Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters

Database
Language
Affiliation country
Publication year range
1.
Hear Res ; 370: 168-180, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30390569

ABSTRACT

This study examines temporal effects both at threshold and at supra-threshold levels. The level needed to detect a short-duration 4.0-kHz signal was measured for signals presented with different onset delays relative to a 300-ms broadband noise masker: 100 ms and 5 ms before the onset of the masker and 5 ms and 100 ms after the onset of the masker. Loudness matches between the signal in quiet and the signal at the same four onset delays were obtained for five presentation levels of the short-duration signal and for three masker levels. The temporal effect was defined as the level difference between the signals near masker onset and the signals well before or well after masker onset, needed to reach threshold and/or achieve equal loudness. Both at threshold and at supra-threshold levels temporal effects were observed consistent with a decrease in gain at the masker frequency during the course of the masker. The temporal effect was not restricted to simultaneous masking, but was also found for backward masking. In both cases the temporal effects were stronger at supra-threshold levels than at threshold. This may be caused by a transient effect at masker onset. The almost simultaneous onset of the signal and the masker makes it difficult for subjects to separate signal from the masker, especially when the signal level is close to masked threshold.


Subject(s)
Auditory Threshold , Loudness Perception , Noise/adverse effects , Perceptual Masking , Acoustic Stimulation , Humans , Psychoacoustics , Signal Detection, Psychological , Time Factors
2.
Trends Hear ; 22: 2331216518805690, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30353784

ABSTRACT

Aversiveness of loud sounds is a frequent complaint by hearing aid users, especially when fitted bilaterally. This study investigates whether loudness summation can be held responsible for this finding. Two aspects of loudness summation should be taken into account: spectral loudness summation for broadband signals and binaural loudness summation for signals that are presented binaurally. In this study, the effect of different symmetrical hearing losses was studied. Measurements were obtained with the widely used technique of Adaptive Categorical Loudness Scaling. For large bandwidths, spectral loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners was found to be greater than that for normal-hearing listeners, both for monaurally and binaurally presented signals. For binaural loudness summation, the effect of hearing loss was not significant. In all cases, individual differences were substantial.


Subject(s)
Correction of Hearing Impairment/instrumentation , Hearing Aids , Hearing Loss/rehabilitation , Hearing , Loudness Perception , Persons With Hearing Impairments/rehabilitation , Acoustic Stimulation , Aged , Audiometry, Pure-Tone , Case-Control Studies , Correction of Hearing Impairment/adverse effects , Electric Stimulation , Equipment Design , Female , Hearing Aids/adverse effects , Hearing Loss/diagnosis , Hearing Loss/physiopathology , Hearing Loss/psychology , Humans , Male , Persons With Hearing Impairments/psychology , Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL