Virtual Care Team Guided Management of Patients With Heart Failure During Hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: Scalable and safe approaches for heart failure guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) optimization are needed. OBJECTIVES: The authors assessed the safety and effectiveness of a virtual care team guided strategy on GDMT optimization in hospitalized patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). METHODS: In a multicenter implementation trial, we allocated 252 hospital encounters in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% to a virtual care team guided strategy (107 encounters among 83 patients) or usual care (145 encounters among 115 patients) across 3 centers in an integrated health system. In the virtual care team group, clinicians received up to 1 daily GDMT optimization suggestion from a physician-pharmacist team. The primary effectiveness outcome was in-hospital change in GDMT optimization score (+2 initiations, +1 dose up-titrations, -1 dose down-titrations, -2 discontinuations summed across classes). In-hospital safety outcomes were adjudicated by an independent clinical events committee. RESULTS: Among 252 encounters, the mean age was 69 ± 14 years, 85 (34%) were women, 35 (14%) were Black, and 43 (17%) were Hispanic. The virtual care team strategy significantly improved GDMT optimization scores vs usual care (adjusted difference: +1.2; 95% CI: 0.7-1.8; P < 0.001). New initiations (44% vs 23%; absolute difference: +21%; P = 0.001) and net intensifications (44% vs 24%; absolute difference: +20%; P = 0.002) during hospitalization were higher in the virtual care team group, translating to a number needed to intervene of 5 encounters. Overall, 23 (21%) in the virtual care team group and 40 (28%) in usual care experienced 1 or more adverse events (P = 0.30). Acute kidney injury, bradycardia, hypotension, hyperkalemia, and hospital length of stay were similar between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized with HFrEF, a virtual care team guided strategy for GDMT optimization was safe and improved GDMT across multiple hospitals in an integrated health system. Virtual teams represent a centralized and scalable approach to optimize GDMT.

The questioning for routine monthly monitoring of proteinuria in patients with ß-thalassemia on deferasirox chelation.

BACKGROUND: Iron chelation therapy is one of the mainstays of the management of the patients with ß-thalassemia (BT) major. Deferasirox is an oral active iron chelating agent. Proteinuria is one of the potential renal adverse effects of deferasirox, and monthly follow-up for proteinuria is suggested by Food and Drug Administration and European Medicine Agency. METHODS: We aimed to investigate the necessity for monthly monitoring for proteinuria among patients with BT on deferasirox. A retrospective laboratory and clinic data review was performed for patients with BT major or intermedia who were treated with deferasirox chelation therapy. All patients were monitored for proteinuria for every 3 or 4 weeks after the initiation of deferasirox with serum creatinine and spot urine protein/creatinine ratios. RESULTS: The median follow-up time of the 37 (36 BT major and one BT intermedia) patients was 44 months. Seven patients (18.9%) developed significant proteinuria (ratio ≥0.8). Of the 1490 measurements, 12 tests (0.8%) were proteinuric. Urine proteinuria resolved in all of the patients during the follow-up. The risk of proteinuria was higher at ages below a cut-off point of 23 years (p = 0.019). Patients, who were on deferasirox at doses above a cut-off dose of 29 mg/kg/day, were found to have higher risk of proteinuria development (p = 0.004). CONCLUSION: Proteinuria resolves without any complication or major intervention according to our results. Potentially more risky groups (age below 23 years old and receivers above a dose of 29 mg/kg/day) might be suggested to be followed monthly, besides monitoring all of the patients.