ABSTRACT
The Brown Widow spider (Latrodectus geometricus) is an invasive species whose geographic range has been expanding worldwide. It is a relative species of the Black Widow and Red-backed spiders of the genus Latrodectus. Despite its broad geographic distribution cases of Brown Widow envenomation have rarely been documented. The venom of L. geometricus is similar to the venom of L. mactans with the primary venom component being alpha-latrotoxin, and consequent envenoming by L. geometricus to humans has resulted in symptoms similar to those reported for other Latrodectus spp. Specific FDA approved Latrodectus antivenom (IgG) available in North America has been effectively used in treating venom-induced symptoms following L. mactans envenoming. The patient reported here involved a confirmed L. geometricus envenoming who was efficaciously treated with an alternately available F(ab')2 antivenom from Mexico.
Subject(s)
Antivenins/therapeutic use , Black Widow Spider , Receptors, Immunologic , Spider Bites/drug therapy , Animals , HumansABSTRACT
As a result of the widespread use of phototherapy, the need for neonatal exchange transfusion has declined markedly over the last 25 years. However, in spite of this, we have discovered a marked disparity in the number of requests for units of blood suitable for exchange transfusion made by neonatal units of similar size. A retrospective audit was therefore performed to establish current practice. A questionnaire was sent to consultant neonatologists and an audit trail of all units of blood issued from our Transfusion Centre for exchange transfusion over an 18-month period was followed. A significant finding was the large amount of overordering of blood by neonatologists, resulting in units produced expensively to high specification being given to other patients. Only 42% of the blood issued for exchange transfusions was actually used for that purpose. Also, published guidelines are not being adhered to, particularly with respect to the specification of the blood products being used. Better communication between neonatologists, hospital haematologists and transfusion medicine specialists would help to ensure that infants requiring exchange transfusion are given the best product and that valuable resources are not wasted.
Subject(s)
Blood Transfusion , Jaundice, Neonatal/therapy , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Retrospective Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
In this study we examined the ability of the furofuran lignan yangambin to influence the local and systemic responses induced by antigen or PAF in actively sensitized or normal rats. Given intraperitoneally 1 h before stimulation, yangambin inhibited the pleural neutrophil and eosinophil infiltration evoked by the i.pl. injection of PAF or antigen into normal or 14 daysensitized rats whereas plasma exudation evoked by both stimuli was unaffected. The pleural neutrophil influx (6 h) after LTB4 stimulation was also significantly inhibited by yangambin. We also evidenced that the hemoconcentration, thrombocytopenia, and leucocytosis noted after i.v. PAF were all attenuated by yangambin. In actively sensitized rats, pretreatment with yangambin failed to modify the antigen-induced hemoconcentration and leucocytosis, but dose-dependently abrogated the thrombocytopenia noted 1 h post-stimulation. In vitro, the anaphylactic contraction of longitudinal jejunal segments to antigen challenge was significantly inhibited by yangambin (10(-5)-10(-4) M). Likewise, the contraction of jejunal segments from normal rats to PAF was markedly blocked by yangambin under conditions where the response to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) was not altered. In conclusion, our results show that antigen- and PAF-induced pleural neutrophil and eosinophil accumulation, but not exudation, is sensitive to treatment with yangambin. In addition, yangambin also suppressed the pleural neutrophil infiltration triggered by LTB4 as well as the blood thrombocytopenia and intestinal anaphylaxis elicited by antigen in rats. Thus, our findings indicate that yangambin shows an antagonistic action on receptors other than those of PAF, i.e., LTB4, and strongly suggest that it may be a useful drug in the treatment of some allergic inflammatory responses.