ABSTRACT
Chronic abdominal pain is a challenging problem in clinical practice, with several pathophysiological mechanisms underlying its aetiologies. This case report presents a geriatric patient with multiple comorbidities who had experienced intermittent abdominal pain for over 10 years. Alarming symptoms were ruled out, and a functional gastrointestinal disorder was determined as the most likely cause. The patient's medical history and previous treatments were thoroughly reviewed, revealing that long-term use of metformin and an oral iron supplement was the iatrogenic symptom triggers. The abdominal pain resolved upon discontinuation of these two medications. This case report highlights the significance of reviewing iatrogenic causes and periodically assessing chronic medical conditions to identify potential contributing factors of chronic abdominal pain.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain , Gastrointestinal Diseases , Humans , Aged , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Abdominal Pain/therapy , Gastrointestinal Diseases/complications , Chronic Disease , Comorbidity , Iatrogenic DiseaseABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a highly prevalent disorder for which treatment options such as medication, diets, and hypnotherapy either have shown limited effect or relieve symptoms in only a limited subset of patients. Abdominal pain is the key criterion for the diagnosis and is deemed the most distressing IBS symptom, and the most disruptive of everyday life. A growing body of research demonstrates the effect of Eye Movement Desensitization and Reprocessing (EMDR) on chronic pain. EMDR is known as a safe and successful treatment for disorders in which unresolved traumatic memories play a role in the cause or maintenance of symptoms. In IBS, activated memories may increase pain through pain flashbacks and the stress generated by unresolved memories. The aim of this study is to ascertain whether applying EMDR to traumatic memories including pain memories will reduce abdominal pain in IBS patients. METHODS: This study is a randomized controlled trial which will be conducted at a city hospital in the Netherlands. Adult patients with considerable IBS pain (pain intensity at least 60/100 during at least 5/10 days) will be randomly assigned to either EMDR therapy or the wait list. We aim to include 34 participants. The EMDR condition comprises seven sessions, around 90 min in length delivered weekly, the first of which is a case conceptualization session. All participants will be assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and at 3 months follow-up. The primary outcome measure is pain intensity on a Likert scale which is self-reported daily during a 2-week period. Secondary outcomes include similar daily ratings on other IBS symptoms and reported hindrance of valued activities, and also standardized questionnaires on IBS symptoms and Quality of Life. Data will be analyzed by a Linear Mixed Effects Model for repeated measures. DISCUSSION: The results are expected to gain insight into the effectiveness of EMDR treatment on abdominal pain in IBS. As there are very few effective treatment options for IBS-related abdominal pain, this study could have important implications for clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Human ethics committee MEC-U NL71740.100.20. International Clinical Trial Registry Platform: NL8894. Prospectively registered on 28 January 2020.
Subject(s)
Chronic Pain , Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic , Adult , Humans , Eye Movement Desensitization Reprocessing/methods , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications , Quality of Life , Eye Movements , Treatment Outcome , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Abdominal Pain/therapy , Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic/therapy , Randomized Controlled Trials as TopicABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to explore the clinical characteristics and related factors of centrally mediated abdominal pain syndrome (CAPS). METHODS: Our study included 73 patients with CAPS and 132 age-matched and gender-matched healthy controls. The general information of the participants was collected, and the questionnaires were completed including the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale, 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire, Hamilton Anxiety Scale, Hamilton Depression Scale Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Visual Analog Scale, and Short-Form 36. Univariate and forward stepwise regression analyses were performed to explore the influencing factors of CAPS. RESULTS: Nonexercise (adjusted odds ration [AOR] 4.53; confidence interval [CI] 1.602-12.809), mild-to-moderate depression (AOR 7.931; CI 3.236-19.438), married status (AOR 3.656; CI 1.317-10.418), and drinking coffee (AOR 0.199; CI 0.051-0.775) were found to be related with centrally mediated abdominal syndrome. The Hamilton Anxiety Scale score (7-13) was significantly related to moderate-to-severe abdominal pain (AOR 7.043; CI 1.319-37.593). Higher Hamilton Depression Scale score was related to lower mental component scale score (ß = -0.726, P < 0.01) and physical component scale score (ß = -0.706, P < 0.01). DISCUSSION: Depression, married status, and nonexercise were the independent risk factors of CAPS. Conversely, coffee intake was an independent protective factor of CAPS. Anxiety was related to the severity of abdominal pain, while depression was related to low health-related quality of life.
Subject(s)
Depression , Quality of Life , Humans , Depression/diagnosis , Depression/epidemiology , Coffee , Anxiety/diagnosis , Anxiety/epidemiology , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/epidemiology , Abdominal Pain/etiologySubject(s)
Abdominal Pain , Drugs, Chinese Herbal , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiologyABSTRACT
Importance: Acupuncture is a promising therapy for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but the use of subjective scales as an assessment is accompanied by high placebo response rates. Objectives: To preliminarily test the feasibility of using US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-recommended end points to evaluate the efficacy of acupuncture in the treatment of IBS. Design, Setting, and Participants: This pilot, multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted in 4 tertiary hospitals in China from July 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021, and 14-week data collection was completed in March 2021. Individuals with a diagnosis of IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D) were randomized to 1 of 3 groups, including 2 acupuncture groups (specific acupoints [SA] and nonspecific acupoints [NSA]) and a sham acupuncture group (non-acupoints [NA]) with a 1:1:1 ratio. Interventions: Patients in all groups received twelve 30-minute sessions over 4 consecutive weeks at 3 sessions per week (ideally every other day). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the response rate at week 4, which was defined as the proportion of patients whose worst abdominal pain score (score range, 0-10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating unbearable severe pain) decreased by at least 30% and the number of type 6 or 7 stool days decreased by 50% or greater. Results: Ninety patients (54 male [60.0%]; mean [SD] age, 34.5 [11.3] years) were enrolled, with 30 patients in each group. There were substantial improvements in the primary outcomes for all groups (composite response rates of 46.7% [95% CI, 28.8%-65.4%] in the SA group, 46.7% [95% CI, 28.8%-65.4%] in the NSA group, and 26.7% [95% CI, 13.0%-46.2%] in the NA group), although the difference between them was not statistically significant (P = .18). The response rates of adequate relief at week 4 were 64.3% (95% CI, 44.1%-80.7%) in the SA group, 62.1% (95% CI, 42.4%-78.7%) in the NSA group, and 55.2% (95% CI, 36.0%-73.0%) in the NA group (P = .76). Adverse events were reported in 2 patients (6.7%) in the SA group and 3 patients (10%) in NSA or NA group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this pilot randomized clinical trial, acupuncture in both the SA and NSA groups showed clinically meaningful improvement in IBS-D symptoms, although there were no significant differences among the 3 groups. These findings suggest that acupuncture is feasible and safe; a larger, sufficiently powered trial is needed to accurately assess efficacy. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR2000030670.
Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome , United States , Humans , Male , Adult , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Pilot Projects , Diarrhea/drug therapy , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Abdominal Pain/therapy , Abdominal Pain/diagnosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs) are common among children and are associated with decreased quality of life and school attendance. Several dietary interventions have been suggested to improve symptoms of FAPDs. This systematic review assessed the efficacy and safety of dietary interventions for pediatric FAPDs. DESIGN AND METHODS: Electronic databases were searched (inception-October 2021). Systematic reviews or RCTs were included if children (4-18 years) with FAPDs were treated with dietary interventions and compared to placebo, no diet or any other diet. Data extraction and assessment of quality of evidence based on GRADE system was independently performed by two review authors. Outcomes were treatment success, pain intensity and frequency, and withdrawal due to adverse events. RESULTS: Twelve articles were included, representing data of 819 pediatric FAPD patients. Trials investigating fibers, FODMAP diet, fructans, fructose-restricted diet, prebiotic (inulin), serum-derived bovine immunoglobulin, and vitamin D supplementation were included. We found very low-certainty evidence that the use of fibers leads to higher treatment success (NNT = 5). CONCLUSION: Based on current evidence, the use of fibers can be discussed in daily practice. High-quality intervention trials are highly needed to investigate if other dietary interventions are effective in the treatment of pediatric FAPD.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain , Quality of Life , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Abdominal Pain/therapy , Animals , Cattle , Child , Humans , Pain Measurement , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Secondary amyloidosis is a rare complication of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that is histologically characterized by the deposition of amyloid fibrils in target organs, such as the kidneys and gastrointestinal tract. Controlling the inflammatory response is essential to prevent organ dysfunction in amyloid A (AA) amyloidosis secondary to RA, and no clear treatment strategy exists. PATIENT CONCERNS AND DIAGNOSIS: A 66-year-old woman with RA, who had been treated with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs for 1âyear, presented with recurrent abdominal pain and prolonged diarrhea. Endoscopy showed chronic inflammation, and colon tissue histology confirmed AA amyloidosis. INTERVENTIONS AND OUTCOMES: After tocilizumab therapy was begun, her diarrhea and abdominal pain subsided, and articular symptoms improved. Biologic drugs for RA have been used in patients with secondary AA amyloidosis, including tumor necrosis factor and Janus kinase inhibitors, interleukin 6 blockers, and a T cell modulator. Here, we systematically review existing case reports and compare the outcomes of RA-related AA amyloidosis after treatment with various drugs. CONCLUSION: The data indicate that biologic drugs like tocilizumab might be treatments of choice for AA amyloidosis secondary to RA.
Subject(s)
Amyloidosis , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biological Therapy/methods , Colon , Serum Amyloid A Protein/analysis , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Aged , Amyloidosis/etiology , Amyloidosis/immunology , Amyloidosis/physiopathology , Amyloidosis/therapy , Antirheumatic Agents/administration & dosage , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Biological Products/administration & dosage , Colon/immunology , Colon/pathology , Diarrhea/diagnosis , Diarrhea/etiology , Female , Humans , Interleukin-6/antagonists & inhibitors , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BackgroundAbdominal pain and constipation are 2 main symptoms in patients with constipation-predominant irritable bowel syndrome (IBS-C). This study aimed to investigate the effects and possible mechanisms of transcutaneous auricular vagal nerve stimulation (taVNS) in patients with IBS-C.MethodsForty-two patients with IBS-C were randomized into a 4-week sham-taVNS or taVNS treatment. The primary outcomes were complete spontaneous bowel movements per week (CSBMs/week) and visual analog scale (VAS) for abdominal pain. High-resolution anorectal manometry (HRAM) was performed to evaluate anorectal motor and sensory function. Cytokines and brain gut peptides were analyzed in blood samples. ECG was recorded for the assessment of autonomic function.ResultsCompared with sham-taVNS, (a) taVNS increased CSBMs/week (P = 0.001) and decreased VAS pain score (P = 0.001); (b) improved quality of life (P = 0.020) and decreased IBS symptom score (P = 0.001); (c) improved rectoanal inhibitory reflex (P = 0.014) and improved rectal sensation (P < 0.04); (d) decreased a number of proinflammatory cytokines and serotonin in circulation; and (e) enhanced vagal activity (P = 0.040). The vagal activity was weakly correlated with the CSBMs/week (r = 0.391; P = 0.010) and the VAS pain score (r = -0.347; P = 0.025).ConclusionsNoninvasive taVNS improves both constipation and abdominal pain in patients with IBS-C. The improvement in IBS-C symptoms might be attributed to the integrative effects of taVNS on intestinal functions mediated via the autoimmune mechanisms.Trial registrationwww.chictr.org.cn, no. ChiCTR2000029644.FundingNational Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81970538 for FL).
Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/therapy , Constipation/therapy , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/therapy , Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation/methods , Vagus Nerve Stimulation/methods , Vagus Nerve , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Constipation/diagnosis , Ear Auricle/innervation , Female , Humans , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Quality of Life , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The mesenteric artery calcium score (MACS) identifies patients with possible chronic mesenteric ischaemia (CMI) using standard computed tomography (CT) imaging. The MACS does not necessitate a dedicated computed tomography angiography (CTA) which is required for evaluation of mesenteric artery patency. This study aimed to test the use of a symptom and MACS based score chart to facilitate the selection of patients with a low probability of CMI, in whom further diagnostic workup can be omitted, and to validate the CTA-based score chart proposed by van Dijk et al. which guides treatment decisions in patients with suspected CMI. METHODS: This retrospective study included consecutive patients with suspected CMI. The Agatston definition was used to calculate the MACS. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to create a MACS score chart, which was applied in all patients to determine its discriminative ability. The score chart by van Dijk et al. was validated in this independent external patient series. RESULTS: Hundred-ninety-two patients were included, of whom 49 had CMI. The MACS score chart composed of the variables weight loss, postprandial abdominal pain, history of cardiovascular disease, and MACS, showed an excellent discriminative ability (area under the curve [AUC] 0.87). CMI risks were 2.1% in the low-risk group (0-4 points) and 39.1% in the increased risk group (5-10 points); sensitivity (97.8%) and negative predictive value (NPV; 97.9%) were high. The CTA-based score chart by van Dijk et al. showed an excellent discriminative ability (AUC 0.89). CONCLUSION: The MACS score chart shows promise for early risk stratification of patients with suspected CMI based on a near-perfect NPV. It is complementary to the CTA-based score chart by van Dijk et al., which showed excellent external validity and is well suited to guide subsequent (invasive) treatment decisions in patients with suspected CMI.
Subject(s)
Calcinosis/diagnostic imaging , Computed Tomography Angiography , Mesenteric Arteries/diagnostic imaging , Mesenteric Ischemia/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Aged , Area Under Curve , Cardiovascular Diseases/complications , Chronic Disease , Constriction, Pathologic/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Mesenteric Ischemia/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Postprandial Period , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Symptom Assessment , Weight LossABSTRACT
RESUMEN El Blastocystis sp. es un parásito frecuente en el humano, identificado por el laboratorio en muestras de heces fecales. Se presentó el caso de un paciente de 5 años atendido en consulta de Gastroenterología en el Hospital Pediátrico Docente Provincial Eliseo Noel Caamaño, de Matanzas, por presentar dolor abdominal, heces pastosas, náuseas y vómitos desde hacía un año. Llevó tratamiento con ranitidina, omeprazol y domperidona, sin mejoría clínica. Se realizó estudio coproparasitológico en muestras de heces fecales seriadas, con la presencia del Blastocystis hominis. Se indicó tratamiento con metronidazol, sin mejoría clínica, y posteriormente se indicó como alternativa la nitazoxanida. Se evaluó a los 15 días, sin sintomatología y con negativización de las heces fecales seriadas. Resulta frecuente el desconocimiento y la poca importancia que los profesionales sanitarios muestran ante esta infestación, aunque cada vez más se confirma la participación del parásito en manifestaciones clínicas (AU).
ABSTRACT Blastocystis sp. is a frequent parasite in humans, identified in the laboratory in samples of fecal feces. The case of a 5-year-old patient is presented; he assisted the consultation of Gastroenterology in the Provincial Teaching Pediatric Hospital Eliseo Noel Caamaño in Matanzas, suffering abdominal pain, mash feces, nauseas and vomits for one year, and was treated with ranitidine, omeprazole and domperidone without clinical improvement. A coproparasitological study was carried out in serial fecal feces samples with the presence of Blastocystis hominis. Treatment with metronidazole was indicated without clinical improvement and them, as an alternative, nitazoxanide was indicated. He was evaluated at 15 days without symptoms and with negative serial fecal feces. The ignorance and the little importance that health professionals show towards this infestation are frequent, although more and more frequently it is confirmed the participation of the parasite in clinical manifestations (AU).
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Child , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Child , Blastocystis hominis/pathogenicity , Signs and Symptoms , Specimen Handling/methods , Clinical Diagnosis , Feces/parasitology , Gastroenterology , Intestinal Diseases, Parasitic/complicationsABSTRACT
Acute abdominal pain is a common presentation to the emergency department (ED). Ruling out life-threatening causes and giving pain relief are the most important tasks in ED. We describe a 32-year-old man who presented to ED with abdominal pain and vomiting which was unrelieved by usual doses of analgesic. Extensive investigations revealed no significant abnormalities. On further probing, he admitted taking traditional medications for infertility. The toxicological panel revealed a high blood lead level, leading to a diagnosis of acute lead toxicity. Chelation therapy with D-penicillamine was initiated and the patient's abdominal pain resolved within 4 days.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Counterfeit Drugs/adverse effects , Lead Poisoning/diagnosis , Quackery , Vomiting/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/drug therapy , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Acute Disease , Adult , Anemia/etiology , Antiemetics/therapeutic use , Chelating Agents/therapeutic use , Chlordiazepoxide/therapeutic use , Cholinergic Antagonists , Constipation/etiology , Counterfeit Drugs/chemistry , Drug Combinations , Emergency Service, Hospital , Humans , Lead Poisoning/complications , Lead Poisoning/drug therapy , Male , Parasympatholytics/therapeutic use , Penicillamine/therapeutic use , Phenethylamines/therapeutic use , Quinuclidines/therapeutic use , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Vomiting/drug therapy , Vomiting/etiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To highlight an extremely unusual presentation of an aggressive, rare small bowel malignancy presenting as abdominal myofascial pain syndrome. CASE PRESENTATION: The report is presented from a tertiary pain medicine unit at a university teaching hospital. A female patient presenting with chronic abdominal pain was initially diagnosed as abdominal myofascial pain syndrome. The report details the possible facilitation of the diagnosis of a rare, highly aggressive small bowel tumour by interventional treatment for abdominal myofascial pain syndrome. CONCLUSION: This case highlights a rare and aggressive malignancy of the small intestine presenting clinically as abdominal myofascial pain syndrome.
Subject(s)
Fibromyalgia , Leiomyosarcoma , Myofascial Pain Syndromes , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Female , Humans , Intestine, Small , Leiomyosarcoma/diagnosis , Myofascial Pain Syndromes/diagnosisABSTRACT
Acupuncture is a practice based on traditional Chinese medicine, in which needles are used to restore the body's internal balance. Recently, there has been growing interest in the use of acupuncture for various pain conditions. Acupuncture's efficacy in five pain conditions-low back pain (LBP), migraines, fibromyalgia, neck pain, and abdominal pain-was evaluated in this evidence-based, comprehensive review. Based on the most recent evidence, migraine and fibromyalgia are two conditions with the most favorable outcomes after acupuncture. At the same time, abdominal pain has the least evidence for the use of acupuncture. Acupuncture is efficacious for reducing pain in patients with LBP, and for short-term pain relief for those with neck pain. Further research needs to be done to evaluate acupuncture's efficacy in these conditions, especially for abdominal pain, as many of the current studies have a risk of bias due to lack of blinding and small sample size.
Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Chronic Pain/diagnosis , Chronic Pain/therapy , Pain Management/methods , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/physiopathology , Abdominal Pain/therapy , Back Pain/diagnosis , Back Pain/physiopathology , Back Pain/therapy , Chronic Pain/physiopathology , Fibromyalgia/diagnosis , Fibromyalgia/physiopathology , Fibromyalgia/therapy , Humans , Migraine Disorders/diagnosis , Migraine Disorders/physiopathology , Migraine Disorders/therapy , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
BACKGROUND The aims of this study were to summarize the clinical characteristics and risk factors for bezoars and to analyze the effectiveness and safety of the endoscopic treatment of bezoars. MATERIAL AND METHODS From January 2015 to February 2020, 75 of the 23 950 patients who underwent gastroscopic examination in our medical center were diagnosed with bezoars. Clinical and treatment information for these patients was collected retrospectively and analyzed. RESULTS The detection rate of bezoars was 0.31%. Risk factors included the time of year (autumn and winter seasons), alcohol consumption, hypertension, diabetes, and residing in the Mentougou district, which is rich in hawthorn and persimmon. Abdominal pain (90.7%) and bloating (80.0%) were common clinical symptoms of bezoars, while gastric mucosa erosion (90.7%) and gastric ulcers (60%) were common manifestations on endoscopic examination. Six patients with bezoars were successfully discharged after drug treatment. The success rate for bezoars treated by gastroscopic lithotripsy was 94.2% (65/69 patients). The factors affecting the therapeutic effect of bezoars include patient age (P=0.025) and bezoar size (P=0.042). Patients with bezoars larger than 9 cm were significantly more likely to have intestinal obstructions than were patients with bezoars smaller than 9 cm (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Bezoars mainly occur in elderly patients with diseases such as gastrointestinal dyspraxia and diabetes, and are most common in hawthorn and persimmon producing areas. Endoscopic treatment is safe and effective for bezoars in general, but intestinal obstruction should be considered for bezoars larger than 9 cm.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain , Bezoars , Gastroscopy , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/epidemiology , Abdominal Pain/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bezoars/diagnosis , Bezoars/epidemiology , Bezoars/surgery , China/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
Functional dyspepsia is a common functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorder of gastroduodenal origin, diagnosed clinically in the presence of prototypical symptoms of epigastric pain and meal-related symptoms, and without structural explanation. The most recent diagnostic criteria provide for two functional dyspepsia subtypes, epigastric pain syndrome (EPS) and post-prandial distress syndrome (PDS) based on the predominant symptom pattern. The evaluation of dyspepsia should keep laboratory, imaging, and invasive testing to a minimum, as extensive or repetitive investigations are of rather low diagnostic yield in the absence of localizing symptoms or alarm features. Factors with etiopathologic relationships to functional dyspepsia include micro-inflammation, GI infections, abnormalities of gastroduodenal motility, visceral hypersensitivity, disturbances along the brain-gut axis, and psychological factors; all of these causative mechanisms have potential to partially explain symptoms in some functional dyspepsia patients, thus providing a rationale for the efficacy of a diversity of therapeutic approaches to functional dyspepsia. Management of dyspepsia symptoms relies upon both pharmacologic treatments and non-pharmacologic approaches, including psychological and complementary interventions. The evidence in support of established functional dyspepsia therapies is reviewed, and forms the basis for an effective functional dyspepsia treatment strategy emphasizing the patient's current symptom severity, pattern, and impact on the function and quality of life of the individual.
Subject(s)
Acupuncture Therapy/methods , Dyspepsia/diagnosis , Gastrointestinal Agents/therapeutic use , Psychotherapy/methods , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Abdominal Pain/psychology , Abdominal Pain/therapy , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Dyspepsia/complications , Dyspepsia/psychology , Dyspepsia/therapy , Humans , Postprandial Period , Quality of Life , Syndrome , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Stomachache is not only disease name of Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) but also the clinical symptom. It is a common and multiple diseases. TCM has its particular advantage in clinical treatment of stomachache. Syndrome differentiation is an important concept in TCM practice. The therapeutic process is virtually a nonlinear mapping process from clinical symptom to syndrome diagnosis with processing and seeking rules from mass data. Artificial neutral network has strong learning ability for nonlinear relationship. Artificial neutral network has been widely used to TCM area where the multiple factors, multilevel, nonlinear problem accompanied by a large number of optimization exist.We present an original experimental method to apply the improved third-order convergence LM algorithm to intelligent syndrome differentiation for the first time, and compare the predicted ability of Levenberg-Marquardt (LM) algorithm and the improved third-order convergence LM algorithm in syndrome differentiation.In this study, 2436 cases of stomachache electronic medical data from hospital information system, and then the real world data were normalized and standardized. Afterwards, LM algorithm and the improved third-order convergence LM algorithm were used to build the Back Propagation (BP) neural network model for intelligent syndrome differentiation of stomachache on Matlab, respectively. Finally, the differentiation performance of the 2 models was tested and analyzed.The testing results showed that the improved third-order convergence LM algorithm model has better average prediction and diagnosis accuracy, especially in predicting "liver-stomach disharmony" and "stomach yang deficiency", is above 95%.By effectively using the self-learning and auto-update ability of the BP neural network, the intelligent syndrome differentiation model of TCM can fully approach the real side of syndrome differentiation, and shows excellent predicted ability of syndrome differentiation.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Medicine, Chinese Traditional/methods , Neural Networks, Computer , Stomach Diseases/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/physiopathology , Algorithms , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Stomach Diseases/physiopathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Peppermint oil is frequently used to treat irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), despite a lack of evidence for efficacy from high-quality controlled trials. We studied the efficacy and safety of small-intestinal-release peppermint oil in patients with IBS and explored the effects of targeted ileocolonic-release peppermint oil. METHODS: We performed a double-blind trial of 190 patients with IBS (according to Rome IV criteria) at 4 hospitals in The Netherlands from August 2016 through March 2018; 189 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis (mean age, 34.0 years; 77.8% female; 57.7% in primary care), and 178 completed the study. Patients were randomly assigned to groups given 182 mg small-intestinal-release peppermint oil, 182 mg ileocolonic-release peppermint oil, or placebo for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was abdominal pain response, as defined by the US Food and Drug Administration: at least a 30% decrease in the weekly average of worst daily abdominal pain compared with baseline in at least 4 weeks. The co-primary endpoint was overall relief of IBS symptoms, as defined by the European Medicines Agency. Secondary endpoints included abdominal pain, discomfort, symptom severity, and adverse events. RESULTS: Abdominal pain response did not differ significantly between the peppermint oil and placebo groups: 29 of 62 patients in the small-intestinal-release peppermint oil group had a response (46.8%, P = .170 vs placebo), 26 of 63 patients in the ileocolonic-release peppermint oil group had a response (41.3%, P = .385 vs placebo), and 22 of 64 patients in the placebo group had a response (34.4%). We did not find differences among the groups in overall relief (9.7%, P = .317 and 1.6%, P = .351 vs 4.7% for placebo). The small intestinal peppermint oil did, however, produce greater improvements than placebo in secondary outcomes of abdominal pain (P = .016), discomfort (P = .020), and IBS severity (P = .020). Adverse events, although mild, were more common in both peppermint oil groups (P < .005). CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized trial of patients with IBS, we found that neither small-intestinal-release nor ileocolonic-release peppermint oil (8 weeks) produced statistically significant reductions in abdominal pain response or overall symptom relief, when using US Food and Drug Administration/European Medicines Agency recommended endpoints. The small-intestinal-release peppermint oil did, however, significantly reduce abdominal pain, discomfort, and IBS severity. These findings do not support further development of ileocolonic-release peppermint oil for treatment of IBS. Clinicaltrials.gov, Number: NCT02716285.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/drug therapy , Analgesics/administration & dosage , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/drug therapy , Plant Oils/administration & dosage , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Administration, Oral , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Analgesics/adverse effects , Capsules , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Intestinal Mucosa/drug effects , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/complications , Irritable Bowel Syndrome/diagnosis , Male , Mentha piperita , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Pain Measurement , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Somatization is regarded as psychological or emotional distress in the form of physical symptoms that are otherwise medically unexplained. CASE PRESENTATION: We report a case of a patient with a somatic symptom disorder (SSD) and depression who was later diagnosed with anterior cutaneous nerve entrapment syndrome (ACNES) when Carnett's test was positive and block anesthesia using trigger point injections dramatically improved the symptom of abdominal pain. CONCLUSION: We concluded that the differentiation of SSDs, such as psychogenic pain, from ACNES is very difficult. Psychiatrists should be aware of this syndrome.
Subject(s)
Medically Unexplained Symptoms , Nerve Compression Syndromes/diagnosis , Nerve Compression Syndromes/psychology , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Abdominal Pain/etiology , Abdominal Pain/psychology , Adolescent , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Mental Disorders/complications , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/psychologyABSTRACT
In the embroyological development, any deviation from physiological midgutrotation results in intestinal malrotation, which may further cause midgutvolulus or intestinal obstruction. It is predominantly a pediatric diagnosis; however, it may occur in adolescent or adult life. A case is presented here of a 17-year boy who came in Accident and Emergency Department, Abbasi Shaheed Hospital with complaint of intermittent and severe intensity pain in left upper quadrant of abdomen. Screening ultrasound abdomen was done, which was unremarkable; then he underwent Doppler evaluation of upper abdomen. Doppler ultrasound depicted abnormal vertical orientation of superior mesenteric vessels. He underwent barium enema, which revealed features of intestinal malrotation. He was further investigated with contrast-enhanced CT abdomen for complications, which confirmed the aforementioned abnormal orientation of superior mesenteric vessels and diagnosis of intestinal malrotation without any complication. In summary, any non-specific abdominal complaint with or without intestinal obstruction in an adolescent or adult patient should be investigated for the possibility of intestinal malrotation.
Subject(s)
Abdominal Pain/etiology , Digestive System Abnormalities/complications , Intestinal Obstruction/complications , Intestinal Volvulus/complications , Abdominal Pain/diagnosis , Adolescent , Diagnosis, Differential , Digestive System Abnormalities/diagnosis , Digestive System Abnormalities/surgery , Digestive System Surgical Procedures/methods , Humans , Intestinal Obstruction/diagnosis , Intestinal Obstruction/surgery , Intestinal Volvulus/diagnosis , Intestinal Volvulus/surgery , Male , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Ultrasonography, DopplerABSTRACT
Background: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is highly prevalent and presents a clinical challenge. Gelsectan is a medical device containing xyloglucan (XG), pea protein and tannins (PPT) from grape seed extract, and xylo-oligosaccharides (XOS), which act together to protect and reinforce the intestinal barrier. Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of XG + PPT + XOS in patients with diarrhoea-predominant IBS (IBS-D). Methods: In this double-blind study, 60 patients were randomly assigned to receive XG + PPT + XOS or placebo for 28 days, then crossed over to the alternative treatment. Patients were followed for 60 days. Results: At Day 28, a significantly higher proportion of patients starting treatment with XG + PPT + XOS than placebo (87 vs 0%; p = 0.0019) presented normal stools (Bristol Stool Form Scale type 3-4). At Day 56, a significantly higher proportion of patients who crossed over to XG + PPT + XOS than placebo (93% vs 23%; p = 0.0001) presented normal stools. In the group allocated to receive XG + PPT + XOS after placebo, benefits of XG + PPT + XOS were maintained during follow-up. Subjective assessments of abdominal pain, bloating, quality of life and general health indicated significant improvement with XG + PPT + XOS over placebo. There were no related adverse events. Conclusion: XG + PPT + XOS effectively controlled diarrhoea and alleviated clinical symptoms in patients with IBS-D, and was well tolerated.