A Case Control Study of the Seroprevalence of Helicobacter pylori Proteins and Their Association with Pancreatic Cancer Risk.

Background: The association between Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection and pancreatic cancer (PC) risk remains inconclusive. We examined the association between H. pylori antibodies and PC risk in a case-control study at a comprehensive cancer center. Methods: Multiplex serology using a glutathione S-transferase capture immunosorbent assay in conjunction with fluorescent bead technology was used to measure antibodies to 15 H. pylori proteins in serum or plasma from 131 incident cases with PC or a PC precursor and 131 healthy controls. Reactivity to ≥4 H. pylori proteins was defined as the overall seroprevalence. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), with adjustment for age at diagnosis/interview, gender, and race. Results: The majority of the sample was 50 years or older, and from the white race group. Half of the sample were women. Seroprevalence ≥4 of H. pylori proteins was 11.1%. Overall, H. pylori seroprevalence was not associated with PC risk (OR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.25-1.40). The prevalence of several H. pylori-specific proteins HP537 (OR: 1.78; 95% CI: 0.30-10.51), HP305 (OR: 1.38; 95% CI: 0.61-3.16), and HP410 (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 0.44-3.96) increased the odds of PC. Similarly, H. pylori-specific proteins HP522 (OR: 0.25; 95% CI: 0.04-1.66), HyuA (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.21-1.14), and HP1564 (OR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.27-1.51) decreased the odds of PC. However, these findings were not statistically significant at α = 0.05. Conclusions: Our findings do not support an association between H. pylori and PC risk. Further evaluation of this lack of association is recommended.

Trends in, and predictors of, swallowing and social eating outcomes in head and neck cancer survivors: A longitudinal analysis of head and neck 5000.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the recovery trajectory and predictors of outcome for swallowing difficulties following head and neck cancer treatment in a large prospective cohort. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from 5404 participants of the Head and Neck 5000 study were collected from 2011 to 2014. Patient-reported swallowing was measured using the EORTC HN35, recorded at baseline (pre-treatment) and 4 and 12 months post-baseline. Mixed-effects linear multivariable regression was used to investigate time trends, compare cancer sites, and identify associations between clinical, socio-demographic and lifestyle variables. RESULTS: 2458 participants with non-recurrent oral (29%) oropharyngeal (46%) and laryngeal (25%) cancer were included in the analysis. There was a clinically significant deterioration in scores between baseline and four months for swallowing (11.7 points; 95% CI 10.7-12.8) and trouble with social eating (17.9 points; 95% CI 16.7-19.2), but minimal difference between baseline and 12 months. Predictors of better swallowing and social eating were participants with larynx cancer, early-stage disease, treatment type, age, gender, co-morbidity, socio-economic status, smoking behaviour and cohabitation. CONCLUSION: Swallowing problems persist up to a year after head and neck cancer treatment. These findings identify disease and demographic characteristics for particularly vulnerable groups, supporting the need for holistic interventions to help improve swallowing outcomes. People diagnosed with head and neck cancer at risk of severe eating and drinking problems following treatment can be identified earlier in the pathway, receive more accurate information about early and late post-treatment side-effects, which can inform shared decision-making discussions.

Soy and tea intake on cervical cancer risk: the Singapore Chinese Health Study.

PURPOSE: Soy isoflavones and tea catechins have immunomodulating and chemopreventive properties relevant for cervical carcinogenesis; however, there are limited epidemiologic data on the relationship of soy and tea consumption with cervical cancer risk. The aim of our study was to examine effects of soy and tea intake on cervical cancer risk among Singapore Chinese women. METHODS: The association between intake of soy and tea drinking and cervical cancer risk was investigated in a prospective, population-based cohort of 30,744 Chinese women in Singapore with an average 16.7 years of follow-up and 312 incident cervical cancer cases. Multivariable proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) of cervical cancer associated with intake levels of soy and tea. RESULTS: High intake of soy alone was associated with a statistically borderline significant 20% reduced risk of cervical cancer (HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.61, 1.05) while green tea alone was not (HR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.76, 1.22). In stratified analysis, high intake of soy was associated with a statistically significant decrease in cervical cancer risk among green tea drinkers (HR 0.43; 95% CI 0.28, 0.69) but not among non-drinkers of green tea. The difference in the soy-cervical cancer risk association between green tea drinkers and non-drinkers was statistically significant (p for interaction = 0.004). This inverse association between soy intake and cervical cancer risk remained after further adjustment for human papillomavirus serostatus. Black tea consumption was not associated with cervical cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that a protective effect of soy against cervical cancer development may depend on green tea constituents.