A case of pseudo-Bartter/Gitelman syndrome caused by long-term laxative abuse, leading to end-stage kidney disease.

Pseudo-Bartter/Gitelman syndrome (PBS/PGS) is a disorder that presents with hypokalemia and metabolic alkalosis resembling Gitelman syndrome (GS) due to secondary factors, such as lifestyle and /or medicines. Notably, PBS/PGS is more likely to cause renal dysfunction than GS. We report the first case of PBS/PGS due to long-term laxative abuse leading to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The patient was a 49-year-old woman with a history of constipation since school, who had used excessive doses of laxatives on her own judgment for nine years at least from 22 years of age. Two years later, blood tests revealed hypokalemia (serum K 3.1 mEq/L), and nine years later, the patient's renal function began to deteriorate (Cr-eGFR 48.7 mL/min/1.73 m2). Since abuse of laxatives was suspected as the cause, it was changed to the proper dosage of laxatives. At 33 years, the patient developed acute kidney injury (AKI), due to a urinary tract infection, and required intensive treatment, including hemodialysis. Although the patient was eventually weaned off dialysis, the renal function did not recover to pre-AKI levels. In suspected GS, comprehensive genetic testing for renal disease-related genes was performed; however, no obvious pathogenic variants were identified. Thereafter, despite decreasing the laxative doses and potassium supplementation, her renal function continued to decline. At 49 years, the patient developed ESKD and was started on maintenance hemodialysis. PBS/PGS is a disease that can lead to ESKD. An early diagnosis of PBS/PGS is crucial to prevent renal function deterioration, and the underlying causes should be removed immediately.

Clinical efficacy and cost-effectiveness of lanthanum carbonate as second-line therapy in hemodialysis patients in Japan.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lanthanum carbonate (LC) is a nonaluminum, noncalcium phosphate binder that is effective for hyperphosphatemia in dialysis patients. However, its efficacy and cost-effectiveness as second-line therapy have not been fully examined. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We first conducted a multicenter, open-label, 16-week clinical trial to examine the effect of additive LC in 116 hemodialysis patients who had uncontrolled hyperphosphatemia with conventional phosphorus-lowering therapy alone. Based on these clinical data, a state transition model was developed to evaluate the benefits and costs associated with LC as second-line therapy. Reduced risks for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality among patients treated with LC arise through more of the population achieving the target phosphorus levels. Uncertainty was explored through sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: After 16 weeks of additive LC treatment, mean serum phosphorus levels decreased from 7.30 ± 0.90 to 5.71 ± 1.32 mg/dl, without significant changes in serum calcium or intact parathyroid hormone levels. A subsequent cost-effectiveness analysis showed that compared with conventional treatment, additive LC incurred an average additional lifetime cost of $22,054 per person and conferred an additional 0.632 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $34,896 per QALY gained. Applying a cost-effectiveness threshold of $50,000 per QALY, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that additive LC had a 97.4% probability of being cost-effective compared with conventional treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the use of LC as second-line therapy would be cost-effective among hemodialysis patients with uncontrolled hyperphosphatemia in Japan.

The effect of aldosterone blockade in patients with Alport syndrome.

Recent studies indicate that adding the mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist spironolactone (SP) to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or ACEI and angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), which is known as a triple blockade, enhances the more beneficial effects on urinary protein excretion of patients with chronic kidney diseases. In this study, we explored the effects of SP on urinary protein excretion in patients with Alport syndrome featuring persistent proteinuria in spite of the long-term use of ACEI (lisinopril) or both ACEI and ARB (candesartan). Five patients with Alport syndrome were enrolled and SP treatment (25 mg/day) was started. At the start of SP administration, all patients showed good renal function and none of them suffered from hypertension. We decided to assess the effect of SP by determining the morning urinary protein/creatinine ratio (U-P/C) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (EGFR). After SP treatment was started, U-P/C was significantly reduced at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months, while EGFR did not change. The drop in systolic and diastolic blood pressure was statistically significant and serum potassium level was slightly elevated. None of the patients showed signs of severe hyperkalemia (>5.0 mEq/l). These results suggest that aldosterone receptor blockade combined with ACEI and ARB therapy offers a valuable adjuvant treatment for the reduction of proteinuria in patients with Alport syndrome as in those with other chronic kidney diseases. SP can thus be expected to constitute a good renoprotective agent for Alport syndrome. These preliminary data indicate that large-scale trials of this therapy should be done.

High-dose mizoribine treatment for adolescents with systemic lupus erythematosus.

BACKGROUND: In treating pediatric patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), it is necessary to quickly attain remission to avoid sequelae in various organs and to maintain it over a long period. However, to maintain remission, the prolonged use of immunosuppressants which have various adverse effects, is often necessary in addition to steroids, and complications due to such immunosuppressants pose very important problems. A regimen of mizoribin (MZR) at 150 mg/day divided into two or three doses has been recommended, but while this regimen has been safe, its efficacy has not been satisfactory. However, MZR produces effects dose-dependently, and the dose recommended to date may have been insufficient for the treatment of children with SLE. METHODS: The authors administered oral MZR at 300 mg/day in two divided doses, which is twice the conventional dose for adults, to five adolescents with SLE. Three of these five were markedly steroid-dependent patients and two had previously been treated with steroids only. Thereafter, the authors evaluated the safety and efficacy of the regimen by following the patients for at least 7 months after the beginning of treatment. RESULTS: Patients 1 and 2 had been treated with prednisolone (PSL) and cyclosporine (CyA), but as the duration of CyA administration became long, it was replaced with 300 mg MZR. This transition could be accomplished smoothly. Patient 3 showed repeated recurrence during the treatment with PSL and CyA or CPM, but the symptoms could be controlled by the addition of 300 mg MZR. In patients 4 and 5, the control of symptoms with PSL alone was judged to be difficult, and concomitant administration of MZR at 300 mg was started. This resulted in a decrease in the dose of PSL. The Cmax (C2) of MZR was 1.33 microg/mL or higher in all five patients, and the efficacy of the treatment was satisfactory. Concerning side-effects, hyperuricemia was noted in two patients, but it was resolved in one of them by reducing the dose of MZR and in the other spontaneously while the treatment was continued. Temporary exacerbation of hair loss was observed in two patients, but it disappeared in both of them after a few months. CONCLUSION: MZR could be administered at a high dose effectively and safely. However, monitoring of the serum uric acid level was necessary. High-dose MZR therapy showed an efficacy and safety that would warrant its application to steroid-dependent pediatric patients with SLE.

Long-term follow-up of atypical membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis: are steroids indicated?

Atypical membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) has been reported to have a good prognosis when treated with corticosteroids. However, this recommendation is based on uncontrolled trials and is associated with many complications. The purpose of our study is to determine whether steroid therapy is indicated for atypical MPGN. The cases of seven patients with atypical MPGN are reported in this study. Urinary abnormalities of five of them were detected by urine screening at school, of two because of macrohematuria. Hypocomplementemia was noted in six patients. All but one patient were treated without corticosteroids, and five with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and/or the Chinese herbal medicine Sairei-to (TJ-114). One patient recovered spontaneously from proteinuria and was therefore not treated, and one who developed severe proteinuria during observation was treated with corticosteroids. After an average follow-up period of 10.0 years, five patients showed normal urinary findings, one had hematuria and one proteinuria. At the most recent follow-up, the renal function of all patients remained within the normal range, and serum C3 had returned to normal levels in five out of six. These findings suggest that the indication of steroid therapy for atypical MPGN should be re-examined, since most of the patients with atypical MPGN seem to have an excellent prognosis without treatment with corticosteroids.