ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Improving medical students' wellbeing and empowerment through curricular activities is a topic of interest worldwide. Mindfulness-based interventions (MBIs) are increasingly implemented in medical education often as part of elective courses. To better understand training outcomes and adjust curriculum to students' needs, we will explore why will medical students participate in meditation-based education? METHODS: We analyzed 29 transcripts from the first session of an 8-week MBSR program offered to medical students in French. Transcripts were coded and analyzed using a qualitative content thematic analysis and the constant comparison method. RESULTS: Analyses resulted in three themes describing students' motivation: (1) Medical education and the physician's role, i.e. improving interpersonal skills, acquiring skills oriented toward a more integrative medicine, being more productive in a highly competitive context. (2) Caring for my health i.e. aiming at stress reduction, emotion regulation, and improving self-compassion. (3) A quest for meaning, i.e. optimizing meaning of care, and meaning of life. CONCLUSION: The results highlight the congruence between the perceived motivations and the evidence on the effect of mindfulness on self-care, the development of humanistic medical skills, and the meaning of care. Some findings raise the issue of the limits of using mindfulness to enhance one's productivity. Notably, participants articulated the need for self-care as in mindfulness training, with the ability to care for others.
Subject(s)
Education, Medical , Mindfulness , Students, Medical , Humans , Students, Medical/psychology , Motivation , Mindfulness/education , Educational StatusABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) after complete surgical resection is currently accepted as a therapeutic option for peritoneal carcinomatosis. However, considerable morbidity is reported after HIPEC. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the impact of HIPEC on the quality of life (QoL) of survivors without recurrences of disease according to socio-demographic and medical variables. For that purpose, HIPEC was used as a global concept including the surgical procedure effects. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed by analyzing questionnaires concerning socio-demographic data, the psychological status, and general and specific QoL scores. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (86% of those contacted) completed and returned mailed questionnaires. For 19/21 QoL dimensions explored, survivors reported good to very good QoL with a median score >/=67%. The two adversely affected dimensions were future prospects and sexual functioning with a mean score of 57% and 23%, respectively. The burden of carcinomatosis, evaluated by a peritoneal index, was not correlated with statistically identified sequels in QoL. The extent of morbidity due to HIPEC, evaluated by the hospital stay, was statistically correlated with only one score, namely, embarrassment during social activities (p = 0.01) but not during familial life. CONCLUSIONS: Even though HIPEC is considered as an aggressive treatment, survivors reported good to very good QoL. However, specific care for the psychological aspect, as reflected by anxiety regarding future prospects and sexual activity, needs to be developed for survivors.