Prognostic Nutrition Index as an Indicator of Therapeutic Response to Lenvatinib Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Lenvatinib (LEN) has been approved as an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, in some patients, LEN does not provide adequate therapeutic benefits. In this study, we examined the factors that affect the therapeutic response to LEN. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study involved patients with HCC who received LEN therapy at Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital. We used the delivered dose intensity to body surface area ratio for 60 days (2M-DBR) as an index of the therapeutic response. RESULTS: This study included 83 patients divided into two groups, the high 2M-DBR group (47 patients, 56.7%) and low 2M-DBR group (36 patients, 43.4%). Univariate analysis showed that Child-Pugh class, C-reactive protein, and prognostic nutrition index (PNI) were significant factors for high 2M-DBR. Furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that a PNI>39.15 was significantly associated with high 2M-DBR. CONCLUSION: A PNI cut-off value of less than 39.15 may indicate a poor response to LEN therapy. PNI, an easy, simple, and inexpensive tool, may be useful in identifying patients in need of early intervention.

Clinical significance of circulating soluble immune checkpoint proteins in sorafenib-treated patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

In hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the clinical significance of soluble immune checkpoint protein levels as predictors of patient outcomes or therapeutic responses has yet to be defined. This study profiled the baseline levels of sixteen soluble checkpoint proteins and their changes following sorafenib treatment for HCC. Plasma samples were obtained from 53 patients with advanced HCC at baseline, week 1, 2 and 4 of sorafenib treatment and tested the concentrations of 16 soluble checkpoint proteins using multiplexed fluorescent bead-based immunoassays. Multivariate analysis showed high sBTLA levels at baseline were an independent predictor of poor overall survival (p = 0.038). BTLA was highly expressed in T cells and macrophages in peritumoral areas. At week 2, sCD27 levels were decreased compared to baseline. By contrast, the concentrations of most inhibitory proteins, including sBTLA, sLAG-3, sCTLA-4, sPD-1, sCD80, sCD86 and sPD-L1, had significantly increased. The fold-changes of soluble checkpoint receptors and their ligands, including sCTLA-4 with sCD80/sCD86, sPD-1 with sPD-L1; and the fold-changes of sCTLA-4 with sBTLA or sPD-1 were positively correlated. sBTLA may be a good biomarker for predicting overall survival in HCC patients. Sorafenib treatment in patients with advanced HCC revealed dynamic changes of soluble checkpoint protein levels.

Changes in plasma interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α levels during the early treatment period as a predictor of the response to sorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify a biomarker for predicting the response to sorafenib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: Of 100 patients with unresectable HCC who received sorafenib treatment in our institute (Cohort A), 48 had stored plasma samples collected within 28 days before the start of treatment (Cohort B). Concentrations of 18 plasma cytokines were measured in plasma samples using a sandwich immunoassay with multiplexed fluorescent bead-based technology. Among 27 patients with follow-up plasma samples taken at 5-10 days of treatment (Cohort C), changes in the 18 cytokines were also evaluated. RESULTS: In Cohort A, progressive disease (PD) according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) was associated with poor overall survival by multivariate analysis (p = 0.024). In Cohort B, no significant differences in baseline concentrations of α-fetoprotein, des-γ-carboxy prothrombin, or the 18 cytokines were found between patients with PD and those with stable disease (SD) or partial response (PR). In Cohort C, the increase in interleukin-8 and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) was significant in the PD group (p = 0.0063 and p < 0.001, respectively) but not in the SD + PR group (p = 0.67 and p = 0.15, respectively). In addition, the fold changes in interleukin-8 and in TNF-α were correlated (p < 0.001, r = 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Changes in plasma interleukin-8 and TNF-α levels during the first few days could predict the response to sorafenib therapy in HCC patients.