Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 16 de 16
Filter
1.
Maturitas ; 184: 107941, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430618

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Medicinal cannabis might have a role in supporting the mental health of people with cancer. This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the efficacy and safety of medicinal cannabis, compared with any control, as an intervention for depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms in people living with cancer. A secondary aim was to examine the effect of low versus high Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) dose on these outcomes. METHODS: Five databases were systematically searched, and complemented with a snowball search from inception to May 2023, for any type of interventional study that included humans of any age with any cancer type. Primary outcomes were incidence and severity of depression, anxiety, and stress symptoms. Secondary outcomes were mood, cognition, quality of life, appetite, nutrition status, gastrointestinal symptoms, and adverse events. Data were pooled using Review Manager. Evidence was appraised using Cochrane risk of bias tools. Confidence in the estimated effect of pooled outcomes was assessed using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). RESULTS: Fifteen studies (n = 11 randomized trials, n = 4 non-randomized trials) of 18 interventions (N = 1898 total participants; 100 % ≥18 years of age) were included. Ten studies examined THC (70 % synthetic), two synthetic cannabidiol with or without THC, and six whole-plant extracts. No clinically significant effects of medicinal cannabis were found on primary outcomes. The likelihood of anxiety events increased with higher-dose synthetic THC compared with a lower dose (OR: 2.0; 95 % CI: 1.4, 2.9; p < 0.001; Confidence: very low). Medicinal cannabis (THC, cannabidiol, and whole-plant extract) increased the likelihood of improved appetite (OR: 12.3; 95 % CI: 3.5, 45.5; p < 0.001; n = 3 interventions; Confidence: moderate) and reduced severity of appetite loss (SMD: -0.4; 95 % CI: -0.8, -0.1; p = 0.009; Confidence: very low). There was very low confidence that higher doses of synthetic THC increased the likelihood of any adverse event (OR: 0.5; 95 % CI: 0.3, 0.7; p < 0.001). Medicinal cannabis had no effect on emotional functioning, mood changes, confusion, disorientation, quality of life, and gastrointestinal symptoms. Confidence in findings was limited by some studies having high or unclear risk of bias and imprecise pooled estimates. CONCLUSIONS: There was insufficient evidence to determine the efficacy and safety of medicinal cannabis as a therapeutic intervention for depression, anxiety, or stress in people with active cancer. Further research should explore whether medicinal cannabis might improve and maintain appetite and if high-dose synthetic THC might increase the incidence of side-effects, including anxiety. To inform clinical practice, well-powered and rigorously designed trials are warranted that evaluate the effects of medicinal cannabis prescribed to target anxiety, depression, and stress.


Subject(s)
Anxiety , Depression , Medical Marijuana , Neoplasms , Stress, Psychological , Humans , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Neoplasms/psychology , Medical Marijuana/therapeutic use , Medical Marijuana/adverse effects , Anxiety/drug therapy , Depression/drug therapy , Stress, Psychological/drug therapy , Dronabinol/pharmacology , Dronabinol/therapeutic use , Quality of Life
2.
BMJ Open ; 12(5): e059952, 2022 05 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35577469

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is one of the most common and debilitating adverse effects of cancer and its treatment reported by cancer survivors. Physical activity, psychological interventions and management of concurrent symptoms have been shown to be effective in alleviating CRF. This pilot randomised controlled trial (RCT) will determine the feasibility of a telehealth CRF clinic intervention (T-CRF) to implement evidence-based strategies and assess the impact of the intervention on CRF and other clinical factors in comparison to usual care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A parallel-arm (intervention vs usual care) pilot RCT will be conducted at the Princess Alexandra Hospital in Queensland, Australia. Sixty cancer survivors aged 18 years and over, who report moderate or severe fatigue on the Brief Fatigue Inventory and meet other study criteria will be recruited. Participants will be randomised (1:1) to receive the T-CRF intervention or usual care (ie, specialist-led care, with a fatigue information booklet). The intervention is a 24-week programme of three telehealth nurse-led consultations and a personalised CRF management plan. The primary objective of this pilot RCT is to determine intervention feasibility, with a secondary objective to determine preliminary clinical efficacy. Feasibility outcomes include the identification of recruitment methods; recruitment rate and uptake; attrition; adherence; fidelity; apathy; and intervention functionality, acceptability and satisfaction. Clinical and resource use outcomes include cancer survivor fatigue, symptom burden, level of physical activity, productivity loss, hospital resource utilisation and carer's fatigue and productivity loss. Descriptive statistics will be used to report on feasibility and process-related elements additional to clinical and resource outcomes. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial is prospectively registered (ACTRN12620001334998). The study protocol has been approved by the Metro South Health and Hospital Services Human Research Ethics Committee (MSHHS HREC/2020/QMS/63495). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, national and international conferences and seminars or workshops. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ID: ACTRN12620001334998; Pre-results. Trial Version: Version 1.1. Last updated 10 December 2020.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Neoplasms , Telemedicine , Adolescent , Adult , Australia , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Fatigue/etiology , Fatigue/therapy , Feasibility Studies , Humans , Neoplasms/complications , Neoplasms/therapy , Pilot Projects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
3.
Eur J Oncol Nurs ; 54: 102025, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34500317

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Investigate the reported use and perceived effectiveness of self-care activities for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) symptoms in the feet. METHODS: Cancer survivors with CIPN (n = 405) completed a questionnaire that assessed the use and perceived effectiveness of 25 self-care activities. Effectiveness was rated on a 0 (not at all) to 10 (completely effective) numeric rating scale. Descriptive statistics and regression analyses were conducted to identify demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics associated with the use and effectiveness of selected self-care activities. RESULTS: The five most commonly used activities were: went for a walk (73.8%); watched television (67.8%); read a book, newspaper or magazine (64.4%); listened to radio, music (60.0%); and did exercises (jogging, swimming) (58.6%). The five most effective self-care activities were: had a trigger point injection (8.3 ( ± 1.3)); took tranquilizers (4.8 ( ± 2.6)); went for ultrasonic stimulation treatment (4.3 ( ± 3.1)); used a heating pad or hot water bottle (4.3 ( ± 2.5)); and used a transcutaneous electric nerve stimulator (4.2 ( ± 2.6)). Demographic, clinical, and pain characteristics influenced use and perceived effectiveness of selected self-care activities to varying degrees. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of the survivors used at least seven self-care activities to manage CIPN symptoms. The most commonly used activities did not receive the highest effectiveness ratings. Some activities that were rated as highly effective warrant more rigorous evaluation. Survivors can try a range of activities to decrease CIPN symptoms in the feet following discussion of their potential risks and benefits with their clinicians.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Cancer Survivors , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Humans , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/chemically induced , Peripheral Nervous System Diseases/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survivors
4.
J Cancer Educ ; 36(6): 1219-1229, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32406045

ABSTRACT

To assess cancer survivors' unmet supportive care needs and associated factors. Limited evidence is available about the supportive care needs of Chinese cancer survivors to inform future service planning. A cross-sectional survey was conducted (STROBE cross-sectional checklist used for report). Standardized questionnaires were administered to 364 cancer survivors. Using the Supportive Care Framework as conceptual framework, factors concerning individuals' cognitive appraisals of their situation and social resources were examined to explore their association with unmet supportive care needs. The most common unmet supportive care needs included concern about the cancer coming back (51.5%), the need for up-to-date information (49.3%), collaborative management with the medical team (48.8%), and financial support (48.8%). Factors associated with greater strength of unmet supportive care needs included being female, having higher personal support, and higher self-efficacy pertaining to social relationship. Having lower support from family and friends was a contributing factor associated with greater strength of unmet needs in comprehensive cancer care and relationship, as was lower self-efficacy pertaining to uncertainty management associated with greater strength of unmet needs in quality of life, and lower self-efficacy pertaining to health professional interaction associated with greater strength of unmet needs in information. Chinese cancer survivors experience a number of unmet supportive needs. Female and rural cancer survivors, and those with lower social support level and self-efficacy are susceptible to having higher levels of unmet supportive care needs. Consistent information provision and peer support system establishment are two potentially beneficial approaches to meet cancer patients' long-term supportive care needs. Females and rural cancer survivors, those with less support from family and friends, and those with lower self-efficacy in interactions with health professionals and in managing uncertainty are especially at risk for unmet supportive care needs.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Neoplasms , China , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Humans , Neoplasms/therapy , Quality of Life , Survivors
5.
Support Care Cancer ; 27(10): 3701-3716, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31236699

ABSTRACT

PURPOSES: To assess the effects of Tai Chi on quality of life (QOL) of cancer survivors. METHODS: The following databases were searched: PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, EBSCO (including MEDLINE, CINAHL, and other databases), ScienceDirect, CNKI, Wangfang Data, and CQVIP until April 25, 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English or Chinese examining the effects of Tai Chi intervention for cancer survivors were included. The primary outcome was QOL; the secondary outcomes were limb function/muscular strength, immune function indicators, cancer-related fatigue (CRF), and sleep disturbance. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Results of RCTs were pooled with mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Quality of evidence for each outcome was assessed with the GRADE system. RESULTS: Twenty-two RCTs were included in this review. Tai Chi improved the physical (SMD 0.34, 95%CI 0.09, 0.59) and mental health (SMD 0.60, 95%CI 0.12, 1.08) domains of quality of life. The intervention improved the limb/muscular function of breast cancer survivors (SMD 1.19, 95%CI 0.63, 1.75) and in mixed samples of cancer survivors reduced the levels of cortisol (MD - 0.09, 95%CI - 0.16, - 0.02), alleviated CRF (SMD - 0.37, 95%CI - 0.70, - 0.04), and promoted sleep (SMD - 0.37, 95%CI - 0.72, - 0.02). CONCLUSION: There is low-level evidence suggesting that Tai Chi improves physical and mental dimensions of QOL and sleep. There is moderate-level evidence suggesting Tai Chi reduces levels of cortisol and CRF and improves limb function. Additional studies with larger sample sizes and with higher-quality RCT designs comparing different regimens of Tai Chi are warranted.


Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms/psychology , Cancer Survivors/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Tai Ji/psychology , Fatigue/therapy , Female , Humans , Hydrocortisone/blood , Mental Health , Sleep Wake Disorders
6.
J Clin Nurs ; 28(13-14): 2486-2498, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30811715

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: To synthesise the evidence on the use of evaluation frameworks by nurses and midwives in research designed to improve healthcare services and practice. A secondary aim was to identify the attributes and elements of evaluation frameworks. BACKGROUND: Evaluation is an integral component of any initiative to improve outcomes or change clinical practice. Yet often an evaluation may not yield the information required to sustain or integrate an initiative into practice. Evaluation frameworks can support effective evaluations, but there is a lack of consensus regarding elements and attributes of frameworks that support use. METHODS: We undertook an integrative review to synthesise the use of evaluation frameworks in practice guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis flow diagram and checklist 2009 (Supporting Information File 4). The protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018087033). A broad range of electronic databases were systematically searched using keywords. FINDINGS: Twenty-five papers were included from a diverse range of clinical areas and across high-, middle- and low-income nations. Twenty of the research projects had used nine existing frameworks, and five had developed an evaluation specific to an initiative. Frameworks supported the processes of evaluation and made them more meaningful by simplifying a complex process (providing structure and guidance for the evaluation processes); identifying and including stakeholders; explaining reasons for outcomes; generating transferable lessons; and identifying the mechanisms driving or inhibiting change. CONCLUSION: Nurses and midwives reported that frameworks were useful in undertaking evaluations. Each framework had positive attributes and missing or confusing elements. When undertaking an evaluation, it is pertinent to review the elements and attributes of a framework to ensure it includes evaluation measures that are relevant to specific projects. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses are actively involved in evaluation of clinical practice. This review identifies important elements to consider when choosing a framework for evaluation.


Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/standards , Nursing Research/standards , Evaluation Studies as Topic , Female , Humans , Midwifery/methods , Nursing/methods , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/standards , Pregnancy
7.
J Clin Nurs ; 26(11-12): 1608-1620, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27487255

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To report a study protocol and the theoretical framework normalisation process theory that informs this protocol for a case study investigation of private sector nurse practitioners. BACKGROUND: Most research evaluating nurse practitioner service is focused on public, mainly acute care environments where nurse practitioner service is well established with strong structures for governance and sustainability. Conversely, there is lack of clarity in governance for emerging models in the private sector. In a climate of healthcare reform, nurse practitioner service is extending beyond the familiar public health sector. Further research is required to inform knowledge of the practice, operational framework and governance of new nurse practitioner models. DESIGN: The proposed research will use a multiple exploratory case study design to examine private sector nurse practitioner service. METHODS: Data collection includes interviews, surveys and audits. A sequential mixed method approach to analysis of each case will be conducted. Findings from within-case analysis will lead to a meta-synthesis across all four cases to gain a holistic understanding of the cases under study, private sector nurse practitioner service. Normalisation process theory will be used to guide the research process, specifically coding and analysis of data using theory constructs and the relevant components associated with those constructs. CONCLUSIONS: This article provides a blueprint for the research and describes a theoretical framework, normalisation process theory in terms of its flexibility as an analytical framework. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Consistent with the goals of best research practice, this study protocol will inform the research community in the field of primary health care about emerging research in this field. Publishing a study protocol ensures researcher fidelity to the analysis plan and supports research collaboration across teams.


Subject(s)
Clinical Nursing Research/methods , Nurse Practitioners , Nursing Theory , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Private Sector , Health Care Reform , Humans , Nurse's Role , Queensland , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
BMC Palliat Care ; 15: 51, 2016 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27251335

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Brazilian healthcare system offers universal coverage but lacks information about how patients with PC needs are serviced by its primary care program, Estratégia Saúde da Família (ESF). METHODS: Cross-sectional study in community settings. Patients in ESF program were screened using a Palliative Care Screening Tool (PCST). Included patients were assessed with Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and Palliative Care Outcome Scale (POS). RESULTS: Patients with PC needs are accessing the ESF program regardless of there being no specific PC support provided. From 238 patients identified, 73 (43 women, 30 men) were identified as having a need for PC, and the mean age was 77.18 (95 % Confidence Interval = ±2,78) years, with non-malignant neurologic conditions, such as dementia and cerebrovascular diseases, being the most common (53 % of all patients). Chronic conditions (2 or more years) were found in 70 % of these patients, with 71 % scoring 50 or less points in the KPS. Overall symptom intensity was low, with the exception of some cases with moderate and high score, and POS average score was 14.16 points (minimum = 4; maximum = 28). Most patients received medication and professional support through the primary care units, but limitations of services were identified, including lack of home visits and limited multi-professional approaches. CONCLUSION: Patients with PC needs were identified in ESF program. Basic health care support is provided but there is a lack of attention to some specific needs. PC policies and professional training should be implemented to improve this area.


Subject(s)
Palliative Care/organization & administration , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/epidemiology , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Karnofsky Performance Status , Male , Middle Aged , Mobility Limitation , National Health Programs/organization & administration , National Health Programs/statistics & numerical data , Needs Assessment , Pain/epidemiology , Patient Comfort/organization & administration , Patient Comfort/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic/organization & administration , Sex Distribution , Socioeconomic Factors , Time Factors
9.
BMJ Support Palliat Care ; 6(3): 315-22, 2016 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25743438

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: In Australia, patients at the end of life with complex symptoms and needs are often referred to palliative care services (PCSs), but little is known about the symptoms of patients receiving palliative care in different settings. OBJECTIVE: To explore patients' levels of pain and other symptoms while receiving care from PCSs. METHOD: PCSs registered through Australia's national Palliative Care Outcomes Collaboration (PCOC) were invited to participate in a survey between 2008 and 2011. Patients (or if unable, a proxy) were invited to complete the Palliative Care Outcome Scale. RESULTS: Questionnaires were completed for 1800 patients. One-quarter of participants reported severe pain, 20% reported severe 'other symptoms', 20% reported severe patient anxiety, 45% reported severe family anxiety, 66% experienced depressed feelings and 19% reported severe problems with self-worth. Participants receiving care in major cities reported higher levels of depressed feelings than participants in inner regional areas. Participants receiving care in community and combined service settings reported higher levels of need for information, more concerns about wasted time, and lower levels of family anxiety and depressed feelings when compared to inpatients. Participants in community settings had lower levels of concern about practical matters than inpatients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving care from Australian PCSs have physical and psychosocial concerns that are often complex and rated as 'severe'. Our findings highlight the importance of routine, comprehensive assessment of patients' concerns and the need for Specialist Palliative Care clinicians to be vigilant in addressing pain and other symptoms in a timely, systematic and holistic manner, whatever the care setting.


Subject(s)
Pain/epidemiology , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Terminal Care/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Quality of Life , Young Adult
10.
Aust Crit Care ; 29(2): 83-9, 2016 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26228855

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The critical care context presents important opportunities for nurses to deliver skilled, comprehensive care to patients at the end of life and their families. Limited research has identified the actual end-of-life care practices of critical care nurses. OBJECTIVE: To identify the end-of-life care practices of critical care nurses. DESIGN: A national cross-sectional online survey. METHODS: The survey was distributed to members of an Australian critical care nursing association and 392 critical care nurses (response rate 25%) completed the survey. Exploratory factor analysis using principal axis factoring with oblique rotation was undertaken on survey responses to identify the domains of end-of-life care practice. Descriptive statistics were calculated for individual survey items. RESULTS: Exploratory factor analysis identified six domains of end-of-life care practice: information sharing, environmental modification, emotional support, patient and family centred decision-making, symptom management and spiritual support. Descriptive statistics identified a high level of engagement in information sharing and environmental modification practices and less frequent engagement in items from the emotional support and symptom management practice areas. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study identified domains of end-of-life care practice, and critical care nurse engagement in these practices. The findings highlight future training and practice development opportunities, including the need for experiential learning targeting the emotional support practice domain. Further research is needed to enhance knowledge of symptom management practices during the provision of end-of-life care to inform and improve practice in this area.


Subject(s)
Critical Care Nursing , Practice Patterns, Nurses' , Terminal Care , Adult , Australia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Factor Analysis, Statistical , Female , Humans , Male , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Oncol Nurs Forum ; 41(5): E267-81, 2014 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25158664

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To identify latent classes of individuals with distinct quality-of-life (QOL) trajectories, to evaluate for differences in demographic characteristics between the latent classes, and to evaluate for variations in pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine genes between the latent classes. DESIGN: Descriptive, longitudinal study. SETTING: Two radiation therapy departments located in a comprehensive cancer center and a community-based oncology program in northern California. SAMPLE: 168 outpatients with prostate, breast, brain, or lung cancer and 85 of their family caregivers (FCs). METHODS: Growth mixture modeling (GMM) was employed to identify latent classes of individuals based on QOL scores measured prior to, during, and for four months following completion of radiation therapy. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and haplotypes in 16 candidate cytokine genes were tested between the latent classes. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationships among genotypic and phenotypic characteristics and QOL GMM group membership. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: QOL latent class membership and variations in cytokine genes. FINDINGS: Two latent QOL classes were found: higher and lower. Patients and FCs who were younger, identified with an ethnic minority group, had poorer functional status, or had children living at home were more likely to belong to the lower QOL class. After controlling for significant covariates, between-group differences were found in SNPs in interleukin 1 receptor 2 (IL1R2) and nuclear factor kappa beta 2 (NFKB2). For IL1R2, carrying one or two doses of the rare C allele was associated with decreased odds of belonging to the lower QOL class. For NFKB2, carriers with two doses of the rare G allele were more likely to belong to the lower QOL class. CONCLUSIONS: Unique genetic markers in cytokine genes may partially explain interindividual variability in QOL. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Determination of high-risk characteristics and unique genetic markers would allow for earlier identification of patients with cancer and FCs at higher risk for poorer QOL. Knowledge of these risk factors could assist in the development of more targeted clinical or supportive care interventions for those identified.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/psychology , Cytokines/genetics , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/psychology , Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide , Age Factors , Aged , Comorbidity , Cytokines/physiology , Ethnicity/genetics , Family Characteristics , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Genetic Association Studies , Genetic Predisposition to Disease , Genetic Variation , Genotype , Haplotypes/genetics , Humans , Inflammation/epidemiology , Inflammation/genetics , Inflammation/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Minority Groups , Models, Theoretical , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/nursing , Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Phenotype , Quality of Life , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects , Risk Factors
12.
Eur J Oncol Nurs ; 17(5): 554-62, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23522829

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this case study is to describe clinical staff perceptions of implementing a person-centred model of nursing in an outpatient radiotherapy treatment department, using a Primary Nursing/Collaborative Practice framework. The questions are: 1) what are the nursing and radiotherapy staff perspectives of the changed model of care, 2) what factors impacted on aspects of the evolving model?, and 3) how was interdisciplinary collaboration influenced by the new model? METHODS: An instrumental case study addressed the multiple perspectives of several radiotherapy health professionals, within a qualitative approach, to assess the new model of nursing care. Interview data were obtained from thirteen clinical staff over a six month period approximately one year after the model was implemented. RESULTS: The new model supports nurses to work more closely with the individual patient, with some perceived positive patient outcomes. Nurses reported increased satisfaction with their work, more autonomy and responsibility, and improved working relationships with medical staff. They also became more aware of the holistic approach to support positive patient outcomes. However, this study acknowledged that education was required for nurses to provide holistic care, especially in the context of complex interdisciplinary relationships. CONCLUSIONS: A person-centred nursing approach in radiotherapy represents a radical change to the functional approach, providing some benefits for patients. However, the challenges of providing holistic care in the context of complex interdisciplinary relationships are evident, and this study acknowledges the importance of a team approach to addressing changes in practice in the future.


Subject(s)
Nursing, Team/organization & administration , Oncology Nursing/methods , Patient-Centered Care/methods , Radiation Oncology/methods , Ambulatory Care/organization & administration , Attitude of Health Personnel , Female , Humans , Male , Models, Nursing , Nurse's Role , Nurse-Patient Relations , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Queensland
13.
BMC Cancer ; 11: 48, 2011 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21284838

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence that up to 35% of patients with cancer experience significant distress, access to effective psychosocial care is limited by lack of systematic approaches to assessment, a paucity of psychosocial services, and patient reluctance to accept treatment either because of perceived stigma or difficulties with access to specialist psycho-oncology services due to isolation or disease burden. This paper presents an overview of a randomised study to evaluate the effectiveness of a brief tailored psychosocial Intervention delivered by health professionals in cancer care who undergo focused training and participate in clinical supervision. METHODS/DESIGN: Health professionals from the disciplines of nursing, occupational therapy, speech pathology, dietetics, physiotherapy or radiation therapy will participate in training to deliver the psychosocial Intervention focusing on core concepts of supportive-expressive, cognitive and dignity-conserving care. Health professional training will consist of completion of a self-directed manual and participation in a skills development session. Participating health professionals will be supported through structured clinical supervision whilst delivering the Intervention. In the stepped wedge design each of the 5 participating clinical sites will be allocated in random order from Control condition to Training then delivery of the Intervention. A total of 600 patients will be recruited across all sites. Based on level of distress or risk factors eligible patients will receive up to 4 sessions, each of up to 30 minutes in length, delivered face-to-face or by telephone. Participants will be assessed at baseline and 10-week follow-up. Patient outcome measures include anxiety and depression, quality of life, unmet psychological and supportive care needs. Health professional measures include psychological morbidity, stress and burnout. Process evaluation will be conducted to assess perceptions of participation in the study and the factors that may promote translation of learning into practice. DISCUSSION: This study will provide important information about the effectiveness of a brief tailored psychological Intervention for patients with cancer and the potential to prevent development of significant distress in patients considered at risk. It will yield data about the feasibility of this model of care in routine clinical practice and identify enablers and barriers to its systematic implementation in cancer settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ACTRN12610000448044.


Subject(s)
Affect/physiology , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/methods , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Psychotherapy/methods , Calibration , Combined Modality Therapy , Delivery of Health Care, Integrated/standards , Feasibility Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Models, Theoretical , Psychotherapy/standards , Quality of Life , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Stress, Psychological/prevention & control , Treatment Outcome
14.
Kidney Blood Press Res ; 33(4): 260-5, 2010.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20606475

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Thirst and dry mouth are common among hemodialysis (HD) patients. This paper reports a study to evaluate the impact of an acupressure program on HD patients' thirst and salivary flow rates. METHODS: The acupressure program included placebo, followed by true acupressure each applied for 4 weeks. Twenty-eight patients (mean age 57.6, SD = 16.13 years) first received a sticker as placebo acupressure at two acupoints CV23 and TE17 three times a week for 4 weeks, and then received true acupressure in the same area for the next 4 weeks. Salivary flow rate and thirst intensity were measured at baseline, during and after treatment completion for both the placebo and true acupressure program. RESULTS: The true acupressure program was associated with significantly increased salivary flow rate (0.09 +/- 0.08 ml/min at baseline to 0.12 +/- 0.08 ml/min after treatments completion, p = 0.04). The mean thirst intensity also improved from 4.21 +/- 2.66 at baseline to 2.43 +/- 2.32 (p = 0.008) after treatment completion in HD patients. There was no statistically significant difference in pre-post program salivary flow rate; however, significant improvement in thirst intensity scores was observed (p = 0.009) in the placebo acupressure program. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence that acupressure may be effective in improving salivary flow rates and thirst intensity.


Subject(s)
Acupressure/methods , Kidney Failure, Chronic/therapy , Renal Dialysis , Thirst/physiology , Xerostomia/therapy , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Kidney Failure, Chronic/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Satisfaction , Saliva/physiology , Xerostomia/physiopathology
15.
Int J Palliat Nurs ; 13(5): 222-9, 2007 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17577174

ABSTRACT

There has been limited research into the scope or standards of specialist palliative care nursing practice in an Australian context. This study sought to develop a competency framework that described the core domains of specialist palliative care nursing. This article explores one key domain of specialist palliative care nursing practice - therapeutic relationships - that was identified as underpinning other domains of practice. A mixed method was used, involving a literature review, a survey including practice exemplars and an interview of specialist palliative care nurses. Seventy-four registered nurses working in designated specialist palliative care nursing roles from each Australian state and mainland territory were involved. The nurses represented metropolitan, regional, rural and remote communities, various inpatient facilities and community practice settings. Five core domains of specialist palliative care nursing practice were identified: complex supportive care, collaborative practice, leadership, improving practice and therapeutic relationships. Therapeutic relationships were identified as the central domain of specialist palliative care nursing practice to which all other domains were inextricably linked.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Nurse's Role/psychology , Nurse-Patient Relations , Palliative Care/organization & administration , Specialties, Nursing/organization & administration , Australia , Cooperative Behavior , Female , Holistic Health , Humans , Interprofessional Relations , Leadership , Models, Nursing , Nursing Methodology Research , Palliative Care/psychology , Patient Advocacy , Patient Education as Topic , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Professional Autonomy , Professional Competence , Social Support , Surveys and Questionnaires , Total Quality Management/organization & administration , Trust
16.
Int J Nurs Pract ; 12(5): 288-94, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16942517

ABSTRACT

There is a growing demand for complementary and alternative medicines (CAMs) among people with cancer. This study aims to describe how nurses' respond to people with cancer who use CAMs, and the factors which might contribute to these different responses. A grounded theory approach was used. Six semistructured interviews were conducted with nurses who were working in cancer settings. The core category which emerged from this study was 'nurses' responses towards patients who use CAMs'. Nurses respond in a variety of ways to patients who use CAMs. They include: open, sceptical and ambivalent responses. A range of factors which influence the way nurses respond were also identified. These include the ambiguous definitions of CAM, nurses' personal philosophies, life experiences, evidence of the therapy's effectiveness, impact on patients, the motives of patients who use CAM and organizational culture. Several implications for nursing education and practice are identified from these findings.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Complementary Therapies , Neoplasms/therapy , Nurse-Patient Relations , Nurses/psychology , Humans , Organizational Culture
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL