Robotic-assisted laparoscopic Malone appendicostomy: a 6-year perspective.

PURPOSE: A robotic-assisted laparoscopic approach to appendicostomy offers the benefits of a minimally invasive approach to patients who would typically necessitate an open procedure, those with a larger body habitus, and those requiring combined complex colorectal and urologic reconstructive procedures. We present our experience performing robotic-assisted appendicostomies with a focus on patient selection, perioperative factors, and functional outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of patients who underwent a robotic-assisted appendicostomy/neoappendicostomy at our institution was performed. RESULTS: Twelve patients underwent robotic-assisted appendicostomy (n = 8) and neoappendicostomy (n = 4) at a range of 8.8-25.8 years. Five patients had a weight percentile > 50% for their age. Seven patients underwent combined procedures. Median operative time for appendicostomy/neoappendicostomy only was 185.0 min. Complications included surgical site infection (n = 3), stricture requiring minor operative revision (n = 2), conversion to an open procedure due to inadequate appendiceal length (prior to developing our technique for robotic neoappendicostomies; n = 1), and granuloma (n = 1). At a median follow-up of 10.8 months (range 1.7-74.3 months), 91.7% of patients were consistently clean with antegrade enemas. DISCUSSION: Robotic-assisted laparoscopic appendicostomy and neoappendicostomy with cecal flap is a safe and effective operative approach. A robotic approach can potentially overcome the technical difficulties encountered in obese patients and can aid in patients requiring both a Malone and a Mitrofanoff in a single, combined minimally invasive procedure.

Outcomes of children with constipation and autism spectrum disorder treated with antegrade continence enemas.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of functional constipation (FC) in children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is challenging due to sensory and behavioral issues. We aimed to understand whether antegrade continence enemas (ACEs) are successful in the treatment of FC in children with ASD. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was performed in children diagnosed with ASD and FC who underwent appendicostomy or cecostomy placement from 2007 to 2019. Descriptive statistics regarding soiling and complications were calculated. RESULTS: There were 33 patients included, with a median age of 9.7 years at the time of ACE initiation. The average intelligence quotient was 63.6 (SD = 18.0, n = 12), the average behavioral adaptive score was 59.9 (SD = 11.1, n = 13), and the average total Child Behavioral Checklist score was 72.5 (SD = 7.1, n = 10). Soiling rates were significantly lower following ACE initiation (42.3% vs. 14.8%, p = 0.04). Behavioral issues only prevented 1 patient (3.0%) from proper ACE use. Eleven patients (36.6%) were able to transition to laxatives. There were significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes measures and quality of life. CONCLUSION: Placement of an appendicostomy or cecostomy for management of FC in children with severe ASD was successful in treating constipation and improving quality of life.

Wandering Spleen in a Patient With Significant Medical History.

The clinical presentation of a wandering spleen is characterized mainly by unspecific acute symptoms, ranging from diffuse abdominal pain to left upper/lower quadrant and referred shoulder pain to asymptomatic. This has challenged accelerated medical care and impeded the acquisition of confirmatory diagnosis; therefore, increasing morbidity and mortality risks. Splenectomy is an established operative procedure for a wandering spleen. However, there has not been enough literature emphasizing the clinical history of congenital malformations and surgical corrections as inferential tools for facilitating a decisive and informed procedure. The case presented is of a 22-year-old female who reported to the emergency department with a five-day persistent left upper quadrant and left lower quadrant (LLQ) abdominal pain, associated with nausea. According to the medical history, the patient had a significant history of vertebral defects, anal atresia, cardiac anomalies, tracheoesophageal fistula, renal anomalies, and limb abnormalities (VACTERL) associated with congenital anomalies. By the age of eight years, the patient had undergone multiple surgical interventions, including tetralogy of Fallot repair, an imperforate anal repair with rectal pull-through, Malone antegrade continence enema (MACE), and bowel vaginoplasty. Computed tomography imaging of the abdomen revealed evidence of a wandering spleen in the LLQ with associated torsion of the splenic vasculature (whirl sign). Intra-operatively, appendicostomy was identified extending from the cecum in a near mid-line position, to the umbilicus, and carefully incised distally, preventing injury to the appendicostomy. The spleen was identified in the pelvis, and the individual vessels were clamped, divided, and ligated. Blood loss was minimal with no post-operative complications. This rare case report adds valuable teaching points about the treatment of wandering spleen in individuals with VACTERL anomalies.

Impact of antegrade enema initiation on healthcare utilization in pediatric patients: A population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: When constipation is refractory to first-line interventions, antegrade enema use may be considered. We aimed to assess the impact of this intervention on healthcare utilization. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, quasi-experimental study with pre-post comparison of the intervention group and a non-equivalent control group using linked clinical and health administrative data from Ontario, Canada. Subjects included children (0-18 years) who underwent antegrade enema initiation from 2007 to 2020 and matched controls (4:1) from the general population. To assess the change in healthcare utilization following antegrade enema initiation, we used negative binomial generalized estimating equations with covariates selected a priori. KEY RESULTS: One hundred thirty-eight subjects met eligibility criteria (appendicostomy = 55 (39.9%); cecostomy tube = 83 (60.1%)) and were matched to 550 controls. There was no significant difference in the change in the rate of hospitalizations (rate ratio (RR) 1.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.35-1.75), outpatient visits (RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.91-1.18), or same-day surgical procedures (RR 1.51, 95% CI 0.60-2.43) across cases in 2 years following antegrade enema initiation compared with controls. Cases had an increased rate of emergency department (ED) visits, which was not observed in controls (RR 1.52, 95% CI 1.11-1.79), driven in part by device-related complications. CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Understanding healthcare utilization patterns following antegrade enema initiation allows for effective health system planning and aids medical decision-making. The observed increase in ED visits for device-related complications speaks to the need to improve preventive management to help mitigate emergency care after initiation of antegrade enemas.

Functional constipation refractory to medical management: The colon is the problem.

BACKGROUND: Management of refractory constipation in children has not been standardized. We propose a protocolized approach which includes a contrast enema, anorectal manometry and exclusion of Hirschsprung disease (HD). For those without HD or with normal sphincters, an assessment of the colonic motility may be needed. The subgroups of dysmotility include (1) slow motility with contractions throughout, (2) segmental dysmotility (usually the sigmoid), or (3) a diffusely inert colon. We offered a Malone appendicostomy in all groups with the hope that this would avoid colonic resection in most cases. METHODS: Patients with medically refractory constipation were reviewed at a single institution (2020 to 2021). For patients without HD or an anal sphincter problem, assessment of colonic motility using colonic manometry was performed followed by a Malone appendicostomy for antegrade flushes. RESULTS: Of 196 patients evaluated for constipation refractory to medical management, 22 were felt to have a colonic motility cause. These patients underwent colonic manometry and Malone appendicostomy. 13 patients (59%) had a slow colon but with HAPCs throughout, 5 (23%) had segmental dysmotility, and 4 (18%) had a diffuse colonic dysmotility. 19 (86%) responded well to antegrade flushes with 17 reporting no soiling and 2 having occasional accidents. 3 patients (14%) failed flushes and underwent a colon resection within 6-month following Malone procedure. CONCLUSION: We propose a protocol for medically refractory constipation which provides a collaborative framework to standardize evaluation and management of these patients with antegrade flushes, which aids in avoidance of colonic resection in most cases. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Do preoperative factors predict success of antegrade continence enemas in children?

INTRODUCTION: Antegrade continent enemas (ACE) procedures are one treatment option in children with medically refractory constipation or encopresis and predicting success is difficult. We hypothesize that there are preoperative factors that can be identified to help with patient selection and family counseling. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of children who underwent a cecostomy or appendicostomy for an ACE program between 2015 and 2021. Underlying diagnosis, pre-operative bowel regimen and imaging were analyzed. Patients were reviewed for success at 3-, 6- and 12-months post-procedure. Data was analyzed with Fisher's Exact, Kruskal-Wallis and logistic regression where applicable with significance defined as p < 0.05. RESULTS: Forty-three children were identified; 28 were male, 15 were female, mean age at time of operation was 8 years old. 76% were considered successful at 3-months, 86% at 6-months, and 87% at 12-months post- procedure. Univariate analysis showed that a pre-ACE retrograde enema program predicted success at 3-months (94% vs. 64% p = 0.03) but no difference at 6- or 12-months. At one year after ACE procedure there was a significant reduction in number of enteral medications (2 to 0, p < 0.01) and 94% of patients were on one or fewer at one year follow-up. Age, gender, weight at time of operation, contrast enema, anorectal manometry and colonic transit time results were not predictive of outcomes. CONCLUSION: In this study, we characterized expected time to success in our population as well as identified use of a pre-operative retrograde enema program as a potential predictor of success at 3-months in children undergoing an ACE procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV. TYPE OF STUDY: Prognosis study.

A Rare Complication of Appendicostomy.

Teaching Point: The acute appendicitis in a context of Malone appendicostomy complication is very rare but can occur and may be challenging to diagnose due to its unusual position.

Antegrade continence enemas in children with functional constipation and dyssynergic defecation: Go or no go?

OBJECTIVE: To assess outcomes of children with functional constipation after antegrade continence enemas (ACEs) and determine if pre operative anorectal manometry (AMAN) findings, including dyssynergic defecation, are associated with outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of pediatric patients with functional constipation who received a Malone appendicostomy or cecostomy after failed medical management was conducted. Patients were included if they had AMAN data prior to their operation. Patients that underwent colonic resection were excluded. Demographics, clinical characteristics, manometry results, and post ACE outcomes were obtained. Descriptive statistics were performed. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were identified with median age at ACE of 8.9 years (IQR: 7.2-12.6) and median follow-up of 2.5 years (IQR: 1.8-3.2 years). Twenty patients (51%) were female and most (35, 92%) were White. All patients had severe constipation prior to ACE and 59% had fecal incontinence. Thirty-four patients (87%) received a Malone and 5 (13%) received a cecostomy. Post ACE, 35 (90%) were clean with daily flushes and 6 (15%) eventually successfully transitioned to laxatives only. Awake AMAN and balloon expulsion test were performed in 15 patients, with 14 (93%) displaying evidence of dyssynergic defecation. Twelve of 14 of patients (86%) with dyssynergia were clean with ACE at follow-up. because of the majority of patients being clean post ACE, there was limited power to detect predictors of poor outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: ACEs are successful treatment options for patients with severe constipation and fecal incontinence, including those with dyssynergic defecation. Larger studies are needed to identify factors predictive of poor outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Single institution review of Mini-ACE® low-profile appendicostomy button for antegrade continence enema administration.

PURPOSE: Malone antegrade continence enemas (MACE) provide a conduit in which the patient can achieve improved continence, be clean of stool, and gain independence in maintaining bowel function. The Mini-ACE® is a low-profile balloon button that is used to facilitate the administration of antegrade enemas. We sought to describe our practice and short-term outcomes. METHODS: This work is a retrospective review of the Mini-ACE® appendicostomy button from April 2019 to March 2021, with follow-up concluding in October 2021. Patient demographics, colorectal diagnoses, and outcomes were examined. RESULTS: Forty-three patients underwent Mini-ACE® placement; 22 (51%) were male. The average age at Mini-ACE® insertion was 9.2 years (range 3-20 years). The most common diagnoses were functional constipation in 19 (44%), anorectal malformation in 15 (35%), and Hirschsprung disease in 3 (7%), spinal differences 3 (7%). There were no intra-operative complications, but 5 (12%) required prolapse resection. The median length of stay was two days (IQR 1, 4). Patients achieved self-catheterization at 4.5 [3,7] months from MACE creation, with 38 children (88%) reporting excellent success in remaining clean of stool. CONCLUSION: The Mini-ACE® appears to be a safe and low-profile option for antegrade continence enema access. Further research is needed directly comparing complications and patient satisfaction rates between different MACE devices and overall quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Use of expedited post-operative protocol for children undergoing appendicostomy reduces length of hospitalization.

BACKGROUND: An appendicostomy (ACE) is a surgical option for antegrade enemas in children with severe constipation and/or fecal incontinence who have failed medical management.  In 2019, we initiated an expedited post-operative protocol and sought to examine our short-term outcomes compared with our historical cohort. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all children undergoing ACE between 2017 and 2020. Children were excluded if they underwent an associated procedure (e.g. colon resection). Patients were divided into two cohorts: historical cohort (2017-2018, Group A) and the expedited protocol (2019 to present, Group B). The primary outcome was length of stay. RESULTS: 30 patients met inclusion (Group A = 16, Group B = 14). The most common indications for ACE were constipation (50%) and constipation or fecal incontinence associated with anorectal malformation (43%). Group B experienced a decreased length of stay (1 vs 3 days, P = 0.001) without differences in 30-day surgical site infection (7.1% vs 18.8%, p = 0.61) or unplanned visit (15.4% vs 18.8%, p = 1.0). Group B had a higher prevalence of MiniACE® button placed through the appendix vs. Malone (42.8% vs 12.5%, p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: Our expedited post-op protocol decreased length of stay without other significant adverse clinical sequelae. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective Comparative Study, Level III.

Reducing Constipation-Related Admissions: The Effectiveness of Antegrade Continence Enema Procedures in Children.

INTRODUCTION: Constipation in pediatrics remains a common problem. Antegrade continence enema (ACE) procedures have been shown to decrease the distress of daily therapy. Patients are able to administer more aggressive washouts in the outpatient setting. Therefore, we hypothesize that patients following an ACE procedure would have reduced admissions for constipation. METHODS: Patients who underwent an ACE procedure at a large children's hospital from 2015 to 2018 were included. Demographics, diagnosis, procedure, and preoperative/postoperative hospital admissions were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were included in the study. Over half were diagnosed with idiopathic constipation. Majority of patients underwent an appendicostomy (88%, n = 42). Preoperatively, 26 patients were admitted for a combined total of 63 times for constipation. Postoperatively, 4 patients were admitted for a total of 5 visits (P = .021). Twenty-eight patients required a nonscheduled appendicostomy tube replacement. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates ACE procedures can improve constipation-related symptoms in children and are associated with decrease hospital admissions.

Optimization of Pediatric Bowel Management Using an Antegrade Enema Troubleshooting Algorithm.

BACKGROUND: A successful flush is the ability to flush through the appendicostomy or cecostomy channel, empty the flush through the colon, and achieve fecal cleanliness. We evaluated our experience with patients who were having flush difficulties based on a designed algorithm. METHODS: Eight patients with flush difficulties were initially evaluated. Based on the need for additional surgery versus changes in bowel management therapy (BMT), we developed an algorithm to guide future management. The algorithm divided flush issues into before, during, and after flushing. Children aged <20 y who presented with flush issues from September 2018 to August 2019 were evaluated to determine our algorithm's efficacy. Specific outcomes analyzed included changes in BMT versus need for additional surgery. RESULTS: After algorithm creation, 29 patients were evaluated for flush issues. The median age was 8.4 y (interquartile range: 6, 14); 66% (n = 19) were men. Underlying diagnoses included anorectal malformations (n = 17), functional constipation (n = 7), Hirschsprung's disease (n = 2), spina bifida (n = 2), and prune belly (n = 1). A total of 35 flush issues/complaints were noted: 29% before the flush, 9% during the flush, and 63% after the flush. Eighty percent of issues before the flush required surgical intervention, wherease 92% of issues during or after the flush were managed with changes in BMT. CONCLUSIONS: Most flush issues respond to changes in BMT. This algorithm can help delineate which types of flush issues would benefit from surgical intervention and what problems might be present if patients are not responding to changes in their flush regimen.

Tube cecostomy versus appendicostomy for antegrade enemas in the management of fecal incontinence in children: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have directly compared between cecostomy and appendicostomy for the management of fecal incontinence in pediatric population. This systematic review of the literature describes outcomes and complications following both procedures. We also reviewed studies reporting impact on quality of life and patient satisfaction. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar were searched for chronic constipation pediatric patients who underwent cecostomy or appendicostomy. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality. RESULTS: An initial literature search retrieved 633 citations. After review of all abstracts, 40 studies were included in the final analysis, assessing a total of 2086 patients. The overall rate of complications was lower in the cecostomy group compared to the appendicostomy group (16.6% and 42.3%, respectively). Achievement of fecal continence and improvement in patient quality of life were found to be similar in both groups, however the need for revision of surgery was approximately 15% higher in the appendicostomy group. CONCLUSION: Cecostomy has less post procedural complications, however rates of patient satisfaction and impact on quality of life were similar following both procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

A comparison of surgical complications after appendicostomy and neoappendicostomy in pediatric patients.

PURPOSE: There are limited data on neoappendicostomy complications owing to small patient populations. This study compares appendicostomy and neoappendicostomy procedures with an emphasis on major postoperative complications requiring either a surgical or interventional radiology procedure. METHOD: A single-institution retrospective review included all patients with complete medical charts in the Cincinnati Children's Colorectal Database who underwent either an appendicostomy or neoappendicostomy from August 2005 through December 2016. Demographics, details of the procedure, and major postoperative complications were evaluated. RESULTS: 261 patients (appendicostomy n = 208, neoappendicostomy n = 53) with a median follow up time of 2.5 years resulted in 84 patients (appendicostomy n = 60, neoappendicostomy n = 24) experiencing a total of 118 complications requiring surgical or radiologic intervention with a significant difference between the groups (29% vs 45%, RR = 1.79 (95% CI: 1.24-2.60), p < 0.01). Skin level stricture was the most common complication (20% appendicostomies vs 30% neoappendicostomies, p = 0.13). CONCLUSIONS: Appendicostomies and neoappendicostomies can be an effective way to manage fecal incontinence; however, 32% of our patients experienced a complication that required either a surgical or interventional radiology procedure. Patients need to be informed of the possible complications that are associated with appendicostomy and neoappendicostomy construction. TYPE OF STUDY: Single institution retrospective review. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Primary placement of a skin-level Cecostomy Tube for Antegrade Colonic Enema Administration Using a Modification of the Laparoscopic-Assisted Percutaneous Endoscopic Cecostomy (LAPEC).

PURPOSE: Children failing medical management for severe constipation and/or fecal incontinence may undergo surgical intervention for antegrade enema administration. We present a modification of the laparoscopic-assisted percutaneous endoscopic cecostomy (LAPEC) procedure that allows primary placement of a skin-level device. METHODS: A single-institution retrospective review was performed from 2009 to 2015. In the modified technique the colonoscope is advanced to the cecum, cecal suspension sutures are placed under laparoscopic visualization, and percutaneous needle puncture of the cecum is performed under direct laparoscopic and endoscopic visualization. A skin-level cecostomy tube is then placed over a guide wire. Patient characteristics and 30-day results were analyzed by Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients underwent attempted LAPEC. Successful LAPEC using both laparoscopic and endoscopic guidance was achieved in 46 (88.5%). A MIC-KEY device was placed in 38. Corflo PEG tube placement was necessary in 14 due to high BMI (mean 28.4). Colonoscopy failed to reach the cecum in 6 and laparoscopy alone was utilized to achieve successful tube placement. Cecostomy site infections occurred in 3 (5.8%), only in those undergoing PEG placement using a pull technique (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Primary placement of a skin-level device was successful in the majority of patients undergoing cecostomy tube placement for bowel management utilizing antegrade colonic enemas. This technique avoids a second anesthesia for tube conversion. Visualization via colonoscopy with the use of cecal suspension sutures is recommended. High BMI necessitates initial placement of a PEG tube and complications exclusively occurred in this group. TYPE OF STUDY: Clinical. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV Case series study.

A comparison of Malone appendicostomy and cecostomy for antegrade access as adjuncts to a bowel management program for patients with functional constipation or fecal incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Appendicostomy and cecostomy are two approaches for antegrade enema access for children with severe constipation or fecal incontinence as adjuncts to a mechanical bowel management program. Each technique is associated with a unique set of complications. The purpose of our study was to report the rates of various complications associated with antegrade enema access techniques to help guide which option a clinician offers to their patients. METHODS: We reviewed all patients in our Center who received an appendicostomy or cecostomy from 2014 to 2017 who were participants in our bowel management program. RESULTS: 204 patients underwent an antegrade access procedure (150 appendicostomies and 54 cecostomies). Skin-level leakage (3% vs. 22%) and wound infections (7% vs. 28%) occurred less frequently in patients with appendicostomy compared to cecostomy. Nineteen (13%) appendicostomies required revision for stenosis, 4 (3%) for mucosal prolapse, and 1 (1%) for leakage. The rates of stenosis (33 vs. 12%) and wound infection (13 vs. 6%) were higher in patients who received a neoappendicostomy compared to an in situ appendicostomy. Intervention was needed in 19 (35%) cecostomy patients, 15 (28%) for an inability to flush or a dislodged tube, and 5 for major complications including intraperitoneal spillage in 4 (7%) and 1 (2%) for a tube misplaced in the ileum, all occurring in patients with a percutaneously placed cecostomy. One appendicostomy (1%) patient required laparoscopic revision after the appendicostomy detached from the skin. CONCLUSION: Patients had a lower rate of minor and major complications after appendicostomy compared to cecostomy. The unique complication profile of each technique should be considered for patients needing these procedures as an adjunct to their care for constipation or fecal incontinence. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Laparoscopic Appendicostomy Low-Profile Balloon Button for Antegrade Enemas in Children.

INTRODUCTION: The Malone appendicostomy is a continent channel used for antegrade enemas. It requires daily cannulation and is susceptible to stenosis. We use an indwelling low-profile balloon button tube inserted through the appendix into the cecum for antegrade enemas. We hypothesized that this method is effective at managing constipation or fecal incontinence and is associated with a low rate of stenosis. METHODS: Children who underwent laparoscopic appendicostomy balloon button placement at our institution from January 2011 to April 2017 were identified. The primary outcome was success in managing constipation or fecal continence as measured by the Malone continence scale. Postoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Thirty-six children underwent the procedure, 35 of which met the inclusion criteria. Thirty-one patients (88.5%) underwent the operation for idiopathic constipation, 3 patients (8.6%) for anorectal malformation, and 1 patient (2.9%) for hypermobility. Rate of open conversion was 3%. A full response was obtained in 24 patients (68.6%), partial response in 9 patients (25.7%), and 2 patients failed (5.7%). One patient developed an internal hernia requiring laparotomy and later developed mucosal prolapse. One patient developed a stricture noted at button change. Seven patients (20%) underwent reversal of their appendicostomy tube: 5 due to return of normal bowel function and 2 due to discomfort with flushes. CONCLUSION: A laparoscopic appendicostomy with a balloon button tube is an effective means of addressing chronic constipation or fecal incontinence. The stenosis rate associated with tube appendicostomy may be lower than those reported for Malone antegrade continence enema procedures.

New surgical technique for creation of a continent appendicostomy: Invaginated appendicostomy.

INTRODUCTION: The main complications of appendicostomy are stenosis and stomal fecal leakage. Although many authors report that the appendix is naturally continent, it is recommended to perform a plication of the cecum with the appendix to prevent stomal fecal leakage. We present here the creation of a different continent mechanism. Our technique is advantageous when the anatomy, vascularity, or the length of the appendix does not allow for a standard plication procedure. DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIVE TECHNIQUE: During 2014-2016 we performed four appendicostomies in patients with anorectal malformations with fecal incontinence that requested an "Antegrade Continent Enema" procedure after a successful bowel management program in the Colorectal Center for Children of Mexico. The average age at surgery was 13years. All patients had anorectal malformations with a poor prognosis for proper control of defecation, with a sacral ratio lower than 0.4. In these patients, we invaginated a 1cm length of the appendix at its base, placing eight circumferential stitches with 5-0 silk. None of the patients experienced leakage when a saline solution was introduced with a catheter into the cecum during the surgical procedure. After an average of 15months of follow-up, none of the patients were experiencing stomal leakage. CONCLUSIONS: The "Invaginated Appendicostomy" is a reproducible and effective continent mechanism to prevent stomal fecal leakage. It appears to be an excellent alternative to cecal plication around the appendix.

Sacral nerve stimulation allows for decreased antegrade continence enema use in children with severe constipation.

BACKGROUND: Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) can be beneficial for children with constipation, but no studies have focused on children with constipation severe enough to require antegrade continence enemas (ACEs). Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of SNS in children with constipation treated with ACE. METHODS: Using a prospective patient registry, we identified patients <21years old who were receiving ACE prior to SNS placement. We compared ACE/laxative usage, PedsQL Gastrointestinal Symptom Scale (GSS), Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale (FIQL), Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), and Vancouver Dysfunctional Elimination Syndrome Score (DES) at baseline and progressive follow-up time intervals. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (55% male, median 12years) were included. Median ACE frequency decreased from 7 per week at baseline to 1 per week at 12months (p<0.0001). Ten children (45%) had their cecostomy/appendicostomy closed. Laxative use, GSS, FIQL, and DES did not change. FISI improved over the first 12months with statistical significance reached only at 6months (p=0.02). Six (27%) children experienced complications after SNS that required further surgery. CONCLUSIONS: In children with severe constipation dependent on ACE, SNS led to a steady decrease in ACE usage with nearly half of patients receiving cecostomy/appendicostomy closure within 2years. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.