Perspective: Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data Within Food Is Medicine Program Evaluation: Considerations and Potential Paths Forward.

Government, health care systems and payers, philanthropic entities, advocacy groups, nonprofit organizations, community groups, and for-profit companies are presently making the case for Food is Medicine (FIM) nutrition programs to become reimbursable within health care services. FIM researchers are working urgently to build evidence for FIM programs' cost-effectiveness by showing improvements in health outcomes and health care utilization. However, primary collection of this data is costly, difficult to implement, and burdensome to participants. Electronic health records (EHRs) offer a promising alternative to primary data collection because they provide already-collected information from existing clinical care. A few FIM studies have leveraged EHRs to demonstrate positive impacts on biomarkers or health care utilization, but many FIM studies run into insurmountable difficulties in their attempts to use EHRs. The authors of this commentary serve as evaluators and/or technical assistance providers with the United States Department of Agriculture's Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program National Training, Technical Assistance, Evaluation, and Information Center. They work closely with over 100 Gus Schumacher Nutrition Incentive Program Produce Prescription FIM projects, which, as of 2023, span 34 US states and territories. In this commentary, we describe recurring challenges related to using EHRs in FIM evaluation, particularly in relation to biomarkers and health care utilization. We also outline potential opportunities and reasonable expectations for what can be learned from EHR data and describe other (non-EHR) data sources to consider for evaluation of long-term health outcomes and health care utilization. Large integrated health systems may be best positioned to use their own data to examine outcomes of interest to the broader field.

Improvements in nutrition knowledge among adults with physical disabilities: A program evaluation of the mindfulness, exercise, and nutrition to optimize resilience (MENTOR) program 2020-2021.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) funds a quality improvement (QI) health promotion telewellness program for adults with physical disabilities. OBJECTIVE: The nutrition component of the parent program, Mindfulness, Exercise, and Nutrition to Optimize Resilience (MENTOR) program, from 2020 to 2021, was evaluated to assess changes in nutrition knowledge of people with physical disabilities. METHODS: This was a quasi-experimental program evaluation by pre-post survey of participating adults with physical disabilities. Participants attended weekly nutrition classes for eight weeks with optional one-on-one counseling with a Registered Dietitian. Participants completed pre-post General Nutrition Knowledge Questionnaire Revised (GNKQ-R) that were analyzed using paired t-tests. Participants were grouped into quartiles by pre-program GNKQ-R scores for additional comparisons. Program attendance and post-program feedback were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 286 participants completed the MENTOR program, and 31% (n = 89) completed pre-post questionnaires for data analysis. Mean pre-program GNKQ-R scores were 58.4 ± 15.1 and post scores were 64.4 ± 11.3, which demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in nutrition knowledge (p < .001). Ancillary analysis revealed that participants with the lowest quartile of pre-program nutrition knowledge had the greatest improvements in their post-GNKQ-R scores (Mean change 16.4 ± 13.9). Questionnaire data revealed participants' subjective knowledge changes and their feedback on the nutrition component of the program. CONCLUSIONS: The eight-week MENTOR program effectively improved nutrition knowledge among people with physical disabilities. This demonstrates the impact the program can have on individual knowledge levels. Additionally, these results support the implementation of the program to the broader population of people with disabilities.

Evaluation of a Palliative Care Longitudinal Curriculum for Medical Students Using the Context-Input-Process-Product Model.

Palliative care (PC) longitudinal curricula are increasingly being recognized as important in Undergraduate Medical Education (UME). They are however, not yet commonplace, and where they do exist may be implemented without a systematic, prospective approach to curriculum evaluation. This paper describes an implementation of a new longitudinal curriculum at the Perelman School of Medicine (PSOM) at the University of Pennsylvania. We used the Context Input Process Product (CIPP) model, a holistic evaluation model, to assess the local environment, design the curriculum, guide the improvement process, and evaluate outcomes. Comprehensive models such as CIPP provide a more robust approach to curriculum evaluation than outcomes-only models and may be of use to other programs who are implementing new curricula or improving upon existing programs.

Process evaluation of paediatric fellowship training programs at a University Hospital in Pakistan.

BACKGROUND: Fellowship programs offer training in a subspecialty focusing on distinct and advanced clinical/academic skills. This advanced postgraduate training allows physicians, who desire a more specialized practice, to further develop clinical, academic, research, and leadership/administrative skills. The Aga Khan University (AKU) is one of the few institutes offering paediatric sub-specialty training in Pakistan. We aimed to evaluate the current Paediatric fellowship programs at AKU. METHODS: Process evaluation of six paediatric fellowship programs (cardiology, neurology, endocrinology, critical care medicine, neonatology, and infectious disease) was conducted from September 2020 to April 2021 by senior clinicians and medical educationists. Evidence was collected through document review (using existing postgraduate medical education program information form), observation of teaching and learning support, and focused group discussions/interviews with program faculty and fellows were conducted. A review of the evaluation report was done as part of this study. This study received an exemption from the ethical review committee. The quantitative data were analyzed using SPSS (22.0) while the reports of discussion with fellows and friends underwent content analysis. RESULTS: All fellowship programs met the criteria for having a robust competency-based fellowship curriculum as per the institutional and national guidelines. Formative assessment in the form of continuous evaluation was found to be integrated into all the fellowship programs, however, most of the programs were found to lack a summative assessment plan. Fellows in training and program faculty were satisfied with the opportunities for mentorship, teaching, and learning. Thematic analysis of the discussion reports with faculty and fellows revealed three key themes including, program aspects translating into strengthening the training, gaps in the training program in delivering the expectations, and making ways to reach par excellence. CONCLUSIONS: The process evaluation of paediatric fellowship programs provided an opportunity to holistically review the current strengths and quality of the training in individual programs along with the unmet needs of the trainees. This will help the program stakeholders to prioritize, align and allocate the resources to further enhance the quality of training and outcome of individual fellowship programs to ensure wider impacts at a regional, national, and international health system level.

Leadership Development in Early Career Scientists: Themes and Feedback from Executive Coaching and Mindful Leadership Training.

Background: Career development is essential for all academic stages, but particularly critical for the growth and retention of early career scientists. In addition to scientific technical training, professional skill development is crucial for the upward transition from postdoctoral trainee to early faculty member and beyond. Building leadership skills, specifically, is an important component of professional development, and the evaluation and reporting of professional development are important to improve and enhance the impact of programs. Methods: The purpose of this article is to share the program evaluation performed on leadership development activities, including executive coaching and mindful leadership training provided to a small group of early career scientists who participated in the National Institutes of Health (NIH)-funded Mayo Clinic Specialized Center of Research Excellence (SCORE) in Sex Differences Career Enhancement Core and Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health (BIRCWH) K12 programs during 2020-2022. Results: Eighty-seven percent of participants rated their satisfaction with the executive coaching program as "Very Satisfied" or "Satisfied," and 75% of participants were "Very Satisfied" or "Satisfied" with the mindful leadership training program. The findings of this program evaluation highlight the value of communication skills for navigating precarious situations, building self-efficacy and intentionality in making and holding boundaries for an individual's time and energy. Further, the individualized small group format of the activities allowed for deeper introspection and peer to peer connection. Conclusion: The identification of common themes within the Mayo Clinic program provides guidance to other academic environments on areas where they can support their early career scientists.

Integrative approaches to methods training for early-career scientists: Rationale and process evaluation of the first cohort of the Michigan Integrative Well-Being and Inequality Training Program.

Background: The Michigan Integrative Well-Being and Inequality (MIWI) Training Program aims to provide state-of-the-art, interdisciplinary training to enhance the methodological skills of early-career scientists interested in integrative approaches to understanding health disparities. The goals of this paper are to describe the scientific rationale and core design elements of MIWI, and to conduct a process evaluation of the first cohort of trainees (called "scholars") to complete this program. Methods: Mixed methods process evaluation of program components and assessment of trainee skills and network development of the first cohort (n = 15 scholars). Results: The program drew 57 applicants from a wide range of disciplines. Of the 15 scholars in the first cohort, 53% (n = 8) identified as an underrepresented minority, 60% (n = 9) were within 2 years of completing their terminal degree, and most (n = 11, 73%) were from a social/behavioral science discipline (e.g., social work, public health). In the post-program evaluation, scholars rated their improvement in a variety of skills on a one (not at all) to five (greatly improved) scale. Areas of greatest growth included being an interdisciplinary researcher (mean = 4.47), developing new research collaborations (mean = 4.53), and designing a research study related to integrative health (mean = 4.27). The qualitative process evaluation indicated that scholars reported a strong sense of community and that the program broadened their research networks. Conclusions: These findings have implications for National Institutes of Health (NIH) efforts to train early-career scientists, particularly from underrepresented groups, working at the intersection of multiple disciplines and efforts to support the formation of research networks.

Programa Nacional de Suplementação de Ferro nos primeiros mil dias de vida em Salvador (BA) / National Iron Supplementation Program in the first thousand days of life in Salvador (BA) / Programa Nacional de Suplementación de Hierro en los primeros mil días de vida en Salvador, Bahía

Os primeiros mil dias de vida correspondem ao período desde a concepção até os primeiros dois anos após o nascimento. Durante essa fase, as necessidades nutricionais são elevadas devido às aceleradas alterações fisiológicas inerentes ao período, e o ferro está entre os micronutrientes mais requisitados. Considerando que a anemia, em especial por deficiência de ferro, é um problema de saúde pública, principalmente nessa fase da vida, foi instituído em 2005 o Programa Nacional de Suplementação de Ferro (PNSF). No entanto, há uma lacuna de estudos que analisam sua execução em municípios da Bahia. Por esse motivo, este estudo observacional descritivo objetivou avaliar a cobertura real do PNSF entre gestantes e crianças de 6 a 24 meses de vida, público-alvo do programa, no município de Salvador (BA), entre os anos de 2017 e 2022, a partir da análise de dados secundários disponibilizados pelo Ministério da Saúde. A cobertura real do PNSF ocorreu de forma insatisfatória no município, alcançando quantidades inferiores a 7% das gestantes e 1% das crianças, entre os anos de 2019 e 2021, e valores iguais a 0% para ambos os grupos nos anos de 2017, 2018 e 2022. Tais resultados podem ser motivados por diferentes fatores, como problemas operacionais na gestão/monitoramento do programa e/ou a baixa adesão da população. Destaca-se, assim, a necessidade da constante avaliação do desempenho do PNSF no intuito de identificar suas limitações e propor melhorias em sua execução.

The first thousand days of life correspond to the period from conception to the first two years after birth. During this phase, nutritional needs are high due to the accelerated physiological changes inherent to the period, and iron is among the most required micronutrients. Considering that anemia, especially due to iron deficiency, is a public health problem, especially at this stage of life, the National Iron Supplementation Program (PNSF) was instituted in 2005. However, there is a lack of studies that analyze its execution on municipalities in Bahia (BA). For this reason, this descriptive observational study aimed to evaluate the coverage of the PNSF among pregnant women and children between 6 and 24 months of life, the target audience of the program, in the municipality of Salvador (BA), between 2017 and 2022, based on the analysis of secondary data provided by the Ministry of Health. The actual coverage of the PNSF occurred unsatisfactorily in the municipality, reaching numbers below 7% of pregnant women and 1% of children, between the years 2019 and 2021, and values equal to 0% for both groups in the years 2017, 2018, and 2022. Such results can be due to different factors, such as operational problems in the management/monitoring of the program and/or the low adherence of the population. Thus, we highlight the need for constant evaluation of the PNSF performance to identify its limitations and propose improvements in its execution.

Los primeros mil días de vida corresponden al período que va desde la concepción hasta los primeros dos años después del nacimiento. Durante esta fase, las necesidades nutricionales son elevadas, debido a los cambios fisiológicos acelerados propios del período, y el hierro es uno de los micronutrientes más requeridos. Como la anemia, especialmente por deficiencia de hierro, es un problema de salud pública, especialmente en esta etapa de la vida, en 2005 se instituyó el Programa Nacional de Suplementación con Hierro (PNSF, por sus siglas en portugués). Sin embargo, faltan estudios que analicen su ejecución en municipios de Bahía (Brasil). Por esta razón, este estudio observacional descriptivo tuvo por objetivo evaluar la cobertura real del PNSF en mujeres embarazadas y en niños de entre 6 y 24 meses de vida, público objetivo del programa, en la ciudad de Salvador (Bahía), entre 2017 y 2022, con base en el análisis de datos secundarios proporcionados por el Ministerio de Salud. La cobertura real del PNSF se presentó de manera insatisfactoria en el municipio, alcanzando cifras inferiores al 7% de embarazadas y al 1% de niños, entre los años 2019 y 2021, con valores iguales al 0% para ambos grupos analizados en los años 2017, 2018 y 2022. Estos resultados pueden ser causados por diferentes factores, entre ellos, problemas operativos en la gestión/seguimiento del programa y/o baja adherencia de la población. Así, se destaca la necesidad de una evaluación constante del desempeño del Programa para identificar sus limitaciones y proponer mejoras en su ejecución.

Acceptability, Appropriateness and Feasibility of a Nurse-Led Integrated Care Intervention for Patients with Severe Exacerbation of COPD from the Healthcare Professional's Perspective - A Mixed Method Study.

Purpose: To improve inpatient care and self-management in patients with severe acute exacerbations of COPD, we implemented a nurse-led behavioral intervention. This study aimed to assess implementation outcomes from the perspective of the healthcare professionals (HCP) who delivered it. Methods: Using an explanatory sequential mixed method approach, we conducted an online questionnaire and two small group interviews. We applied descriptive statistics for quantitative data, a framework analysis for qualitative data, and a mixed methods matrix to integrate the results. Results: A total of 19 of 27 invited participants answered the online questionnaire; 9 of 19 participated in the group interviews. The intervention's overall acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility was rated high to very high (median 5/5; 4/5 and 4/5). Enablers to implementation included general recognition of the need for specialized care, sufficient knowledge of the intervention by HCP, and strong interprofessional collaboration. Main barriers included the lack of resident physician's resources and difficulties in adaptability. Conclusion: While the acceptance of the intervention was very high, the perceived appropriateness and feasibility were affected by its complexity. The availability of a knowledgeable interprofessional core team is a strategy that supports the implementation of complex interventions.

The implementation and evaluation of a mentoring program for Bachelor of Midwifery students in the clinical practice environment.

AIM: To describe the implementation and evaluation of a midwife/midwifery student-mentoring program in one Local Health District in Sydney NSW Australia. BACKGROUND: Evidence suggests well designed and supported midwife/midwifery student mentorship programs can make a difference to the clinical placement experiences and attrition rates of midwifery students. DESIGN: In the evaluation of the mentoring program, we used surveys, focus groups and individual interviews. METHODS: Eighty-six participants, including midwife mentors, midwifery students, non-mentor midwives and midwifery managers participated in the evaluation. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative data, content analysis. RESULTS: The mentoring program increased midwives' mentoring skills and was beneficial to their professional growth and leadership skills. Students reported positive outcomes including someone to talk to, emotional support and a sense of belonging. Mentoring programs require structure, mentor training, organisational support and transparency. CONCLUSION: The mentoring program provided benefits to both midwifery mentors and students and demonstrated the value of a structured and supported mentoring program for midwifery students.

Critical success factors for school-based integrated health care models: Learnings from an Australian example.

ISSUES ADDRESSED: Integrated school-based health services have the potential to address the unmet health needs of children experiencing disadvantage, yet these models remain poorly evaluated. The current article examines an integrated social and health care hub located on the grounds of a regional Australian public primary school, the Our Mia Mia Wellbeing Hub, to identify critical success factors for this service and others like it. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with N = 55 multi-sector stakeholders comprising parents, students, school staff, social and health care providers, and local Aboriginal community members. Interview transcripts were analysed according to a grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Six themes emerged from the analysis, reflecting important success factors for the model: service accessibility; service coordination; integration of education and health systems; trust; community partnerships; and perceptions of health. CONCLUSIONS: Findings highlighted Our Mia Mia as a promising model of care, yet also revealed important challenges for the service as it responds to the varied priorities of the stakeholders it serves. SO WHAT?: Through capturing the perspectives of a large number of stakeholders, the current study provides valuable insight into key challenges and success factors for Our Mia Mia; these learnings can guide the development of other emerging school-based health services and integrated care hubs.

A triangulation model for assessment of change in classroom behavior of medical teachers participating in faculty development program on lecturing skills.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: We utilized a triangulation method of a faculty development program's (FDP) evaluation comprising short-course workshops on classroom behaviors and lecturing skills of basic sciences faculty in a medical school. METHODS & RESULTS: This study utilized data from the pre and post evaluation of classroom lectures by an expert observer. Course participants were observed before the inception of a 4-month FDP and after 6-months of program completion. Findings at 6-month post-FDP interval were supplemented with students' and participant's self-evaluation. Expert evaluation of 15 participants showed that more participants were summarizing lectures at the end of their class (p = 0.021), utilizing more than one teaching tool (p = 0.008) and showing a well-structured flow of information (p = 0.013). Among the students, majority (95.5%, n = 728) agreed on "teachers were well-prepared for the lecture", however, a low number (66.1%, n = 504) agreed on "teachers were able to make the lecture interesting". On self-evaluation (n = 12), majority of the participants (91.7%, n = 11) thought these FDP workshops had a positive impact on their role as a teacher. CONCLUSIONS: Gathering feedback from multiple sources can provide a more holistic insight into the impact of an FDP and can provide a robust framework for setting up future FDP targets.

Diffusion of excellence: evaluating a system to identify, replicate, and spread promising innovative practices across the Veterans health administration.

Introduction: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) Diffusion of Excellence (DoE) program provides a system to identify, replicate, and spread promising practices across the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States. DoE identifies innovations that have been successfully implemented in the VHA through a Shark Tank style competition. VHA facility and regional directors bid resources needed to replicate promising practices. Winning facilities/regions receive external facilitation to aid in replication/implementation over the course of a year. DoE staff then support diffusion of successful practices across the nationwide VHA. Methods: Organized around the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) Framework, we summarize results of an ongoing long-term mixed-methods implementation evaluation of DoE. Data sources include: Shark Tank application and bid details, tracking practice adoptions through a Diffusion Marketplace, characteristics of VHA facilities, focus groups with Shark Tank bidders, structured observations of DoE events, surveys of DoE program participants, and semi-structured interviews of national VHA program office leaders, VHA healthcare system/facility executives, practice developers, implementation teams and facilitators. Results: In the first eight Shark Tanks (2016-2022), 3,280 Shark Tank applications were submitted; 88 were designated DoE Promising Practices (i.e., practices receive facilitated replication). DoE has effectively spread practices across the VHA, with 1,440 documented instances of adoption/replication of practices across the VHA. This includes 180 adoptions/replications in facilities located in rural areas. Leadership decisions to adopt innovations are often based on big picture considerations such as constituency support and linkage to organizational goals. DoE Promising Practices that have the greatest national spread have been successfully replicated at new sites during the facilitated replication process, have close partnerships with VHA national program offices, and tend to be less expensive to implement. Two indicators of sustainment indicate that 56 of the 88 Promising Practices are still being diffused across the VHA; 56% of facilities originally replicating the practices have sustained them, even up to 6 years after the first Shark Tank. Conclusion: DoE has developed a sustainable process for the identification, replication, and spread of promising practices as part of a learning health system committed to providing equitable access to high quality care.

Programa Nacional de Suplementação de Vitamina A na atenção primária: qual a realidade em Minas Gerais, Brasil? / National Vitamin A Supplementation Program in primary care: what is the reality in Minas Gerais, Brazil?

Resumo Objetivou-se avaliar o Programa Nacional de Suplementação de Vitamina A em Minas Gerais. Utilizou-se método misto sequencial explanatório. Na abordagem quantitativa, utilizou-se instrumento multidimensional segundo componentes de suplementação da vitamina A e educação alimentar e nutricional. Usou-se uma matriz de análise com parâmetros para definir a implantação como adequada, parcialmente adequada, não adequada e crítica. Na abordagem qualitativa, foram utilizadas entrevistas semiestruturadas. A dimensão processo foi melhor avaliada que a estrutura, apresentando grau de implantação de 84,6% e 78,5%, respectivamente. As fortalezas do programa incluem: planejamento da suplementação, alcance de metas, registro de informações, apoio ao aleitamento materno e atuação dos agentes comunitários de saúde. Entre as fragilidades estão: fragmentação do trabalho, limites na análise das informações, acesso às ações do programa, implantação de ações educativas, ausência ou insuficiência de nutricionistas e capacitações. A realidade do programa não contemplou, em sua totalidade, ações de promoção da saúde, sendo o foco a suplementação da vitamina A. É imperativo implementar ações de educação alimentar e nutricional para o enfrentamento da deficiência de vitamina A.

Abstract The present study aimed to evaluate the National Vitamin A Supplementation Program in Minas Gerais, adopting the mixed sequential explanatory method. The quantitative approach adopted the multidimensional instrument per the components of vitamin A supplementation and food and nutrition education. We employed an analysis matrix with parameters to define the implementation as adequate, partially adequate, inadequate, and critical. We used semi-structured interviews in the qualitative approach. The "process" dimension was better evaluated than the "structure", with an implementation level (IL) of 84.6% and 78.5%, respectively. The Program's strengths include supplementation planning, achieving goals, recording information, supporting breastfeeding, and the performance of Community Health Workers. Weaknesses are fragmented work, analysis of information limits, access to the Program's actions, implementation of educational actions, and lack of or insufficient availability of nutritionists and training. The Program's reality only partially considered health promotion actions and focused on vitamin A supplementation. Implementing food and nutritional education actions is imperative to face vitamin A deficiency.

The impact of medically tailored meals and nutrition therapy on biometric and dietary outcomes among food-insecure patients with congestive heart failure: a matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the impact of home-delivered, medically tailored meals and medical nutrition therapy among food-insecure patients following hospitalization for congestive heart failure by comparing clinical outcomes to a retrospectively matched cohort. METHODS: Patients at high risk for readmission and food insecurity received up to three months of medically tailored meals and medical nutrition therapy after discharge. Pre-intervention and post-intervention weight, body mass index, blood pressure, and dietary intake were assessed. A combination of difference-in-difference and logistic regression models were used to compare changes between cohorts and evaluate impact attributable to the program. RESULTS: Thirty-nine program participants were compared to a matched cohort of 117 unexposed patients. Participants experienced a marginal reduction in body mass index and an increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure; however, these results were not statistically significant. To determine relevance to clinical cut-offs, logistic regressions were used, demonstrating that exposure to the intervention resulted in higher odds of a categorical reduction in blood pressure (OR: 1.85), though this did not reach statistical significance (95% CI: 0.67-5.32). Pre vs. post trends indicated that more-healthful foods and drinks increased numerically or remained similar to baseline, while less-healthful foods decreased numerically or remained similar to baseline. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: These findings highlight the need for more longitudinal research on medically tailored meals and medical nutrition therapy interventions using clinical outcomes while setting realistic suggestions for program implementation. This study additionally illustrates the promise of integrating electronic medical record data and matched cohorts into medical nutrition program evaluation within the health sector.

Understanding malnutrition management through a socioecological lens: Evaluation of a community-based child malnutrition program in rural Uganda.

In Uganda, almost half of children under 5 years old suffer from undernutrition. Undernutrition, a common form of malnutrition in children, encompasses stunting, wasting and underweight. The causes of child undernutrition are complex, suggesting that interventions to tackle malnutrition must be multifaceted. Furthermore, limited access to healthcare for vulnerable populations restricts the potential of hospital-based strategies. Community-based management of acute malnutrition (CMAM), which includes nutritional counselling, ready-to-use therapeutic foods and the outpatient management of malnutrition by caregivers, is recognised as an effective approach for children's recovery. However, evaluations of CMAM programs are largely based on biomedical and behavioural health models, failing to incorporate structural factors that influence malnutrition management. The objective of this evaluation was to understand the factors influencing malnutrition management in a CMAM program in rural Uganda, using the socioecological model to assess the multilevel determinants of outpatient malnutrition management. This evaluation used qualitative methods to identify factors related to caregivers, healthcare providers and societal structures that influence children's outpatient care. Data were collected at a community health clinic in 2019 through observations and interviews with caregivers of malnourished children. We observed 14 caregiver-provider encounters and interviewed 15 caregivers to examine factors hindering outpatient malnutrition management. Data were thematically analysed informed by the socioecological model. Findings showed that caregivers had a limited understanding of malnutrition. Counselling offered to caregivers was inconsistent and insufficient. Poverty and gender inequality limited caregivers' access to healthcare and their ability to care for their children. Factors at the caregiver and healthcare levels interacted with societal factors to shape malnutrition management. Results suggest that CMAM programs would benefit from providing holistic interventions to tackle the structural barriers to children's care. Using a socioecological approach to program evaluation could help move beyond individual determinants to address the social dynamics shaping malnutrition management in low- and middle-income countries.

[Development and Evaluation of an Integrated Health Management Program for Psychiatric Patients with Metabolic Syndrome].

PURPOSE: This study developed an integrated health management program for metabolic syndrome in psychiatric patients and examined its effects on self-efficacy, healthy lifestyle, physiological indicators, knowledge of metabolic syndrome, attitudes toward healthy behavior, and social support. METHODS: A non-equivalent control group pretest posttest design was used. The participants were 65 psychiatric patients with metabolic syndrome in psychiatric rehabilitation centers, with 33 in the experimental group and 32 in the control group. The experimental group participants engaged in daily mobile application and walking exercises three times a week for more than 40 minutes over 8 weeks, while those in the control group were provided education booklets. The outcomes were measured using self-report questionnaires, anthropometrics, and blood analyses. Intervention effects were analyzed using the independent t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, ANCOVA, and Ranked ANCOVA. RESULTS: The experimental group showed a significant increase in self-efficacy (F = 8.85, p = .004, ηp² = .13) and knowledge of metabolic syndrome (t = 2.60, p = .012, d = 0.60) compared to the control group. Additionally, the experimental group demonstrated a significant decrease in waist circumference (Z = -2.34, p = .009, d = 0.58) and body mass index (Z = -1.91, p = .028, d = 0.47) compared to the control group. CONCLUSION: The integrated health management program for psychiatric patients with metabolic syndrome is effective in improving self-efficacy and knowledge of metabolic syndrome and decreasing physiological indicators such as waist circumference and body mass index.

What helps distressed Australian adolescents impacted by cancer? Mechanisms of improvement of the PEER program.

PEER is a four-day residential program for adolescents impacted by their own or a relative's cancer, with both psychosocial (acceptance and commitment therapy, self-compassion) and recreational components. This study aimed to determine whether previously observed improvements in quality of life amongst highly distressed participants were mediated by improvements in processes targeted by psychotherapeutic elements of the program (psychological flexibility, mindfulness, self-compassion, peer support, distress). Adolescents attending PEER completed surveys assessing the quality of life and proposed mediator variables at pre-program, post-program and two-month follow-up. Adolescents experiencing high/very high levels of baseline distress (n = 52; 5 patients/survivors, 31 siblings/offspring, 13 bereaved siblings/offspring) were previously identified as experiencing clinically significant improvements in psychosocial well-being; here, mediation analyses explored whether these improvements were associated with improvements in process variables. Findings evidenced improvements in quality of life amongst distressed PEER participants, mediated by increases in psychological flexibility and self-compassion, and reductions in distress. Peer support and mindfulness were not significant mediators. Together, this suggests that the psychosocial benefits of PEER observed for highly distressed adolescents are linked to the specific therapeutic approaches used in the program, rather than being non-specific effects of peer connection or recreation. Findings from this evaluation provide further evidence for the efficacy and mechanisms of the effect of PEER for supporting distressed adolescents impacted by cancer. The study also demonstrates the viability and utility of the therapeutic approaches (acceptance and commitment therapy, self-compassion) used, showing that they have psychosocial benefits for this population.

A Multi-Site Evaluation of A National Employee Wellness Initiative at the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Background: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) seeks to transform its health care delivery from disease-centered, episodic care to a holistic and patient-centered model known as the Whole Health System (WHS) of care. Employee engagement and buy-in are crucial to this cultural transformation. The VA aspires to provide employees with opportunities to experience whole health in their personal and professional lives through a national Employee Whole Health (EWH) program. Although there are national recommendations, different local facilities may have unique strategies and challenges as they implement this program. Objective: This study aimed to conduct a program evaluation of EWH at three different VA facilities across the United States in order to identify facilitators and barriers to the implementation of EWH. Methods: The team used the RE-AIM framework to develop an interview guide to assess various domains of implementation. Quantitative data on whole health offerings at each site were gauged using a national employee education platform. Standardized employee-related metrics at each site were assessed using the annual, national VA employee survey. Results: EWH has had variable implementation at the three sites. Sites noted main facilitators as employee interest as well as available skills and expertise for delivering complementary and integrative care to employees. Limited staffing for EWH and a lack of dedicated employee time were cited as barriers. The infrastructure to perform local program evaluations to demonstrate effectiveness and impact were missing. Conclusion: Employee engagement in whole health activities has the potential to support the VA's mission to transform its health care delivery model. Currently, the use of EWH and its potential impact are difficult to discern based on available information. Local sites need guidance to conduct program evaluations and find creative solutions to enhance employee participation. A robust measurement system to demonstrate effectiveness is paramount to ensure the success of this initiative.