Brain Structures and Networks Underlying Treatment Response to Deep Brain Stimulation Targeting the Inferior Thalamic Peduncle in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a debilitating disease with a lifetime prevalence of 2-3%. Neuromodulatory treatments have been successfully used in severe cases. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) targeting the inferior thalamic peduncle (ITP) has been shown to successfully alleviate symptoms in OCD patients; however, the brain circuits implicated remain unclear. Here, we investigate the efficacious neural substrates following ITP-DBS for OCD. METHODS: High-quality normative structural and functional connectomics and voxel-wise probabilistic mapping techniques were applied to assess the neural substrates of OCD symptom alleviation in a cohort of 5 ITP-DBS patients. RESULTS: The region of most efficacious stimulation was located in the regions of the ITP and bed nucleus of the stria terminalis. Both functional and structural connectomics analyses demonstrated that successful symptom alleviation involved a brain network encompassing the bilateral amygdala and prefrontal regions. LIMITATIONS: The main limitation is the small size of the ITP-DBS cohort. While the findings are highly consistent and significant, these should be validated in larger studies. CONCLUSIONS: These results identify a tripartite brain network - composed of the bilateral amygdala and prefrontal regions 24 and 46 - whose engagement is associated with greater symptom improvement. They also provide information for optimizing targeting and identifying network components critically involved in ITP-DBS treatment response. Amygdala engagement in particular seems to be a key component for clinical benefits and could constitute a biomarker for treatment optimization.

Probing the circuitry of panic with deep brain stimulation: Connectomic analysis and review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Panic attacks affect a sizeable proportion of the population. The neurocircuitry of panic remains incompletely understood. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the neuroanatomical underpinnings of panic attacks induced by deep brain stimulation (DBS) through (1) connectomic analysis of an obsessive-compulsive disorder patient who experienced panic attacks during inferior thalamic peduncle DBS; (2) appraisal of existing clinical reports on DBS-induced panic attacks. METHODS: Panicogenic, ventral contact stimulation was compared with benign stimulation at other contacts using volume of tissue activated (VTA) modelling. Networks associated with the panicogenic zone were investigated using state-of-the-art normative connectivity mapping. In addition, a literature search for prior reports of DBS-induced panic attacks was conducted. RESULTS: Panicogenic VTAs impinged primarily on the tuberal hypothalamus. Compared to non-panicogenic VTAs, panicogenic loci were significantly functionally coupled to limbic and brainstem structures, including periaqueductal grey and amygdala. Previous studies found stimulation of these areas can also provoke panic attacks. CONCLUSIONS: DBS in the region of the tuberal hypothalamus elicited panic attacks in a single obsessive-compulsive disorder patient and recruited a network of structures previously implicated in panic pathophysiology, reinforcing the importance of the hypothalamus as a hub of panicogenic circuitry.

Inferior thalamic peduncle deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder: A phase 1 pilot trial.

BACKGROUND: Several different surgical procedures targeting the limbic circuit have been utilized for severe, treatment resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder; however, there has only been limited exploration of the inferior thalamic peduncle (ITP). The aim of this study was to determine the safety and initial efficacy of ITP deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients with severe obsessive-compulsive disorder. METHODS: Patients with severe, treatment-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder were enrolled into this open-label phase 1 DBS pilot study. Bilateral ITP DBS devices were implanted between November 2010 and December 2015. The primary outcome was safety. The initial efficacy was determined by Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive scale (YBOCs) scores. Component Y-BOCs scores, Hamilton Depression Severity Scale, Quality of Life Assessment (SF-36), Oxford Happiness Questionnaire, Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale, and Sheehan Disability Scale were also analyzed for a minimum of 2 years after surgery. Additionally, preoperative and three-month postoperative FDG-PET studies were performed on two patients. RESULTS: Five patients (2 males, 3 females; age range 25-48 years) received ITP DBS. All five patients were considered responders at one year (52% improvement in YBOCs scores compared to baseline (range 39-73%, p < 0.01) and last follow-up (54% improvement; range 38-85%; p < 0.01). At two years follow-up, there were three adverse events that occurred in two patients. One patient had his DBS system removed after one year due to the device becoming the object of his obsession. The other two adverse events were not related to the device. Post-operative FDG-PET imaging in two patients demonstrated decreased glucose uptake within the right caudate, right putamen, right supplementary motor area, and right cingulum and increased glucose uptake in bilateral motor areas, left temporal pole, and left orbitfrontal cortex. CONCLUSIONS: ITP DBS has a favorable safety profile and is potentially an efficacious treatment for severe obsessive-compulsive disorder. Larger clinical trials are necessary to determine efficacy.

Surgery for psychiatric disorders.

Surgery in psychiatric disorders has a long history and has regained momentum in the past few decades with deep brain stimulation (DBS). DBS is an adjustable and reversible neurosurgical intervention using implanted electrodes to deliver controlled electrical pulses to targeted areas of the brain. It holds great promise for therapy-refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Several double-blind controlled and open trials have been conducted and the response rate is estimated around 54%. Open trials have shown encouraging results with DBS for therapy-refractory depression and case reports have shown potential effects of DBS on addiction. Another promising indication is Tourette syndrome, where potential efficacy of DBS is shown by several case series and a few controlled trials. Further research should focus on optimizing DBS with respect to target location and increasing the number of controlled double-blinded trials. In addition, new indications for DBS and new target options should be explored in preclinical research.