Neuroactivity screening of botanical extracts using microelectrode array (MEA) recordings.

Toxicity testing of botanicals is challenging because of their chemical complexity and variability. Since botanicals may affect many different modes of action involved in neuronal function, we used microelectrode array (MEA) recordings of primary rat cortical cultures to screen 16 different botanical extracts for their effects on cell viability and neuronal network function in vitro. Our results demonstrate that extract materials (50 µg/mL) derived from goldenseal, milk thistle, tripterygium, and yohimbe decrease mitochondrial activity following 7 days exposure, indicative of cytotoxicity. Importantly, most botanical extracts alter neuronal network function following acute exposure. Extract materials (50 µg/mL) derived from aristolochia, ephedra, green tea, milk thistle, tripterygium, and usnea inhibit neuronal activity. Extracts of kava, kratom and yohimbe are particularly potent and induce a profound inhibition of neuronal activity at the low dose of 5 µg/mL. Extracts of blue cohosh, goldenseal and oleander cause intensification of the bursts. Aconite extract (5 µg/mL) evokes a clear hyperexcitation with a marked increase in the number of spikes and (network) bursts. The distinct activity patterns suggest that botanical extracts have diverse modes of action. Our combined data also highlight the applicability of MEA recordings for hazard identification and potency ranking of botanicals.

Cardiotoxicity screening of illicit drugs and new psychoactive substances (NPS) in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes using microelectrode array (MEA) recordings.

The use of recreational drugs, including new psychoactive substances (NPS), is paralleled by emergency department visits of drug users with severe cardiotoxicity. Drug-induced cardiotoxicity can be the (secondary) result of increased norepinephrine blood concentrations, but data on potential drug-induced direct effects on cardiomyocyte function are scarce. The presence of hundreds of NPS therefore calls for efficient screening models to assess direct cardiotoxicity. We investigated effects of four reference compounds (3-30 nM dofetilide, nifedipine and isoproterenol, and 1-10 µM mexiletine) and six recreational drugs (0.01-100 µM cocaine, 0.01-1000 µM amphetamine, MDMA, 4-fluoroamphetamine, α-PVP and MDPV) on cardiomyocyte function (beat rate, spike amplitude and field potential duration (FPD ≈ QT interval in ECGs)), using Pluricyte® human-induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived cardiomyocytes cultured on ready-to-use CardioPlate™ multi-well microelectrode arrays (mwMEAs). Moreover, the effects of exposure to recreational drugs on cell viability were assessed. Effects of reference compounds were in accordance with the literature, indicating the presence of hERG potassium (dofetilide), sodium (mexiletine) and calcium (nifedipine) channels and α-adrenergic receptors (isoproterenol). All recreational drugs decreased the spike amplitude at 10-100 µM. All amphetamine-type stimulants and α-PVP decreased the beat rate at 300 µM, while cocaine and MDPV did so at 10 µM and 30 µM, respectively. All drugs increased the FPD, however at varying concentrations. MDMA, MDPV and amphetamine affected cardiomyocyte function at concentrations relevant for human exposure, while other drugs affected cardiomyocyte function only at higher concentrations (≥ 10 µM). Cell viability was only mildly affected at concentrations well above the lowest concentrations affecting cardiomyocyte function. We demonstrate that MEA recordings of hiPSC-derived cardiomyocytes enable screening for acute, direct effects on cardiomyocyte function. Our data further indicate that tachycardia in patients exposed to recreational drugs is likely due to indirect drug effects, while prolonged repolarization periods (prolonged QTc interval) could (partly) result from direct drug effects on cardiomyocyte function.

Effect fingerprinting of new psychoactive substances (NPS): What can we learn from in vitro data?

The use of new psychoactive substances (NPS) is increasing and currently >600 NPS have been reported. However, limited information on neuropharmacological and toxicological effects of NPS is available, hampering risk characterization. We reviewed the literature on the in vitro neuronal modes of action to obtain effect fingerprints of different classes of illicit drugs and NPS. The most frequently reported NPS were selected for review: cathinones (MDPV, α-PVP, mephedrone, 4-MEC, pentedrone, methylone), cannabinoids (JWH-018), (hallucinogenic) phenethylamines (4-fluoroamphetamine, benzofurans (5-APB, 6-APB), 2C-B, NBOMes (25B-NBOMe, 25C-NBOMe, 25I-NBOMe)), arylcyclohexylamines (methoxetamine) and piperazine derivatives (mCPP, TFMPP, BZP). Our effect fingerprints highlight the main modes of action for the different NPS studied, including inhibition and/or reversal of monoamine reuptake transporters (cathinones and non-hallucinogenic phenethylamines), activation of 5-HT2receptors (hallucinogenic phenethylamines and piperazines), activation of cannabinoid receptors (cannabinoids) and inhibition of NDMA receptors (arylcyclohexylamines). Importantly, we identified additional targets by relating reported effect concentrations to the estimated human brain concentrations during recreational use. These additional targets include dopamine receptors, α- and ß-adrenergic receptors, GABAAreceptors and acetylcholine receptors, which may all contribute to the observed clinical symptoms following exposure. Additional data is needed as the number of NPS continues to increase. Also, the effect fingerprints we have obtained are still incomplete and suffer from a large variation in the reported effects and effect sizes. Dedicated in vitro screening batteries will aid in complementing specific effect fingerprints of NPS. These fingerprints can be implemented in the risk assessments of NPS that are necessary for eventual control measures to reduce Public Health risks.

Neuropharmacological characterization of the new psychoactive substance methoxetamine.

The use of new psychoactive substances (NPS) is steadily increasing. One commonly used NPS is methoxetamine (MXE), a ketamine analogue. Several adverse effects have been reported following MXE exposure, while only limited data are available on its neuropharmacological modes of action. We investigated the effects of MXE and ketamine on several endpoints using multiple in vitro models. These included rat primary cortical cells, human SH-SY5Y cells, human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC)-derived iCell® Neurons, DopaNeurons and astrocyte co-cultures, and human embryonic kidney (HEK293) cells. We investigated effects on several neurotransmitter receptors using single cell intracellular calcium [Ca2+]i imaging, effects on neuronal activity using micro-electrode array (MEA) recordings and effects on human monoamine transporters using a fluorescence-based plate reader assay. In rat primary cortical cells, 10 µM MXE increased the glutamate-evoked increase in [Ca2+]i, whereas 10 µM ketamine was without effect. MXE and ketamine did not affect voltage-gated calcium channels (VGCCs), but inhibited spontaneous neuronal activity (IC50 0.5 µM and 1.2 µM respectively). In human SH-SY5Y cells, 10 µM MXE slightly inhibited the K+- and acetylcholine-evoked increase in [Ca2+]i. In hiPSC-derived iCell®(Dopa)Neurons, only the ATP-evoked increase in [Ca2+]i was slightly reduced. Additionally, MXE inhibited spontaneous neuronal activity (IC50 between 10 and 100 µM). Finally, MXE potently inhibits uptake via monoamine transporters (DAT, NET and SERT), with IC50 values in the low micromolar range (33, 20, 2 µM respectively). Our combined in vitro data provide an urgently needed first insight into the multiple modes of action of MXE. The use of different models and different (neuronal) endpoints can be complementary in pharmacological profiling. Rapid in vitro screening methods as those presented here, could be of utmost importance for gaining a first mechanistic insight to aid the risk assessment of emerging NPS.

Do we really want to REACH out to in vitro?

To comply with international regulations on chemicals, such as REACH (registration, evaluation, and authorization of chemicals), an enormous amount of toxicity testing is required. Traditional tests will fall short, since these strongly rely on in vivo studies, in particular for neurotoxicity. Therefore, a shift to alternative/in vitro toxicity testing is essential, in particular for neurotoxicity testing. However, the use of in vitro models and in vitro endpoints appears far from well accepted. This brief personal view highlights some of the concerns regarding in vitro research, e.g. using clonal cell lines such as PC12 cells and SH-SY5Y cells, to illustrate that many of these concerns may not be justified. A better characterization of specific in vitro models as well as a better understanding of the motive for using these in vitro models for neurotoxicity testing in the scientific community is necessary. The future of neurotoxicity testing will involve an increased use of in vitro experiments that are carefully designed with respect to compatibility of the exposure paradigm, the in vitro model and the chosen endpoint(s).

Application of in vitro neurotoxicity testing for regulatory purposes: Symposium III summary and research needs.

Prediction of neurotoxic effects is a key feature in the toxicological profile of many compounds and therefore is required by regulatory testing schemes. Nowadays neurotoxicity assessment required by the OECD and EC test guidelines is based solely on in vivo testing, evaluating mainly effects on neurobehavior and neuropathology, which is expensive, time consuming and unsuitable for screening large number of chemicals. Additionally, such in vivo tests are not always sensitive enough to predict human neurotoxicity and often do not provide information that facilitates regulatory decision-making processes. Incorporation of alternative tests (in vitro testing, computational modelling, QSARs, grouping, read-across, etc.) in screening strategies would speed up the rate at which compound knowledge and mechanistic data are available and the information obtained could be used in the refinement of future in vivo studies to facilitate predictions of neurotoxicity. On 1st June 2007, the European Commission legislation concerning registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals (REACH) has entered into force. REACH addresses one of the key issues for chemicals in Europe, the lack of publicly available safety data sheets. It outlines a plan to test approximately 30,000 existing substances. These chemicals are currently produced in volumes greater than 1ton/year and the essential data on the human health and ecotoxicological effects are lacking. It is estimated that approximately 3.9 million test animals (including 2.6 million vertebrates) (Hartung T, Bremer S, Casati S, Coecke S, Corvi R, Fortnaer S, et al. ECVAM's response to the changing political environment for alternatives: consequences of the European Union chemicals and cosmetics policies. ATLA 2003;31:473-81) would be necessary to fulfill the requirements of REACH if the development and establishment of alternative methods is not accepted by regulatory authorities. In an effort to reduce animal use and testing costs within this tonnage band, the European Commission has advocated the use of alternative approaches. Neurotoxicity testing is not directly addressed within REACH, however when alerts are observed based on organ specific toxicity studies then neurotoxicity assessment has to be performed. This session at the 11th International Neurotoxicology Association Meeting provided a forum to openly discuss and debate the potential of in vitro testing strategies that could be relevant for neurotoxicity evaluation in the context of regulatory requirements. The EU FP6 project A-Cute-Tox was presented as an example of a possible in vitro testing strategy for prediction of human acute systemic toxicity. Other presentations focused on the characterization of the available in vitro models (cell lines and primary culture) and neuronal specific endpoints, with a special emphasis on electrical activity, metabonomics and modulation of vesicular neurotransmitter release as possible neuronal endpoints relevant for in vitro neurotoxicity testing. Finally, it was underlined that in vitro systems (strategies) that have the potential to be applied for neurotoxicity assessment have to be formally validated under standardised conditions that have been recognised by national and international validation bodies.