Chronic Low Back Pain in Adults: Evaluation and Management.

Chronic low back pain, defined as lumbar pain persisting for 12 weeks or more, occurs in about 13% of U.S. adults. Patients with chronic low back pain should have a history and physical examination to identify red flags that may indicate serious conditions that warrant immediate intervention or yellow flags (i.e., psychological, environmental, and social factors) that indicate risk of disability. The examination should include an evaluation for radicular symptoms. Routine imaging is not recommended but is indicated when red flags are present, there is a neuromuscular deficit, or if pain does not resolve with conservative therapy. Patients should avoid bed rest. Nonpharmacologic treatment is first-line management and may include therapies with varying evidence of support, such as counseling, exercise therapy, spinal manipulation, massage, heat, dry needling, acupuncture, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, and physical therapy. Pharmacologic interventions are second-line treatment. Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are the initial medication of choice; duloxetine may also be beneficial. Evidence is inconclusive to recommend the use of benzodiazepines, muscle relaxants, antidepressants, corticosteroids, insomnia agents, anticonvulsants, cannabis, acetaminophen, or long-term opioids. Epidural corticosteroid injections are not recommended except for short-term symptom relief in patients with radicular pain. Most patients with chronic low back pain will not require surgery; evaluation for surgery may be considered in those with persistent functional disabilities and pain from progressive spinal stenosis, worsening spondylolisthesis, or herniated disk. Physicians should consider prevention of chronic low back pain when patients present with acute back pain. Screening tools are available to predict the progression from acute to chronic low back pain, and targeted treatment strategies are beneficial for preventing progression.

Non-opioid analgesic combinations following total hip arthroplasty (RECIPE): a randomised, placebo-controlled, blinded, multicentre trial.

BACKGROUND: Multimodal postoperative analgesia following total hip arthroplasty is recommended, but the optimal combination of drugs remains uncertain. The aim of the RECIPE trial was to investigate the relative benefit and harm of the different combinations of paracetamol, ibuprofen, and the analgesic adjuvant dexamethasone for treatment of postoperative pain following total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: The RECIPE trial was a randomised, blinded, placebo-controlled trial conducted at nine Danish hospitals. Adults scheduled for total hip arthroplasty were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) using a computer-generated list with stratification by site to receive combinations of oral paracetamol 1000 mg every 6 h, oral ibuprofen 400 mg every 6 h, or a single-dose of intravenous dexamethasone 24 mg in the following groups: paracetamol plus ibuprofen, ibuprofen plus dexamethasone, paracetamol plus dexamethasone, and paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone. The primary outcome was 24 h intravenous morphine consumption, analysed in a modified intention-to-treat population, defined as all randomly assigned participants who underwent total hip arthroplasty. The predefined minimal important difference was 8 mg. Safety outcomes included serious and non-serious adverse events within 90 days and 24 h. The trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04123873. FINDINGS: Between March 5, 2020, and Nov 15, 2022, we randomly assigned 1060 participants, of whom 1043 (589 [56%] women and 454 [44%] men) were included in the modified intention-to-treat population. 261 were assigned to paracetamol plus ibuprofen, 262 to ibuprofen plus dexamethasone, 262 to paracetamol plus dexamethasone, and 258 to paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone. Median 24 h morphine consumption was 24 mg (IQR 12-38) in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen group, 20 mg (12-32) in the paracetamol plus dexamethasone group, 16 mg (10-30) in the ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group, and 15 mg (8-26) in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group. The paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group had a significantly reduced 24 h morphine consumption compared with paracetamol plus ibuprofen (Hodges-Lehmann median difference -6 mg [99% CI -10 to -3]; p<0·0001) and paracetamol plus dexamethasone (-4 mg [-8 to -1]; p=0·0013), however, none of the comparisons showed differences reaching the minimal important threshold of 8 mg. 91 (35%) of 258 participants in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group had one or more adverse events, compared with 99 (38%) of 262 in the ibuprofen plus dexamethasone group, 103 (39%) of 262 in the paracetamol plus dexamethasone group, and 165 (63%) of 261 in the paracetamol plus ibuprofen group. INTERPRETATION: In adults undergoing total hip arthroplasty, a combination of paracetamol, ibuprofen, and dexamethasone had the lowest morphine consumption within 24 h following surgery and the most favourable adverse event profile, with a lower incidence of serious and non-serious adverse events (primarily driven by differences in nausea, vomiting, and dizziness) compared with paracetamol plus ibuprofen. FUNDING: The Novo Nordisk Foundation and Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals' Research Fund.

Changes in pharmacist's recommendations of over-the-counter treatments for the common cold during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The common cold is one of the most frequently occurring illnesses worldwide. The aim of this study was to determine which OTC anti-common cold medications were most often recommended by pharmacists and if the COVID-19 pandemic affected such recommendations. METHODS: Non-interventional, observational research trial using a self-developed questionnaire to collect data on pharmacists' recommendations for anti-common cold OTC treatment. The data were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic (December 2021-February 2022) in four large community network pharmacies in Lodz (Poland) and then compared with an analogue period of time before the pandemic (December 2019-February 2020). RESULTS: During COVID-19 pandemic there was a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in paracetamol, acetylsalicylic acid, metamizole magnesium, inosines, alpha-mimetics, mucolytics, homeopathics, and sore throat products and an increase in other tablets/capsules and add-on product recommendations. There was a significant relationship (p < 0.05, OR > 1) between the recommended frequency of paracetamol, inosines, sore throat products (each symptom), metamizole magnesium (headache, fever), acetylsalicylic acid (headache, fever, fatigue), NSAIDs, alpha-mimetics (headache, rhinorrhea), pseudoephedrine (rhinorrhea), homeopathics (headache), herbal products (fatigue), antihistamines (rhinorrhea, cough), and mucolytics (headache, fever, cough). CONCLUSIONS: Favorable prices (before COVID-19 pandemic) and reports on common NSAIDs side effects (beginning of the pandemic) led to high sale of paracetamol. Increased awareness of clinical effectiveness of some medications or their reduced availability influenced their limited recommendations.

A comparison of the mixed and sequential use of acetaminophen and dexketoprofen in painful vaso-occlusive crises.

PURPOSE: Opioids are widely used to treat painful vaso-occlusive crises (VOC) in sickle cell disease (SCD). However, due to opioids' significant adverse effect profiles, the search for alternative therapies continues from the past to the present. The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of acetaminophen and dexketoprofen in the treatment of painful VOC. METHODS: This study is a single-center, prospective, non-randomized, single-blinded, controlled study. The study comprised two groups: the first administered acetaminophen and dexketoprofen mixed group, while the second received them sequential group. Opioids were used in patients with persistent pain despite these analgesics. Demographic and laboratory information, pain scores, opioid requirement, dose amount, side effects, and length of hospital stay of the patients were recorded. RESULTS: The study comprised 56 (100%) patients with painful VOC, 29 (51.8%) from the mixed group, and 27 (48.2%) from the sequential group. Opioid use was seen in 16 (55.2%) patients in the mixed group and 21 (77.8%) patients in the sequential group (p = 0.074). The median amount of opioid used was significantly lower in the mixed group than in the sequential group (p < 0.001). Also, the median length of hospital stay was significantly lower in the mixed group than in the sequential group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that administering acetaminophen and dexketoprofen in the mix for the treatment of painful VOC in patients with SCD may be a more efficient approach compared to sequential administration. This approach appears to reduce opioid usage and shorten hospital stays.

Opioid-Free Discharge After Pancreatic Resection Through a Learning Health System Paradigm.

Importance: Postoperative opioid overprescribing leads to persistent opioid use and excess pills at risk for misuse and diversion. A learning health system paradigm using risk-stratified pancreatectomy clinical pathways (RSPCPs) may lead to reduction in inpatient and discharge opioid volume. Objective: To analyze the outcomes of 2 iterative RSPCP updates on inpatient and discharge opioid volumes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included 832 consecutive adult patients at an urban comprehensive cancer center who underwent pancreatic resection between October 2016 and April 2022, comprising 3 sequential pathway cohorts (version [V] 1, October 1, 2016, to January 31, 2019 [n = 363]; V2, February 1, 2019, to October 31, 2020 [n = 229]; V3, November 1, 2020, to April 30, 2022 [n = 240]). Exposures: After V1 of the pathway established a baseline and reduced length of stay (n = 363), V2 (n = 229) updated patient and surgeon education handouts, limited intravenous opioids, suggested a 3-drug (acetaminophen, celecoxib, methocarbamol) nonopioid bundle, and implemented the 5×-multiplier (last 24-hour oral morphine equivalents [OME] multiplied by 5) to calculate discharge volume. Pathway version 3 (n = 240) required the nonopioid bundle as default in the recovery room and scheduled conversion to oral medications on postoperative day 1. Main Outcomes and Measures: Inpatient and discharge opioid volume in OME across the 3 RSPCPs were compared using nonparametric testing and trend analyses. Results: A total of 832 consecutive patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [56-72] years; 410 female [49.3%] and 422 male [50.7%]) underwent 541 pancreatoduodenectomies, 285 distal pancreatectomies, and 6 other pancreatectomies. Early nonopioid bundle administration increased from V1 (acetaminophen, 320 patients [88.2%]; celecoxib or anti-inflammatory, 98 patients [27.0%]; methocarbamol, 267 patients [73.6%]) to V3 (236 patients [98.3%], 163 patients [67.9%], and 238 patients [99.2%], respectively; P < .001). Total inpatient OME decreased from a median 290 mg (IQR, 157-468 mg) in V1 to 184 mg (IQR, 103-311 mg) in V2 to 129 mg (IQR, 75-206 mg) in V3 (P < .001). Discharge OME decreased from a median 150 mg (IQR, 100-225 mg) in V1 to 25 mg (IQR, 0-100 mg) in V2 to 0 mg (IQR, 0-50 mg) in V3 (P < .001). The percentage of patients discharged opioid free increased from 7.2% (26 of 363) in V1 to 52.5% (126 of 240) in V3 (P < .001), with 187 of 240 (77.9%) in V3 discharged with 50 mg OME or less. Median pain scores remained 3 or lower in all cohorts, with no differences in postdischarge refill requests. A subgroup analysis separating open and minimally invasive surgical cases showed similar results in both groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, the median total inpatient OME was halved and median discharge OME reduced to zero in association with a learning health system model of iterative opioid reduction that is freely adaptable by other hospitals. These findings suggest that opioid-free discharge after pancreatectomy and other major cancer operations is realistic and feasible with this no-cost blueprint.

Interventions for patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants: an overview of Cochrane Systematic Reviews.

BACKGROUND: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. Several non-pharmacological, pharmacological, and surgical approaches have been explored to prevent or treat a PDA. OBJECTIVES: To summarise Cochrane Neonatal evidence on interventions (pharmacological or surgical) for the prevention of PDA and related complications, and interventions for the management of asymptomatic and symptomatic PDA in preterm infants. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews on 20 October 2022 for ongoing and published Cochrane Reviews on the prevention and treatment of PDA in preterm (< 37 weeks' gestation) or low birthweight (< 2500 g) infants. We included all published Cochrane Reviews assessing the following categories of interventions: pharmacological therapy using prostaglandin inhibitor drugs (indomethacin, ibuprofen, and acetaminophen), adjunctive pharmacological interventions, invasive PDA closure procedures, and non-pharmacological interventions. Two overview authors independently checked the eligibility of the reviews retrieved by the search, and extracted data from the included reviews using a predefined data extraction form. Any disagreements were resolved by discussion with a third overview author. Two overview authors independently assessed the methodological quality of the included reviews using the AMSTAR 2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews) tool. We reported the GRADE certainty of evidence as assessed by the respective review authors using summary of findings tables. MAIN RESULTS: We included 16 Cochrane Reviews, corresponding to 138 randomised clinical trials (RCT) and 11,856 preterm infants, on the prevention and treatment of PDA in preterm infants. One of the 16 reviews had no included studies, and therefore, did not contribute to the results. Six reviews reported on prophylactic interventions for the prevention of PDA and included pharmacological prophylaxis with prostaglandin inhibitor drugs, prophylactic surgical PDA ligation, and non-pharmacologic interventions (chest shielding during phototherapy and restriction of fluid intake); one review reported on the use of indomethacin for the management of asymptomatic PDA; nine reviews reported on interventions for the management of symptomatic PDA, and included pharmacotherapy with prostaglandin inhibitor drugs in various routes and dosages, surgical PDA ligation, and adjunct therapies (use of furosemide and dopamine in conjunction with indomethacin). The quality of reviews varied. Two reviews were assessed to be high quality, seven reviews were of moderate quality, five of low quality, while two reviews were deemed to be of critically low quality. For prevention of PDA, prophylactic indomethacin reduces severe intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH; relative risk (RR) 0.66, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53 to 0.82; 14 RCTs, 2588 infants), and the need for invasive PDA closure (RR 0.51, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.71; 8 RCTs, 1791 infants), but it does not appear to affect the composite outcome of death or moderate/severe neurodevelopmental disability (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.15; 3 RCTs, 1491 infants). Prophylactic ibuprofen probably marginally reduces severe IVH (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.00; 7 RCTs, 925 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), and the need for invasive PDA closure (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.96; 7 RCTs, 925 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). The evidence is very uncertain on the effect of prophylactic acetaminophen on severe IVH (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.07 to 16.39; 1 RCT, 48 infants). Necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) was lower with both prophylactic surgical ligation (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.08 to 0.83; 1 RCT, 84 infants), and fluid restriction (RR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.87; 4 RCTs, 526 infants). For treatment of asymptomatic PDA, indomethacin appears to reduce the development of symptomatic PDA post-treatment (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.68; 3 RCTs, 97 infants; quality of source review: critically low). For treatment of symptomatic PDA, all available prostaglandin inhibitor drugs appear to be more effective in closing a PDA than placebo or no treatment (indomethacin: RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.38; 10 RCTs, 654 infants; high-certainty evidence; ibuprofen: RR 0.62, 95% CI 0.44 to 0.86; 2 RCTs, 206 infants; moderate-certainty evidence; early administration of acetaminophen: RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.53; 2 RCTs, 127 infants; low-certainty evidence). Oral ibuprofen appears to be more effective in PDA closure than intravenous (IV) ibuprofen (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.56; 5 RCTs, 406 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). High-dose ibuprofen appears to be more effective in PDA closure than standard-dose ibuprofen (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.61; 3 RCTs, 190 infants; moderate-certainty evidence). With respect to adverse outcomes, compared to indomethacin administration, NEC appears to be lower with ibuprofen (any route; RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.94; 18 RCTs, 1292 infants; moderate-certainty evidence), oral ibuprofen (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.73; 7 RCTs, 249 infants; low-certainty evidence), and with acetaminophen (RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.19 to 0.96; 4 RCTs, 384 infants; low-certainty evidence). However, NEC appears to be increased with a prolonged course of indomethacin versus a shorter course (RR 1.87, 95% CI 1.07 to 3.27; 4 RCTs, 310 infants). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This overview summarised the evidence from 16 Cochrane Reviews of RCTs regarding the effects of interventions for the prevention and treatment of PDA in preterm infants. Prophylactic indomethacin reduces severe IVH, but does not appear to affect the composite outcome of death or moderate/severe neurodevelopmental disability. Prophylactic ibuprofen probably marginally reduces severe IVH (moderate-certainty evidence), while the evidence is very uncertain on the effect of prophylactic acetaminophen on severe IVH. All available prostaglandin inhibitor drugs appear to be effective in symptomatic PDA closure compared to no treatment (high-certainty evidence for indomethacin; moderate-certainty evidence for ibuprofen; low-certainty evidence for early administration of acetaminophen). Oral ibuprofen appears to be more effective in PDA closure than IV ibuprofen (moderate-certainty evidence). High dose ibuprofen appears to be more effective in PDA closure than standard-dose ibuprofen (moderate-certainty evidence). There are currently two ongoing reviews, one on fluid restriction for symptomatic PDA, and the other on invasive management of PDA in preterm infants.

Targeting macrophage polarization as a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of osteoarthritis.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic osteoarthropathy characterized by the progressive degeneration of articular cartilage and synovial inflammation. Early OA clinical treatments involve intra-articular injection of glucocorticoids, oral acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which are used for anti-inflammation and pain relief. However, long-term use of these agents will lead to inevitable side effects, even aggravate cartilage loss. At present, there are no disease-modifying OA drugs (DMOADs) yet approved by regulatory agencies. Polarization regulation of synovial macrophages is a new target for OA treatment. Inhibiting M1 polarization and promoting M2 polarization of synovial macrophages can alleviate synovial inflammation, relieve joint pain and inhibit articular cartilage degradation, which is a promising strategy for OA treatment. In this study, we describe the molecular mechanisms of macrophage polarization and its key role in the development of OA. Subsequently, we summarize the latest progress of strategies for OA treatment through macrophage reprogramming, including small molecule compounds (conventional western medicine and synthetic compounds, monomer compounds of traditional Chinese medicine), biomacromolecules, metal/metal oxides, cells, and cell derivatives, and interprets the molecular mechanisms, hoping to provide some information for DMOADs development.

Pharmaceutical treatment of osteoarthritis.

OBJECTIVE: To review the current state of pharmaceutical treatment recommendations for the management of osteoarthritis. METHOD: A narrative review was drafted to describe treatment guidelines, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, and toxicity for nine classes of pharmaceuticals: 1) oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), 2) topical NSAIDs, 3) COX-2 inhibitors, 4) duloxetine, 5) intra-articular corticosteroids, 6) intra-articular hyaluronic acid, 7) acetaminophen (paracetamol), 8) tramadol, and 9) capsaicin. RESULTS: In general, oral and topical NSAIDs, including COX-2 inhibitors, are strongly recommended first-line treatments for osteoarthritis due to their ability to improve pain and function but are associated with increased risks in patients with certain comorbidities (e.g., heightened cardiovascular risks). Intra-articular corticosteroid injections are generally recommended for osteoarthritis management and have relatively minor adverse effects. Other treatments, such as capsaicin, tramadol, and acetaminophen, are more controversial, and many updated guidelines offer differing recommendations. CONCLUSION: The pharmaceutical management of osteoarthritis is a constantly evolving field. Promising treatments are emerging, and medicines that were once considered conventional (e.g., acetaminophen) are gradually becoming less acceptable based on concerns with efficacy and safety. Clinicians need to consider the latest evidence and recommendations to make an informed decision with their patients about how to optimize treatment plans for patients with knee, hip, polyarticular, or hand osteoarthritis.

Successful buprenorphine transition while overlapping with a full opioid agonist to treat chronic pain: a case report.

Buprenorphine is a partial mu opioid agonist that has been increasingly utilized to treat patients with chronic pain and opioid use disorder (OUD). The drug has proven to provide significant chronic pain relief at low doses ranging from 75 to 1800 mcg. The conventional buprenorphine transitional process delays its introduction until patients begin withdrawal. However, this process can pose a barrier to both patients and providers due to some patients' inability to tolerate traditional prerequisite withdrawal. To our knowledge, this is a rare reported case to describe a transitional process utilizing buccal buprenorphine in which a patient with chronic pain simultaneously tapered completely off an extended-release (ER) full opioid agonist and uptitrated buprenorphine. The patient was weaned from oxycodone ER 30 mg every 12 h and oxycodone/acetaminophen 10/325 mg 3x/day for breakthrough pain utilizing an unconventional approach. Tapering down to oxycodone ER 20 mg 2x/day for the first 2 weeks was successful. However, reducing to oxycodone ER 10 mg 2x/day for the following 2 weeks presented adherence difficulty and increased breakthrough pain. At this time, buccal buprenorphine was added at 300 mcg daily for 3 days. From days 4 to 6, buprenorphine was increased to 300 mcg 2x/day and oxycodone ER decreased to 10 mg daily. Six days later, oxycodone ER was discontinued and oxycodone/acetaminophen continued as needed. The patient exhibited no signs of withdrawal and adequate relief of symptoms through this tapering process. At the 1-month follow-up, the patient was doing well and was being treated solely with buprenorphine and oxycodone/acetaminophen to control her breakthrough pain. After 5 months, buprenorphine was increased to 600 mcg 2x/day and her oxycodone/acetaminophen decreased to 5/325 mg 3x/day as needed. From the start of the patient's taper to her current transition, the patient reduced her morphine milligram equivalent (MME) dosage from 135 MME to 22.5 MME. The Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS), which measures the severity of a patient's opioid withdrawal symptoms, was consistently less than 5. This buprenorphine schedule demonstrated a successful tapering approach for this patient because she had reported improved quality of life and function. A patient-centered osteopathic treatment approach was utilized when the patient presented with mid-taper adherence difficulty. Transitioning patients from full to partial opioid agonists could become an important practice standard for patient safety not only for formal pain management practices but also in primary care, family practice, and even geriatric offices.

A randomized, placebo-controlled study of magnetic acupuncture for supplementary analgesia after laparoscopic appendectomy in children.

PURPOSE: Magnetic acupuncture (MA) is a noninvasive technique potentially useful for postoperative pain reduction. While anecdotal case series have reported analgesic effects, this has not been systematically studied. We evaluated the analgesic properties of supplemental MA versus placebo and standard treatment in children who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). METHODS: Children age 2-18 years who underwent LA for acute appendicitis were recruited from 2018 through 2020. Standardized postoperative pain medication including Ibuprofen, Acetaminophen, and narcotics were given as needed. Patients were randomized to 3 groups: Group 1 had adhesive acupuncture magnets placed on 5 predetermined meridian points for 48 h. Group 2 had corresponding non-magnetic adhesive metal disks placed in the same locations. Group 3 received no supplemental treatment. Pain was measured every 4 h using a 1-10 Visual-Analog-Scale (VAS). Cumulative demand of as-needed pain medication was calculated. Patients and families were handed open questionnaires upon discharge assessing satisfaction with treatment. RESULTS: A total of 126 patients were randomized. Groups were similar in age and gender distribution. Differences of means of cumulative VAS scores were significantly lower for group 1 (8.0,SD5.2) compared to group 2 (12.8,SD4.4; -4.8[95%CI -7.1 to -2.5], p < 0.01), and group 3 (19.8,SD7.7; -11.8[95%CI -15.0 to -8.6], p < 0.01). Cumulative acetaminophen and ibuprofen use per patient during the entire hospital stay was lower for group 1 (1510 mg, 20 mg) than for group 2 (2950 mg, 1800 mg), and group 3 (6100 mg; 2300 mg), respectively. In contrast to groups 2 and 3, none of the patients in group 1 asked for narcotics. Patients were highly satisfied with MA. CONCLUSIONS: Supplemental MA after LA in children had a beneficial effect on the postoperative pain perception and on-demand use of analgesics that could not be explained by placebo mechanism. MA is a safe, simple, and effective adjunct to standard postoperative care. Further studies are warranted. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective randomized, placebo-controlled trial LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level I.

Comparing the effect of body wash with marshmallow plant and lukewarm water on reducing the temperature of febrile children: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Fever is the most common reason for children's visits to medical centers. Its management is an essential duty of a pediatric nurse. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of body wash with Marshmallow plant on children's fever. METHODS: This parallel clinical trial was performed on 92 children aged 6 months to 10 years with a tympanic temperature above 38.3 °C. Participants were randomly assigned to groups. Simultaneously with receiving acetaminophen, body wash was performed in the control group with lukewarm water and in the intervention group with white Marshmallow extract. The children's temperature; from the beginning of the study was checked and recorded every 15 min in the first hour and in the 4th and 6th hours. The time duration to resolve fever, the frequency of afebrile children at different times of the study, and the value of temperature reduction were primary outcomes. Heart rate, the need to administer the next dose of acetaminophen, and the time of fever recurrence were recorded as secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The mean time duration to resolve fever in the intervention group was shorter than in the control group (B = 8.181, 95% CI 3.778-12.584, p < 0.001). The frequency of the children without fever was higher in the intervention group during different times of the study (p < 0.001). The mean value of temperature reduction in the intervention group was higher than the control group (B = -0.27 °C, 95% CI: -0.347 to -0.193, P < 0.001), although, after adjusting the effect of confounding variables it was not significant (P = 0.127). The mean of adjusted heart rate change (p = 0.771), the time of fever recurrence (P = 0.397), and the frequency of children requiring the next dose of acetaminophen (p = 0.397) did not show a significant difference between the groups. CONCLUSION: Body wash with Marshmallow extract reduced children's fever in a shorter period of time and to some extent a greater extent than the control group without side effects. Therefore, it can be used as an effective and safe complementary method to help reduce fever. However, more studies are necessary for this field. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration in Iranian Clinical Trials (RCTs) on 31.08.2020 with registration code: IRCT20200809048345N1.

Paracetamol, ibuprofen and dexamethasone for pain treatment after total hip arthroplasty: protocol for the randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel 4-group, blinded, multicentre RECIPE trial.

INTRODUCTION: Multimodal analgesia with paracetamol, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug and glucocorticoid is recommended for hip arthroplasty, but with uncertain effects of the different combinations. We aim to investigate benefit and harm of different combinations of paracetamol, ibuprofen and dexamethasone following total hip arthroplasty. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: RECIPE is a randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel 4-group, blinded trial with 90-day and 1-year follow-up performed at nine Danish hospitals. Interventions are initiated preoperatively and continued for 24 hours postoperatively. Eligible participants undergoing total hip arthroplasty are randomised to:group A: oral paracetamol 1000 mg × 4+oral ibuprofen 400 mg × 4+intravenous placebo; group B: oral paracetamol 1000 mg × 4+intravenous dexamethasone 24 mg+oral placebo; group C: oral ibuprofen 400 mg × 4+intravenous dexamethasone 24 mg+oral placebo; group D: oral paracetamol 1000 mg × 4+oral ibuprofen 400 mg × 4+intravenous dexamethasone 24 mg.Primary outcome is cumulative opioid consumption at 0-24 hours. Secondary outcomes are pain at rest, during mobilisation and during a 5 m walk and adverse events. Follow-up includes serious adverse events and patient reported outcome measures at 90 days and 1 year. A total of 1060 participants are needed to demonstrate a difference of 8 mg in 24-hour morphine consumption assuming an SD of 24.5 mg, a risk of type I errors of 0.0083 and a risk of type 2 errors of 0.2. Primary analysis will be a modified intention-to-treat analysis.With this trial we aim to verify recommendations for pain treatment after total hip arthroplasty, and investigate the role of dexamethasone as an analgesic adjuvant to paracetamol and ibuprofen. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This trial is approved by the Region Zealand Committee on Health Research Ethics (SJ-799). Plans for dissemination include publication in peer-reviewed journals and presentation at scientific meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04123873.

Efficacy and safety of oral Nigella sativa oil for symptomatic treatment of knee osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The oil of Nigella sativa (NS) seeds has analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. Therefore, the efficacy and safety of NS oil in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and sixteen patients aged 50-70 years were randomly assigned to take 2.5 mL NS oil (N = 58) or placebo (N = 58) orally every 8 h for 1 month. WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index) was the primary outcome measure and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, number of 500 mg acetaminophen tablets taken per day during the trial, patients' satisfaction with the interventions, complete blood count and the blood levels of alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine and blood urea nitrogen were the secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Fifty two and 54 patients respectively in the NS oil and placebo groups completed the study. The VAS scores were decreased by 33.96 ± 17.04% (NS oil group) and 9.21 ± 0.32% (placebo group) (p < 0.001), and WOMAC total scores were decreased by 27.72 ± 18.61% (NS oil group) and 1.34 ± 2.31% (placebo group) (p < 0.001) compared to baseline. The NS oil reduced the dose of acetaminophen significantly compared with the placebo (p = 0.001). The patients were significantly more satisfied with the NS oil than the placebo (p < 0.001). The NS oil had no significant effect on the other variables. There was no side effect. CONCLUSION: Oral NS oil safely reduces the osteoarthritis symptoms and analgesic dose in the knee osteoarthritis patients.

2022 Taiwan Guidelines for Acute Treatment of Migraine.

The Taiwan Headache Society published its guidelines for acute migraine treatment in 2017. Since then, emerging drugs and treatment options have developed rapidly. The migraine-specific drugs gepants and ditans and several noninvasive neuromodulation devices have been approved for use in Europe and the United States. Although not all emerging drugs and treatment options have been approved for use in Taiwan, keeping pace with international trends and updating treatment guidelines are imperative. Therefore, the Treatment Guideline Subcommittee of the Taiwan Headache Society reviewed the quality of recent trials, evaluated the corresponding grade of evidence, and appraised the reported clinical efficacy to reach a new consensus. To ensure that the updated Taiwan guidelines are appropriate and feasible, the subcommittee also referred to the guidelines from the United States, Europe, Canada, and other countries concerning the main roles, recommendation levels, clinical efficacy, and adverse reactions of drugs for the acute migraine treatment. Several types of drugs are currently available for acute migraine treatment in Taiwan. These drugs can be categorized into migraine-specific and migraine-non-specific. Among them, migraine-specific triptans (oral or nasal spray formulations) and migraine-nonspecific acetaminophen and NSAIDs (diclofenac, ibuprofen, naproxen) are highly recommended because they are supported by strong evidence and demonstrate high efficacy. Prochlorperazine injection has been upgraded to a highly recommended level because of the rich clinical experience for this treatment. Ergotamine/caffeine remains a second-line drug because of its lower specificity and efficacy compared with triptans. High-dose aspirin was downgraded to rescue treatment because of potential gastrointestinal side effects. Although evidence supports the combination of oral tramadol and acetaminophen, this combination should be used as a rescue treatment due to concerns about dependence. Evidence supporting the use of intravenous tramadol or morphine is insufficient; therefore, their use is not recommended. As for non-pharmacological approaches, there are only limited controlled data. The choice of treatment for acute migraine attacks should follow the concept of "stratified care." For mild to moderate migraine attacks, oral NSAIDs are the first choice, with combination analgesics, intravenous/intramuscular NSAIDs as alternatives. For moderate to severe attacks, oral or nasal spray triptans and ergotamine/caffeine compounds are recommended and should be administered in the early stage of migraine attacks. Antiemetics can be used as supplements to alleviate nausea and vomiting. Other emerging migraine-specific drugs, such as gepants or ditans, may also have a role in the future. Notably, a combination of a triptan and a NSAID yielded a better efficacy compared with either therapy alone. Parenteral steroids and fluid supply are the first-line treatment for status migrainosus. Acetaminophen is suitable for mild to moderate migraine attacks and remains the first choice for children and pregnant women. To prevent medication overuse headache, the use of acute treatment should be limited to a maximum of 2 days per week. Key words: acute migraine treatment, evidence-based medicine, treatment guidelines, triptans, ergotamine, neuromodulation.

[Preparation of salvianolic acid B, tanshinone â ¡_A, and glycyrrhetinic acid lipid emulsion and its protective effect against acute liver injury induced by acetaminophen].

Salvianolic acid B(Sal B), tanshinone Ⅱ_A(TSN Ⅱ_A), and glycyrrhetinic acid(GA) lipid emulsion(GTS-LE) was prepared by the high-speed dispersion method combined with ultrasonic emulsification.The preparation process of the emulsion was optimized by single-factor method and D-optimal method with appearance, centrifugal stability, and particle size of the emulsion as evalua-tion indexes, followed by verification.In vitro release of Sal B, TSN Ⅱ_A, and GA in GTS-LE was performed by reverse dialysis.In vivo pharmacokinetic evaluation was carried out in mice.The acute liver injury model was induced by acetaminophen.The effect of oral GTS-LE on the acute liver injury was investigated by serum liver function indexes and pathological changes in liver tissues of mice.The results showed that under the optimal preparation process, the average particle size of GTS-LE was(145.4±9.25) nm and the Zeta potential was(-33.6±1.45) mV.The drug-loading efficiencies of Sal B, TSN Ⅱ_A, and GA in GTS-LE were above 95%, and the drug release in vitro conformed to the Higuchi equation.The pharmacokinetic results showed that the C_(max) of Sal B, TSN Ⅱ_A, and GA in GTS-LE was 3.128, 2.7, and 2.85 times that of the GTS-S group, and AUC_(0-t) of Sal B, TSN Ⅱ_A, and GA in GTS-LE was 3.09, 2.23, and 1.9 times that of the GTS-S group.After intragastric administration of GTS-LE, the activities of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase were significantly inhibited, the content of malondialdehyde was reduced, and the structure of hepatocytes recovered to normal.In conclusion, GTS-LE can delay the release of Sal B and promote the release of TSN Ⅱ_A and GA.The encapsulation of three drug components in the emulsion can improve the oral bioavailability to varying degrees and can effectively prevent the acute liver injury caused by acetaminophen.

Interventions to prevent or treat heavy menstrual bleeding or pain associated with intrauterine-device use.

BACKGROUND: Heavy menstrual bleeding and pain are common reasons women discontinue intrauterine device (IUD) use. Copper IUD (Cu IUD) users tend to experience increased menstrual bleeding, whereas levonorgestrel IUD (LNG IUD) users tend to have irregular menstruation. Medical therapies used to reduce heavy menstrual bleeding or pain associated with Cu and LNG IUD use include non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), anti-fibrinolytics and paracetamol. We analysed treatment and prevention interventions separately because the expected outcomes for treatment and prevention interventions differ. We did not combine different drug classes in the analysis as they have different mechanisms of action. This is an update of a review originally on NSAIDs. The review scope has been widened to include all interventions for treatment or prevention of heavy menstrual bleeding or pain associated with IUD use. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that have assessed strategies for treatment and prevention of heavy menstrual bleeding or pain associated with IUD use, for example, pharmacotherapy and alternative therapies. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL to January 2021. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included RCTs in any language that tested strategies for treatment or prevention of heavy menstrual bleeding or pain associated with IUD (Cu IUD, LNG IUD or other IUD) use. The comparison could be no intervention, placebo or another active intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, and extracted data. Primary outcomes were volume of menstrual blood loss, duration of menstruation and painful menstruation. We used a random-effects model in all meta-analyses. Review authors assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE. MAIN RESULTS: This review includes 21 trials involving 3689 participants from middle- and high-income countries. Women were 18 to 45 years old and either already using an IUD or had just had one placed for contraception. The included trials examined NSAIDs and other interventions. Eleven were treatment trials, of these seven were on users of the Cu IUD, one on LNG IUD and three on an unknown type. Ten were prevention trials, six focused on Cu IUD users, and four on LNG IUD users. Sixteen trials had high risk of detection bias due to subjective assessment of pain and bleeding. Treatment of heavy menstrual bleeding Cu IUD Vitamin B1 resulted in fewer pads used per day (mean difference (MD) -7.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) -8.50 to -5.50) and fewer bleeding days (MD -2.00, 95% CI -2.38 to -1.62; 1 trial; 110 women; low-certainty evidence) compared to placebo. The evidence is very uncertain about the effect of naproxen on the volume of menstruation compared to placebo (odds ratio (OR) 0.09, 95% CI 0.00 to 1.78; 1 trial, 40 women; very low-certainty evidence). Treatment with mefenamic acid resulted in less volume of blood loss compared to tranexamic acid (MD -64.26, 95% CI -105.65 to -22.87; 1 trial, 94 women; low-certainty evidence). However, there was no difference in duration of bleeding with treatment of mefenamic acid or tranexamic acid (MD 0.08 days, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.42, 2 trials, 152 women; low-certainty evidence). LNG IUD The use of ulipristal acetate in LNG IUD may not reduce the number of bleeding days in 90 days in comparison to placebo (MD -9.30 days, 95% CI -26.76 to 8.16; 1 trial, 24 women; low-certainty evidence). Unknown IUD type Mefenamic acid may not reduce volume of bleeding compared to Vitex agnus measured by pictorial blood assessment chart (MD -2.40, 95% CI -13.77 to 8.97; 1 trial; 84 women; low-certainty evidence). Treatment of pain Cu IUD Treatment with tranexamic acid and sodium diclofenac may result in little or no difference in the occurrence of pain (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.06 to 17.25; 1 trial, 38 women; very low-certainty evidence). Unknown IUD type Naproxen may reduce pain (MD 4.10, 95% CI 0.91 to 7.29; 1 trial, 33 women; low-certainty evidence). Prevention of heavy menstrual bleeding Cu IUD We found very low-certainty evidence that tolfenamic acid may prevent heavy bleeding compared to placebo (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34 to 0.85; 1 trial, 310 women). There was no difference between ibuprofen and placebo in blood volume reduction (MD -14.11, 95% CI -36.04 to 7.82) and duration of bleeding (MD -0.2 days, 95% CI -1.40 to 1.0; 1 trial, 28 women, low-certainty evidence). Aspirin may not prevent heavy bleeding in comparison to paracetamol (MD -0.30, 95% CI -26.16 to 25.56; 1 trial, 20 women; very low-certainty evidence). LNG IUD Ulipristal acetate may increase the percentage of bleeding days compared to placebo (MD 9.50, 95% CI 1.48 to 17.52; 1 trial, 118 women; low-certainty evidence). There were insufficient data for analysis in a single trial comparing mifepristone and vitamin B. There were insufficient data for analysis in the single trial comparing tranexamic acid and mefenamic acid and in another trial comparing naproxen with estradiol. Prevention of pain Cu IUD There was low-certainty evidence that tolfenamic acid may not be effective to prevent painful menstruation compared to placebo (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.14; 1 trial, 310 women). Ibuprofen may not reduce menstrual cramps compared to placebo (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.11 to 8.95; 1 trial, 20 women, low-certainty evidence). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this review should be interpreted with caution due to low- and very low-certainty evidence. Included trials were limited; the majority of the evidence was derived from single trials with few participants. Further research requires larger trials and improved trial reporting. The use of vitamin B1 and mefenamic acid to treat heavy menstruation and tolfenamic acid to prevent heavy menstruation associated with Cu IUD should be investigated. More trials are needed to generate evidence for the treatment and prevention of heavy and painful menstruation associated with LNG IUD.

The Effect of Thunder-Fire Moxibustion on Lumbar Disc Herniation: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a common disease seen in orthopedics; it is caused by nucleus pulposus herniation. Its clinical manifestations are low back pain, radiating pain of the lower limbs, and cauda equina symptoms that seriously affect patients' quality of life. At present, oral analgesics are commonly used in the treatment of LDH; but they can produce gastrointestinal reactions and other side effects. Thunder-fire moxibustion is a method that is widely used in China to treat pain syndromes. This study aimed to design a randomized controlled trial to explore the effectiveness and safety of thunder-fire moxibustion in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Methods: Ninety patients will be enrolled and randomly divided into one of two groups: the thunder-fire moxibustion group and the acetaminophen group. The thunder-fire moxibustion group will be treated with moxa sticks at BL25, GV3, BL23, and GV4; and after 15 min of local whirling moxibustion, the contralateral acupoints will be treated with moxibustion for 15 min. The study period will include two 10-day courses of treatment, for a total study duration of 20 days. The acetaminophen group participants will take one acetaminophen sustained-release tablet twice a day for the duration of the study period. In contrast, the thunder-fire moxibustion group participants will be treated with thunder-fire moxibustion every other day for 30 min. The primary outcome will be the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score. Visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) will be used as the secondary outcome measures. Adverse events (AEs) will also be recorded. Assessments will be conducted at baseline, the end of the first and second courses of treatment. Discussion: This study will determine whether thunder-fire moxibustion is more effective and safer than acetaminophen in the treatment of patients with LDH. Trial Registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (http://www.chictr.org.cn), ChiCTR2000036079.

Systematic review of guideline-recommended medications prescribed for treatment of low back pain.

OBJECTIVE: To identify and descriptively compare medication recommendations among low back pain (LBP) clinical practice guidelines (CPG). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Database of Systematic Review, Index to Chiropractic Literature, AMED, CINAHL, and PEDro to identify CPGs that described the management of mechanical LBP in the prior five years. Two investigators independently screened titles and abstracts and potentially relevant full text were considered for eligibility. Four investigators independently applied the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II instrument for critical appraisal. Data were extracted for pharmaceutical intervention, the strength of recommendation, and appropriateness for the duration of LBP. RESULTS: 316 citations were identified, 50 full-text articles were assessed, and nine guidelines with global representation met the eligibility criteria. These CPGs addressed pharmacological treatments with or without non-pharmacological treatments. All CPGS focused on the management of acute, chronic, or unspecified duration of LBP. The mean overall AGREE II score was 89.3% (SD 3.5%). The lowest domain mean score was for applicability, 80.4% (SD 5.2%), and the highest was Scope and Purpose, 94.0% (SD 2.4%). There were ten classifications of medications described in the included CPGs: acetaminophen, antibiotics, anticonvulsants, antidepressants, benzodiazepines, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), opioids, oral corticosteroids, skeletal muscle relaxants (SMRs), and atypical opioids. CONCLUSIONS: Nine CPGs, included ten medication classes for the management of LBP. NSAIDs were the most frequently recommended medication for the treatment of both acute and chronic LBP as a first line pharmacological therapy. Acetaminophen and SMRs were inconsistently recommended for acute LBP. Meanwhile, with less consensus among CPGs, acetaminophen and antidepressants were proposed as second-choice therapies for chronic LBP. There was significant heterogeneity of recommendations within many medication classes, although oral corticosteroids, benzodiazepines, anticonvulsants, and antibiotics were not recommended by any CPGs for acute or chronic LBP.

Gabapentinoids and Acetaminophen as Adjuvants for Managing Postoperative Pain.

With the current opiate epidemic in the United States, there is renewed interest in evaluating non-opiate adjuvant medications as effective alternatives for the prevention and treatment of postoperative pain. A systematic review of randomized, controlled trials on Pub Med, Medline, and Embase was conducted looking on postoperative pain management from 2008 to 2018. Studies were included if they used a gabapentenoid with or without acetaminophen and evaluated supplemental opiate use. All adult (18 years or older) surgical populations were considered for inclusion, and fourteen clinical trials met inclusion criteria. Gabapentenoid dosing varied among studies. In nine of fourteen studies, there was a finding of superiority as compared to placebo in managing postoperative pain and decreasing supplemental opiate use. Pregabalin was used in twelve of the fourteen studies and gabapentin was used in two of the fourteen studies. Of the nine studies that found a benefit from using a gabapentoid, all included pregabalin. While the rate of adverse effects was low in all studies, it was found to increase as dosages increased. Results support that pregabalin has a role in decreasing postoperative pain intensity and supplemental opiate use; however, the optimal dose or dosing regimen is not yet well understood.

The efficacy of low-level laser therapy versus paracetamol-caffeine in controlling orthodontic separation pain and changes in the oral-health-related quality of life in Class I malocclusions: A 3-arm, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the analgesic effects of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and paracetamol-caffeine in controlling orthodontic pain induced by elastomeric separators, as well as changes in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL). METHODS: A total of 54 patients (22 male, 32 female; mean age [standard deviation]: 21.68 [±2.77]) participated in the study. Elastomeric separators were placed mesially and distally to the first molars in the upper and lower dental arches. The first group (n = 18) received a single dose of aluminum gallium arsenide (GaAlAs) laser irradiation (808 nm; 350 milliwatts; 3.5 joule/point) with a placebo medication. The laser beam was applied buccally and lingually at the center of the first molar roots and the adjacent teeth (2nd molar and 2nd premolar) in both the upper and lower dental arches bilaterally. The second group (n = 18) received paracetamol-caffeine tablets (3 times daily for the first couple of days after separator insertion, and as needed for the rest of the week), with a placebo light-emitting diode (LED) light; patients in the third group (n = 18) were exposed to the 2 placebo procedures. An 11-point numeric rating scale was used to assess spontaneous and chewing pain perception immediately and at 1 hour, 24 hour, 48 hours, and 1 week after separator placement. The short version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) was used to evaluate OHRQoL at 48 hours and at 1 week after separator placement. RESULTS: Pain perception reached its peak at 24 hours after separator placement (median values: 3, 3, 6.5 for spontaneous pain, and 6, 6, 8 for chewing pain in the LLLT, drug, and control groups, respectively). LLLT relieved the induced pain more than did the placebo procedures (P = 0.002 for spontaneous pain, P = 0.012 for chewing pain). Orthodontic separators worsened patients' OHRQoL scores during the entire week, especially at 48 hours after placement (median OHIP-14 score: 21, 25, 24 in the LLLT, drug, and control groups, respectively). In comparison with the control group, LLLT slightly increased the "physical pain" domain score (P = 0.015) and the "psychological disability" domain score of the scale (P = 0.010) after 48 hours, as well as the "psychological disability" domain score 1 week after separator placement. CONCLUSIONS: The pain levels were similar in the laser and drug groups. The LLLT group had decreased pain, compared with the placebo group. Paracetamol-caffeine and LLLT were unable to enhance the overall OHRQoL.