Efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with sodium hyaluronate in treatment of knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) combined with sodium hyaluronate (HA) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (KOA). METHODS: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang database, China Science and Technology Journal Database, and SinoMed were searched from inception to July 2020. The quality of the randomized controlled trials was evaluated independently by two reviewers according to the criteria in the Cochrane Collaboration for Systematic Reviews. The identified articles were then screened individually using EndnoteX9 for eligibility in this Meta-analysis. The heterogeneity among the articles was evaluated using I2. RESULTS: A total of 17 studies, comprising 2000 individuals, were included in this Meta-analysis. The results showed that a significant improvement was observed in knee pain and function based on the clinical efficacy of ESWT combined with HA. Statistical analysis of clinical efficacy showed that [relative risk (RR) = 1.21, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.12, 1.30), P < 0.01]. Statistical analysis of visual analog scale showed that [standardized mean difference (SMD) = －2.84, 95%CI (－4.01, －1.66), P < 0.01]. Western Ontario and McMaster University osteoarthritis index statistical analysis showed that [SMD = －1.57, 95% CI (－2.52, －0.61), P < 0.01]. Lysholm score statistical analysis showed that [SMD = 1.71, 95% CI (0.98, 2.44), P < 0.01]. In addition, only minor side effects, such as redness and swelling of the skin, were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Medium to low quality evidence showed that ESWT combined with HA offers an inexpensive, well-tolerated, safe, and effective method to improve pain and functionality in patients with KOA. However, tightly controlled, randomized, large multicenter trials are warranted to validate the current findings.

Combinação de terapia por ondas de choque extracorpórea e agulhamento seco no tratamento de lombalgia crônica incapacitante: um relato de caso / Combination of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and dry needling as treatment of disabling chronic low back pain: a case report

Paciente do sexo masculino, 55 anos, apresentava antecedente clínico de radiculopatia lombar abordado cirurgicamente (discectomia e artrodese L5-S1) em dezembro de 2021, com resolução completa da dor associada. Iniciou com quadro de dor pós-operatória de características distintas. A primeira sessão de tratamento iniciou-se com terapia por ondas de choque extracorpóreas focal direcionada ao quadrado lombar, glúteo médio, glúteo mínimo e região peritrocantérica à direita. Posteriormente, associou-se agulhamento seco em pontos-gatilho presentes nesses mesmos 3 músculos e também no ligamento sacrotuberal direito, junto à inserção do glúteo máximo direito. Numa reavaliação uma semana depois, o paciente referiu uma redução de 70% da intensidade da dor inicial. O mesmo tratamento foi repetido, com resolução completa dos sintomas no final da sessão. Três meses depois, o doente manteve o controle álgico e recuperou totalmente a sua funcionalidade e qualidade de vida anteriores. Neste caso de limitação funcional a longo prazo devido a dor lombar crônica, a combinação da terapia por ondas de choque extracorporais e do agulhamento seco resultou num método eficaz e rápido para obter o alívio da dor e restaurar a funcionalidade anterior. No entanto, são necessários mais estudos para investigar o impacto desta combinação de terapias no controle da dor e na perda de funcionalidade devido à dor lombar crônica.

Male patient, 55 years old, had a clinical background of lumbar radiculopathy and a surgical approach (L5-S1 discectomy and arthrodesis) in December of 2021, with complete resolution of associated pain. One year later, the patient seeks medical treatment, referring a new, different pattern of low back pain, which initiated post-surgery. The first treatment session began with focused extracorporeal shockwave therapy directed at the right quadratus lumborum, gluteus medius, gluteus minimus and peritrochanteric region. Afterwards, dry needling was associated in trigger-points present in those same 3 muscles and also in the right sacrotuberal ligament, close to the insertion of the right gluteus maximus. In a reevaluation one week later, the patient reported a reduction of 70% of initial pain intensity. The same treatment was repeated, with complete resolution of symptoms at the end of the session. Three months later, the patient-maintained symptom control and fully recovered his previous functionality and quality of life. In this case of long-term functional limitation due to chronic low back pain, the combination of extracorporeal shock wave therapy and dry needling resulted in an effective and quick method to achieve pain relief and restore previous functionality. However, more studies are needed to investigate the impact of this combination of therapies in pain management and functionality loss due to chronic low back pain.

Comparing the effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and myofascial release therapy in chronic pelvic pain syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome is a highly prevalent syndrome. Previous studies showed that extracorporeal shockwave therapy and myofascial release therapy could improve the quality of life in patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS). Theoretically, combined therapy with extracorporeal shockwave therapy and myofascial release therapy will likely have significant advantages in treating CP/CPPS. We, therefore, present a protocol for conducting a well-designed randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of each therapy. METHODS: The proposed study will be a three-group randomized control trial (RCT) design that includes 150 participants from Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, with equal allocation of participants to the three intervention groups. The study duration will be 8 weeks, which includes a 4-week treatment period and a 4-week follow-up period. The primary outcome will be the changes in surface electromyography (sEMG) assessment and National Institutes of Health-Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index (NIH-CPSI). The secondary outcomes will include the changes in three-dimensional quantification, shear wave elastography (SWE), and sympathetic skin response (SSR) testing. Assessments will be conducted before the intervention (T0), before the 5th intervention (T1), immediately after the 8th intervention (T2), and the 4th week after the end of the 8th intervention (T3). DISCUSSION: This trial will compare the differences in efficacy between single extracorporeal shockwave therapy, single myofascial release therapy, and combined therapy to select the most appropriate treatment option for patients with CP/CPPS. The possible pathogenesis of CP/CPPS would also be analyzed by comparing the intercorrelation between each objective and subjective measurement (NIH-CPSI score, sEMG, SWE, SSR). TRIAL REGISTRATION: The name of the registry: Extracorporeal Shockwave and Myofascial Release Therapy in Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome. REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05659199. Date of registration: December 2022.

A preliminary investigation into the impact of shock wave therapy and sonotherapy on postural control of stepping tasks in patients with Achilles tendinopathy.

Objective: The outcomes of physical therapy are commonly assessed with subjective scales and questionnaires. Hence, a continuous search to identify diagnostic tests that would facilitate objective assessment of symptom reduction in those patients with Achilles tendinopathy who undergo mechanotherapy. The main aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of shock wave and ultrasound treatments, using objective posturographic assessment during step-up and step-down initiation. Materials and methods: The patients with non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy and pain lasting for more than 3 months were randomly assigned to one of the experimental groups, i.e., radial shock wave therapy (RSWT), ultrasound therapy, or placebo ultrasound. All groups also received deep friction massage as the primary therapy. The transitional locomotor task was performed with the affected and unaffected limb in random order, on two force platforms under two conditions (step-up and step-down). The recording of center of foot pressure displacements was divided into three phases: quiet standing before step-up/step-down, transit, and quiet standing until measurement completion. Pre-intervention measurements were performed and then short-term follow-ups at weeks 1 and 6 post-therapy. Results: The three-way repeated measures ANOVA showed few statistically significant two-factor interactions between therapy type, time point of measurement and the type of the locomotor task. Significant increases in postural sway were observed in the entire study population throughout the follow-up period. Three-way ANOVAs revealed a group effect (shock wave vs. ultrasound) on almost all variables of the quiet standing phase prior to step-up/step-down initiation. Overall, postural stability before the step-up and step-down tasks appeared to be more efficient in patients who had undergone RSWT compared to the ultrasound group. Conclusion: Objective posturographic assessment during step-up and step-down initiation did not demonstrate therapeutic superiority of any of the three therapeutic interventions used in patients with non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy.Clinical Trial Registration: The trial was prospectively registered in the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (no. ACTRN12617000860369; registration date: 9.06.2017).

Comparing radial extracorporeal shockwave therapy and corticosteroid injection in the treatment of piriformis syndrome: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the effects of shockwave therapy and corticosteroid injection in the treatment of piriformis syndrome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this randomized clinical trial, thirty-five patients with piriformis syndrome were randomly divided into two groups of 18 in the shockwave group and 17 in the corticosteroid group. The Shockwave group underwent three sessions of shockwave therapy per week (2000 pulses per session with 5Hz frequency and pressure equal to 4 Bar) and the corticosteroid group underwent an injection of 40 mg methylprednisolone with 1 mL of 1% lidocaine under ultrasound guidance. All patients were assessed by SF-36 questionnaire and visual analogue scale (VAS). The SF-36 questionnaire was used to evaluate the quality of life before and 4 weeks after the intervention. VAS scale was used to evaluate pain before the intervention, and 1, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the two groups were not significantly different. At the end of the study, both groups had a significant improvement in pain and quality of life compared to before the intervention. However, according to the VAS, in the shockwave group improvement was seen in the first follow-up while not seen in the corticosteroid group (P-value <0.001 and P-value 1.00, respectively). According to the SF-36 questionnaire, the overall score in both groups had a significant improvement (P-value <0.05). CONCLUSIONS: It seems that shockwave therapy and corticosteroid injection are both effective in the treatment of piriformis syndrome. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the quarterly follow-up. Because shockwave therapy is a relatively non-invasive treatment with fewer side effects, it can be useful to improve pain and the quality of life of patients with piriformis syndrome.

Efficacies of extracorporeal shockwave therapy and low-level laser therapy in patients with plantar fasciitis.

BACKGROUND: Various conservative treatment methods can be administered in the early stages of plantar fasciitis (PF). The aim of the treatment is to enable the patient to return to the physical activity as soon as possible. AIM: In this study it was aimed to compare efficacies of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) and Low-Level Laser Therapy (LLLT) on patients with PF. DESIGN: A local prospective cross-sectional study SETTING: Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Outpatient Clinic of Sakarya University, Faculty of Medicine POPULATION: Patients aged 18-70 years, having ongoing heel pain for at least 3 months, and not using oral and/or parenteral corticosteroids in the last 6 months. METHODS: A total of 40 patients with PF included in the current study. Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Roles and Maudsley Score (RMS), American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Association Score (AOFAS) and Foot Function Index (FFI) questionnaire were performed for all patients. ESWT and LLLT groups comprised of 22 (55%) and 18 (45%) patients, respectively. RESULTS: We found significant improvements in scores based on the VAS, RMS, AOFAS, FFI in patients with PF and it was sustained for 3 months (p = 0.001, for all scores). While decrease in scores based on the VAS and FFI in LLLT group was statistically more significant compared to ESWT group (p = 0.014, p = 0.013), there was statistically less significant decrease in scores on the AOFAS in LLLT group than that of ESWT group (p = 0.032). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated significant improvements in terms of pain, functional status and daily life activities following the administration of either of the treatments. Furthermore, LLLT was found to be significantly more effective for alleviating pain than ESWT in the treatment of PF.

Outcome of eight working dogs with fibrotic myopathy following extracorporeal shockwave and rehabilitation therapy: a case series.

Introduction: Fibrotic myopathy of the gracilis, semitendinosus, and semimembranosus is described primarily in working German Shepherd dogs. The purpose of this case series is to describe the rehabilitation modalities and treatments utilized in working dogs with fibrotic myopathy and the time frame they were able to continue working. Methods: Medical records of patients with hindlimb lameness that were presented to the Schwarzman Animal Medical Center in New York City from 2012 to 2023 were retrospectively searched. Signalment, history, clinical evaluation, gait analysis, goniometry of stifles, and follow-up evaluation were compared among patients. Ten male working dogs met inclusion criteria. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ECSWT) was administered under sedation or general anesthesia. Rehabilitation therapy (RT), including massage, hamstring stretch, photobiomodulation, pulsed electromagnetic field therapy, warm compress, therapeutic ultrasound, underwater treadmill, and therapeutic exercises, were performed once every one to 3 weeks with varying protocols according to patient assessments. Follow-up phone calls and emails were conducted to determine long-term outcome. Results: On average, dogs were able to work full-time for 32.1 months (range 6-82; SD 23.6) from the time of diagnosis. No activity limitation was reported by the owners/handlers. Discussion: This report is the first to describe non-invasive medical treatments that may extend the working ability of dogs diagnosed with fibrotic myopathy. Further prospective randomized controlled studies are needed to demonstrate the efficacy of ECSWT and RT for treating fibrotic myopathy. Conclusion: The results of this retrospective study suggest that the combination of ECSWT and RT may allow working dogs with fibrotic myopathy to continue their working capacity for an extended period of time.

The Efficacy and Safety of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy versus Acupuncture in the Management of Chronic Prostatitis/Chronic Pelvic Pain Syndrome: Evidence Based on a Network Meta-analysis.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) and acupuncture therapy for patients with chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS).We searched electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase and web of science from its inception to June 1, 2021. The randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared ESWT and acupuncture in the management of CP/CPPS were identified. A network meta-analysis was conducted with the software of STATA 14.0.Nine RCTs with 525 patients were enrolled in our analysis. The results revealed that both ESWT and acupuncture were significantly better than the sham procedure in the outcomes of total score of NIH-CPSI, pain subscore, urinary symptoms subscore, QoL subscore, IPSS score, the IIEF score and response rates (p < .05). Both ESWT and acupuncture were well-tolerated and had no obviously increased adverse events. Compared with acupuncture, ESWT was associated with better short term (<4w) and mid-term (8-12 w) efficacy of total score, pain subscore, urinary symptoms subscore, and QoL subscore of NIH-CPSI, IPSS score, IIEF score, and response rate. However, ESWT did not present better long-term (<24 w) outcomes than acupuncture in total score, pain subscore, urinary symptoms subscore, and QoL subscore of NIH-CPSI.Both ESWT and acupuncture were effective and well-tolerated in the management of CP/CPPS. ESWT seemed to have better short (<4 w) and mid-term (8-12 w) efficacy but similar long-term (>24 w) efficacy than acupuncture.

[Focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy with centrifugal exercise for the treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical efficacy of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy with centrifugal exercise in the treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome. METHODS: From September 2017 to June 2019, 53 eligible cases of greater trochanteric pain syndrome were randomly divided into observation group (29 cases) and control group (24 cases). In observation group, there were 8 males and 21 females, aged from 38 to 62 years old with an average of (49.96±6.39) years old; the course of disease ranged from 6 to 13 months with an average of (8.58±1.99) months;treated with focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy with centrifugal exercise. In control group, there were 5 males and 19 females, aged from 39 to 62 years old with an average of (52.79±5.86) years old;the course of disease ranged from 6 to 14 months with an average of (9.04±2.51) months;treated with centrifugal exercise alone. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and hip Harris score were measured before ESWT treatment and at 1, 2, and 6 months to evaluate relieve degree of pain and functional recovery of hip joint, respectively. RESULTS: At 1 month after treatment, there were no significant differences in VAS, hip Harris score and treatment success rate (all P>0.05). At 2 months after treatment, VAS score in observation group (3.20±0.81) was lower than that of control group (3.87±0.61, P=0.002), there were no significant differences in hip Harris score score between observation group (81.93±2.43) and control group (82.12±2.34, P=0.770), the treatment success rate in observation group (58.62%, 17 / 29) was higher than that of control group (29.16%, 7 / 24) (P=0.032). At 6 months after treatment, VAS score in observationgroup (2.24±0.68) was lower than that of control group (3.12±0.53, P<0.001), hip Harris score score in observation group(85.10±1.75) was higher than that of control group (83.66±1.78)(P=0.005), there were no significant differences in treatment success rate between observation group (82.75%, 24 / 29) and control group (62.50%, 15 / 24)(P=0.096). CONCLUSION: In treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome, focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy with centrifugal exercise could significantly relieve symptoms of lateral hip pain, improve functional recovery of hip joint with good safety. This treatment strategy is worthy of application and promotion in clinical practice.

Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy for erectile dysfunction: an overview of systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LI-ESWT) may be a successful complementary treatment approach for erectile dysfunction (ED). In this study, we aimed to review and summarize the research evidence from systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) regarding the clinical effectiveness of LI-ESWT for ED. METHODS: Studies on LI-ESWT for ED were searched using eight electronic databases from establishment of each database to 31 June 2021 with the language restrictions of Chinese and English. All articles were screened, and qualifying data were recorded based on the inclusion criteria. Methods including: the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 (AMSTAR-2); the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews (ROBIS); the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA); and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment Development, and the Evaluation (GRADE) were used by two independent raters to assess methodological quality, risk of bias, reporting quality, and SR evidence of quality, respectively. RESULTS: Eight SRs/MAs met all inclusion criteria. Seven reviews were rated as critically low on overall confidence and one review was low on confidence based on the AMSTAR-2 appraisal tool. While most PRISMA criteria were met, the major reporting flaws were in relation the financial statements not being included, along with no protocol registrations. Three SRs/MAs were classed as low risk regarding bias as measured by the ROBIS tool. Based on the GRADE method, only one SRs/MAs of high-quality evidence and seven SRs/MAs of moderate-quality evidence were found. The present research results supported LI-ESWT as a complementary therapy for ED patients, but the evidence should be considered carefully due to the methodological flaws identified. DISCUSSION: Our results showed that LI-ESWT as an adjunctive therapy has benefits for ED patients. There were no obvious side effects, and the number of shockwave treatments and energy flux density (EFD) would affect the IIEF-EF, EHS and PSV scores. However, due to the limited sample size and the quality of reporting evidence, our conclusions may not be fully representative.

Physical Agent Modalities in Early Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review.

Early osteoarthritis (EOA) still represents a challenge for clinicians. Although there is no consensus on its definition and diagnosis, a prompt therapeutic intervention in the early stages can have a significant impact on function and quality of life. Exercise remains a core treatment for EOA; however, several physical modalities are commonly used in this population. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the role of physical agents in the treatment of EOA. A technical expert panel (TEP) of 8 medical specialists with expertise in physical agent modalities and musculoskeletal conditions performed the review following the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews) model. The TEP searched for evidence of the following physical modalities in the management of EOA: "Electric Stimulation Therapy", "Pulsed Electromagnetic field", "Low-Level Light Therapy", "Laser Therapy", "Magnetic Field Therapy", "Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy", "Hyperthermia, Induced", "Cryotherapy", "Vibration therapy", "Whole Body Vibration", "Physical Therapy Modalities". We found preclinical and clinical data on transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT), low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS), pulsed electromagnetic fields stimulation (PEMF), and whole-body vibration (WBV) for the treatment of knee EOA. We found two clinical studies about TENS and PEMF and six preclinical studies-three about ESWT, one about WBV, one about PEMF, and one about LIPUS. The preclinical studies demonstrated several biological effects on EOA of physical modalities, suggesting potential disease-modifying effects. However, this role should be better investigated in further clinical studies, considering the limited data on the use of these interventions for EOA patients.

Alternative Treatment for Erectile Dysfunction: a Growing Arsenal in Men's Health.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To highlight and review encouraging preliminary studies behind several alternative products and interventions for erectile dysfunction (ED). RECENT FINDINGS: Alternative treatments for ED are becoming more prevalent with increased consumer interest. "Natural" products are sold online, and numerous clinics offer various off-label and investigational interventions. These alternative treatments have demonstrated varying degrees of efficacy in randomized trials and meta-analyses, but none of these interventions has robust enough evidence to be considered first-line therapy. These treatments may find a role in combination with guideline treatments or may be used in novel penile rehabilitation research protocols. With growing interest in alternative treatment for men's health, an awareness of the literature is imperative for patient counsel. Alternative treatments, like L-arginine, have a growing body of evidence for efficacy in combination with PDE5i, and low-intensity shock wave therapy and stem cell therapy continue to demonstrate encouraging outcomes in ED trials.

Shockwave Therapy Versus Dry Needling for the Management of Iliotibial Band Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial: SWT Vs. DN for the Treatment of ITBS.

BACKGROUND: Iliotibial band syndrome (ITBS) is a common leading cause of lateral knee pain. Despite varieties of medical and non-medical treatments proposed for the management of ITBS, the best therapeutic approach for its treatment remained a significant question. The current study aims to compare the outcomes of dry needling (DN) versus shockwave therapy (SWT) in the management of ITBS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 40 patients diagnosed with ITBS. The patients were randomly divided into two treatment groups of DN (n=20) and SWT (n=20). Visual analog scale for the pain assessment, Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) for the function evaluation, and length of the iliotibial band were assessed at baseline, immediately after the cessation of the intervention, and within four weeks. RESULTS: The two groups were similar regarding demographic characteristics (P0.05). Both approaches could efficiently lead to improved pain (P0.001) and promoted function based on LEFS (P0.001); however, iliotibial band length (ITBL) did not alter remarkably (P0.05). The groups were similar in terms of pain score, LEFS, and ITBL at all of the assessment intervals (P0.05), but the pain score within four weeks following the interventions that were significantly better in DN (P=0.023). CONCLUSION: Based on our results, DN, as well as SWT, could remarkably lead to an improvement in pain and function among patients resenting from ITBS; however, none of the approaches was superior over the other.

Dextrose prolotherapy versus radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the treatment of chronic plantar fasciitis: A randomized, controlled clinical trial.

In the recent years, prolotherapy is increasingly being used in the field of musculoskeletal medicine. However, few studies have investigated its effectiveness in plantar fasciitis (PF). The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided dextrose prolotherapy with radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) in the treatment of chronic PF. This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 59 patients with chronic PF. Patients were randomly assigned into two groups receiving three sessions of radial ESWT (29 patients) vs. two sessions of ultrasound-guided intrafascial 2 cc dextrose 20% injection (30 patients). The following outcome measures were assessed before and then six weeks and 12 weeks after the treatments: pain intensity by visual analog scale (VAS), daily life and exercise activities by Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and the plantar fascia thickness by ultrasonographic imaging. The VAS and FAAM scales showed significant improvements of pain and function in both study groups 6 weeks and 12 weeks after the treatments. A significant reduction was noted for plantar fascia thickness at these intervals (all p < .05). The inter-group comparison revealed that except for the FAAM-sport subscale which favored ESWT, the interaction effects of group and time were not significant for other outcome measures. Dextrose prolotherapy has comparable efficacy to radial ESWT in reducing pain, daily-life functional limitation, and plantar fascia thickness in patients with PF. No serious adverse effects were observed in either group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I, randomized controlled trial.

Focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy with centrifugal exercise for the treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome / 中国骨伤

OBJECTIVE@#To explore the clinical efficacy of focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy with centrifugal exercise in the treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome.@*METHODS@#From September 2017 to June 2019, 53 eligible cases of greater trochanteric pain syndrome were randomly divided into observation group (29 cases) and control group (24 cases). In observation group, there were 8 males and 21 females, aged from 38 to 62 years old with an average of (49.96±6.39) years old; the course of disease ranged from 6 to 13 months with an average of (8.58±1.99) months;treated with focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy with centrifugal exercise. In control group, there were 5 males and 19 females, aged from 39 to 62 years old with an average of (52.79±5.86) years old;the course of disease ranged from 6 to 14 months with an average of (9.04±2.51) months;treated with centrifugal exercise alone. Visual analogue scale (VAS) and hip Harris score were measured before ESWT treatment and at 1, 2, and 6 months to evaluate relieve degree of pain and functional recovery of hip joint, respectively.@*RESULTS@#At 1 month after treatment, there were no significant differences in VAS, hip Harris score and treatment success rate (all @*CONCLUSION@#In treatment of greater trochanteric pain syndrome, focused extracorporeal shock wave therapy with centrifugal exercise could significantly relieve symptoms of lateral hip pain, improve functional recovery of hip joint with good safety. This treatment strategy is worthy of application and promotion in clinical practice.

Comparison of efficacy of corticosteroid injection versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum muscle: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In this study, we aimed to compare the efficacy of corticosteroid trigger point injection (TPI) versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on inferior trigger points in the quadratus lumborum (QL) muscle. METHODS: In this single-blind randomized clinical trial, 54 low back pain patients with myofascial trigger points on QL muscle were investigated. Participants were randomly allocated into two groups with A and B pockets. Patients in group A underwent radial ESWT and received 5 treatment sessions (1 per week) and actually were not followed-up. However, patients in group B received corticosteroid TPI and received one session of corticosteroid treatment and followed-up for 4 weeks after injection. Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analogue scale (VAS), pain pressure threshold (PPT) and short form (36) health survey (SF-36) were measured in both groups before, two weeks after and four weeks after intervention. RESULTS: The between group comparison indicated that corticosteroid TPI leaded to significant higher improvements of ODI (P-value< 0.01), VAS (P value< 0.001), and PPT (P-value = 0.001) scores compared to the ESWT group at two-week follow-up time-point. ESWT group recorded significant higher improvement of ODI (P-value< 0.01) and SF-36 (P-value< 0.001) compared to the corticosteroid TPI at 4th week post treatment evaluation. At four-week follow-up time-point, the patients in the ESWT group were 1.46 times more likely to achieve 30% reduction in VAS, 2.67 times more likely to achieve 30% reduction in ODI, and 2.30 times more likely to achieve 20% improvement in SF-36 compared to the participants in corticosteroid TPI group. These results refer to large effect size for all study outcomes in ESWT group (d = 4.72, d = 1.58, d = 5.48, and d = 7.47 for ODI, PPT, SF-36, and VAS, respectively). CONCLUSION: Corticosteroid TPI was more effective compared to ESWT in short-term controlling of pain and disability caused by myofascial pain syndrome of QL muscle. However, after 4 weeks treatment, ESWT further improved the quality of life and disability and was related with more probability of achievement the minimal clinically important difference concerning pain, disability and quality of life and large effect size for all study outcomes in treated patients compared to corticosteroid TPI. TRIAL REGISTRATION: www.irct.ir , IRCT20100827004641N14 , retrospectively registered 2019-01-19.

Combined treatment with extracorporeal shockwaves therapy and an herbal formulation for activation of penile progenitor cells and antioxidant activity in diabetic erectile dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: A Korean herbal formulation named KH-204 was reported to have an antioxidant effect in our previous study. We hypothesized that Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (Li-ESWT) combined with KH-204 would accelerate the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) by enhancing antioxidant. We investigated the synergistic effect of Li-ESWT and KH-204 for ED and explored the mechanism. METHODS: Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVEC) were treated with KH-204 and LI-ESWT in vitro. Fifty 5-week-old male Sprague Dawley rats received an intraperitoneal injection of 5-ethynyl-20-deoxyuridine (EdU) which can label live cells, and were randomly divided into five groups: (I) normal; (II) diabetes mellitus-associated erectile dysfunction (DMED); (III) DMED + KH-204; (IV) DMED + Li-ESWT; and (V) DMED + KH-204/Li-ESWT. Li-ESWT treatment was repeated three times a week every other day for four weeks in group 4 and 5. Meanwhile, rats in group 3 and 5 were orally fed 400 mg/kg of KH-204 daily for 1 month. Following a 1-week washout period, penile tissues were evaluated by immunostaining and Western blotting. RESULTS: KH-204 combined with Li-ESWT improved intracavernosal pressure (ICP) in DMED rats. Li-ESWT/KH-204 stimulated HUVEC tube formation and promoted proliferation. Li-ESWT drove progenitor cells to migrate to penile tissue and KH-204 protected penile progenitor cells in the corpus cavernosum. Oxidative stress was relieved by KH-204/Li-ESWT. Treatment with KH-204/Li-ESWT protected penile progenitor cells, which were recruited to the corpus cavernosum by Li-ESWT, from apoptosis via its antioxidant activity. KH-204/Li-ESWT protected penile tissue from oxidative stress by improving the expression of nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2)/heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), increasing superoxide dismutase (SOD), decreasing 8-hydroxy-20-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG), and reducing apoptosis. KH-204/Li-ESWT promoted stromal derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1 (PECAM-1) in DMED rats. CONCLUSIONS: KH-204 protected penile progenitor cells, which were recruited to the corpus cavernosum by Li-ESWT, from apoptosis via its antioxidant activity. The combination of Li-ESWT and KH-204 as a synergy therapy could be a potential and effective treatment for DMED.

Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy on Pain and Function in Myofascial Pain Syndrome of the Trapezius: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) on pain and function in myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) of the trapezius. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched from the time of their inception to September 2019. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials comparing the effects of ESWT on MPS of the trapezius were included in this review. DATA EXTRACTION: Data related to study participants, intervention, follow-up period, measure time, and outcomes were extracted. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale and the Cochrane Collaboration Tool for Assessing Risk of Bias were used to assess study quality and risk of bias. DATA SYNTHESIS: In total, 10 articles (n=477 patients) met our criteria and were included in this study. The overall effectiveness was calculated using a meta-analysis method. The meta-analysis revealed that ESWT exhibited significant improvement in pain reduction compared with sham ESWT or ultrasound treatment, but no significant effect when compared with conventional treatments (dry needling, trigger point injection, laser therapy) as for pain intensity and neck disability index. CONCLUSIONS: ESWT appears to benefit patients with MPS of the trapezius by alleviating pain. ESWT may not be an ideal therapeutic method to replace conventional therapies but could serve as an adjunct therapeutic method to those treatments.

[Treatment of knee osteoarthritis with six-step manipulation combined with extracorporeal shock wave].

OBJECTIVE: To observe the clinical effect of six-step manipulation combined with extracorporeal shock wave in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Seventy-six patients with KOA from December 2016 to June 2018 were divided into control group and treatment group, 38 in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with oral medicine combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy, while the patients in the treatment group were treated with six-step manipulation combined with shock wave therapy. The VAS score, WOMAC score and clinical efficacy of the two groups were compared before treatment, 1 day, 1 month and 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in VAS score and WOMAC score between the two groups before treatment(P>0.05). VAS score and WOMAC score in treatment group were significantly lower than those in control group at 1 day, 1 month and 6 months after treatment, and the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Six-step manipulation combined with extracorporeal shock wave therapy can significantly alleviate pain and improve knee function in patients with knee osteoarthritis, and the clinical effect is obvious.