In Atrial Fibrillation, Omnipolar Voltage Maps More Accurately Delineate Scar Than Bipolar Voltage Maps.

BACKGROUND: Optimal method for voltage assessment in AF remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated different methods for assessing atrial voltage and their accuracy in identifying pulmonary vein reconnection sites (PVRSs) in atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: Patients with persistent AF undergoing ablation were included. De novo procedures: voltage assessment in AF with omnipolar voltage (OV) and bipolar voltage (BV) methodology and BV assessment in sinus rhythm (SR). Activation vector and fractionation maps were reviewed at voltage discrepancy sites on OV and BV maps in AF. AF voltage maps were compared with SR BV maps. Repeat ablation procedures: OV and BV maps in AF were compared to detect gaps in wide area circumferential ablation (WACA) lines that correlated with PVRS. RESULTS: Forty patients were included: 20 de novo and 20 repeat procedures. De novo procedure: OV vs BV maps in AF; average voltage 0.55 ± 0.18 mV vs 0.38 ± 0.12 mV; P = 0.002, voltage difference of 0.20 ± 0.07 mV; P = 0.003 at coregistered points and proportion of left atrium (LA) area occupied by low-voltage zones (LVZs) was smaller on OV maps (42.4% ± 12.8% OV vs 66.7% ± 12.7% BV; P < 0.001). LVZs identified on BV maps and not on OV maps correlated frequently to wavefront collision and fractionation sites (94.7%). OV AF maps agreed better with BV SR maps (voltage difference at coregistered points 0.09 ± 0.03 mV; P = 0.24) unlike BV AF maps (0.17 ± 0.07 mV, P = 0.002). Repeat ablation procedure: OV was superior in identifying WACA line gaps that correlated with PVRS than BV maps (area under the curve = 0.89, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: OV AF maps improve voltage assessment by overcoming the impact of wavefront collision and fractionation. OV AF maps correlate better with BV maps in SR and more accurately delineate gaps on WACA lines at PVRS.

Anterior mitral line in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation and anterior scar: A multicenter matched comparison-The MiLine study.

BACKGROUND: The benefit of an anterior mitral line (AML) in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) and anterior atrial scar undergoing ablation has never been investigated. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of AML in addition to standard treatment compared to standard treatment alone (no AML) in this subset of patients. METHODS: Patients with persistent AF and anterior low-voltage zone (LVZ) treated with AML in 3 centers were retrospectively enrolled. The patients were matched in 1:1 fashion with patients having persistent AF and anterior LVZ who underwent conventional ablation in the same centers. Matching parameters were age, LVZ burden, and repeated ablation. Primary endpoint was AF/atrial tachycardia (AT) recurrence. RESULTS: One hundred eight-six patients (age 66 ± 9 years; 34% women) were selected and divided into 2 matched groups. Bidirectional conduction block was achieved in 95% of AML. After median follow-up of 2 years, AF/AT recurrence occurred in 29% of the patients in the AML group vs 48% in the no AML group (log-rank P = .024). On Cox regression multivariate analysis, left atrial volume (hazard ratio [HR] 1.03; P = .006) and AML (HR 0.46; P = .003) were significantly associated with the primary endpoint. On univariate logistic regression, lower body mass index, older age, extensive anterior LVZ, and position of the left atrial activation breakthrough away from the AML were associated with first-pass AML block. CONCLUSION: In this retrospective matched analysis of patients with persistent AF and anterior scar, AML in addition to standard treatment was associated with improved AF/AT-free survival compared to standard treatment alone.

DR-FLASH Score Is Useful for Identifying Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Who Require Extensive Catheter Ablation Procedures.

Background Modification of arrhythmogenic substrates with extensive ablation comprising linear and/or complex fractional atrial electrogram ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI-plus) can theoretically reduce the recurrence of atrial fibrillation. The DR-FLASH score (score based on diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunction, persistent form of atrial fibrillation, left atrialdiameter >45 mm, age >65 years, female sex, and hypertension) is reportedly useful for identifying patients with arrhythmogenic substrates. We hypothesized that, in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation, the DR-FLASH score can be used to classify patients into those who require PVI-plus and those for whom a PVI-only strategy is sufficient. Methods and Results This study is a post hoc subanalysis of the a multicenter, randomized controlled, noninferiority trial investigating efficacy and safety of pulmonary vein isolation alone for recurrence prevention compared with extensive ablation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (EARNEST-PVI trial). This analysis focuses on the relationship between DR-FLASH score and the efficacy of different ablation strategies. We divided the population into 2 groups based on a DR-FLASH score of 3 points. A total of 469 patients were analyzed. Among those with a DR-FLASH score >3 (N=279), the event rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence was significantly lower in the PVI-plus arm than in the PVI-only arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.45 [95% CI, 0.28-0.72]; P<0.001). In contrast, among patients with a DR-FLASH score ≤3 (N=217), no differences were observed in the event rate of atrial arrhythmia recurrence between the PVI-only arm and the PVI-plus arm (HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.61-1.89]; P=0.795). There was significant interaction between patients with a DR-FLASH score >3 and DR-FLASH score ≤3 (P value for interaction=0.020). Conclusions The DR-FLASH score is a useful tool for deciding the catheter ablation strategy for patients with persistent atrial fibrillation. Registration URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03514693.

Low-voltage area substrate modification for atrial fibrillation ablation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.

AIMS: The value of additional ablation beyond pulmonary vein isolation for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is unclear, especially for persistent AF. The optimal target for substrate modification to improve outcomes is uncertain. We investigate the utility of low-voltage area (LVA) substrate modification in patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF. METHODS AND RESULTS: This meta-analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Only randomized studies were included. AF patients who underwent catheter ablation with voltage-guided substrate modification targeting LVA (LVA group) vs. conventional ablation approaches not targeting LVA (non-LVA group) were compared. Four studies comprising 539 patients were included (36% female). Freedom from arrhythmia (FFA) in patients with persistent AF was greater in the LVA group [risk ratio (RR) 1.30; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03-1.64]. There was no difference in FFA in patients with paroxysmal AF between groups (RR 1.30; 95% CI 0.89-1.91). There was no difference in total procedural time (mean difference -17.54 min; 95% CI -64.37 to 29.28 min) or total ablation time (mean difference -36.17 min; 95% CI -93.69 to 21.35 min) in all included patients regardless of AF type between groups. There was no difference in periprocedural complications between groups in all included patients regardless of AF type (RR 0.93; 95% CI 0.22-3.82). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis demonstrates improved FFA in persistent AF patients who underwent voltage-guided substrate modification targeting LVA.

Comparison of the empirical linear ablation and low voltage area-guided ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone is not guaranteed for persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF), and it is unclear which type of ablation approach should be applied in addition to PVI. This study aimed to compare outcomes and prognosis between empirical linear ablation and low-voltage area (LVA) ablation after PVI for PeAF. METHODS: We enrolled 128 patients with PeAF who were assigned to the linear ablation group (n = 64) and the LVA ablation group (n = 64) using a propensity score-matched model. After PVI and cardioversion, the patients underwent either empirical linear ablation or LVA ablation during sinus rhythm. All patients in the linear ablation group underwent both roof line and mitral valve isthmus (MVI) ablations. An electrical-guided ablation targeting LVA (< 0.5 mV) was performed in the LVA group. When there was no LVA in the LVA group, only PVI was applied. We compared the procedural outcomes and recurrence after ablation between the two groups. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. Fifty patients had LVA (22 and 28 patients in the linear and LVA groups). The roof and MVI lines were completed in 100% and 96.9% of the patients. During the mean follow-up of 279.5 ± 161.3 days, the LVA group had significantly lower recurrence than the linear group (15 patients [23%] vs. 29 patients [45%], p = 0.014). Thirty-five patients were prescribed antiarrhythmic drugs during the follow-up period (linear group, n = 17; LVA group, n = 18); amiodarone and bepridil were administered to most of the patients (15 and 17 patients, respectively). The difference in the prognosis was relevant among the patients with LVA, while this trend was not observed in those without LVA. The LVA ablation group demonstrated significantly lower radiofrequency energy and shorter procedural time compared to the linear ablation group. The recurrence of atrial flutter was more likely to occur in the linear group than in the LVA group (14 [22%] vs. 6 [9.4%], p = 0.052). CONCLUSION: The electrophysiological-guided LVA ablation is more effective than empirical linear ablation in PeAF patients with LVA. Unnecessary empirical linear ablation might have a risk of iatrogenic gap and atrial flutter recurrence.

Acupuncture for persistent atrial fibrillation after catheter ablation: study protocol for a pilot randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common arrhythmia, which is closely related to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although acupuncture is used in the treatment of AF, the evidence is insufficient. The objective of this pilot trial is to evaluate the feasibility, preliminary efficacy, and safety of acupuncture in reducing AF burden for persistent AF after catheter ablation (CA). METHODS AND DESIGN: This will be a multi-center, 3-arm, pilot randomized controlled trial in China. Sixty patients in total will be randomly assigned to the specific acupoints group, the non-specific acupoints group, or the non-acupoints group in a 1:1:1 ratio. The whole study period is 6 months, including a 3-month treatment period and a 3-month follow-up period. All patients will receive 18 sessions of acupuncture over 12 weeks after CA and appropriate post-ablation routine treatment. The primary outcome is AF burden at 6 months after CA measured by electrocardiography patch that can carry out a 7-day continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. The secondary outcomes include AF burden at 3 months after CA, recurrence of AF, quality of life, etc. The adverse events will also be recorded. DISCUSSION: This pilot study will contribute to evaluating the feasibility, preliminary efficacy, and safety of acupuncture in reducing AF burden for persistent AF after CA. The results will be used for the sample size calculation of a subsequent large-scale trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2000030576 . Registered on 7 March 2020.

Voltage-guided ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation-favorable 1-year outcome and predictors.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) has a low success rate. A newer ablation concept targets left atrial (LA) low voltage zones (LVZ) which correlate with fibrosis and predict recurrence after PVI. We aimed to determine the success of combined PVI- and LVZ-guided ablation and to identify the predictors for LVZ and for ablation success. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 119 consecutive patients who underwent their first ablation procedure due to persistent AF were included. After acquisition of a high-resolution LA voltage map, PVI- and LVZ-guided ablation were performed. Mean age was 69 ± 8 years, 53% were men, and 8% had longstanding persistent AF. We found LVZ in 55% of patients. Twelve-month freedom from recurrences off drugs was 69%. The only independent predictor for recurrence was the existence of LVZ (OR 4.2, 95% CI 1.54-11.41, p = 0.005). Existence of LVZ was predicted positively by age ≥ 67 years (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.4-13.7, p = 0.011), LA volume index ≥ 68 ml/m2 (OR 3.9, 95% CI 1.4-10.5, p = 0.008), and GFR ≤ 85 ml/min/1.73 m2 (OR 12.5, 95% CI 2.0-76.6, p = 0.006). BMI ≥ 26 kg/m2 (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01-0.30, p = 0.001) was a negative predictor of LVZ. CONCLUSION: LVZ-guided ablation in combination with PVI results in comparably high success rates. However, the existence of LVZ remains the strongest predictor of ablation success.

Spectral characterization and impact of stepwise ablation protocol including LAA electrical isolation on persistent AF.

OBJECTIVES: To study how left atrial appendage electrical isolation (LAAEI) impacts atrial dominant frequency (DF) in patients with long-standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF). BACKGROUND: LAAEI is associated with a high probability of freedom from atrial fibrillation (AF) and spectral analysis may identify high-frequency sources. How LAAEI impacts the AF dynamics and the subgroup of LSPAF patients in whom LAAEI would be most beneficial, is unclear. METHODS: Twenty patients with LSPAF were included in the study. Fast Fourier transforms (FFT) were performed on atrial electrograms recorded from 13 sites in the LA and RA. The highest peak frequency was defined as DF. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in DF between atrial sites except for at the superior vena cava which had the lowest DF at baseline. Stepwise ablation consisting of circumferential pulmonary vein isolation and a linear ablation set of mitral isthmus and roof significantly reduced the DF within the coronary sinus (CS) (5.93 ± 0.98 Hz vs. 5.09 ± 0.72 Hz, p < .05) and the LA posterior wall (LApos) (6.26 ± 0.92 Hz vs. 5.43 ± 0.98 Hz, p < .01). LAAEI preferentially further decreased the DF at the LApos (p < .01), but not at the CS. In cases where there was < 13.6% reduction in the DF of the LApos following the stepwise ablation, the addition of LAAEI was associated with an increased restoration of sinus rhythm (55%, p < .05). CONCLUSION: LAAEI in addition to stepwise ablation results in further reduction of the DF in the LApos, which is associated with acute termination of AF and favorable ablation outcome.

Pulmonary vein isolation alone vs. more extensive ablation with defragmentation and linear ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: the EARNEST-PVI trial.

AIMS: Previous studies could not demonstrate any benefit of more intensive ablation in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) including complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) and linear ablation for recurrence in the initial catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). This study aimed to establish the non-inferiority of PVI alone to PVI plus these additional ablation strategies. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with persistent AF who underwent an initial catheter ablation (n = 512, long-standing persistent AF; 128 cases) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either PVI alone (PVI-alone group) or PVI plus CFAE and/or linear ablation (PVI-plus group). After excluding 15 cases who did not receive procedures, we analysed 249 and 248 patients, respectively. The primary endpoint was recurrence of AF, atrial flutter, and/or atrial tachycardia, and the non-inferior margin was set at a hazard ratio of 1.43. In the PVI-plus group, 85.1% of patients had linear ablation and 15.3% CFAE ablation. After 12 months, freedom from the primary endpoint occurred in 71.3% of patients in the PVI-alone group and in 78.3% in the PVI-plus group [hazard ratio = 1.56 (95% confidence interval: 1.10-2.24), non-inferior P = 0.3062]. The procedure-related complication rates were 2.0% in the PVI-alone group and 3.6% in the PVI-plus group (P = 0.199). CONCLUSION: This randomized trial did not establish the non-inferiority of PVI alone to PVI plus linear ablation or CFAE ablation in patients with persistent AF, but implied that the PVI plus strategy was promising to improve the clinical efficacy (NCT03514693).

Association between left atrial reverse remodeling and maintenance of sinus rhythm after catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation.

The success rate of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) is not satisfactory, for reasons that are unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between left atrial reverse remodeling after ablation and recurrence of AF in patients with persistent AF. One hundred and thirty-two patients with persistent AF were enrolled. Extensive encircling pulmonary vein isolation plus ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms was performed. Bepridil or amiodarone was prescribed for 3 months after ablation. All patients were studied by serial echocardiography and 24-h ambulatory electrocardiogram at baseline, for the day after ablation, and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month intervals after ablation. Recurrence of AF was observed in 42 patients at 2-year follow-up. The duration of AF (median 12 (IQR 6-37) vs 8 (IQR 5-17) months, p < 0.05), and early recurrence of AF (69 vs 26%, p < 0.05) after ablation were significantly different between the patients with AF recurrence and those without. The left atrial dimensions at 3 months (40 ± 6 vs 44 ± 6 mm, p < 0.001) and 6 months (40 ± 6 vs 44 ± 6 mm, p < 0.001) were significantly smaller than those just after ablation in the patients without AF recurrence. A 5% reduction from baseline in the left atrial dimension at 6 months after ablation was associated with freedom from late AF recurrence (p < 0.05). Left atrial reverse remodeling after ablation of persistent AF was associated with freedom from late recurrence of AF.

The Electrical Isolation of the Left Atrial Posterior Wall in Catheter Ablation of Persistent Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: This study explored whether complete electrical isolation of the left atrial (LA) posterior wall improves the rhythm outcome of catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Although the STAR AF2 (Substrate and Trigger Ablation for Reduction of Atrial Fibrillation Trial Part II) proved no additional benefit of empirical extra-pulmonary vein (PV) LA ablation, the long-term recurrence rate after circumferential PV isolation (CPVI) alone remains high. METHODS: We randomly assigned 217 patients with persistent AF (83.1% men, age 58.7 ± 10.8 years, 73.3% long-standing persistent AF) to ablation with CPVI alone (CPVI group) or CPVI with a POsterior wall Box Isolation (POBI group). The endpoint of the POBI group was the elimination of the posterior atrial potentials by roof and posterior inferior lines and touch-up focal ablation. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 16.2 ± 8.8 months, the clinical recurrence rate did not significantly differ between the 2 groups (23.8% vs. 26.5%; p = 0.779) in the CPVI and POBI groups. The recurrence rate for atrial tachycardias (16.0% vs. 11.1%; p = 0.913) and cardioversion rates (6.7% vs. 13.7%; p = 0.093) to control clinical recurrences also did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. At the final follow-up, sinus rhythm was maintained without antiarrhythmic drug in 50.5% and 55.9% in the CPVI and POBI groups, respectively (p = 0.522). No significant difference was found in the major complication rates between the 2 groups, but the total ablation time was significantly longer in the POBI group (4,289 ± 1,837 s vs. 5,365 ± 2,358 s; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistent AF, an empirical complete POBI did not improve the rhythm outcome of catheter ablation or influence the type of recurrent atrial arrhythmia. (Comparison of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone Versus Linear Ablation in Addition to Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Catheter Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial; NCT02721121).

Identification of repetitive atrial activation patterns in persistent atrial fibrillation by direct contact high-density electrogram mapping.

INTRODUCTION: Recent studies have characterized drivers in persistent atrial fibrillation using automated algorithm detection with panoramic endocardial mapping by means of basket catheters. We aimed to identify repetitive atrial activation patterns (RAAPs) during ongoing atrial fibrillation (AF) based upon automated annotation of unipolar electrograms (EGMs) recorded with a high-density regional endocardial contact mapping catheter. METHODS: In 14 persistent AF patients, high-resolution EGMs were recorded for 30 seconds at sequential PentaRay (Biosense Inc) positions covering the entire biatrial surface. All recordings were reviewed off-line with dedicated software allowing automated annotation of the local activation time of the unipolar fibrillatory EGMs (CARTOFINDER; Biosense Inc). RAAPs were defined as a consistent activation pattern (for ≥3 consecutive beats) of either focal activity with centrifugal spread (RAAPfocal ) or rotational activity across the PentaRay splines spanning the AF cycle length (RAAProtational ). RESULTS: A total of 498 PentaRay recordings were analyzed (35.6 ± 7.6 per patient). The number of PentaRay recordings displaying RAAP was 9.8 ± 3.1 per patient (range = 3-15), of which 2.4 ± 2.4 RAAProtational (range = 0-7), and 7.4 ± 4.4 RAAPfocal (range = 1-13). 77% of RAAPs portrayed focal firing. The median number of repetitions per 30 second recording was 11 (range = 3-225) per recording. RAAPs were observed both in the right atrium (RA) (35%) and left atrium (LA) (65%), with the majority being near the left PVs/appendage (35% of all RAAPs) and the superior vena cava/right appendage (23% of all RAAPs). CONCLUSION: High-resolution, sequential endocardial EGM-based mapping allows identification of RAAPs in persistent AF. In our series, focal firing was the most frequently observed pattern.

Subcutaneous nerve stimulation for rate control in ambulatory dogs with persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous nerve stimulation (ScNS) damages the stellate ganglion and improves rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF) in ambulatory dogs. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that thoracic ScNS can improve rate control in persistent AF. METHODS: We created persistent AF in 13 dogs and randomly assigned them to ScNS (n = 6) and sham control (n = 7) groups. 18F-2-Fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging of the brain stem was performed at baseline and at the end of the study. RESULTS: The average stellate ganglion nerve activity reduced from 4.00 ± 1.68 µV after the induction of persistent AF to 1.72 ± 0.42 µV (P = .032) after ScNS. In contrast, the average stellate ganglion nerve activity increased from 3.01 ± 1.26 µV during AF to 5.52 ± 2.69 µV after sham stimulation (P = .023). The mean ventricular rate during persistent AF reduced from 149 ± 36 to 84 ± 16 beats/min (P = .011) in the ScNS group, but no changes were observed in the sham control group. The left ventricular ejection fraction remained unchanged in the ScNS group but reduced significantly in the sham control group. Immunostaining showed damaged ganglion cells in bilateral stellate ganglia and increased brain stem glial cell reaction in the ScNS group but not in the control group. The 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose uptake in the pons and medulla was significantly (P = .011) higher in the ScNS group than the sham control group at the end of the study. CONCLUSION: Thoracic ScNS causes neural remodeling in the brain stem and stellate ganglia, controls the ventricular rate, and preserves the left ventricular ejection fraction in ambulatory dogs with persistent AF.

Non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation mapping: characterization of the electrophysiological substrate using a novel integrated mapping technique.

AIMS: Clinical outcomes after radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) remain suboptimal in the treatment of non-paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). Electrophysiological mapping may improve understanding of the underlying mechanisms. To describe the arrhythmia substrate in patients with persistent (Pers) and long-standing persistent (LSPers) AF, undergoing RFCA, using an integrated mechanism mapping technique. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients underwent high-density electroanatomical mapping before and after catheter ablation. Integrated maps characterized electrogram (EGM) cycle length (CL) in regions with repetitive-regular (RR) activations, stable wavefront propagation, fragmentation, and peak-to-peak bipolar voltage. Among 83 patients (72% male, 60 ± 11 years old), RR activations were identified in 376 regions (mean CL 180 ± 31 ms). PersAF patients (n = 43) showed more RR sites per patient (5.3 ± 2.4 vs. 3.7 ± 2.1, P = 0.002) with faster CL (166 ± 29 vs. 190 ± 29 ms; P < 0.001) and smaller surface area of fragmented EGMs (15 ± 14% vs. 27 ± 17%, P < 0.001) compared with LSPersAF. The post-ablation map in 50 patients remaining in AF, documented reduction of the RR activities per patient (1.5 ± 0.7 vs. 3.7 ± 1.4, P < 0.001) and area of fragmentation (22 ± 17% vs. 8 ± 9%, P < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation termination during ablation occurred at RR sites (0.48 ± 0.24 mV; 170.5 ± 20.2 ms CL) in 31/33 patients (94%). At the latest follow-up, arrhythmia freedom was higher among patients receiving ablation >75% of RR sites (Q4 82.6%, Q3 63.1%, Q2 35.1%, and Q1 0%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The integrated mapping technique allowed characterization of multiple arrhythmic substrates in non-paroxysmal AF patients. This technique might serve as tool for a substrate-targeted ablation approach.

Optimum lesion set and predictors of outcome in persistent atrial fibrillation ablation: a meta-regression analysis.

AIMS: Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) has been performed by many techniques with varying success rates. This may be due to ablation techniques, patient demographics, comorbidities, and trial design. We conducted a meta-regression of studies of PsAF ablation to elucidate the factors affecting atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. METHODS AND RESULTS: Databases were searched for prospective studies of PsAF ablation. A meta-regression was performed. Fifty-eight studies (6767 patients) were included. Complex fractionated atrial electrogram (CFAE) ablation reduced freedom from AF by 8.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) -15 to -2.3, P = 0.009). Left atrial appendage [LAA isolation (three study arms)] increased freedom from AF by 39.5% (95% CI 9.1-78.4, P = 0.008). Posterior wall isolation (PWI) (eight study arms) increased freedom from AF by 19.4% (95% CI 3.3-38.1, P = 0.017). Linear ablation or ganglionated plexi ablation resulted in no significant effect on freedom from AF. More extensive ablation increased intraprocedural AF termination; however, intraprocedural AF termination was not associated with improved outcomes. Increased left atrial diameter was associated with a reduction in freedom from AF by 4% (95% CI -6.8% to -1.1%, P = 0.007) for every 1 mm increase in diameter. CONCLUSION: Linear ablation, PWI, and CFAE ablation improves intraprocedural AF termination, but such termination does not predict better long-term outcomes. Study arms including PWI or LAA isolation in the lesion set were associated with improved outcomes in terms of freedom from AF; however, further randomized trials are required before these can be routinely recommended. Left atrial size is the most important marker of AF chronicity influencing outcomes.

Effect of Extensive Ablation on Recurrence in Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Pulmonary Vein Isolation (EARNEST-PVI) trial: Design and rationale.

BACKGROUND: Although extensive substrate modification in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has been recommended in catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), recent randomized controlled trials have not demonstrated efficacy of such additional ablations. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: The Osaka Cardiovascular Conference will conduct a multicenter, randomized, open-label trial aiming to examine whether PVI alone is non-inferior to PVI plus additional ablation such as linear ablation and/or complex fractionated atrial electrogram ablation in patients with persistent AF. The primary outcome is recurrence of AF documented by scheduled or symptom-driven electrocardiogram tests during a 1-year follow-up period after the index ablation. The key secondary endpoints include all-cause death, occurrence of symptomatic stroke, complications related to the procedure, and quality of life assessment using the 36-item Short-Form Health Survey. The clinical impact of the presence or absence of AF trigger foci, and their origins in cases with them, on the results of catheter ablation will also be investigated as an exploratory endpoint. A total of 512 patients will be enrolled and followed up to 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The EARNEST-PVI trial is a randomized controlled trial designed to assess whether PVI alone is non-inferior to extended substrate ablation for patients with persistent AF undergoing a first catheter ablation.

New tailored approach using a revised assessment of fragmented potentials for persistent atrial fibrillation: Early area defragmentation by modified CFAE module.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is widely performed for atrial fibrillation (AFib). However, it is insufficient to maintain sinus rhythm (SR) in persistent and long persistent atrial fibrillation (Per-AFib). Ablation of complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) is currently classified as class IIb, However, the concept of length of potential was different between the current CFAE module of CARTO system and the definition of CFAE potential. The current CFAE module was configured in the shortest complex interval (SCI) mode, in which the meaning of length of potential was the interval of each component of fragmented potentials. That was a part of the potential. On the other hand, the meaning of the definition of CFAE potential was the length of fragmented potential itself. The purpose of this study was to essentially evaluate fragmented potentials by revisiting in interval confidence level (ICL) mode and express them on the map and prospectively investigate the efficacy and prognosis of a new tailored approach for defragmentation, which is called early area defragmentation (EADF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We acquired atrial potentials by modified CFAE module in ICL mode (K-CFAE potential) and visualized the distribution of K-CFAE potential (K-CFAE map). We performed PVI, and we ablated the fragmented areas based on the K-CFAE map. We enrolled 77 patients in this study (control group: 84 patients). After 24-month follow-up, 75.3% were able to maintain SR. CONCLUSIONS: K-CFAE mapping faithfully represented the distribution of fragmented areas. PVI, together with our new tailored approach, EADF, was successful in treating Per-AFib.

Characterization and significance of localized sources identified by a novel automated algorithm during mapping of human persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Automated algorithms may identify focal (FA) and rotational (RoA) activations during persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an automated algorithm for characterizing and assessing significance of FA/RoA. METHODS: Eighty-six PeAF ablation patients (1411 maps) were analyzed. Maps were obtained with a 64-electrode basket using CARTOFINDER, which filters/annotates atrial unipolar electrograms over 30 seconds. Operators ablated FA/RoA followed by pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). The automated algorithm was retrospectively applied using QS patterns to identify FA and sequential activation gradients for RoA without phase mapping. Algorithm-identified FA and RoA were validated against blinded adjudicators. Ablation of algorithm-identified FA/RoA was related to procedural AF termination. RESULTS: 73% ± 18% of electrodes (65% ± 11% atrial surface area) were adequate for analysis. Compared with adjudicators, the algorithm had a sensitivity of 84% for FA and 86% for RoA. There were 4 ± 2 FA and 2 ± 2 RoA per patient. FA occurred 8 ± 6 times during the 30-second window (cumulative duration 8 ± 6 seconds). RoA occurred 5 ± 3 times (median 2, consecutive rotations) with a cumulative duration of 3 ± 2 seconds. Compared to patients without procedural AF termination, patients with termination had more FA ablated (75% vs 38%, P = 0.006). AF termination was not predicted by percentage of RoA ablated although there was a trend towards a higher percentage of left atrial RoA ablated ( P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: An automated algorithm had high sensitivity for FA and RoA. Acute AF termination was associated with FA ablation but not RoA ablation. Future studies need to define the significance of FA and RoA and whether they are overlapping or separate mechanisms.