Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Psychosomatics ; 61(2): 135-144, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31928783

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Admission to a neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU) is sudden and often traumatic for both patients and their informal caregivers. No prior studies have assessed prospectively risk and resiliency factors for chronic posttraumatic symptoms, as well as the potential interdependence between patients' and caregivers' symptoms over time. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of baseline resiliency factors on symptoms of posttraumatic stress (PTS) longitudinally in dyads of patients admitted to the Neuro-ICU and their primary family caregivers. METHODS: We recruited dyads (M = 108) of patients admitted to the Neuro-ICU (total N = 102) and their family caregivers (total N = 103). Dyads completed self-report assessments of PTS and resiliency factors (mindfulness and coping) at baseline in the Neuro-ICU. PTS was measured again at 3- and 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Clinically significant PTS symptoms were high at baseline in both patients (20%) and caregivers (16%) and remained high through 6 months (25% in patients; 14% in caregivers). Actor-partner interdependence modeling demonstrated that severity of PTS symptoms was predictive of PTS symptoms at subsequent time points (P < 0.001). High baseline mindfulness and coping predicted less severe PTS symptoms in patients and caregivers (P < 0.001) at all time points. Own degree of PTS symptoms at 3 months predicted worse PTS symptoms in one's partner at 6 months, for both patients and caregivers (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlight the need to prioritize assessment and treatment of PTS in Neuro-ICU patients and their informal caregivers through a dyadic approach.


Subject(s)
Caregivers/psychology , Intensive Care Units , Neoplasms/psychology , Neurosciences , Resilience, Psychological , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/diagnosis , Adaptation, Psychological , Cancer Care Facilities/economics , Cohort Studies , Comorbidity , Family Relations , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units/economics , Mindfulness , Neoplasms/economics , Neurosciences/economics , Prospective Studies , Psychiatric Rehabilitation , Quality of Life/psychology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/economics , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/psychology , United States
2.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 62: 87-92, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31887641

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of resiliency factors on the longitudinal trajectory of depressive symptoms in patients admitted to the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit (Neuro-ICU) and their family caregivers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 102) and family caregivers (N = 103) completed self-report assessments of depressive symptoms (depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; HADS-D) and resiliency factors (i.e., mindfulness and coping) during Neuro-ICU hospitalization. The HADS-D was administered again at 3 and 6 months after discharge. The Actor-Partner Interdependence Model (APIM) was used to assess patient-caregiver interdependence. RESULTS: Baseline rates of clinically significant depressive symptoms were high among patients (23%) and caregivers (19%), and remained elevated through 6-months. Higher depressive symptoms predicted higher levels of symptoms at the subsequent timepoint (ps < 0.05). Higher baseline mindfulness and coping were associated with lower levels of depressive symptoms at all timepoints (ps < 0.001). APIM analysis showed that one's own higher baseline mindfulness was associated with concurrent levels of depressive symptoms in a partner (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Depressive symptoms in Neuro-ICU patient-caregiver dyads are high through 6 months. Mindfulness is protective against depressive symptoms and interdependent between patients and caregivers. Early, dyadic, mindfulness-based interventions may prevent the development of chronic depression in both patients and caregivers.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Brain Diseases/psychology , Caregivers/psychology , Depression/psychology , Family Relations/psychology , Intensive Care Units , Mindfulness , Resilience, Psychological , Adult , Aged , Brain Diseases/therapy , Female , Humans , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Discharge
3.
Neurocrit Care ; 32(2): 512-521, 2020 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31270671

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: Informal caregivers (e.g., family and friends) are at risk for developing depression, which can be detrimental to both caregiver and patient functioning. Initial evidence suggests that resiliency may reduce the risk of depression. However, gender differences in associations between multiple psychosocial resiliency factors and depression have not been examined among neuroscience intensive care unit (neuro-ICU) caregivers. We explored interactions between caregiver gender and baseline resiliency factors on depression symptom severity at baseline through 3 and 6 months post-discharge. METHODS: Caregivers (N = 96) of neuro-ICU patients able to provide informed consent to participate in research were enrolled as part of a prospective, longitudinal study in the neuro-ICU of a major academic medical center. Caregiver sociodemographics and resiliency factors (coping, mindfulness, self-efficacy, intimate care, and preparedness for caregiving) were assessed during the patient's hospitalization (i.e., baseline). Levels of depressive symptoms were measured using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at baseline, 3 months, and 6 months post-discharge. RESULTS: Baseline depressive symptoms predicted depressive symptoms at both 3- and 6-month follow-ups, with no difference at any time point in rates of depression by gender. At baseline, greater levels of coping, mindfulness, and preparedness for caregiving were individually associated with lower levels of concurrent depression regardless of gender (ps < 0.006). The main effect of baseline coping remained significant at 3-month follow-up (p = 0.045). We observed a trend-level interaction between gender and baseline intimate care, such that among male caregivers only, high baseline intimate care was associated with lower depression at 3-month follow-up (p = 0.055). At 6-month follow-up, we observed a significant interaction between caregiver gender and baseline intimate care, such that male caregivers reporting high intimate care reported lower symptoms of depression than females reporting high intimate care (p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Results support implementation of psychosocial resiliency interventions for caregivers of patients admitted to the neuro-ICU early in the recovery process. Male caregivers may particularly benefit from strategies focused on increasing intimate care (e.g., physical and emotional affection with their loved one) and quality of the patient-caregiver dyadic relationship.


Subject(s)
Adaptation, Psychological , Brain Neoplasms/nursing , Caregivers/psychology , Cerebrovascular Disorders/nursing , Depression/psychology , Interpersonal Relations , Object Attachment , Resilience, Psychological , Adult , Aged , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/nursing , Critical Illness , Epilepsy/nursing , Family/psychology , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Mindfulness , Self Efficacy , Sex Factors , Spouses/psychology , Survivors
4.
J Crit Care ; 36: 154-159, 2016 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27546765

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of the study is to examine the associations of patients' and their informal caregivers' psychosocial resiliency factors with their own and their partners' emotion domains (distress, anxiety, depression, and anger) after admission to the neuroscience intensive care unit (Neuro-ICU). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-three dyads of patients (total n = 87) and their informal caregivers (total n = 99) participated in this observational, cross-sectional study by self-reporting demographics and measures of resiliency factors (mindfulness [Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale Revised], coping [Measure of Coping Status-A], intimate bond [Intimate Bond Measure], self-efficacy [patients: General Self-Efficacy Scale; caregivers: Revised Caregiver Self-Efficacy Scale]) and emotion domains (Emotion Thermometers) within 2 weeks of Neuro-ICU admission. RESULTS: There were no differences between patients' and caregivers' levels of psychosocial resiliency, distress, or anxiety. Patients reported greater depression and anger relative to their caregivers. Overall, roughly half of patients (50.6%) and caregivers (42.4%) reported clinically significant emotional distress. Patients' and caregivers' own psychosocial resiliency factors were associated with their own, but not their partner's, emotion domains. CONCLUSIONS: Findings of high distress among both patients and caregivers at admission emphasize the importance of attending to the mental health of both patients and caregivers in the Neuro-ICU. As modifiable psychosocial resiliency factors were associated with emotion domains for both patients and caregivers, interventions to enhance these factors may ameliorate emotional distress among these vulnerable populations.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/psychology , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/psychology , Brain Neoplasms/psychology , Caregivers/psychology , Depression/psychology , Intracranial Hemorrhages/psychology , Resilience, Psychological , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Stroke/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Adult , Aged , Anger , Cross-Sectional Studies , Emotions , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Interpersonal Relations , Male , Middle Aged , Mindfulness , Neurosciences , Self Efficacy
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL