Differential effects of cyclo-oxygenase 1 and 2 inhibition on angiogenesis inhibitor-induced hypertension and kidney damage.

Vascular endothelial growth factor antagonism with angiogenesis inhibitors in cancer patients induces a 'preeclampsia-like' syndrome including hypertension, proteinuria and elevated endothelin (ET)-1. Cyclo-oxygenase (COX) inhibition with aspirin is known to prevent the onset of preeclampsia in high-risk patients. In the present study, we hypothesised that treatment with aspirin would prevent the development of angiogenesis inhibitor-induced hypertension and kidney damage. Our aims were to compare the effects of low-dose (COX-1 inhibition) and high-dose (dual COX-1 and COX-2 inhibition) aspirin on blood pressure, vascular function, oxidative stress, ET-1 and prostanoid levels and kidney damage during angiogenesis-inhibitor therapy in rodents. To this end, Wistar Kyoto rats were treated with vehicle, angiogenesis inhibitor (sunitinib) alone or in combination with low- or high-dose aspirin for 8 days (n=5-7/group). Our results demonstrated that prostacyclin (PGI2) and ET-1 were increased during angiogenesis-inhibitor therapy, while thromboxane (TXA2) was unchanged. Both low- and high-dose aspirin blunted angiogenesis inhibitor-induced hypertension and vascular superoxide production to a similar extent, whereas only high-dose aspirin prevented albuminuria. While circulating TXA2 and prostaglandin F2α levels were reduced by both low- and high-dose aspirin, circulating and urinary levels PGI2 were only reduced by high-dose aspirin. Lastly, treatment with aspirin did not significantly affect ET-1 or vascular function. Collectively our findings suggest that prostanoids contribute to the development of angiogenesis inhibitor-induced hypertension and renal damage and that targeting the prostanoid pathway could be an effective strategy to mitigate the unwanted cardiovascular and renal toxicities associated with angiogenesis inhibitors.

Transfer and Vascular Effect of Endothelin Receptor Antagonists in the Human Placenta.

Increasing evidence suggests a role for the ET (endothelin) system in preeclampsia. Hence, blocking this system with endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) could be a therapeutic strategy. Yet, clinical studies are lacking due to possible teratogenic effects of ERAs. In this study, we investigated the placental transfer of ERAs and their effect on ET-1-mediated vasoconstriction. Term placentas were dually perfused with the selective ETAR (ET type A receptor) antagonists sitaxentan and ambrisentan or the nonselective ETAR/ETBR antagonist macitentan and subsequently exposed to ET-1 in the fetal circulation. ET-1 concentration-response curves after incubation with sitaxentan, ambrisentan, macitentan, or the selective ETBR antagonist BQ-788 were also constructed in isolated chorionic plate arteries using wire-myography, and gene expression of the ET-system was quantified in healthy and early onset preeclamptic placentas. At steady state, the mean fetal-to-maternal transfer ratios were 0.32±0.05 for sitaxentan, 0.21±0.02 for ambrisentan, and 0.05±0.01 for macitentan. Except for BQ-788, all ERAs lowered the response to ET-1, both in the perfused cotyledon and isolated chorionic plate arteries. Placental gene expression of ECE-1, ETAR, and ETBR were comparable in healthy and preeclamptic placentas, while ET-1 expression was higher in preeclampsia. Our study is the first to show direct transfer of ERAs across the term human placenta. Furthermore, ETAR exclusively mediates ET-1-induced constriction in the fetoplacental vasculature. Given its limited transfer, macitentan could be considered as potential preeclampsia therapy. Extending knowledge on placental transfer to placentas of preeclamptic pregnancies is required to determine whether ERAs might be applied safely in preeclampsia.

Effects of 2-year vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation in hyperhomocysteinemic elderly on arterial stiffness and cardiovascular outcomes within the B-PROOF trial.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperhomocysteinemia is an important cardiovascular risk indicator in the oldest old, and is associated with elevated arterial stiffness in this age group. Since several intervention trials reported a lack of benefit of B-vitamin supplementation on cardiovascular outcomes, we aimed to investigate the effect of B-vitamin supplementation on arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis in hyperhomocysteinemic elderly patients. METHODS: The B-PROOF study is a double-blind, randomized controlled trial, including 2919 elderly aged at least 65 years, with hyperhomocysteinemia (12-50  µmol/l), treated with B-vitamins (500  µg vitamin B12 and 400  µg folic acid) or placebo for 2 years. In a subgroup (n = 569), the effect of B-vitamins on pulse wave velocity (PWV) was investigated as a measurement of arterial stiffness. To measure atherosclerosis, carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) measures had been used. Incidents of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events were determined via structured questionnaires, and blood pressure was also measured. RESULTS: Compared to placebo, B-vitamin supplementation lowered serum homocysteine by 3.6  µmol/l (P < 0.001). Analysis of covariance showed no effect of supplementation on PWV levels, and this was not different for patients without increased arterial stiffness at baseline. Furthermore, no effect on carotid IMT was observed. DISCUSSION: Vitamin B12 and folic acid supplementation in hyperhomocysteinemic elderly patients have no effect on PWV or carotid IMT. Further research will still be necessary to unravel the effects and pathways of homocysteine-lowering treatment on cardiovascular outcomes.

Hypertension: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system alterations.

Blockers of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS), that is, renin inhibitors, angiotensin (Ang)-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, Ang II type 1 receptor antagonists, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, are a cornerstone in the treatment of hypertension. How exactly they exert their effect, in particular in patients with low circulating RAAS activity, also taking into consideration the so-called Ang II/aldosterone escape that often occurs after initial blockade, is still incompletely understood. Multiple studies have tried to find parameters that predict the response to RAAS blockade, allowing a personalized treatment approach. Consequently, the question should now be answered on what basis (eg, sex, ethnicity, age, salt intake, baseline renin, ACE or aldosterone, and genetic variance) a RAAS blocker can be chosen to treat an individual patient. Are all blockers equal? Does optimal blockade imply maximum RAAS blockade, for example, by combining ≥2 RAAS blockers or by simply increasing the dose of 1 blocker? Exciting recent investigations reveal a range of unanticipated extrarenal effects of aldosterone, as well as a detailed insight in the genetic causes of primary aldosteronism, and mineralocorticoid receptor blockers have now become an important treatment option for resistant hypertension. Finally, apart from the deleterious ACE-Ang II-Ang II type 1 receptor arm, animal studies support the existence of protective aminopeptidase A-Ang III-Ang II type 2 receptor and ACE2-Ang-(1 to 7)-Mas receptor arms, paving the way for multiple new treatment options. This review provides an update about all these aspects, critically discussing the many controversies and allowing the reader to obtain a full understanding of what we currently know about RAAS alterations in hypertension.