Comparison of Stable and Unstable Ethiodized Oil Emulsions for Transarterial Chemoembolization of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results of a Single-Center Double-Blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the stability of stable and unstable water-in-oil emulsions and the efficacy and safety of these emulsions in a single-center, prospective double-blind trial of transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 812 patients with inoperable HCC were randomized (stable emulsion, n = 402; unstable emulsion, n = 410). The 2 emulsions were prepared by using the same protocol except that different solvents were used for chemotherapy agents, including epirubicin, lobaplatin, and mitomycin C. The solvent in the stable emulsion arm was contrast medium and distilled water, and the solvent in the unstable emulsion arm was distilled water. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were time to progression (TTP), tumor response, adverse events (AEs), and plasma epirubicin concentrations. RESULTS: In vitro, stable emulsions did not occur until 1 day, and unstable emulsions, with a lower peak plasma concentration (P = .001) in vivo, exhibited rapid separation of the oil and aqueous phases after 10 minutes. Median OS times in the stable and unstable emulsion arms were 17.7 and 19.2 months, respectively (P = .81). No differences were found in TTP, tumor response, and AEs except for myelosuppression (anemia, 3.5% vs 7.6%; thrombocytopenia, 11.5% vs 17.7%), which was significantly more severe and frequent in the unstable emulsion arm (P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: Chemoembolization is equally effective with the use of stable and unstable emulsions, but the use of a stable emulsion has the advantage of less myelosuppression and a favorable pharmacokinetic profile.

Phase II Study of Sorafenib Combined with Concurrent Hepatic Arterial Infusion of Oxaliplatin, 5-Fluorouracil and Leucovorin for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Major Portal Vein Thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: Sorafenib is recommended for the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the median progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with HCC and major portal vein tumor thrombosis treated with sorafenib monotherapy is no more than 3 months. A prospective single-arm phase II study was conducted to determine whether adding hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy of oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin to sorafenib could improve on these results. METHODS: Thirty five patients were treated with sorafenib 400 mg orally twice a day, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 HAI on day 1, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 HAI on days 1, and 5-fluorouracil 2800 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2, repeated every 21 days. The primary end point was the 3-month PFS rate. RESULTS: The 3-, 6-, and 12-month PFS rates were 82.9, 51.4, and 22.9%, respectively. The median PFS and overall survival was 6.7 and 13.2 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 40%, and the disease control rate was 77.1% by RECIST criteria. Five (14.3%) patients achieved conversion to complete resection after the study treatment, and one of them experienced a pathological complete response. Treatment-related deaths did not occur. Grade 3-4 toxicities consisted of increases in aspartate aminotransferase (31.4%), hand-foot syndrome (17.1%), thrombocytopenia (14.3%), and neutropenia (8.6%). CONCLUSIONS: The combination treatment met the pre-specified end point of a 3-month progression free survival rate exceeding 65% and was clinical tolerable. The merits of this approach need to be established with a phase III trial. Clinical trial number http://ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT02981498).

Roles played by chemolipiodolization and embolization in chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: single-blind, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to compare the efficacy and safety of: 1) transarterial chemolipiodolization with gelatin sponge embolization vs chemolipiodolization without embolization, and 2) chemolipiodolization with triple chemotherapeutic agents vs epirubicin alone. METHODS: A single-blind, three parallel arm, randomized trial was conducted at three clinical centers with patients with biopsy-confirmed unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Arm 1 received triple-drug chemolipiodolization and sponge embolization, whereas Arm 2 received triple-drug chemolipiodolization only. Patients in arm 3 were treated with single-drug chemolipiodolization and sponge embolization. We compared overall survival and time to progression. Event-time distributions were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: From July 2007 to November 2009, 365 patients (Arm 1: n = 122; Arm 2: n = 121; Arm 3: n = 122) were recruited. The median tumor size was 10.9cm (range = 7-22cm), and 34.5% had macrovascular invasion. The median survivals and time to progression in Arm 1, Arm 2, and Arm 3 were 10.5 and 3.6 months, 10.1 and 3.1 months, and 5.9 and 3.1 months, respectively. Survival was statistically significantly better in Arm 1 than in Arm 3 (P < .001), whereas there was no statistically significant difference between Arm 1 and Arm 2 (P = .20). Objective response rates were 45.9%, 29.7%, and 18.9% for Arm 1, Arm 2, and Arm 3, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Chemolipiodolization played an important role in transarterial chemoembolization, and the choice of chemotherapy regimen may largely affect survival outcomes. However, the removal of embolization from chemoembolization might not statistically significantly decrease survival.