Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 273(4): 933-8, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26100031

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the histopathological impact, effectiveness, and safety of two hemostatic agents, Ankaferd Blood Stopper (ABS) and microporous polysaccharide hemospheres (MPH), in an experimental rabbit epistaxis model. Rabbits were randomly assigned, using a computerized random number generator, to the following three groups of six animals: group 1 (control, irrigated with saline); group 2 (ABS-treated); and group 3 (MPH-treated). In all groups, a standardized rabbit epistaxis model was used. Hemostasis time and extent of nasal bleeding were measured to compare the hemostatic effect of ABS and MPH among groups. Septums were removed for histopathological analysis, 7 days after the procedure. ABS reduced hemostasis time to 104.2 s and amount of bleeding to 20.5 mg. MPH reduced hemostasis time to 71.7 s and amount of bleeding to 11.5 mg. Mean bleeding time in wounds administered ABS and MPH was significantly shorter compared with wounds administered isotonic saline solution (p = 0.004). ABS and MPH application decreased bleeding significantly compared with the control group (p = 0.004). Bleeding time and amount in the MPH group was significantly reduced compared with the ABS group (p = 0.013 and p = 0.004, respectively). There was no significant difference in the histopathological evaluation results between the ABS, MPH, and control groups. Our data indicate that both ABS and MPH represent safe, effective, and fast-acting hemostatic agents in the management of epistaxis. MPH was more effective than ABS in terms of hemostasis time and amount of bleeding.


Subject(s)
Epistaxis , Plant Extracts/pharmacology , Polysaccharides/pharmacology , Administration, Topical , Animals , Bleeding Time/methods , Disease Models, Animal , Epistaxis/diagnosis , Epistaxis/drug therapy , Hemostatics/pharmacology , Rabbits , Treatment Outcome
2.
J Photochem Photobiol B ; 149: 289-91, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26123190

ABSTRACT

Allergic rhinitis is one of the most common health problems and has a major effect on quality of life. Although new-generation antihistamines and nasal steroids are the main treatment options, complete resolution cannot be obtained in some patients. Besides common side effects such as nasal irritation and epistaxis, the use of these drugs is controversial in some patients, such as pregnant or breastfeeding women. These findings highlight the need for new treatment options. Although phototherapy has been successfully used in the treatment of atopic dermatitis, which is an IgE-mediated disease and shares several common pathogenic features with allergic rhinitis, there are limited studies about its role in the treatment of allergic rhinitis. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the histopathological effects of intranasal phototherapy (Rhinolight) and nasal corticosteroid treatment on the nasal mucosa in allergic rhinitis in a rabbit model and we found that both treatment options significantly reduced inflammation in the nasal mucosa without increasing apoptosis of mucosal cells.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones/pharmacology , Nasal Mucosa/drug effects , Nasal Mucosa/radiation effects , Phototherapy , Rhinitis, Allergic/pathology , Rhinitis, Allergic/therapy , Administration, Intranasal , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Animals , Disease Models, Animal , Male , Nasal Mucosa/pathology , Rabbits , Rhinitis, Allergic/drug therapy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL