Could an optimized joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment of continuous infusion ceftazidime-avibactam be a way to avoid the need for combo therapy in the targeted treatment of deep-seated DTR Gram-negative infections?

The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between joint pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment of continuous infusion (CI) ceftazidime-avibactam and the microbiological outcome of documented difficult-to-treat resistant (DTR) Gram-negative infections. A 2-year retrospective cohort study was performed in patients receiving CI ceftazidime-avibactam mono- or combo therapy for documented DTR Gram-negative infections and undergoing therapeutic drug monitoring of both ceftazidime and avibactam. The free fractions of steady-state concentrations (fCss) of ceftazidime and avibactam were calculated. The joint PK/PD target was considered optimal when both the fCss/MIC ratio for ceftazidime ≥4 (equivalent to 100% fT>4xMIC) and the fCss/CT ratio for avibactam >1 (equivalent to 100% fT >CT of 4.0 mg/L) were simultaneously achieved (quasi-optimal if only one of the two and suboptimal if neither of the two was achieved). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied for testing potential variables associated with microbiological failure. Fifty-eight patients were treated with CI ceftazidime-avibactam mono- (36) or combo therapy (22) for documented DTR Gram-negative infections [74.2% for primary or secondary bloodstream infections (BSIs)]. Combo therapy was administered more frequently to intensive care unit (ICU) patients (P = 0.023) or for pneumonia (P = 0.001) and less frequently for intra-abdominal infections and BSIs (P = 0.04). Microbiological failure occurred in five cases (8.6%, three in mono- and two in combo therapy). In the multivariate analysis, the suboptimal/quasi-optimal joint PK/PD target emerged as the only independent predictor of microbiological failure (odds ratio [OR] 11.11; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.31-93.98; P = 0.023), whereas monotherapy was not (P = 0.99). Optimized joint PK/PD target attainment of CI ceftazidime-avibactam monotherapy could represent a way forward for allowing microbiological eradication of DTR Gram-negative infections and could render unnecessary combo therapy.

A novel method to evaluate ceftazidime/avibactam therapy in patients with carbapenemase-producing Enterobactericeae (CPE) bloodstream infections.

INTRODUCTION: This study reports experience managing eight patients with bloodstream infections treated with a continuous infusion of ceftazidime-avibactam. METHODS: Patients who were treated for documented CPE BSIs susceptible to CAZ-AVI and who underwent real-time therapeutic drug monitoring were retrospectively assessed. Ceftazidime MICs were assessed in presence of increasing concentrations of avibactam by the broth microdilution method. An inhibitory sigmoid Emax model was used to characterize ceftazidime MIC reduction as a function of avibactam concentration, and the MICi was derived by conditioning the best-fit model using steady-state avibactam concentrations (Css). Ceftazidime fCss/MICi ratio was calculated for each patient and correlated to microbiological outcome. RESULTS: By adopting the innovative concept of effective MIC with an inhibitor (MICi), a trend towards higher microbiological failure and resistance development was found in patients with a lower ceftazidime fCss/MICi ratio (2/3 vs. 0/5). CONCLUSION: Assessment of changes in the ceftazidime MIC in relation to increasing avibactam concentration could represent a more robust pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic method for predicting microbiological failure given beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations.