frequency generators, plasma vaporisation was recently introduced. OBJECTIVE: To provide the first clinical information on bipolar plasma vaporisation of the prostate for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients were included in this prospective bicentre study. INTERVENTION: All patients underwent bipolar plasma vaporisation with a novel electrode (Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). MEASUREMENTS: International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), bother score, maximum flow rate (Q(max)), and postvoid residual were evaluated at baseline and at the time of discharge as well as at 1, 3, and 6 mo after the intervention. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Mean preoperative prostate volume was 59±32 ml (range: 30-170), and mean operating time was 61±26 min (range: 20-140). Besides one reoperation (conventional transurethral prostatectomy) due to persistent obstruction, no major complication occurred intra- or postoperatively and no blood transfusion was required. Catheterisation time averaged 41±35 h (range: 18-192). Transient mild to moderate dysuria was noted in four patients (13%). At 1, 3, and 6 mo, Q(max) increased from 6.6±2.7 ml/s preoperative to 17.3±4.7 ml/s (p<0.01), 18.5±4.6 ml/s (p<0.01), and 18.1±5.0 ml/s (p<0.01), respectively. The IPSS decreased from 20.8±3.6 to 10.4±3.5 (p<0.01), 8.2±2.9 (p<0.01), and 8.1±3.1 (p<0.01), respectively. These data represent a small nonrandomised study cohort with limited follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Our initial experience indicates that bipolar plasma vaporisation might be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with LUTS due to BOO. To define the potential role of this novel technique, randomised trials with longer follow-up are mandatory.