ABSTRACT
Image processing in amniotes is usually accomplished by the thalamofugal and/or tectofugal visual systems. In laterally eyed birds, the tectofugal system dominates with functions such as color and motion processing, spatial orientation, stimulus identification, and localization. This makes it a critical system for complex avian behavior. Here, the brains of chicks, Gallus gallus, were used to produce serial brain sections in either coronal, sagittal, or horizontal planes and stained with either Nissl and Gallyas silver myelin or Luxol fast blue stain and cresyl echt violet (CEV). The emerging techniques of diffusible iodine-based contrast-enhanced computed tomography (diceCT) coupled with serial histochemistry in three planes were used to generate a comprehensive three-dimensional (3D) model of the avian tectofugal visual system. This enabled the 3D reconstruction of tectofugal circuits, including the three primary neuronal projections. Specifically, major components of the system included four regions of the retina, layers of the optic tectum, subdivisions of the nucleus rotundus in the thalamus, the entopallium in the forebrain, and supplementary components connecting into or out of this major avian visual sensory system. The resulting 3D model enabled a better understanding of the structural components and connectivity of this complex system by providing a complete spatial organization that occupied several distinct brain regions. We demonstrate how pairing diceCT with traditional histochemistry is an effective means to improve the understanding of, and thereby should generate insights into, anatomical and functional properties of complicated neural pathways, and we recommend this approach to clarify enigmatic properties of these pathways.
Subject(s)
Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Visual Pathways , Animals , Visual Pathways/diagnostic imaging , Visual Pathways/physiology , Chickens/metabolism , Prosencephalon , Sense OrgansABSTRACT
Selective attention refers to the ability to restrict neural processing and behavioral responses to a relevant subset of available stimuli, while simultaneously excluding other valid stimuli from consideration. In primates and other mammals, descriptions of this ability typically emphasize the neural processing that takes place in the cerebral neocortex. However, non-mammals such as birds, reptiles, amphibians and fish, which completely lack a neocortex, also have the ability to selectively attend. In this article, we survey the behavioral evidence for selective attention in non-mammals, and review the midbrain and forebrain structures that are responsible. The ancestral forms of selective attention are presumably selective orienting behaviors, such as prey-catching and predator avoidance. These behaviors depend critically on a set of subcortical structures, including the optic tectum (OT), thalamus and striatum, that are highly conserved across vertebrate evolution. In contrast, the contributions of different pallial regions in the forebrain to selective attention have been subject to more substantial changes and reorganization. This evolutionary perspective makes plain that selective attention is not a function achieved de novo with the emergence of the neocortex, but instead is implemented by circuits accrued and modified over hundreds of millions of years, beginning well before the forebrain contained a neocortex. Determining how older subcortical circuits interact with the more recently evolved components in the neocortex will likely be crucial for understanding the complex properties of selective attention in primates and other mammals, and for identifying the etiology of attention disorders.
Subject(s)
Neocortex/physiology , Orientation/physiology , Superior Colliculi/physiology , Thalamus/physiology , Animals , Biological Evolution , Humans , Neurons/physiologyABSTRACT
The distribution of DARPP-32 (a phosphoprotein related to the dopamine D1 receptor) has been widely used as a means to clarify the brain regions with dopaminoceptive cells, primarily in representative species of tetrapods. The relationship between dopaminergic and dopaminoceptive elements is frequently analyzed using the catecholamine marker tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). In the present study, by means of combined immunohistochemistry, we have analyzed these relationships in lungfishes, the only group of sarcopterygian fishes represented by 6 extant species that are the phylogenetically closest living relatives of tetrapods. We used the Australian lungfish Neoceratodus forsteri and the African lungfish Protopterus dolloi. The DARPP-32 antibody yields a distinct and consistent pattern of neuronal staining in brain areas that, in general, coincide with areas that are densely innervated by TH-immunoreactive fibers. The striatum, thalamus, optic tectum, and torus semicircularis contain intensely DARPP-32-immunoreactive cell bodies and fibers. Cells are also located in the olfactory bulbs, amygdaloid complex, lateral septum, pallidum, preoptic area, suprachiasmatic nucleus, tuberal hypothalamic region, rostral rhombencephalic reticular formation, superior raphe nucleus, octavolateral area, solitary tract nucleus, and spinal cord. Remarkably, DARPP-32-immunoreactive fibers originating in the striatum reach the region of the dopaminergic cells in the mesencephalic tegmentum and represent a well-established striatonigral pathway in lungfishes. Double immunolabeling reveals that DARPP-32 is present in neurons that most likely receive TH input, but it is absent from the catecholaminergic neurons themselves, with the only exception of a few cells in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of Neoceratodus and the solitary tract nucleus of Protopterus. In addition, some species differences exist in the localization of DARPP-32 cells in the pallium, lateral amygdala, thalamus, prethalamus, and octavolateral area. In general, the present study demonstrates that the distribution pattern of DARPP-32, and its relationship with TH, is largely comparable to those reported for tetrapods, highlighting a shared situation among all sarcopterygians.
Subject(s)
Dopamine and cAMP-Regulated Phosphoprotein 32/physiology , Fishes/physiology , Animals , Brain/metabolism , Brain/physiology , Brain Chemistry , Catecholamines/metabolism , Dopamine/metabolism , Dopamine and cAMP-Regulated Phosphoprotein 32/metabolism , Fishes/genetics , Hypothalamus/metabolism , Immunohistochemistry/methods , Nerve Tissue Proteins/metabolism , Neurons/metabolism , Phosphoproteins , Spinal Cord , Thalamus/metabolismABSTRACT
The avian circadian pacemaker system is comprised of independent clocks in the retina, pineal and hypothalamus, as shown by daily and circadian oscillations of core clock genes (Per2, Cry1, Bmal1 and Clock) in several birds including migratory blackheaded buntings (Emberiza melanocephala). This study investigated the extra-hypothalamic brain circadian clocks in blackheaded buntings, and measured Per2, Cry1, Cry2, Bmal1 and Clock mRNA expressions at 4h intervals over 24h beginning 1h after light-on in the left and right telencephalon, optic tectum and cerebellum, the brain regions involved in several physiological and cognitive functions. Because of seasonal alterations in the circadian clock dependent brain functions, we measured daily clock gene oscillations in buntings photoperiod-induced with the non-migratory state under short days (SDnM), and the pre-migratory (LDpM), migratory (LDM) and post-migratory (refractory, LDR) states under long days. Daily Per2 oscillations were not altered with changes in the photoperiodic states, except for about 2-3h phase difference in the optic tectum between the SDnM and LDpM states. However, there were about 3-5h differences in the phase and 2 to 4 fold change in the amplitude of daily Bmal1 and Cry1 mRNA oscillations between the photoperiod-induced states. Further, Cry2 and Clock genes lacked a significant oscillation, except in Cb (Cry2) and TeO and Rt (Clock) under LDR state. Overall, these results show the presence of circadian clocks in extra-hypothalamic brain regions of blackheaded buntings, and suggest tissue-dependent alterations in the waveforms of mRNA oscillations with transitions in the photoperiod-induced seasonal states in a long-day species.
Subject(s)
Brain/physiology , CLOCK Proteins/genetics , Circadian Clocks/genetics , Photoperiod , Songbirds/physiology , Animal Migration/physiology , Animals , Circadian Rhythm Signaling Peptides and Proteins/genetics , Hypothalamus/physiology , Periodicity , Pineal Gland , RNA, Messenger , Retina/physiology , SeasonsABSTRACT
The present research aimed to investigate the existence of clock gene expression rhythms in tilapia, their endogenous origin, and how light and feeding cycles synchronize these rhythms. In the first experiment, two groups of fish were kept under an LD cycle and fed at two different time points: in the middle of the light (ML) or in the middle of the dark (MD) phase. In the second experiment, fish fed at ML was fasted and kept under constant lighting (LL) conditions for 1 day. In both experiments, the samples from central (optic tectum and hypothalamus) and peripheral (liver) tissues were collected every 3 h throughout a 24 h cycle. The expression levels of clock genes bmal1a, clock1, per1b, cry2a, and cry5 were analyzed by quantitative PCR. All the clock genes analyzed in brain regions showed daily rhythms: clock1, bmal1a, and cry2a showed the acrophase approximately at the end of the light phase (ZT 8:43-11:22 h), whereas per1b and cry5 did so between the end of the dark phase and the beginning of the light phase, respectively (ZT 21:16-4:00 h). These rhythms persisted under constant conditions. No effect of the feeding time was observed in the brain. In the liver, however, the rhythms of clock1 and cry5 were influenced by feeding, and a shift was observed in the MD fish group (ZT 3:58 h for clock1 and 11:20 h for cry5). This study provides the first insights into the molecular clock of tilapia, a very important fish species for aquaculture. It also reveals the endogenous origin of clock gene rhythms and the ability of feeding time to shift the phase in some clock genes in the peripheral, but not the central, oscillator.
Subject(s)
CLOCK Proteins/genetics , Cichlids/genetics , Circadian Rhythm/genetics , Feeding Behavior/physiology , Animals , Gene Expression , Hypothalamus/metabolism , Light , Liver/metabolism , Motor Activity , Photoperiod , Superior Colliculi/metabolismABSTRACT
Juvenile Senegalese sole Solea senegalensis were subjected for short periods to two different types of handling-related stress: air exposure stress and net handling stress. The S. senegalensis were sacrificed 2 and 24 h after the stress events and the levels of serotonin (5-HT), noradrenaline (NA), dopamine (DA) and their respective major metabolites, 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA), 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylglycol (MHPG) and 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid (DOPAC), were measured in three brain regions (telencephalon, hypothalamus and optic tectum) and compared with those in control, non-stressed S. senegalensis. Neither type of stress caused any significant alteration of serotoninergic activity (5-HIAA:5-HT ratio) or NA levels. Dopaminergic activity (DOPAC:DA ratio) was lower in stressed fish in all of the brain regions studied. For both air exposure stress and net handling stress, DA levels were significantly higher (P < 0.05) than in the control S. senegalensis. In addition, the higher DA levels after net handling stress were always significantly higher (P < 0.05) than those observed after acute air exposure stress, except in the telencephalon after 24 h. The significantly lower DOPAC:DA ratio (P < 0.05) in all of the brain regions studied was only observed in response to net handling stress.