Stimulation of the pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus in epilepsy: A systematic review and individual patient data (IPD) analysis.

Emerging neuromodulatory treatments, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) and responsive neurostimulation (RNS), have shown promise in reducing drug-resistant seizures. While centromedian thalamic nucleus and anterior thalamic nucleus stimulation have been effective in certain types of seizures, limited research has explored pulvinar nucleus stimulation for epilepsy. To address this gap, we conducted a systematic review and individual patient data analysis. Of 78 resultant articles, 5 studies with transient stimulation and chronic stimulation of the pulvinar nucleus were included. Of the 20 patients reviewed, 65% of patients had temporal lobe seizures, while 20% had temporooccipital/occipital lobe seizures. Transient stimulation studies via stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) showed pulvinar evoked potential response rates of 80% in the mesial temporal region, 76% in the temporal neocortex, and 67% in the TP junction. Another study reported clinically less severe seizures in 62.5% of patients with pulvinar stimulation. In chronic stimulation studies, 80% of patients responded to RNS or DBS, and 2 of 4 patients experienced > 90% seizure reduction. The pulvinar nucleus of the thalamus emerges as a potential target for chronic stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsy. However, knowledge regarding pulvinar connectivity and chronic stimulation remains limited. Further research should investigate specific subregions of the pulvinar for epilepsy treatment. Understanding the role of pulvinar stimulation and its cortical connectivity will advance therapeutic interventions for epilepsy patients.

Neuromonitoring in neonatal critical care part II: extremely premature infants and critically ill neonates.

Neonatal intensive care has expanded from cardiorespiratory care to a holistic approach emphasizing brain health. To best understand and monitor brain function and physiology in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), the most commonly used tools are amplitude-integrated EEG, full multichannel continuous EEG, and near-infrared spectroscopy. Each of these modalities has unique characteristics and functions. While some of these tools have been the subject of expert consensus statements or guidelines, there is no overarching agreement on the optimal approach to neuromonitoring in the NICU. This work reviews current evidence to assist decision making for the best utilization of these neuromonitoring tools to promote neuroprotective care in extremely premature infants and in critically ill neonates. Neuromonitoring approaches in neonatal encephalopathy and neonates with possible seizures are discussed separately in the companion paper. IMPACT: For extremely premature infants, NIRS monitoring has a potential role in individualized brain-oriented care, and selective use of aEEG and cEEG can assist in seizure detection and prognostication. For critically ill neonates, NIRS can monitor cerebral perfusion, oxygen delivery, and extraction associated with disease processes as well as respiratory and hypodynamic management. Selective use of aEEG and cEEG is important in those with a high risk of seizures and brain injury. Continuous multimodal monitoring as well as monitoring of sleep, sleep-wake cycling, and autonomic nervous system have a promising role in neonatal neurocritical care.