Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Country/Region as subject
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30863037

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This longitudinal, retrospective cohort study of patients with COPD describes baseline characteristics, adherence, and persistence following initiation of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS)/long-acting ß2-agonists (LABA)/long-acting muscarinic antagonists (LAMA) from multiple inhaler triple therapy (MITT). METHODS: Patients aged ≥40 years receiving MITT between January 2012 and September 2015 were identified from the IQVIA™ Real-world Data Adjudicated Claims-USA database. MITT was defined as subjects with ≥1 overlapping days' supply of three COPD medications (ICS, LABA, and LAMA). Adherence (proportion of days covered, PDC) and discontinuation (defined as a gap of 1, 30, 60, or 90 days of supply in any of the three components of the triple therapy) were calculated for each patient over 12 months of follow-up. In addition, analyses were stratified by number of inhalers. RESULTS: In total, 14,635 MITT users were identified (mean age, 62 years). Mean PDC for MITT at 12 months was 0.37%. Mean PDC for the ICS/LABA and LAMA component at 12 months was 49% (0.49±0.31; median, 0.47) and 54% (0.54±0.33; 0.56), respectively. The proportion of adherent patients (PDC ≥0.8) at 12 months was 14% for MITT. Allowing for a 30-day gap from last day of therapy, 86% of MITT users discontinued therapy during follow-up. CONCLUSION: Patients with COPD had low adherence to and persistence with MITT in a real-world setting. Mean PDC for each single inhaler component was higher than the mean PDC observed with MITT. Reducing the number of inhalers may improve overall adherence to intended triple therapy.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/administration & dosage , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Lung/drug effects , Medication Adherence , Muscarinic Antagonists/administration & dosage , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/drug therapy , Administration, Inhalation , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Adrenergic beta-Agonists/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Bronchodilator Agents/adverse effects , Databases, Factual , Drug Combinations , Female , Humans , Insurance, Health , Longitudinal Studies , Lung/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Muscarinic Antagonists/adverse effects , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/diagnosis , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/epidemiology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Retrospective Studies , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
2.
Am J Clin Nutr ; 96(2): 374-81, 2012 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22695871

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Coffee and tea are widely consumed globally and are rich sources of potential chemopreventive compounds. Epidemiologic data for coffee and tea intakes in relation to colorectal cancer remain unclear. Despite differences in gut physiology, few studies have conducted investigations by anatomic subsites. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated coffee and tea intakes (caffeinated and decaffeinated) in relation to colon (proximal and distal) and rectal cancers. DESIGN: The NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study included 489,706 men and women who completed a baseline (1995-1996) self-administered questionnaire of demographics, diet, and lifestyle. Over a median of 10.5 y of follow-up, we identified 2863 proximal colon, 1993 distal colon, and 1874 rectal cancers. Multivariable HRs and 95% CIs were estimated by using Cox regression. RESULTS: Approximately 16% of participants drank ≥4 cups coffee/d. Compared with nondrinkers, drinkers of 4-5 cups coffee/d (HR: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.75, 0.96) and ≥6 cups coffee/d (HR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.61, 0.89; P-trend < 0.001) had a lower risk of colon cancer, particularly of proximal tumors (HR for ≥6 cups/d: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.49, 0.81; P-trend < 0.0001). Results were similar to those overall for drinkers of predominantly caffeinated coffee. Although individual HRs were not significant, there was a significant P-trend for both colon and rectal cancers for people who drank predominantly decaffeinated coffee. No associations were observed for tea. CONCLUSIONS: In this large US cohort, coffee was inversely associated with colon cancer, particularly proximal tumors. Additional investigations of coffee intake and its components in the prevention of colorectal cancer by subsites are warranted. The NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00340015.


Subject(s)
Beverages/analysis , Caffeine/administration & dosage , Coffee/chemistry , Colorectal Neoplasms/prevention & control , Feeding Behavior , Tea/chemistry , Colorectal Neoplasms/etiology , Colorectal Neoplasms/physiopathology , Diet , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Life Style , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL