Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Language
Journal
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Cancer ; 124(9): 1954-1963, 2018 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29509276

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of sorafenib on the outcomes of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3)-internal tandem duplication (ITD) undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHODS: A total of 144 patients with FLT3-ITD AML undergoing allo-HSCT between January 2012 and December 2015 were enrolled in this study. Depending on whether they were receiving sorafenib before transplantation or sorafenib maintenance after transplantation, patients were divided into 4 groups: patients receiving sorafenib before transplantation (group A; n = 36), patients receiving sorafenib after transplantation (group B; n = 32), patients receiving sorafenib both before and after transplantation (group C; n = 26), and patients receiving sorafenib neither before nor after transplantation (group D; n = 50). Outcomes were compared among these groups. RESULTS: The 3-year relapse rates were 22.2%, 18.8%, 15.8%, and 46.1% for groups A, B, C, and D, respectively (P = .006). The 3-year overall survival (OS) rates were 74.9%, 78.1%, 84.6%, and 50.9%, respectively (P = .023), and the 3-year leukemia-free survival (LFS) rates were 69.4%, 78.1%, 80.4%, and 34.8%, respectively (P < .001). The relapse rate was higher and the LFS was shorter in group D versus groups A, B, and C. The OS in group D was shorter than the OS in group C but was similar to the OS in groups A and B. A multivariate analysis revealed that sorafenib before transplantation, sorafenib maintenance after transplantation, and their combined application were protective factors for a lower relapse rate (hazard ratios [HRs], 0.436 [P = .048], 0.431 [P = .046], and 0.173 [P = .002], respectively) and longer LFS (HRs, 0.322 [P = .010], 0.343 [P = .014], and 0.187 [P = .001], respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Sorafenib before transplantation, sorafenib maintenance after transplantation, and their combined application all could improve the outcomes for patients with FLT3-ITD AML. Further study is needed to determine whether the use of sorafenib both before and after transplantation might be ideal. Cancer 2018;124:1954-63. © 2018 American Cancer Society.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Sorafenib/therapeutic use , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/genetics , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gain of Function Mutation , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control , Protein Domains/genetics , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Remission Induction/methods , Retrospective Studies , Segmental Duplications, Genomic/genetics , Sorafenib/pharmacology , Survival Rate , Tandem Repeat Sequences/genetics , Transplantation, Homologous , Young Adult , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/antagonists & inhibitors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL