The stability of implants and microbiological effects following photobiomodulation therapy with one-stage placement: A randomized, controlled, single-blinded, and split-mouth clinical study.

BACKGROUND: Studies have reported a positive effect on bone healing and the elimination of microorganisms placed on the titanium implants, while others have not confirmed the positive photobiomodulation therapy (PBMT) effects on bone regeneration and bone structure around the implants. PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to address the following questions: Does PBMT improve implant stability and affect microbiota around dental implants in the early stage of osseointegration? MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was designed as randomized-controlled prospective, split mouth, single-blinded clinical trial. Implants were randomly divided into two groups and implants placed in the test group were treated with Gallium-aluminum-arsenide (GaAlAs) diode laser with PBMT immediately after surgery and for 15 days (n = 47). In the control group, implants were not irradiated(n = 46). The primary stability of the implants was measured by the Resonance frequency analysis (RFA) after insertion and the secondary stability values were recorded at 30th, 60th, and 90th days after surgery as implant stability quotient (ISQ). The hand-held RFA was held perpendicular to the jaw line as indicated by the manufacturer for buccal-lingual (BL), mesial-distal (MD), and lingual-buccal (LB) measurement and different measurements were analyzed as separately. RESULTS: Significantly higher magnetic RFA values were achieved on the 90th day in all measurement sides for both groups. ISQ levels in groups at baseline and the day-30, 60, and 90. ISQ readings were not statistically significant between test and control groups for each time point. A statistically significant increase in ISQ reading for BL, MD, and LB dimensions in both groups was noted from baseline to the day-90 (P < .05). CONCLUSION: It was concluded that PBMT did not have a clinically significant effect on implant stabilization, especially in terms of ISQ values at early alveolar bone healing term. Clinical trial number is NCT04495335.

Effect of surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength, phase transformation, and surface roughness of bilayered porcelain/zirconia dental ceramics.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Veneered zirconia restorations are widely used in prosthetic applications. However, these restorations often fail because of chipping of the veneer porcelain. Surface treatments of zirconia core materials may affect the connection between the 2 layers. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of surface treatments on the biaxial flexural strength, phase transformation, and mean surface roughness of different bilayered porcelain/zirconia ceramics. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Forty disk-shaped specimens were obtained for each material (Kavo and Noritake) and divided into 4 (n=10) groups (control, airborne-particle abraded, ground, and ground and airborne-particle abraded). Airborne-particle abrasion was performed with 110-µm Al2O3 particles for 15 seconds and at 400 kPa. Diamond rotary instruments with 100-µm grain size were used for grinding. The monoclinic phase transformation and surface roughness of the specimens were measured. Then, the specimens were veneered and subjected to a biaxial flexural strength test to calculate the Weibull moduli (m values) and the stresses occurring at the layers, outer surfaces of the bilayer, and interfaces of the layers. RESULTS: The Kavo airborne-particle abraded group showed higher strength values in both layers (P<.05) than those of all experimental groups. The Kavo airborne-particle abraded group showed the lowest m values at the core and veneer layers. According to the phase analysis, significantly higher Xm values were found in the ground and airborne-particle abraded groups for both materials (P<.05). In both materials, except in the airborne-particle abraded groups, the relative monoclinic phases showed no difference (P<.05). CONCLUSION: Surface treatments affected the phase transformation, surface roughness, and biaxial flexural strength of Kavo and Noritake zirconia ceramics differently. Surface treatments increased the relative monoclinic phase content and average surface roughness.