Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters

Therapeutic Methods and Therapies TCIM
Database
Country/Region as subject
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Chem Biodivers ; 20(2): e202200911, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36627123

ABSTRACT

Arenobufagin, one of the bufadienolides isolated from traditional Chinese medicine Chan'su, exhibits potent antitumor activity. However, serious toxicity and small therapeutic window limits its drug development. In the present study, to our knowledge, novel 3,11-bispeptide ester arenobufagin derivatives have been firstly designed and synthesized on the base of our previous discovery of active 3-monopeptide ester derivative. The in vitro antiproliferative activity evaluation revealed that the moiety at C3 and C11 hydroxy had an important influence on cytotoxic activity and selectivity. Compound ZM350 notably inhibited tumor growth by 58.8 % at a dose 10 mg/kg in an A549 nude mice xenograft model. Therefore, compound ZM350 also presented a concentration-dependent apoptosis induction and low inhibitory effect against both hERG potassium channel and Cav1.2 calcium channel. Our study suggests that novel 3,11-bispeptide ester derivatives will be a potential benefit to further antitumor agent development of arenobufagin.


Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents , Bufanolides , Animals , Mice , Humans , Cell Line, Tumor , Cardiotoxicity/drug therapy , Mice, Nude , Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Bufanolides/chemistry , Apoptosis , Drug Screening Assays, Antitumor , Cell Proliferation
2.
J Thorac Dis ; 14(9): 3277-3284, 2022 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36245591

ABSTRACT

Background: Definitive chemoradiation is the preferred treatment for cervical esophageal carcinoma (CEC), per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines. However, in treatment failures, salvage surgery poses significant technical challenges. If non-responders could be identified, prior to chemoradiation, these patients may benefit from primary esophagectomy. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor is widely used and recognized as an effective treatment method in various cancers including esophageal cancer. Therefore, we propose to screen for treatment response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy to select patients who are radiosensitive and potential candidates for laryngeal preservation. While non-responders are likely to be insensitive to chemoradiation would be offered radical esophagectomy. Methods: A total of 36 patients with histopathologically-confirmed locally advanced CEC have been enrolled in our study. All participants will receive 2 cycles of induction therapy, which was tislelizumab combined with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Patients will be classified into 3 groups according to their response to induction therapy: a remarkable response (RR) group, limited partial response (LPR) group, and poor response (POR) group. Stratified patients will receive the following follow-up treatments: those in the RR group will receive dCRT, and those in the LPR and POR groups will undergo radical surgery. Then, participants in the RR group will be administrated with tislelizumab alone for 1 year. The choice of postoperative treatment for patients in the LPR and POR groups will depend on the patient's condition, including chemotherapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or follow-up. The primary endpoint of the study is the 2-year event-free survival (EFS). The secondary endpoints are disease-free survival (DFS), regression-free survival (RFS), objective response rate (ORR), and 5-year overall survival (OS). At the same time, we will assess the patient's quality of life (QoL). Conclusions: Screening CEC patients after immune-induction therapy combined with chemotherapy using different treatment strategies might lead to improvements in their QoL and OS time. No relevant double-endpoint studies have been reported until now. Our study is the first multicenter, prospective, exploratory study to seek the optimal treatment for locally advanced CEC patients. The results may offer high-level evidence for future CEC treatment. Trial Registration: Chictr.Org identifier: ChiCTR2200057732.

3.
Lancet Oncol ; 23(3): e105-e115, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35240087

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is paucity of investigations into immunotherapy or targeted therapy for postoperative locally recurrent pancreatic cancer. We aimed to assess the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plus pembrolizumab and trametinib in these patients. METHODS: In this open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 2 study, participants were recruited from Changhai Hospital affiliated to the Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma characterised by mutant KRAS and positive immunohistochemical staining of PD-L1, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, and documented local recurrence after surgery followed by chemotherapy (mFOLFIRINOX [ie, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, and folinic acid] or 5-fluorouracil). Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive voice or web response system, without stratification, to receive SBRT with doses ranging from 35-40 Gy in five fractions, intravenous pembrolizumab 200 mg once every 3 weeks, and oral trametinib 2 mg once daily or SBRT (same regimen) and intravenous gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) on day 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle for eight cycles until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the as-treated population in all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02704156, and is now complete. FINDINGS: Between Oct 10, 2016, and Oct 28, 2017, 198 patients were screened, of whom 170 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive SBRT plus pembrolizumab and trametinib (n=85) or SBRT plus gemcitabine (n=85). As of the clinical cutoff date (Nov 30, 2020), median follow-up was 13·1 months (IQR 10·2-17·1). Median overall survival was 14·9 months (12·7-17·1) with SBRT plus pembrolizumab and trametinib and 12·8 months (95% CI 11·2-14·4) with SBRT plus gemcitabine (hazard ratio [HR] 0·69 [95% CI 0·51-0·95]; p=0·021). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse effects were increased alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase (ten [12%] of 85 in SBRT plus pembrolizumab and trametinib group vs six [7%] of 85 in SBRT plus gemcitabine group), increased blood bilirubin (four [5%] vs none), neutropenia (one [1%] vs nine [11%]), and thrombocytopenia (one [1%] vs four [5%]). Serious adverse events were reported by 19 (22%) participants in the SBRT plus pembrolizumab and trametinib group and 12 (14%) in the SBRT plus gemcitabine group. No treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: The combination of SBRT plus pembrolizumab and trametinib could be a novel treatment option for patients with locally recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgery. Phase 3 trials are needed to confirm our findings. FUNDING: Shanghai Shenkang Center and Changhai Hospital. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.


Subject(s)
Pancreatic Neoplasms , Radiosurgery , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , China , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Fluorouracil , Humans , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/drug therapy , Pancreatic Neoplasms/drug therapy , Pyridones , Pyrimidinones , Radiosurgery/adverse effects , Gemcitabine , Pancreatic Neoplasms
4.
Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao ; 6(9): 907-10, 2008 Sep.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18782532

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To observe and discuss the dynamic changes of interleukin-2 (IL-2) and soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL-2R) and their significance in the patients with primary liver cancer after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) therapy combined with Jinglong Capsule. METHODS: A total of 48 patients with primary liver cancer, who failed to be treated by major surgery, were randomly divided into two groups: Jinlong Capsule group (TACE therapy plus Jinlong Capsule) and control group (TACE therapy alone). There were 24 cases in each group. The levels of peripheral blood IL-2 and slL-2R were measured before the first TACE and 1, 7 and 15 days after the second TACE respectively by using double-antibody sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The data from Jinlong Capsule group were compared with those from the control group. RESULTS: The level of sIL-2R in Jinlong Capsule group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P<0.05), while the level of IL-2 was significantly higher than that in the control group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Jinlong Capsule can significantly improve the lymphocyte function of the patients with primary liver cancer after TACE. The levels of IL-2 and sIL-2R can be considered as the valuable parameters for evaluating the effects on primary liver cancer, and Jinlong Capsule is helpful for the patients with primary liver cancer.


Subject(s)
Chemoembolization, Therapeutic , Interleukin-2/blood , Liver Neoplasms/drug therapy , Phytotherapy , Receptors, Interleukin-2/blood , Adjuvants, Immunologic/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Capsules , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/blood , Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/drug therapy , Chemoembolization, Therapeutic/methods , Drug Therapy, Combination , Drugs, Chinese Herbal/therapeutic use , Female , Humans , Liver Neoplasms/blood , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL