Alcohol Consumption Is Associated With Postablation Recurrence but Not Changes in Atrial Substrate in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Insight from a High-Density Mapping Study.

Background The association between alcohol consumption, atrial substrate, and outcomes after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation remains controversial. This study evaluated the impacts of drinking on left atrial substrate and AF recurrence after ablation. Methods and Results We prospectively enrolled 110 patients with AF without structural heart disease (64±12 years) from 2 institutions. High-density left atrial electroanatomic mapping was performed using a high-density grid multipolar catheter. We investigated the impact of alcohol consumption on left atrial voltage, left atrial conduction velocity, and AF ablation outcome. Patients were classified as abstainers (<1 drink/wk), mild drinkers (1-7 drinks/wk), or moderate-heavy drinkers (>7 drinks/wk). High-density mapping (mean 2287±600 points/patient) was performed on 49 abstainers, 27 mild drinkers, and 34 moderate-heavy drinkers. Low-voltage zone and slow-conduction zone were identified in 39 (35%) and 54 (49%) patients, respectively. There was no significant difference in the proportions of low-voltage zone and slow-conduction zone among the 3 groups. The success rate after a single ablation was significantly lower in drinkers than in abstainers (79.3% versus 95.9% at 12 months; mean follow-up, 18±8 months; P=0.013). The success rate after a single or multiple ablations was not significantly different among abstainers and drinkers. In multivariate analysis, alcohol consumption (P=0.02) and the presence of a low-voltage zone (P=0.032) and slow-conduction zone (P=0.02) were associated with AF recurrence after a single ablation, while low-voltage zone (P=0.023) and slow-conduction zone (P=0.024) were associated with AF recurrence after a single or multiple ablations. Conclusions Alcohol consumption was associated with AF recurrence after a single ablation but not changes in atrial substrate.

Bi-atrial characterization of the electrical substrate in patients with atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Little is known regarding the characterization of electrical substrate in both atria in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Eight consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation (five paroxysmal, three persistent) underwent electrical substrate characterization during sinus rhythm. Mapping of the left (LA) and right atrium (RA) was performed with the use of the HD Grid catheter (Abbott). Bipolar voltage maps were analyzed to search for low voltage areas (LVA), the following electrophysiological phenomena were assessed: (1) slow conduction corridors, and (2) lines of block. EGMs were characterized to search for fractionation. Electrical characteristics were compared between atria and between paroxysmal versus persistent AF patients. RESULTS: In the RA, LVAs were present in 60% of patients with paroxysmal AF and 100% of patients with persistent AF. In the LA, LVAs were present in 40% of patients with paroxysmal AF and 66% of patients with persistent AF. The areas of LVA in the RA and LA were 4.8±7.3 cm2 and 7.8±13.6 cm2 in patients with paroxysmal AF versus 11.7±3.0 cm2 and 2.1±1.8 cm2 in patients with persistent AF. In the RA, slow conduction corridors were present in 40.0% (paroxysmal AF) versus 66.7% (persistent AF) whereas in the LA, slow conduction corridors occurred in 20.0% versus 33.3% respectively (p = ns). EGM analysis showed more fractionation in persistent AF patients than paroxysmal (RA: persistent AF 10.8 vs. paroxysmal AF 4.7%, p = .036, LA: 10.3 vs. 4.1%, p = .108). CONCLUSION: Bi-atrial involvement is present in patients with paroxysmal and persistent AF. This is expressed by low voltage areas and slow conduction corridors whose extension progresses as the arrhythmia becomes persistent. This electrophysiological substrate demonstrates the important interplay with the pulmonary vein triggers to constitute the substrate for persistent arrhythmia.

Dynamic Atrial Substrate During High-Density Mapping of Paroxysmal and Persistent AF: Implications for Substrate Ablation.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the impact of rate and direction on left atrial (LA) substrate. BACKGROUND: The extent to which substrate mapped in sinus rhythm varies according to cycle length and direction of wave front propagation is unknown. METHODS: A total of 73 consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) underwent electroanatomic LA mapping before pulmonary vein isolation using multipolar catheter during distal coronary sinus (CS) pacing at 600 ms and 300 ms. Additional maps were created during left superior pulmonary vein pacing at 300 ms. Bipolar voltage, conduction velocity (CV), and complex signals were determined. RESULTS: Mean age was 61 ± 9 years, 67% were men, and 53% had persistent AF. Global mean voltage was lower with CS pacing at 300 ms compared with 600 ms (1.56 ± 0.47 mV vs. 1.74 ± 0.48 mV; p < 0.001). This was seen in all LA segments. Global CV was reduced (30.4 ± 13.0 cm/s vs. 38.6 ± 14.0 cm/s; p < 0.001) with greater complex signals at 300 ms (8.9% vs. 5.3%; p < 0.005). Compared with CS pacing, left superior pulmonary vein pacing demonstrated highly regional changes with decreased voltage (1.04 ± 0.43 mV vs. 1.47 ± 0.53 mV; p = 0.01) and CV (24.4 ± 13.0 cm/s vs. 39.9 ± 16.6 cm/s; p = 0.008), and greater complex signals posteriorly. Longer AF duration in paroxysmal AF (p = 0.02) and shorter duration in persistent AF (p = 0.015) and left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.016) were independent predictors of voltage change. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF, variation in cycle length and direction of wave front activation produce both generalized and regional changes in voltage, CV, and complex fractionation, resulting in significant changes in substrate maps. This study highlights the potential limitations of static low-voltage maps to identify the AF ablation target zone.

Moderate alcohol consumption is associated with atrial electrical and structural changes: Insights from high-density left atrial electroanatomic mapping.

BACKGROUND: Regular alcohol intake is an important modifiable risk factor associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) and left atrial (LA) dilation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of different degrees of alcohol consumption on atrial remodeling using high-density electroanatomic mapping. METHODS: We enrolled 75 patients before AF ablation to undergo high-density LA mapping (CARTO, Biosense Webster) using a multipolar catheter. The Confidense algorithm was used to create maps during distal coronary sinus pacing at 600 ms. Bipolar voltage and complex atrial activity were assessed, and isochronal activation maps were created to determine global conduction velocity (CV). Patients were classified as lifelong nondrinkers, mild drinkers (2-7 drinks/week), or moderate drinkers (8-21 drinks/week). RESULTS: High-density electroanatomic mapping (mean 1016 ± 445 points per patient) was performed on 25 lifelong nondrinkers, 25 mild drinkers (4.4 ± 2.3 drinks/week), and 25 moderate drinkers (14.0 ± 4.2 drinks/week). Moderate drinkers had significantly lower mean global bipolar voltages (1.53 ± 0.62 mV vs 1.89 ± 0.45 mV; P = .02), slower CV (33.5 ± 14.4 cm/s vs 41.7 ± 12.1 cm/s; P = .04), and a higher proportion of complex atrial potentials (7.8% ± 4.7% vs 4.5% ± 2.7%; P = .004) compared to nondrinkers. Global voltage and CV did not differ significantly in mild drinkers, but there was a significant increase in global complex potentials (6.6% ± 4.6%; P = .04) and regional low-voltage zones (<0.5 mV) in the septum and lateral wall (P <.05) compared with nondrinkers. CONCLUSION: Regular moderate alcohol consumption, but not mild consumption, is an important modifiable risk factor for AF associated with lower atrial voltage and conduction slowing. These electrical and structural changes may explain the propensity to AF in regular drinkers.

Comparison between linear and focal ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms in patients with non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: a prospective randomized trial.

AIMS: Findings regarding efficacy of substrate modification for non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) are inconsistent. We prospectively compared clinical outcomes of complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE)-guided focal ablation (CFA) and CFAE-guided linear ablation (CLA) in patients with non-paroxysmal AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomized 150 patients with non-paroxysmal AF into CFA and CLA groups in a 1:1 ratio. Complex fractionated atrial electrogram distribution was evaluated using an automated algorithm of a three-dimensional mapping system. After pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), CFAE-guided ablation was performed in the left atrium and then in the right atrium (RA). When compared with conventional CFA, CLA was performed based on conventional lines, with additional lines. Atrial fibrillation was not induced after PVI alone or with cavotricuspid isthmus ablation in 20.7% of patients. To achieve the endpoint, additional CFAE-guided RA ablation was required in 42.7% and 36.0% of patients undergoing CFA and CLA, respectively (P = 0.403). Atrial fibrillation was terminated during CFAE-guided ablation in 72.9% and 75.0% of patients undergoing CFA and CLA, respectively (P = 0.792). Termination of atrial tachycardia (AT) or non-inducibility of AF/AT was achieved in 61.3% and 68.0% of patients undergoing CFA and CLA, respectively (P = 0.393). The CLA group showed decreased 1-year freedom from AF/AT recurrence (60.0%, CFA vs. 47.3%, CLA; log rank P = 0.085), but no significant difference throughout the follow-up (22.2 ± 21.0 months) (67.1%, CFA vs. 68.9%, CLA; log rank P = 0.298). CONCLUSION: Long-term efficacy of CFAE-guided ablation was unaffected by the ablation technique in patients with non-paroxysmal AF.

Cigarette smoking causes a worse long-term outcome in persistent atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation.

INTRODUCTION: Cigarette smoking contributes to the development of atrial fibrosis via nicotine. The impact of smoking on ablation results in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is unknown. We aimed to investigate the triggers and long-term outcome between smokers and nonsmokers in the patients with persistent AF after catheter ablation. METHODS: This study included 201 (177 males, 53 ± 10 years old) patients who received index catheter ablation, including pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) ablation for persistent AF, retrospectively. Electrophysiological characteristics at the index procedure and long-term outcome were investigated to determine the differences between smokers and nonsmokers. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar between two groups. Pulmonary vein (PV) triggers were found in all patients in the two groups. There was a higher incidence of nonpulmonary vein (NPV) triggers in smokers than in nonsmokers (61% vs. 31%, P < 0.05). There were no differences of the long-term ablation outcomes between smokers and nonsmokers in Kaplan-Meier analysis. Smokers with PV plus right atrial NPV (RA-NPV) triggers had a higher incidence of recurrence (log-rank P < 0.05) than those without RA-NPV triggers, but not in nonsmokers, after a mean follow-up of 31 ± 25 months. CONCLUSIONS: Smoking increases the incidence of NPV triggers in patients with persistent AF. Smokers who have RA-NPV triggers during index procedure do have a worse outcome after catheter ablation, indicating the harmful effects of nicotine to right atrium.

Biatrial linear ablation in sustained nonpermanent AF: Results of the substrate modification with ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs in nonpermanent atrial fibrillation (SMAN-PAF) trial.

BACKGROUND: More advanced atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with lower success rates after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), and the optimal ablation strategy is uncertain. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of additional linear ablation (lines) compared to PVI alone. METHODS: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial, 122 patients (mean age 61.9 ± 10.5 years; left atrial diameter 43 ± 6 mm) with persistent AF (PeAF) or sustained (>12 hours) paroxysmal AF (SusPAF) with risk factors for atrial substrate were included and followed up for 12 months. Patients were randomized to PVI-only or PVI + lines (left atrial roof line, mitral isthmus line, and tricuspid isthmus line) group. Holter monitoring was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months and according to symptoms. The primary outcome was atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence lasting ≥30 seconds. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups; 61% had PeAF and 39% SusPAF. Successful PVI was achieved for 98% of pulmonary veins, and bidirectional block was obtained in 90% of lines. The primary end point occurred in 38% of the PVI + lines group and 32% of the PVI-only group (P = .50), which was consistent in both PeAF (36% vs 28%; P = .45) and SusPAF (42% vs 39%; P = .86). Compared with the PVI-only group, the PVI + lines group had higher procedure duration (209 ± 52 minutes vs 172 ± 44 minutes; P < .001), ablation time (4352 ± 1084 seconds vs 2503 ± 1061 seconds; P < .001), and radiation exposure (Dose-area product 3992 ± 6496 Gy·cm(2) vs 2106 ± 1679 Gy·cm(2); P = .03). Quality of life (disease-specific Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life questionnaire and mental component scale of the Short Form 36 Health Survey) improved significantly during the study but did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Adding lines to wide antral PVI in substrate-based AF requires significantly more ablation, increases procedure duration and radiation dose, but provides no additional clinical benefit.

A prospective and randomized comparison of limited versus extensive atrial substrate modification after circumferential pulmonary vein isolation in nonparoxysmal atrial fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: The optimal substrate ablation approach in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (Per AF) remains unclear. This was a prospective randomized study comparing the efficacy of limited (continuous complex fractionated atrial electrogram, CFAE: <60 milliseconds) versus extensive (continuous CFAE plus variable CFAE: <120 milliseconds) atrial substrate modification in Per AF patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 120 Per AF patients in the study, and 30 patients with AF termination after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) were excluded. In the remaining 90 patients, 45 were treated with limited approach (Group 1) and 45 with an extensive approach (Group 2). The end point of the study was the incidence of an atrial arrhythmia recurrence postblanking period. The patients were followed up for 15 months with 3-month clinical reviews, electrograms (ECGs), Holter recordings, and echocardiographic monitoring. Procedural AF termination and the single procedural efficacy were statistically comparable between the 2 groups (48.9% vs. 63.4% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively, P = 0.289). During the follow-up, patients who received limited ablation had a lower incidence of recurrent AFL (P = 0.04), and better reverse remodeling of the left atrium (LA, P = 0.04). After 2 procedures, the freedom from any atrial arrhythmia was better in Group 2 (62.2% vs. 87.8%, P = 0.009). Those with longstanding AF and a larger baseline LA size responded better to the extensive ablation. CONCLUSIONS: In the Per AF patients who failed to achieve AF termination after PVI alone, a specific atrial substrate modification approach targeting only continuous CFAEs could be considered as an initial ablation strategy.