Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
J Trauma Stress ; 35(5): 1420-1431, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35535472

ABSTRACT

There is no consensus on the treatment of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) during pregnancy, and therapists' views on the matter are largely unknown. This cross-sectional study aimed to explore therapist beliefs and experiences regarding PTSD treatment during pregnancy. Participants were therapists (N = 301) with experience treating PTSD who completed an online survey. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of therapists who were experienced in treating PTSD symptoms during pregnancy; secondary outcome measures assessed preferred treatments for the general and pregnant populations, perceived reluctance to treat PTSD in pregnancy, and perceived effects and adverse events attributed to treatment for pregnant women and fetuses. The majority of participants (n = 246, 81.7%) had experience with treating PTSD during pregnancy. Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing was the preferred treatment for both the general and the pregnant populations. Almost half of the sample (48.8%) reported hearing that PTSD treatment in pregnancy could be harmful; 30.5% of therapists were reluctant to treat pregnant women with PTSD. Most therapists observed a clinically relevant posttreatment reduction of PTSD symptoms in pregnant women. Perceived adverse maternal and fetal events attributed to treatment were reported by 8.4% and 1.4% of therapists, respectively. Despite reluctance, most therapists reported treating PTSD during pregnancy. The results show that although therapists often reported hearing that treating PTSD during pregnancy was harmful, only a small percentage reported perceived adverse events, and treatment was often viewed as effective. These findings implicate a more positive view on the treatment of PTSD in pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Waiting Lists
2.
Eur J Psychotraumatol ; 11(1): 1762310, 2020 Jul 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33029304

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: PTSD in pregnant women is associated with adverse outcomes for mothers and their children. It is unknown whether pregnant women with PTSD, or symptoms of PTSD, can receive targeted treatment that is safe and effective. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the present paper was to assess the effectiveness and safety of treatment for (symptoms of) PTSD in pregnant women. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines in Pubmed, Embase, PsychINFO, and Cochrane. In addition, a case is presented of a pregnant woman with PTSD who received eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing (EMDR) therapy aimed at processing the memories of a previous distressing childbirth. RESULTS: In total, 13 studies were included, involving eight types of interventions (i.e. trauma-focused cognitive behavioural therapy, exposure therapy, EMDR therapy, interpersonal psychotherapy, explorative therapy, self-hypnosis and relaxation, Survivor Moms Companion, and Seeking Safety Intervention). In three studies, the traumatic event pertained to a previous childbirth. Five studies reported obstetrical outcomes. After requesting additional information, authors of five studies indicated an absence of serious adverse events. PTSD symptoms improved in 10 studies. However, most studies carried a high risk of bias. In our case study, a pregnant woman with a PTSD diagnosis based on DSM-5 no longer fulfilled the criteria of PTSD after three sessions of EMDR therapy. She had an uncomplicated pregnancy and delivery. CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that case studies as the one presented here report no adverse events, and treatment is likely safe, due to the poor methodological quality of most studies it is impossible to allow inferences on the effects of any particular treatment of PTSD (symptoms) during pregnancy. Yet, given the elevated maternal stress and cortisol levels in pregnant women with PTSD, and the fact that so far no adverse effects on the unborn child have been reported associated with the application of trauma-focused therapy, treatment of PTSD during pregnancy is most likely safe.


Antecedentes: El TEPT en mujeres embarazadas se asocia con consecuencias adversas para las madres y sus hijos. Se desconoce si las mujeres que están embarazadas y sufren de TEPT, o síntomas de TEPT, pueden recibir un tratamiento dirigido que sea seguro y efectivo.Objetivo: El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar la efectividad y la seguridad del tratamiento para (síntomas de) TEPT en mujeres embarazadas.Método: Se realizó una revisión sistemática de acuerdo con las directrices PRISMA en Pubmed, Embase, PsychINFO y Cochrane. Además, se presenta un caso de una mujer embarazada con TEPT que recibió terapia de desensibilización y reprocesamiento por movimientos oculares (EMDR) destinada a procesar los recuerdos de un parto traumático anterior.Resultados: En total, se incluyeron 13 estudios, que incluyeron ocho tipos de intervenciones (es decir, terapia cognitivo conductual centrada en el trauma, terapia de exposición, terapia EMDR, psicoterapia interpersonal, terapia exploratoria, autohipnosis y relajación, Compañera de madres sobrevivientes e intervención de Búsqueda de Seguridad). En tres estudios, el evento traumático pertenecía a un parto previo. Cinco estudios informaron consecuencias obstétricas. Después de solicitar información adicional, los autores de cinco estudios indicaron la ausencia de eventos adversos graves. Los síntomas de TEPT mejoraron en diez estudios. Sin embargo, la mayoría de los estudios conllevaban un alto riesgo de sesgo. En nuestro estudio de caso, una mujer embarazada con diagnóstico de TEPT basado en DSM-5 ya no cumplía los criterios de TEPT después de tres sesiones de terapia EMDR. Ella tuvo un embarazo y parto sin complicaciones.Conclusión: Debido a la mala calidad metodológica de la mayoría de los estudios, es imposible permitir inferencias sobre los efectos de cualquier tratamiento particular de TEPT (síntomas) durante el embarazo. Sin embargo, dado el elevado nivel de estrés materno y los niveles de cortisol en mujeres embarazadas con TEPT, y el hecho de que hasta ahora no se han reportado efectos adversos en el feto asociados con la aplicación de terapia centrada en el trauma, el tratamiento del TEPT durante el embarazo es muy seguro.

3.
Women Birth ; 33(1): e95-e104, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30579925

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Women suffering from fear of childbirth and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder are often not recognised by health care professionals. AIM: To evaluate practices, knowledge and the attitudes of midwives towards women with fear of childbirth and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed amongst midwives who work in community practices and hospitals in the Netherlands with the use of a questionnaire purposefully designed for this research aim. FINDINGS: 257 midwives participated in the study, of whom 217 completed all items in the questionnaire. Midwives were better equipped to answer knowledge questions concerning fear of childbirth than posttraumatic stress disorder (regarding symptomatology, risk factors, consequences and treatment). When tending to women with fear of childbirth or (suspected) postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder, most midwives referred to another caregiver (e.g. psychologist). Most midwives expressed a positive and compassionate attitude towards women with fear of childbirth and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder. DISCUSSION: The majority of midwives are well informed with respect to fear of childbirth, but knowledge of important aspects of postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder is often lacking. Midwives report no crucial issues related to their attitudes towards women with fear of childbirth and posttraumatic stress disorder. Most midwives provide adequate organisation of care and support. CONCLUSION: Midwives should acquire more in depth knowledge of fear of childbirth and postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder. This can be achieved by including the two conditions in the program of midwifery education.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Nurse Midwives/psychology , Parturition/psychology , Prenatal Care/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Delivery, Obstetric/psychology , Fear/psychology , Female , Humans , Midwifery/methods , Netherlands , Postpartum Period/psychology , Pregnancy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Birth ; 39(1): 70-6, 2012 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22369608

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: No standard intervention with proved effectiveness is available for women with posttraumatic stress following childbirth because of insufficient research. The objective of this paper was to evaluate the possibility of using eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing treatment for women with symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder following childbirth. The treatment is internationally recognized as one of the interventions of choice for the condition, but little is known about its effects in women who experienced the delivery as traumatic. METHODS: Three women suffering from posttraumatic stress symptoms following the birth of their first child were treated with eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing during their next pregnancy. Patient A developed posttraumatic stress symptoms following the lengthy labor of her first child that ended in an emergency cesarean section after unsuccessful vacuum extraction. Patient B suffered a second degree vaginal rupture, resulting in pain and inability to engage in sexual intercourse for years. Patient C developed severe preeclampsia postpartum requiring intravenous treatment. RESULTS: Patients received eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing treatment during their second pregnancy, using the standard protocol. The treatment resulted in fewer posttraumatic stress symptoms and more confidence about their pregnancy and upcoming delivery compared with before the treatment. Despite delivery complications in Patient A (secondary cesarean section due to insufficient engaging of the fetal head); Patient B (second degree vaginal rupture, this time without subsequent dyspareunia); and Patient C (postpartum hemorrhage, postpartum hypertension requiring intravenous treatment), all three women looked back positively at the second delivery experience. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing reduced posttraumatic stress symptoms in these three women. They were all sufficiently confident to attempt vaginal birth rather than demanding an elective cesarean section. We advocate a large-scale, randomized controlled trial involving women with postpartum posttraumatic stress disorder to evaluate the effect of eye-movement desensitization and reprocessing in this patient group.


Subject(s)
Dystocia/psychology , Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing , Parturition/psychology , Postpartum Period/psychology , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Adult , Female , Humans , Pregnancy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL