Emergence of cefiderocol resistance during ceftazidime/avibactam treatment caused by a large genomic deletion, including ampD and piuCD genes, in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

We report the emergence of cefiderocol resistance during the treatment of a ST312 Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory infection with ceftazidime/avibactam. whole genome sequencing (WGS) revealed that resistance was caused by a large genomic deletion, including PiuDC (iron transport system) and AmpD (ampC negative regulator), driven by the integration of phage DNA. Thus, our findings alert that this type of deletion could be an efficient (two mechanisms in one step) specific cefiderocol resistance mechanism that might occur nonspecifically upon treatment with ß-lactams that select for AmpC overexpression.

Clinical efficacy of ceftazidime/avibactam combination therapy for severe hospital-acquired pulmonary infections caused by carbapenem-resistant and difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective study aimed to identify the effectiveness of ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) and its optimisation programs for severe hospital-acquired pulmonary infections (sHAPi) caused by carbapenem-resistant and difficult-to-treat Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA and DTR-P. aeruginosa). METHODS: We retrospectively analysed observational data on treatment and outcomes of CAZ/AVI for sHAPi caused by CRPA or DTR-P. aeruginosa. The primary study outcomes were to evaluate the clinical and microbiology efficacy of CAZ/AVI. RESULTS: The cohort consisted of 84 in-patients with sHAPi caused by CRPA (n = 39) and DTR-P. aeruginosa (n = 45) who received at least 72 h of CAZ/AVI therapy. The clinical cure rate was 63.1% in total. There was no significant difference in study outcomes between patients treated with CAZ/AVI monotherapy and those managed with combination regimens. CAZ/AVI as first-line therapy possessed prominent clinical benefits regarding infections caused by DTR-P. aeruginosa. The clinical cure rate was positively relevant with loading dose for CAZ/AVI (odds ratio [OR] 0.03; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.004-0.19; P < 0.001) and with CAZ/AVI administration by prolonged infusion (odds ratio 0.15; 95% confidence interval 0.03-0.77; P = 0.002). APACHE II score>15 (P = 0.013), septic shock at infection onset (P = 0.001), and CAZ/AVI dose adjustment for renal dysfunction (P = 0.003) were negative predictors of clinical cure. CONCLUSION: CAZ/AVI is a valid alternative for sHAPi caused by CPRA and DTR-P. aeruginosa, even when used alone. Optimisations of the treatment with CAZ/AVI in critically ill patients, including loading dose, adequate maintenance dose and prolonged infusion, were positively associated with potential clinical benefits.

Ceftazidime-avibactam versus polymyxins in treating patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) pose a significant threat to human health and have emerged as a major public health concern. We aimed to compare the efficacy and the safety of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and polymyxin in the treatment of CRE infections. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Published studies on the use of CAZ-AVI and polymyxin in the treatment of CRE infections were collected from the inception of the database until March 2023. Two investigators independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies and extracted the data. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software. RESULTS: Ten articles with 833 patients were included (CAZ-AVI 325 patients vs Polymyxin 508 patients). Compared with the patients who received polymyxin-based therapy, the patients who received CAZ-AVI therapy had significantly lower 30-days mortality (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.01-2.34; I2 = 22%; P < 0.00001), higher clinical cure rate (RR = 2.70; 95% CI 1.67-4.38; I2 = 40%; P < 0.00001), and higher microbial clearance rate (RR = 2.70; 95% CI 2.09-3.49; I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001). However, there was no statistically difference in the incidence of acute kidney injury between patients who received CAZ-AVI and polymyxin therapy (RR = 1.38; 95% CI 0.69-2.77; I2 = 22%; P = 0.36). In addition, among patients with CRE bloodstream infection, those who received CAZ-AVI therapy had significantly lower mortality than those who received polymyxin therapy (RR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.27-0.69, I2 = 26%, P < 0.00004). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to polymyxin, CAZ-AVI demonstrated superior clinical efficacy in the treatment of CRE infections, suggesting that CAZ-AVI may be a superior option for CRE infections.

Identifying Effective Durations of Antibiotic Therapy for the Treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infections: A Multicenter Observational Study.

In a propensity-score-weighted cohort of 183 adults with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bacteremia at 24 US hospitals, patients receiving short courses of active therapy (7-10 days, median 9 days) experienced similar odds of recurrent bacteremia or death within 30 days as those receiving prolonged courses of active therapy (14-21 days, median 14 days).

Ceftazidima/avibactam frente a otros antimicrobianos para el tratamiento de bacteriemias por Enterobacterales productores de carbapenemasa KPC: datos de la vida real en un hospital universitario de Argentina / Ceftazidime/avibactam versus other antibiotics for the treatment of KPC carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia: real-life data from a university hospital in Argentina

INTRODUCCIÓN: Las bacteriemias por Enterobacterales productores de carbapenemasa KPC (EPC-KPC) presentan una mortalidad elevada y opciones terapéuticas limitadas. OBJETIVOS: Describir y comparar la evolución de los pacientes con bacteriemia por EPC-KPC tratados con ceftazidima/avibactam (CA) frente a otros antimicrobianos (OA). PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio prospectivo y retrospectivo de casos y controles. Se incluyeron pacientes adultos con bacteriemia por EPC-KPC, con una proporción entre casos tratados con CA y controles tratados con OA. de 1:2. Se analizaron variables clínicas, epidemiológicas y de evolución. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 48 pacientes (16 CA y 32 OA). Los casos se encontraban más frecuentemente neutropénicos (50 vs.16%, p = 0,012); asimismo, presentaron medianas de score de APACHE II más altas y de score de Pitt más bajas. El 65% de la cohorte total presentó un foco clínico y Klebsiellapneumoniae fue el microorganismo más frecuentemente aislado. Los casos recibieron una mayor proporción de tratamiento antimicrobiano empírico adecuado (81 vs. 53%, p = 0,05). La antibioterapia dirigida en casos y controles fue combinada en 38 y 91%, p = 0,009. Los casos presentaron menor mortalidad al día 7 y al día 30 relacionada a infección (0 vs. 22%, p = 0,04 y 0 vs. 34%, p = 0,008). Solo los controles desarrollaron shock, ingresaron a la unidad de cuidados intensivos y presentaron bacteriemia de brecha. CONCLUSIÓN: CA mostró beneficio clínico frente a OA para el tratamiento de pacientes con bacteriemia por EPC-KPC.

BACKGROUND: KPC-producing Enterobacterales bacteremia (KPCCPE) is associated with a high mortality rate and limited therapeutic options. AIM: To describe and compare the outcome of patients with KPC-CPE bacteremia treated with ceftazidime/avibactam (CA) versus other antibiotics (OA). METHODS: Prospective and retrospective cases and control study performed in adult patients with KPC-CPE bacteremia, with a 1:2 ratio between cases treated with CA. and controls treated with OA. Clinical, epidemiological, and outcome variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients (16 CA and 32 OA) were included. Cases were more frequently neutropenic (50 vs. 16%, p = 0.012), presented higher median APACHE II score and lower Pitt score. Of the total cohort, 65% had a clinical source, and Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most frequently isolated microorganism. Cases received more adequate empirical antibiotic treatment (81 vs. 53%, p = 0.05). Targeted antibiotic therapy in cases and controls was combined in 38 and 91%, p = 0.009. Cases had a lower 7-day mortality and 30-day infection-related mortality (0 vs. 22%, p = 0.04 and 0 vs. 34%, p = 0.008). Only controls developed shock, were admitted to the intensive care unit, and had breakthrough bacteremia. CONCLUSION: CA. showed clinical benefit over OA in the treatment of patients with EPC-KPC bacteremia.

Carriage of multidrug-resistant carbapenemase-producing gram-negative bacteria in patients admitted to NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde hospitals: Implications for treatment.

BACKGROUND: Infections caused by gram-negative carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPO) have become a global phenomenon. Screening of patients for CPO that was carried out at 48-h intervals enables early detection of carriers for infection control purposes and planning therapy. METHODS: We investigated the bacterial flora detected on screening, the enzymes that conferred resistance and the proportion of patients who developed bacteraemia with CPO and their therapy. RESULTS: In all, 27 patients had a positive screen for CPO. A small but significant (7.5%) proportion of patients were not detected on initial screening. Escherichia coli and Klebsiella were predominant. New-Delhi metallo ß-lactamase and oxacillin carbapenemases were the main enzymatic mechanisms of resistance. Four (14.8%) patients developed bacteraemia with CPO (30- and 90-day survival 100% and 75%, respectively). CONCLUSION: A single negative screen does not rule out colonisation. A significant proportion of patients colonised with CPO develop bacteraemia. Vigilance is needed to prevent the nosocomial spread of CPO.

Could an optimized joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment of continuous infusion ceftazidime-avibactam be a way to avoid the need for combo therapy in the targeted treatment of deep-seated DTR Gram-negative infections?

The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of continuous infusion (CI) ceftazidime-avibactam and the microbiological outcome of documented difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) Gram-negative infections. A 2-year retrospective cohort study was performed in patients receiving CI ceftazidime-avibactam mono- or combo therapy for documented DTR Gram-negative infections and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring of both ceftazidime and avibactam. The free fractions of steady-state concentrations (fCss) of ceftazidime and avibactam were calculated. The joint PK/PD target was considered optimal when both the fCss/MIC ratio for ceftazidime ≥4 (equivalent to 100% fT>4xMIC) and the fCss/CT ratio for avibactam >1 (equivalent to 100% fT >CT of 4.0 mg/L) were simultaneously achieved (quasi-optimal if only one of the two and suboptimal if neither of the two was achieved). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied for testing potential variables associated with microbiological failure. Fifty-eight patients were treated with CI ceftazidime-avibactam mono- (36) or combo therapy (22) for documented DTR Gram-negative infections [74.2% for primary or secondary bloodstream infections (BSIs)]. Combo therapy was administered more frequently to intensive care unit (ICU) patients (P = 0.023) or for pneumonia (P = 0.001) and less frequently for intra-abdominal infections and BSIs (P = 0.04). Microbiological failure occurred in five cases (8.6%, three in mono- and two in combo therapy). In the multivariate analysis, the suboptimal/quasi-optimal joint PK/PD target emerged as the only independent predictor of microbiological failure (odds ratio [OR] 11.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-93.98; P = 0.023), whereas monotherapy was not (P = 0.99). Optimized joint PK/PD target attainment of CI ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy could represent a way forward for allowing microbiological eradication of DTR Gram-negative infections and could render unnecessary combo therapy.

Looking for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia treatment: in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam alone and in combination with aztreonam.

During the Sars-Cov-2 pandemic, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (S.maltophilia) secondary pulmonary infections have increased, especially in critically ill patients, highlighting the need for new therapeutic options. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT) is the treatment of choice but the increase of resistant strains or adverse drug reactions limited its clinical use. Recently ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) has been approved for the treatment of multi drug resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria infections, including hospital acquired pneumonia. The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) alone and in combination with aztreonam (ATM) against S. maltophilia clinical isolates by E-test method. Susceptibility of SXT and levofloxacin (LEV) was also investigated. Our results showed 22% of resistance to CZA, 2% to SXT and 26% to LEV. CZA in combination with ATM demonstrated synergistic activity against 86% of the strains, including all those resistant to CZA. The combination of CZA with ATM provides a new therapeutic option for the treatment of severe respiratory infections in critically ill patients.

Optimal treatment of ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam-avibactam against bloodstream infections or lower respiratory tract infections caused by extensively drug-resistant or pan drug-resistant (XDR/PDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and aztreonam-avibactam (AZA) against bloodstream infections (BSIs) or lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) - caused by extensive drug-resistant or pan drug-resistant (XDR/PDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Method: The two-fold dilution method was used to determine the minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CZA/AZA against XDR/PDR P. aeruginosa. Whole-genome sequencing was used to analyze the resistance determinants of each isolate. Monte Carlo simulations (MCSs) were used to evaluate the probability of target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of response (CFR) of each CZA/AZA dosing regimen via traditional infusion (TI)/optimized two-step-administration therapy (OTAT). Results: We found that XDR/PDR P. aeruginosa may carry some rare MBLs (e.g.: IND-6, SLB-1, THIN-B). P. aeruginosa isolates producing IMP-45, VIM-1, or VIM-2 were inhibited by AZA at a concentration of 2 to 8 mg/L. All isolates producing IND-6 plus other serine ß-lactamases were high-level resistant to CZA/AZA (MICs >64 mg/L). All simulated dosing regimens of CZA/AZA against BSIs-causing XDR/PDR P. aeruginosa achieved 100% PTA when the MIC was ≤32 mg/L. Conclusion: AZA has been considered as an option for the treatment of infections caused by XDR/PDR P. aeruginosa producing IMP-45, VIM-1, or VIM-2. OTAT with sufficient pharmacodynamic exposure may be an optimal treatment option for XDR/PDR P. aeruginosa with a high-level MIC of CZA/AZA.

Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Versus Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a Multicenter Cohort Study.

Ceftolozane-tazobactam (C-T) and ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) are two novel antimicrobials that retain activity against resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The comparative effectiveness and safety of C-T versus CAZ-AVI remain unknown. A retrospective, multicenter cohort study was performed in six tertiary centers in Saudi Arabia and included patients who received either C-T or CAZ-AVI for infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) P. aeruginosa. Overall in-hospital mortality, 30-day mortality, and clinical cure were the main study outcomes. Safety outcomes were also evaluated. A multivariate analysis using logistic regression was used to determine the independent impact of treatment on the main outcomes of interest. We enrolled 200 patients in the study (100 in each treatment arm). A total of 56% were in the intensive care unit, 48% were mechanically ventilated, and 37% were in septic shock. Approximately 19% of patients had bacteremia. Combination therapy was administered to 41% of the patients. The differences between the C-T and CAZ-AVI groups did not reach statistical significance in the overall in-hospital mortality (44% versus 37%; P = 0.314; OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.76 to 2.36), 30-day mortality (27% versus 23%; P = 0.514; OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.65 to 2.35), clinical cure (61% versus 66%; P = 0.463; OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.43 to 1.49), or acute kidney injury (23% versus 17%; P = 0.289; OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.69 to 3.14), even after adjusting for differences between the two groups. C-T and CAZ-AVI did not significantly differ in terms of safety and effectiveness, and they serve as potential options for the treatment of infections caused by MDR P. aeruginosa.

Assessment of mortality-related risk factors and effective antimicrobial regimens for treatment of bloodstream infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa in patients with hematological diseases.

Background: Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) are related to higher mortality. The objective of this study was to explore clinical outcomes of CRPA bacteremia, identify risk factors and also, compare the efficacy of traditional and novel antibiotic regimens. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a blood diseases hospital in China. The study included hematological patients who were diagnosed with CRPA bacteremia between January 2014 and August 2022. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at day 30. Secondary endpoints included 7-day and 30-day clinical cure. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was employed to identify mortality-related risk factors. Results: 100 patients infected with CRPA bacteremia were included and 29 patients accepted allogenic-hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. 24 received ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-based therapy and 76 received other traditional antibiotics. 30-day mortality was 21.0%. Multivariable cox regression analysis showed neutropenia >7 days after bloodstream infections (BSI) (P=0.030, HR: 4.068, 95%CI: 1.146~14.434), higher Pitt bacteremia score (P<0.001, HR:1.824, 95%CI: 1.322~2.517), higher Charlson comorbidity index (P=0.01, HR: 1.613, 95%CI: 1.124~2.315) and bacteremia due to multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (MDR-PA) (P=0.024, HR:3.086, 95%CI: 1.163~8.197) were identified as independent risk factors of 30-day mortality. After controlling for confounders, an additional multivariable cox regression analysis revealed definitive regimens containing CAZ-AVI were associated with lower mortality in CRPA bacteremia (P=0.016, HR: 0.150, 95%CI: 0.032~0.702), as well as in MDR-PA bacteremia (P=0.019, HR: 0.119, 95%CI: 0.020~0.709). Conclusions: For patients with hematological diseases and CRPA bacteremia, 30-day mortality rate was 21.0% (21/100). Neutropenia >7 days after BSI, higher Pitt bacteremia score, higher Charlson comorbidity index and bacteremia due to MDR-PA increased 30-day mortality. CAZ-AVI-based regimens were effective alternatives for bacteremia due to CRPA or MDR-PA.

Comparative Activities of Novel Therapeutic Agents against Molecularly Characterized Clinical Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Isolates.

Limited treatment options exist for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bacteria. Fortunately, there are several recently approved antibiotics indicated for CRE infections. Here, we examine the in vitro activity of various novel agents (eravacycline, plazomicin, ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, and meropenem-vaborbactam) and comparators (tigecycline, amikacin, levofloxacin, fosfomycin, polymyxin B) against 365 well-characterized CRE clinical isolates with various genotypes. Nonduplicate isolates collected from the largest public health hospital in Singapore between 2007 and 2020 were subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (broth microdilution or antibiotic gradient test strips). Susceptibilities were defined using Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) or Food and Drug Administration (FDA) interpretative criteria. Sequence types and resistance mechanisms were characterized using short-read whole-genome sequencing. Overall, tigecycline and plazomicin exhibited the highest susceptibility rates (89.6% and 80.8%, respectively). However, the tigecycline susceptibility breakpoint utilized here may be outdated in view of prevailing pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data. Susceptibility varied by carbapenemase genotype; the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combinations were equally active (92.3 to 99.2% susceptible) against KPC producers, but only ceftazidime-avibactam retained high susceptibility (98.7%) against OXA-48-like producers. Against metallo-ß-lactamase producers, only plazomicin exhibited moderate activity (77.0% susceptible). Aminoglycoside activity was also influenced by carbapenemase genotypes. This work provides an insight into the comparative activity and presumptive utility of novel agents in this geographic region. IMPORTANCE This study determined the susceptibilities of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales isolates to various novel antimicrobial agents (ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, eravacycline, and plazomicin). Whole-genome sequencing was performed for all strains. Our study findings provide insights into the comparative activities of novel agents in this geographic region. Plazomicin and ceftazidime-avibactam exhibited the lowest nonsusceptibility rates and may be considered promising agents in the management of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections. We note also that antibiotic activity is influenced by genotypes and that understanding the geographic region's molecular epidemiology could aid in the definition of the presumptive utility of novel agents and contribute to antibiotic decision-making.

Real-world effectiveness of ceftazidime/avibactam versus polymyxin B in treating patients with carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial infections.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) and polymyxin B against carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CRGNB) infections in western China. METHODS: The medical records of patients with CRGNB infections in this hospital from 2018-2022 were retrospectively reviewed. The data included demographic characteristics, laboratory results, antibiotic strategies and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 378 patients with CRGNB infections were enrolled, including 112 patients in the CAZ/AVI group and 266 patients in the polymyxin B group. The most common pathogen was carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (44.44%). The rates of treatment failure at 28 days (65.04% vs. 45.54%; P = 0.000) and 28-day in-hospital mortality (20.30% vs. 9.82%; P = 0.014) in the polymyxin B group were higher than those in the CAZ/AVI group. Multivariable analysis revealed that multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (OR 2.730; P = 0.017), acute renal failure (OR 2.595; P = 0.020), higher Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (OR 1.184; P = 0.011) and Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) Ⅱ scores (OR 1.149; P = 0.000) were independent risk factors for treatment failure, whereas CAZ/AVI therapy (OR 0.333; P = 0.002) had a protective effect. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that CCI ≥ 5 and APACHE II score ≥ 15 were associated with a higher 28-day in-hospital mortality rate (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: CAZ/AVI therapy was associated with treatment success among patients with CRGNB infection. However, CAZ/AVI therapy did not improve 28-day in-hospital survival compared with polymyxin B. The CCI ≥ 5 and APACHE II score ≥ 15 affected 28-day in-hospital mortality of CRGNB-infected patients.

A descriptive pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic analysis of continuous infusion ceftazidime-avibactam for treating DTR gram-negative infections in a case series of critically ill patients undergoing continuous veno-venous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF).

PURPOSE: To explore pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) profile of continuous infusion (CI) ceftazidime-avibactam for treating difficult-to-treat resistant Gram-negative (DTR-GN) infections in critical patients undergoing continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients treated with CI ceftazidime-avibactam for DTR-GN infections during CVVHDF were retrospectively assessed. Ceftazidime and avibactam concentrations were measured at steady-state and the free fraction (fCss) was calculated. Total clearance (CLtot) of both agents were calculated and the impact of CVVHDF intensity was assessed by linear regression. The joint PK/PD target of ceftazidime-avibactam was defined as optimal when both fCss/MIC≥4 for ceftazidime and fCss/CT > 1 for avibactam were achieved. Relationship between ceftazidime-avibactam PK/PD targets and microbiological outcome was assessed. RESULTS: Eight patients with DTR-GN infections were retrieved. Median fCss were 84.5 (73.7-87.7 mg/L) for ceftazidime and 24.8 mg/L (20.7-25.8 mg/L) for avibactam. Median CLtot was 2.39 L/h (2.05-2.96 L/h) for ceftazidime and 2.56 L/h (2.12-2.98 L/h) for avibactam. Median CVVHDF dose was 38.6 mL/h/kg (35.9-40.0 mL/kg/h). CLtot were linearly correlated with CVVHDF dose (r = 0.53;p = 0.03, and r = 0.64;p = 0.006, respectively). The joint PK/PD targets were optimal granting microbiological eradication in all the assessable cases. CONCLUSION: CI administration of 1.25-2.5 g q8h ceftazidime-avibactam may allow prompt attainment and maintenance of optimal joint PK/PD targets during high-intensity CVVHDF.

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam compared to other antimicrobials for the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains, a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections are a significant public health issue. CRKP infections can increase the mortality of severely ill hospitalised patients and elevate the financial burden of their hospitalisation globally. Colistin and tigecycline are the main antimicrobials which have been widely used for the treatment of CRKP infections. However, novel antimicrobials have been recently launched. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) seems one of the most efficient ones. AIM: The aim of the current systematic literature review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI compared to other antimicrobials in adult patients (aged >18) with CRKP infection. METHODS: All data were retrieved using PubMed/Medline, the Web of Science and Cochrane library. The main outcome was the effective treatment of CRKP infection or the microbiological eradication of CRKP in the culture of biological samples. Secondary outcomes included the impact on 28- or 30-day mortality and adverse effects, if available. Pooled analysis was conducted using Review Manager v. 5.4.1 software (RevMan). The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: CAZ-AVI was proved more effective than other antimicrobials against CRKP infections and CRKP bloodstream infections (p < 0.00001 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Patients in the CAZ-AVI arm displayed statistically lower 28- and 30-day mortality rates (p = 0.002 and p < 0.00001, respectively). Concerning the microbiological eradication, no meta-analysis was feasible due to high heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: The promotion of CAZ-AVI for treating CRKP infections over other antimicrobials seems favourable. However, there is a long way ahead to reveal additional scientific findings to further strengthen this statement.

Ceftazidime-avibactam-based combination therapy for hospital-acquired central nervous system infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

OBJECTIVES: Klebsiella pneumoniae (K. pneumoniae) is one of the most common bacteria in the hospital-acquired central nervous system (CNS) infections. Central nervous system infections caused by carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP) are associated with significant mortality rates and high hospital costs due to limited antibiotic treatment options. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) for the treatment of CNS infections caused by CRKP. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with hospital-acquired CNS infections caused by CRKP who received treatment with CZA for ≥ 72 hours were enrolled. The primary outcome was to assess the clinical and microbiology efficacy of CZA for the treatment of CNS infections caused by CRKP. RESULTS: A high burden of comorbidity was discovered in 20 of 21 patients (95.2%). Most patients had a history of craniocerebral surgery and 17 (81.0%) of the patients were in the intensive care unit with a median APACHE II score of 16 (IQR 9-20) and SOFA score of 6 (IQR 3-7). Eighteen cases were treated by CZA-based combination therapies, while the remaining three cases were treated with CZA alone. At the end of the treatment, the overall clinical efficacy was 76.2% (16 of 21) with a bacterial clearance rate of 81.0% (17 of 21) and all-cause mortality of 23.8% (five of 21). CONCLUSION: This study showed that CZA-based combination therapy is an effective treatment option for CNS infections caused by CRKP.

A therapeutic regimen of ceftazidime-avibactam for a critical patient receiving prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy.

The present report firstly described a critically ill patient receiving a dosing regimen of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) (1.875g q24h) to eliminate multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae and a scheduled time for prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT) every 48h (6h-session beginning 12h after the previous dosage on hemodialysis day). This dosing regimen for CAZ-AVI and a scheduled time for PIRRT allowed pharmacodynamic parameters of ceftazidime and avibactam to have little difference on hemodialysis and non-hemodialysis days so that we can maintain a relatively stable drug concentration. Our report highlighted not only the importance of dosing regimens in patients with PIRRT but also the significance of hemodialysis time points during the dosing interval. The innovative therapeutic plan proved to be suitable for patients infected with Klebsiella pneumoniae when on PIRRT according to the trough plasma concentrations of ceftazidime and avibactam which were maintained above the minimum inhibitory concentration during the dosing interval.

Rapid diagnostics and ceftazidime/avibactam for KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections: impact on mortality and role of combination therapy.

This study was aimed at investigating risk factors for mortality in patients suffering from KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) bloodstream infections (BSIs), evaluating the impact of rapid diagnostics and ceftazidime/avibactam use. This observational retrospective study (January 2017-May 2021) included all patients with a KPC-Kp BSI. Uni-multivariable analyses were carried out to evaluate the effect of clinical variables on both in-hospital death (IHD) and 30-day all-cause mortality, and the role of the combination of ceftazidime/avibactam plus polymyxin. One hundred and ninety-six patients met the study's inclusion criteria. Older age, having undergone renal replacement therapy during the 30 days preceding the KPC-Kp BSI onset, having an INCREMENT-CPE score ≥ 8, and having suffered from a superimposed and/or following KPC-Kp BSI treatment candidemia were found to be the main factors associated with both mortality rates. Among protective factors, the centrality of ceftazidime/avibactam in monotherapy (IHD: OR: 0.34; CI 95%: 0.11-1.00-30-day all-cause mortality: OR: 0.18; CI 95%: 0.04-0.77) or combination (IHD: OR: 0.51; CI 95%: 0.22-1.19-30-day all-cause mortality: OR: 0.62; CI 95%: 0.21-1.84) emerged and became even more evident once the effect of ceftazidime/avibactam plus polymyxin was removed. Rapid diagnostics may be useful to adopt more effective strategies for the treatment of KPC-Kp BSI patients and implement infection control measures, even if not associated with higher patient survival. Ceftazidime/avibactam, even when used alone, represents an important option against KPC-Kp, while combined use with polymyxin might not have altered its efficacy. Patient comorbidities, severity of BSI, and complications such as candidemia were confirmed to have a significant burden on survival.

A novel method to evaluate ceftazidime/avibactam therapy in patients with carbapenemase-producing Enterobactericeae (CPE) bloodstream infections.

INTRODUCTION: This study reports experience managing eight patients with bloodstream infections treated with a continuous infusion of ceftazidime-avibactam. METHODS: Patients who were treated for documented CPE BSIs susceptible to CAZ-AVI and who underwent real-time therapeutic drug monitoring were retrospectively assessed. Ceftazidime MICs were assessed in presence of increasing concentrations of avibactam by the broth microdilution method. An inhibitory sigmoid Emax model was used to characterize ceftazidime MIC reduction as a function of avibactam concentration, and the MICi was derived by conditioning the best-fit model using steady-state avibactam concentrations (Css). Ceftazidime fCss/MICi ratio was calculated for each patient and correlated to microbiological outcome. RESULTS: By adopting the innovative concept of effective MIC with an inhibitor (MICi), a trend towards higher microbiological failure and resistance development was found in patients with a lower ceftazidime fCss/MICi ratio (2/3 vs. 0/5). CONCLUSION: Assessment of changes in the ceftazidime MIC in relation to increasing avibactam concentration could represent a more robust pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic method for predicting microbiological failure given beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations.

Jumping into the future: overcoming pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic hurdles to optimize the treatment of severe difficult to treat-Gram-negative infections with novel beta-lactams.

INTRODUCTION: The choice of best therapeutic strategy for difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) Gram-negative infections currently represents an unmet clinical need. AREAS COVERED: This review provides a critical reappraisal of real-world evidence supporting the role of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) optimization of novel beta-lactams in the management of DTR Gram-negative infections. The aim was to focus on prolonged and/or continuous infusion administration, penetration rates into deep-seated infections, and maximization of PK/PD targets in special renal patient populations. Retrieved findings were applied to the three most critical clinical scenarios of Gram-negative resistance phenotypes (i.e. carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; difficult-to-treat resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii). EXPERT OPINION: Several studies supported the role of PK/PD optimization of beta-lactams in the management of DTR Gram-negative infections for both maximizing clinical efficacy and preventing resistance emergence. Optimizing antimicrobial therapy with novel beta-lactams based on the so called 'antimicrobial therapy puzzle' PK/PD concepts may represent a definitive jump into the future toward a personalized patient management of DTR Gram negative infections. Establishing a dedicated and coordinated multidisciplinary team and implementing a real-time TDM-guided personalized antimicrobial exposure optimization of novel beta-lactams based on expert clinical pharmacological interpretation, could represent crucial cornerstones for the proper management of DTR Gram-negative infections.