ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The present study compares the local anesthetic efficacy of EMLA® cream and lidocaine injection used in the radiofrequency reduction of the inferior turbinate. METHODS: The study included a total of 124 patients with inferior turbinate hypertrophy and who underwent turbinate reduction under local anesthesia. The operations were performed 15 min after a lidocaine injection and 30 min after EMLA cream application. The respondent patients were asked to interpret such situations as intraoperative pain, discomfort during the procedure, choking sensation and difficulty swallowing using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). RESULTS: The EMLA cream patients (Group A) were found to have a lower level of discomfort, choking sensation and difficulty swallowing than the lidocaine patients (Group B), while there was no substantial difference in pain between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: It is concluded that EMLA® cream is an effective alternative to lidocaine injection during inferior turbinate reduction procedures.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Local/methods , Anesthetics, Local/administration & dosage , Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination/administration & dosage , Lidocaine/administration & dosage , Lidocaine/adverse effects , Turbinates/surgery , Adult , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Hypertrophy/surgery , Injections , Lidocaine, Prilocaine Drug Combination/adverse effects , Male , Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Radiofrequency Ablation , Retrospective Studies , Turbinates/pathology , Young AdultABSTRACT
We compared the effectiveness of local anaesthetic with Emla cream with that of an injection of lidocaine for radiofrequency reduction of the inferior turbinates. We studied 98 consecutive patients with hypertrophied inferior turbinates, 46 of whom were given Emla cream and 52 lidocaine injection. The procedure began five minutes after the injection of lidocaine and 10minutes after the Emla cream had been applied. Patients were asked to indicate on a visual analogue scale (VAS) the degree of perioperative pain, anxiety, sensation of choking, and discomfort on swallowing that they felt after the procedure. Patients treated with Emla had significantly lower VAS scores for discomfort on swallowing than those treated with lidocaine (p=0.001), but there were no other significant differences between the two groups. We conclude that Emla cream is an efficacious alternative to infiltration of lidocaine for radiofrequency reduction of the inferior turbinates.