Antibody and cell-mediated immune response to whole virion and split virion influenza vaccine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease on maintenance immunosuppressive and biological therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Influenza vaccination is recommended for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients on immunosuppressive therapy. The objective was to evaluate the antibody and cell-mediated immune response to the split and whole virion influenza vaccine in patients with IBD treated with anti-TNF-α and immunosuppressive therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-six immunocompromised IBD patients were vaccinated. Fifty-three patients (control group) refused vaccination. Split virion vaccine and whole virion vaccine were used. Serum samples were obtained for pre- and postimmunization antibody titers to influenza vaccine (A/California/7/2009 [H1N1], A/Victoria/361/2011 [H3N2], B/Wisconsin/1/2010-like B/Hubei-Wujiagang/158/2009). Cell-mediated response was evaluated using an interferon (INF)-γ, interleukine (IL)-2 and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α ELISA. RESULTS: Postimmunization titers of both influenza subtypes increased significantly after the administration of split virion vaccines compared to the controls and to those who received whole virion vaccine. The antibody titers of Influenza B also increased significantly in patients immunized with split vaccine and treated with anti-TNF-α therapy. After influenza vaccination, the level of serum IL-2 significantly decreased. No serious side effects developed occurred after influenza vaccination, and the influenza-like symptoms did not differ significantly between vaccinated versus control patients. The relapse of the disease was observed in only 10% of the patients and was more common in vaccinated than in control subjects. CONCLUSION: Split virion vaccines seem to be more effective than whole virion vaccines. Measuring the antibody responses is worthwhile in patients treated with immunosuppressants to determine the efficacy of influenza vaccination.

Efficacy of combined anti-TNF-alpha and surgical therapy in perianal and enterocutaneous fistulizing Crohn's disease--clinical observations from a tertiary Eastern European center.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Recently, anti-TNF-alpha therapy has increasingly been used in the treatment of perianal Crohn's disease (PCD), but there is only limited data regarding its short- and long-term efficacy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The medical records of 68 patients treated with anti-TNF-alpha for PCD were assessed retrospectively. Rate of complex fistulas was 75%. Every patient received induction therapy, but in 20 cases the treatment was discontinued before week 52 due to funding regulations, an allergic reaction, or compliance problems. On week 12, the luminal activity decreased in more than 80% of the cases and the complete remission (CR) rate was about 60%; by the end of the first year, this ratio did not change substantially. Complete fistula closure was achieved in 26 cases (38.3%) and 53 patients (51.5%) showed a partial response during the 1-year period. Regarding both perianal and luminal activities, CR rate was achieved in 23 cases (33.8%). However, after the biological therapy was discontinued, recurrence of fistulas could be detected in every second patient. Additional surgical intervention was performed in 45% of patients during the 1-year period (seton drainage of fistulas and abscess drainage). CONCLUSION: The anti-TNF-alpha therapy combined with surgery is an effective treatment of PCD. Approximately every third patient revealed complete fistula closure, while half of the other cases showed a partial response. Due to the high rate of fistula recurrence after stopping the biological therapy, more than 1 year of anti-TNF-α treatment may be beneficial.

Frequency and prognostic role of mucosal healing in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis after one-year of biological therapy.

AIM: To assess the endoscopic activity before and after a one-year period of biological therapy and to evaluate the frequency of relapses and need for retreatment after stopping the biologicals in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: The data from 41 patients with CD and 22 patients with UC were assessed. Twenty-four CD patients received infliximab, and 17 received adalimumab. The endoscopic severity of CD was quantified with the simplified endoscopic activity score for Crohn's disease in CD and with the Mayo endoscopic subscore in UC. RESULTS: Mucosal healing was achieved in 23 CD and 7 UC patients. Biological therapy had to be restarted in 78% of patients achieving complete mucosal healing with CD and in 100% of patients with UC. Neither clinical remission nor mucosal healing was associated with the time to restarting the biological therapy in either CD or UC. CONCLUSION: Mucosal healing did not predict sustained clinical remission in patients in whom the biological therapies had been stopped.

The crucial role of early mitochondrial injury in L-lysine-induced acute pancreatitis.

AIMS: Large doses of intraperitoneally injected basic amino acids, L-arginine, or L-ornithine, induce acute pancreatitis in rodents, although the mechanisms mediating pancreatic toxicity remain unknown. Another basic amino acid, L-lysine, was also shown to cause pancreatic acinar cell injury. The aim of the study was to get insight into the mechanisms through which L-lysine damages the rat exocrine pancreas, in particular to characterize the kinetics of L-lysine-induced mitochondrial injury, as well as the pathologic responses (including alteration of antioxidant systems) characteristic of acute pancreatitis. RESULTS: We showed that intraperitoneal administration of 2 g/kg L-lysine induced severe acute necrotizing pancreatitis. L-lysine administration caused early pancreatic mitochondrial damage that preceded the activation of trypsinogen and the proinflammatory transcription factor nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB), which are commonly thought to play an important role in the development of acute pancreatitis. Our data demonstrate that L-lysine impairs adenosine triphosphate synthase activity of isolated pancreatic, but not liver, mitochondria. INNOVATION AND CONCLUSION: Taken together, early mitochondrial injury caused by large doses of L-lysine may lead to the development of acute pancreatitis independently of pancreatic trypsinogen and NF-κB activation.

[Frequency and possible reasons for the loss of response to biological therapy in Crohn's disease after a one-year treatment period]. / A hatásvesztés gyakorisága és lehetséges okai Crohn-betegség egyéves biológiai kezelése során.

UNLABELLED: Secondary loss of response (initial good response followed by loss of response and flare up) is a frequent event occurring during biological therapy. The aim of this study was to assess loss of efficacy in patients with Crohn's disease treated with infliximab or adalimumab for a year. Secondary goals were to identify clinical or laboratory predictors of loss of response and to evaluate whether the frequency of dose escalation differs in patients receiving infliximab or adalimumab. Data were provided by a computerized database. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients with Crohn's disease achieved remission after induction therapy and received regular maintenance treatment. 35 of them were on infliximab, and 26 on adalimumab therapy. None of the patients treated with infliximab received previous biological therapy, while 10 of the adalimumab-treated patients were naïve to biological therapy. Authors compared the data of patients who relapsed with those who remained in remission and also the characteristics of infliximab-treated patients with adalimumab-naïve patients. Data were analyzed using Chi-square test. Kaplan Meier curve was used to show the time of loss of efficacy. RESULTS: Remission was achieved in 70.5%, and response was achieved in 29.5% of the patients after induction. Loss of response occurred in 22 of the 61 patients after a year of therapy. The proportion of remission after induction was significantly lower in patients who lost response vs. those who remained in remission. More patients with sustained remission received immunosuppressive therapy before and during the biological therapy vs. those with loss of response. Loss of response was significantly more frequent and occurred earlier in adalimumab-naive patients vs. infliximab-treated patients. CONCLUSION: The need for dose escalation should be calculated in the budget in the majority of patients, especially in adalimumab-treated patients.