Cost-Effectiveness of Bronchial Thermoplasty, Omalizumab, and Standard Therapy for Moderate-to-Severe Allergic Asthma.

BACKGROUND: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a recently developed treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe asthma. A few studies have suggested the clinical efficacy of this intervention. However, no study has evaluated the cost-effectiveness of BT compared to other alternative treatments for moderate-to-severe allergic asthma, which currently include omalizumab and standard therapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of standard therapy, BT, and omalizumab for moderate-to-severe allergic asthma in the USA. METHODS: A probabilistic Markov model with weekly cycles was developed to reflect the course of asthma progression over a 5-year time horizon. The study population was adults with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma whose asthma remained uncontrolled despite using high-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS, with or without long-acting beta-agonists [LABA]). A perspective of the health-care system was adopted with asthma-related costs as well as quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and exacerbations as the outcomes. RESULTS: For standard therapy, BT, and omalizumab, the discounted 5-year costs and QALYs were $15,400 and 3.08, $28,100 and 3.24, and $117,000 and 3.26, respectively. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of BT versus standard therapy and omalizumab versus BT was $78,700/QALY and $3.86 million/QALY, respectively. At the willingness-to-pay (WTP) of $50,000/QALY and $100,000/QALY, the probability of BT being cost-effective was 9%, and 67%, respectively. The corresponding expected value of perfect information (EVPI) was $155 and $1,530 per individual at these thresholds. In sensitivity analyses, increasing the costs of BT from $14,900 to $30,000 increased its ICER relative to standard therapy to $178,000/QALY, and decreased the ICER of omalizumab relative to BT to $3.06 million/QALY. Reducing the costs of omalizumab by 25% decreased its ICER relative to BT by 29%. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, our study suggests that there is more than 60% chance that BT becomes cost-effective relative to omalizumab and standard therapy at the WTP of $100,000/QALY in patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma. However, there is a substantial uncertainty in the underlying evidence, indicating the need for future research towards reducing such uncertainty.

Cost effectiveness of leukotriene receptor antagonists versus long-acting beta-2 agonists as add-on therapy to inhaled corticosteroids for asthma: a pragmatic trial.

BACKGROUND: Information is lacking on the relative effectiveness and cost effectiveness--in a real-life primary-care setting--of leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs) and long-acting beta2 adrenergic receptor agonists (beta2 agonists) as add-on therapy for patients whose asthma symptoms are not controlled on low-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost effectiveness of LTRAs compared with long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy for patients whose asthma symptoms are not controlled on low-dose ICS. METHODS: An economic evaluation was conducted alongside a 2-year, pragmatic, randomized controlled trial set in 53 primary-care practices in the UK. Patients aged 12-80 years with asthma insufficiently controlled with ICS (n = 361) were randomly assigned to add-on LTRAs (n = 176) or long-acting beta2 agonists (n = 185). The main outcome measures were the incremental cost per point improvement in the Mini Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniAQLQ), per point improvement in the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) and per QALY gained from perspectives of the UK NHS and society. RESULTS: Over 2 years, the societal cost per patient receiving LTRAs was pounds sterling 1157 versus pounds sterling 952 for long-acting beta2 agonists, a (significant, adjusted) increase of pounds sterling 214 (95% CI 2, 411) [year 2005 values]. Patients receiving LTRAs experienced a non-significant incremental gain of 0.009 QALYs (95% CI -0.077, 0.103). The incremental cost per QALY gained from the societal (NHS) perspective was pounds sterling 22,589 (pounds sterling 11,919). Uncertainty around this point estimate suggested that, given a maximum willingness to pay of pounds sterling 30,000 per QALY gained, the probability that LTRAs are a cost-effective alternative to long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy was approximately 52% from both societal and NHS perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: On balance, these results marginally favour the repositioning of LTRAs as a cost-effective alternative to long-acting beta2 agonists as add-on therapy to ICS for asthma. However, there is much uncertainty surrounding the incremental cost effectiveness because of similarity of clinical benefit and broad confidence intervals for differences in healthcare costs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UK National Research Register N0547145240; Controlled Clinical Trials ISRCTN99132811.

Effects of prescription coinsurance and income-based deductibles on net health plan spending for older users of inhaled medications.

BACKGROUND: Health plans that increase prescription cost-sharing for their patients may increase overall plan costs. We analyzed the impact on health plan spending of a switch in public drug insurance from full coverage to a prescription copayment (copay), and then to income-based deductibles plus coinsurance (IBD). METHODS: We studied British Columbia residents 65 years of age or older who were dispensed inhaled steroids, beta2 agonists or anticholinergics on or after January 1996. Multivariable linear regression was used to estimate health plan costs for the population using inhalers by the Ministry of Health (MOH) during the copay and IBD policies. We estimated costs for excess physician visits and emergency hospitalizations based on data from a previously published cohort study and cost data from the MOH. We estimated the net change in MOH spending as the sum of changes in spending for inhalers, physician visits, hospitalizations, and policy administration costs. RESULTS: Net health plan spending increased by C$1.98 million per year during the copay policy [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10-4.34], and C$5.76 million per year during the first 10 months of the IBD policy (95% CI: 1.75-10.58). Out-of-pocket spending by older patients increased 30% during the copay policy (95% CI: 24-36) and 59% during the IBD policy (95% CI: 56-63). CONCLUSIONS: British Columbia's experience indicates that cost containment focused on cost-shifting to patients may increase net expenditures for the treatment of some diseases. Health plans should consult experts to anticipate the potential cross-program impacts of policy changes.

Influence of socioeconomic deprivation on the relation between air pollution and beta-agonist sales for asthma.

BACKGROUND: Air pollution triggers asthma attacks hours to days after exposure. It remains unclear whether socioeconomic deprivation modulates these effects. Investigation of these interactions requires adequate statistical power, obtainable by using either a sufficient number of observations or very sensitive indicators of asthma attacks. Using a small-area temporal ecologic approach, we studied the short-term relations between ambient air pollution and sales of short-acting beta-agonist (SABA) drugs, a frequent and specific treatment for control of asthma attacks in children and young adults, and then tested the influence of deprivation on these relations. METHODS: The study took place in Strasbourg, France in 2004. Health insurance funds provided data on 15,121 SABA sales for patients aged 0 to 39 years. Deprivation was estimated by small geographic areas using an index constructed from census data. Daily average ambient concentrations of particulate matter (particles with an aerodynamic diameter < 10 microm [PM(10)]), nitrogen dioxide (NO(2)), and ozone (O(3)) were modeled on a small-area level. Adjusted case-crossover models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Increased of 10 microg/m(3) in ambient PM(10), NO(2), and O(3) concentrations were associated, respectively, with increases of 7.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4 to 11.2%), 8.4% (95% CI, 5 to 11.9%), and 1% (95% CI, - 0.3 to 2.2%) in SABA sales. Deprivation had no influence on these relations. CONCLUSION: The associations observed are consistent with those reported by studies focusing on SABA use. Similar studies in other settings should confirm whether the lack of interaction with deprivation is due to specific local conditions.

Anaphylaxis management: the essential role of adrenaline (epinephrine) auto-injectors. Should PHARMAC fund them in New Zealand?

Anaphylaxis is an important life-threatening medical emergency. There is extensive evidence supporting the early use of intramuscular adrenaline for first medical responders and for self-initiated treatment, in at-risk individuals. Major patient groups identified as at ongoing risk are children and adults with severe food allergy, patients with venom allergy who have not been desensitised, and those with idiopathic anaphylaxis. Individual anaphylactic events are largely unpredictable. The most effective and safe route of administration for adrenaline is intramuscular, but it is difficult for patients and carers to achieve accurate and timely self-administration using an ampoule, needle, and syringe. The adrenaline auto-injector device which is available in New Zealand (the EpiPen) is not funded by PHARMAC, and thus only available to patients and families who are able to afford the purchase cost. It is difficult to understand the continued unwillingness of PHARMAC to fund an adrenaline auto-injector device to at-risk individuals, given the large body of information supporting its efficacy and use. The Australian model, where authorisation from a relevant specialist is required, could be used.

An economic assessment of inhaled formoterol dry powder versus ipratropium bromide pressurized metered dose inhaler in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is debilitating and costly to manage. A recent clinical trial concluded that formoterol, a long-acting beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist, was more clinically effective than inpratropium bromide in the management of COPD. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform an economic assessment of the management of COPD with formeterol versus ipratropium bromide. METHODS: Assessment were based on the results of a previously published 12-week, multicenter, double-masked, randomized, parallel-group, placebo-controlled clinical trial comparing inhaled formoterol dry powder 12 and 24 microg BID with ipratropium bromide 40 microg QID pressurized metered dose inhaler and with placebo in 780 COPD patients. Treatment costs for study drugs and rescue medications were estimated from resource utilization and average wholesale prices. Costs were assessed with respect to forced expiratory lung volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) and patient-reported quality of life (QOL) as assessed via the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for each treatment arm and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated for each treatment relative to the next best alternative. Economic efficiency frontiers were identified. Sensitivity analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Cost analysis with respect to FEV(1) revealed an economic efficiency frontier formed by placebo, ipratropium bromide 40 microg, and formoterol 12 microg at their respective FEV(1) levels, with cost-effectiveness ratios of $30.18, $53.50, and $142.04, respectively, per FEV(1). The ICER for ipratropium over placebo was $273.03; for formoterol 12 microg over ipratropium, $1611.32. Cost analysis with respect to QOL showed an economic efficiency frontier formed by placebo and formoterol 12 microg at their respective QOL outcomes, with cost-effectiveness ratios of $25.96 and $32.56, respectively, per QOL score change. The cost-effectiveness ratio for ipratropium was $69.40,which was not on the QOL economic efficiency frontier. The ICER for formoterol 12 microg over placebo was $34.51 per QOL score point. CONCLUSIONS: Formoterol 12 microg provided greater QOL outcome than ipratropium bromide at an additional cost of $554.28 per year. Further research would be necessary to assess whether the differences in outcomes, particularly QOL, observed in the short term with formoterol would lead to favorable long-term health and economic outcomes.

Reduction in health care resource utilization associated with extended-release theophylline.

BACKGROUND: People with airway disease are high utilizers of health care resources. Few studies document the value of alternative therapies in reducing utilization. Studies examining theophylline, which demonstrate reduction in resource utilization, have been primarily of short duration in hospitalized settings with small samples. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the role of oral extended-release theophylline in reducing health care utilization over an extended period of time when added to existing inhaler therapy for ambulatory patients with airway disease. METHODS: We used a retrospective, pretest/posttest design in examining the 1990-1993 South Carolina Medicaid database to compare health care utilization of 455 ambulatory patients for 4 months before and 6 months after extended-release theophylline was added to their treatment regimen. We assessed the following three outcomes: inhaler use, physician office visits, and emergency department visits, all measured in units/person/month. RESULTS: Our sample consisted of patients taking beta2-agonist only (n = 393), steroid only (n = 25), and beta2-agonist plus steroid (n = 37). Inhaler use and physician office visits declined significantly among beta2-agonist users, as well as within the entire sample. Initiation of extended-release theophylline therapy was associated with a 30% decline in utilization of inhaler and physician office visits, influenced mostly by the decline with the beta2-agonist group. CONCLUSION: The results of this effectiveness study using an administrative claims database are consistent with the published randomized clinical trials that document the value of extended-release theophylline when added to existing inhaler therapy.