ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: The mismatch negativity (MMN) and P300 event-related potentials (ERPs) have been studied in relation to phoneme discrimination and categorization, respectively. Although the effects of aging and sex on pure-tone perception have been widely investigated using these ERPs, evidence relating to phoneme perception is scarce. The current study aimed to provide insight into the effects of aging and sex on phoneme discrimination and categorization, as measured through the MMN and P300. METHOD: An inattentive and attentive oddball paradigm containing a phonemic articulation place contrast were administered during EEG registration in sixty healthy individuals (thirty males and females), of which an equal number of young (20-39 years), middle-aged (40-59 years) and elderly (60+ years) subjects were included. The amplitude, onset latency and topographical distribution of the MMN and P300 effect, as well as the amplitude of the P1-N1-P2 complex, were analyzed for age group and sex differences. RESULTS: With respect to aging, elderly subjects demonstrated a reduced MMN and P300 amplitude compared to the young group, whereas the scalp distribution of both components was unaffected. No aging effects on the P1-N1-P2 complex were found. In elderly individuals, the P300 was found to be delayed compared to the young group, while no such effect on MMN latency could be observed. No differences in MMN and P300 measures could be identified between males and females. CONCLUSION: Differential effects of aging were found on the MMN and P300, specifically in terms of latency, in relation to phoneme perception. In contrast, sex was found to scarcely affect both processes.
Subject(s)
Aging , Evoked Potentials , Middle Aged , Aged , Humans , Male , Female , Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Aging/physiology , Evoked Potentials/physiology , Cognition , Perception , Electroencephalography/methods , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Auditory Perception/physiologyABSTRACT
Auditory phoneme discrimination (APD) is supported by both auditory and motor regions through a sensorimotor interface embedded in a fronto-temporo-parietal cortical network. However, the specific spatiotemporal organization of this network during APD with respect to different types of phonemic contrasts is still unclear. Here, we use source reconstruction, applied to event-related potentials in a group of 47 participants, to uncover a potential spatiotemporal differentiation in these brain regions during a passive and active APD task with respect to place of articulation (PoA), voicing and manner of articulation (MoA). Results demonstrate that in an early stage (50-110 ms), auditory, motor and sensorimotor regions elicit more activation during the passive and active APD task with MoA and active APD task with voicing compared to PoA. In a later stage (130-175 ms), the same auditory and motor regions elicit more activation during the APD task with PoA compared to MoA and voicing, yet only in the active condition, implying important timing differences. Degree of attention influences a frontal network during the APD task with PoA, whereas auditory regions are more affected during the APD task with MoA and voicing. Based on these findings, it can be carefully suggested that APD is supported by the integration of early activation of auditory-acoustic properties in superior temporal regions, more perpetuated for MoA and voicing, and later auditory-to-motor integration in sensorimotor areas, more perpetuated for PoA.
Subject(s)
Acoustic Stimulation/methods , Auditory Cortex/physiology , Auditory Perception/physiology , Evoked Potentials, Auditory/physiology , Sensorimotor Cortex/physiology , Adult , Electroencephalography/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Psychomotor Performance/physiology , Speech Perception/physiology , Time FactorsABSTRACT
The mechanism of action of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is yet to be elucidated. To that end, the effects of VNS on the brain of epileptic patients were studied. Both when VNS was switched "On" and "Off", the brain activity of responders (R, seizure frequency reduction of over 50%) was compared to the brain activity of nonresponders (NR, seizure frequency reduction of less than 50%). Using EEG recordings, a significant increase in P300 amplitude for R and a significant decrease in P300 amplitude for NR were found. We found biomarkers for checking the efficacy of VNS with accuracy up to 94%. The results show that P300 features recorded in nonmidline electrodes are better P300 biomarkers for VNS efficacy than P300 features recorded in midline electrodes. Using source localization and connectivity analyses, the activity of the limbic system, insula and orbitofrontal cortex was found to be dependent on VNS switched "On" versus "Off" or patient group (R versus NR). The results suggest an important role for these areas in the mechanism of action of VNS, although a larger patient study should be done to confirm the findings.