Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Blood Press Monit ; 26(4): 251-256, 2021 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33734121

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: In a substudy of a randomized controlled trial, we investigated the effects of the valsartan/amlodipine single-pill combination and nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) monotherapy on brachial pulse pressure (bPP) and radial augmentation index (rAI) in patients with previously uncontrolled hypertension. METHODS: We performed measurements of clinic blood pressure (BP) and pulse rate and rAI (n = 63) and ambulatory BP monitoring (n = 42) at baseline and 12-week of follow-up. Analysis of covariance was performed to calculate the least square mean change from baseline and between-group differences [95% confidence interval (CI)]. Correlation analysis was performed to study the interrelationship between the changes in bPP and rAI and in pulse rate. RESULTS: After 12-week treatment, clinic and ambulatory SBP/DBP and pulse rate were not differently changed between the valsartan/amlodipine (n = 29) and nifedipine GITS groups (n = 34, P ≥ 0.06) except daytime SBP (P = 0.01). The reductions in 24-h and daytime ambulatory bPP were significantly greater in the former than the latter group (P ≤ 0.04). rAI increased slightly by 3.5% (P = 0.20) and 5.2% (P = 0.06) in the valsartan/amlodipine and nifedipine groups, respectively, with a between-group difference of -1.7% (95% CI -9.6 to 6.1%, P = 0.66). In the two groups combined, the changes in clinic and ambulatory bPP were not or weakly associated with that in clinic or ambulatory pulse rate (r = -0.14 to 0.36, P = 0.02-0.95), while the changes in rAI were more strongly or significantly associated with that in clinic or ambulatory pulse rate (r = -0.39 to -0.23, P = 0.02-0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Antihypertensive drug-induced changes in rAI but not bPP were dependent on pulse rate.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Nifedipine , Amlodipine , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure , Humans , Hypertension/drug therapy , Nifedipine/pharmacology , Tetrazoles , Treatment Outcome , Valsartan/pharmacology
2.
Blood Press ; 28(5): 291-299, 2019 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31068018

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Baroreflex emerges as a therapeutic target of hypertension. We investigated blood pressure (BP) lowering effect of the combined passive head-up and -down movement with device-guided slow breathing in untreated mild hypertension or high-normal BP. Methods: In a randomized, cross-over trial, untreated subjects with an ambulatory systolic/diastolic BP of 125-140/80-90 mmHg and a clinic BP of 130-150/80-90 mmHg were randomized to intervention treatment with head movement and slow breathing or sham control, and then crossed over. Both treatments consisted of 1-week preparation, 2-week treatment, and 1-week recovery. During the 2-week treatment, subjects were treated for a session of 20 min/day. BP, pulse rate and respiration were measured before and after each treatment session. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed at baseline and the end of the 2-week treatments' period, and home BP monitoring in the morning and evening for the whole 8-week follow-up period. Results: 14 subjects completed the study. The intervention treatment, compared to control, reduced respiration rate by -2.1 breaths/min (95% CI -2.9 to -1.2, p = .0001), but not clinic BP and pulse rate (p ≥ .67). The intervention treatment, compared to control, significantly reduced nighttime systolic/diastolic blood pressure by -5.63/-3.82 mm Hg (p ≤ .01) but not 24-h or daytime ambulatory blood pressure (p ≥ .69). Home BP decreased with the intervention treatment, but the between-treatment difference was not statistically significant (p ≥ .27). Conclusions: The combined head movement with slow breathing did not influence 24-h BP, but reduced nighttime BP in untreated mild hypertension or high-normal BP.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure/physiology , Hypertension/therapy , Movement/physiology , Respiratory Rate/physiology , Adult , Aged , Baroreflex , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Breathing Exercises/methods , Cross-Over Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
3.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 19(10): 973-982, 2017 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28560779

ABSTRACT

In an 8-week randomized trial of patients with mild or moderate hypertension, the authors investigated the efficacy and tolerability of initial high (5.0 mg/d) vs low (2.5 mg/d) doses of S-(-)-amlodipine (equivalent to 5 and 10 mg of racemic amlodipine, respectively). In the S-(-)-amlodipine 2.5-mg group (n=263), 24-hour ambulatory systolic/diastolic blood pressure (±standard deviation) decreased from 131.5±15.0/82.1±10.7 mm Hg at baseline to 126.0±13.5/78.5±9.5 mm Hg at 8 weeks of follow-up by a least square mean (±standard error) change of 6.0±0.6/3.8±0.4 mm Hg. In the S-(-)-amlodipine 5-mg group (n=260), the corresponding changes were from 133.6±13.7/83.1±9.9 mm Hg to 125.0±12.0/78.2±8.9 mm Hg by 8.1±0.6/4.7±0.4 mm Hg, respectively. The between-group differences in changes in 24-hour systolic/diastolic blood pressure were 2.1/0.9 (P=.02/.17) mm Hg. Similar trends were observed for daytime and nighttime ambulatory and clinic blood pressure. The incidence rate was similar for all adverse events. An initial high dose of S-(-)-amlodipine improved ambulatory blood pressure control with similar tolerability as an initial low dose in hypertension.


Subject(s)
Amlodipine/pharmacology , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Drug Tolerance/physiology , Hypertension/drug therapy , Aged , Amlodipine/administration & dosage , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure/drug effects , Calcium Channel Blockers/therapeutic use , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL