Radiologically supervised bowel management program outcome in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze our radiologically supervised bowel management program (RS-BMP) outcomes in patients with chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC). METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted. We included all patients with CIC who participated in our RS-BMP at Children´s Hospital Colorado from July 2016 to October 2022. RESULTS: Eighty patients were included. The average time with constipation was 5.6 years. Before our RS-BMP, 95% had received non-radiologically supervised treatments, and 71% had attempted two or more treatments. Overall, 90% had tried Polyethylene Glycol and 43% Senna. Nine patients had a history of Botox injections. Five underwent anterograde continence procedure, and one a sigmoidectomy. Behavioral disorders (BD) were found in 23%. At the end of the RS-BMP, 96% of patients had successful outcomes, 73% were on Senna, and 27% were on enemas. Megarectum was detected in 93% of patients with successful outcomes and 100% with unsuccessful outcomes (p = 0.210). Of the patients with BD, 89% had successful outcomes, and 11% had unsuccessful. CONCLUSION: Our RS-BMP has been proven to be effective in treating CIC. The radiologically supervised use of Senna and enemas was the appropriate treatment in 96% of the patients. BD and megarectum were associated with unsuccessful outcomes.

The success rate of antegrade enemas for the management of idiopathic constipation.

PURPOSE: Most patients with idiopathic constipation achieve daily voluntary bowel movements with stimulant laxatives after a "Structured Bowel Management Program" (BMP). A small percentage require rectal enemas. One week in a BMP to find the right enema recipe results in a success rate great than 95%. Once the enema is radiologically and clinically effective, antegrade continent enema procedures (ACE) can afford patients an alternative route of enema administration. This study summarized the outcomes of children with idiopathic constipation who receive antegrade enemas (AE) with or without a prior BMP. METHODS: This was a single institution, retrospective cohort study of children with idiopathic constipation who underwent ACE procedures indicated by different providers from 2015-2020. We categorized the outcomes with AE after the ACE procedure as: "successful outcome" when the AE produced a daily bowel movement, no involuntary bowel movements, and no more fecal impactions, "unsuccessful outcome" was defined when the patient continued having involuntary bowel movements or fecal impaction requiring cleanouts despite a daily AE, and "unnecessary outcome" was defined when the patient was no longer doing AE, but had daily bowel movements, and no involuntary bowel movements or fecal impactions. RESULTS: Thirty-eight children with idiopathic constipation had an ACE. The most frequent indication for ACE was a failure of medical treatment. The most common medical treatment was polyethylene glycol. Before ACE, 34 (89%) patients did not have a BMP; 18 patients were on rectal enemas and 16 on laxatives. All four with BMP (100%) had a successful rectal enema. After ACE, 12 (31%) patients had successful antegrade enemas, including the four with previous successful BMP with rectal enemas. Twenty patients (52%) had unsuccessful antegrade enemas, and in 6 (15%), the ACE was unnecessary (Fig. 1). CONCLUSION: Using antegrade enemas without a previously successful formula for rectal enemas has resulted in a high rate of unsuccessful and unnecessary procedures. BMP for children with idiopathic constipation who needs rectal enemas offers a high possibility to find the proper rectal enema recipe and ensures higher rates of successful AE.