Comparison between local and general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: early and late results.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the results between general and local anesthesia (LA) for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: Three hundred and twenty-nine patients in whom 365 CEA procedures were performed between January 1990 and September 2001, were included in this study. RESULTS: Operation time, shunt usage rates, hospitalization time (P < .0001), and permanent stroke rates (P < .05) were significantly lower in group with LA. For long-term period (121.3 ± 37.45 vs 98.6 ± 28.98 months), no significant difference was observed in these 2 group with respect to restenosis rates, neurological events, and deaths. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of significant difference between LA and general anesthesia in terms of restenosis, neurological events, and death in the long-term period; LA is more preferable due its associated advantages including availability of testing the consciousness of the patients by direct contact, reduced use of shunts, shorter hospitalization periods, and less prevalence of permanent stroke in the short-term period.

Local versus general anesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: report of 329 cases.

Since stroke is an important cause of morbidity and mortality, carotid endarterectomies are used frequently to reduce the risk of stroke and death. Unfortunately, an inherent risk of the carotid endarterectomy procedure is that surgery itself may result in stroke. At this point the question is which method of anesthesia, local or general, is better to protect and monitorize the brain function during cross-clamp period in carotid endarterectomies? In the authors' center, 365 carotid endarterectomies were applied to 329 patients between 1990 and 2001; 165 operations were done under general anesthesia and the other 200 operations were done under local anesthesia. These 2 groups, general (group I) and local anesthesia (group II), were studied retrospectively according to preoperative and postoperative data. In group I, the rate of major stroke was 7.3%, but this rate was 1% in group II (p < 0.05). Intraoperative shunts were used in 50 (30.3%) operations of group I, but the usage of shunt was 8% (16 operations) in group II (p < 0.0001). The hospitalization period was also much shorter in group II than in group I. The time of hospitalization was 4.1 +/-1.9 days in group I and 2.4 +/-1.1 days in group II (p < 0.0001). In terms of cost analysis, the mean costs were 1007.14 dollars +/-135.71 dollars in group I and 885.71 dollars +/-78.57 dollars in group II (p < 0.0001). In short, the local procedure was more cost-effective. As a result, in carotid endarterectomy procedures, the authors prefer local anesthesia to achieve better brain function monitoring and to reduce hospitalization time and cost.