Is proctoscopy sufficient for the evaluation of colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal? A nationwide retrospective analysis of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology Colorectal Cancer Network Collaborative group (SICO-CCN).

AIM: Several methods for assessing anastomotic integrity have been proposed, but the best is yet to be defined. The aim of this study was to compare the different methods to assess the integrity of colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal. METHOD: A retrospective cohort analysis on patients between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020 with a defunctioning stoma for middle and low rectal anterior resection was performed. A propensity score matching comparison between patients who underwent proctoscopy alone and patients who underwent proctoscopy plus any other preoperative method to assess the integrity of colorectal anastomosis prior to ileostomy reversal (transanal water-soluble contrast enema via conventional radiology, transanal water-soluble contrast enema via CT, and magnetic resonance) was performed. RESULTS: The analysis involved 1045 patients from 26 Italian referral colorectal centres. The comparison between proctoscopy alone versus proctoscopy plus any other preoperative tool showed no significant differences in terms of stenoses (p = 0.217) or leakages (p = 0.103) prior to ileostomy reversal, as well as no differences in terms of misdiagnosed stenoses (p = 0.302) or leakages (p = 0.509). Interestingly, in the group that underwent proctoscopy and transanal water-soluble contrast enema the comparison between the two procedures demonstrated no significant differences in detecting stenoses (2 vs. 0, p = 0.98), while there was a significant difference in detecting leakages in favour of transanal water-soluble contrast enema via CT (3 vs. 12, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: We can confirm that proctoscopy alone should be considered sufficient prior to ileostomy reversal. However, in cases in which the results of proctoscopy are not completely clear or the surgeon remains suspicious of an anastomotic leakage, transanal water-soluble contrast enema via CT could guarantee its detection.

Ileal Interposition for Ureteral Reconstruction Following Treatment for Abdominopelvic Malignancy: Complications and Outcomes From a Comprehensive Cancer Center.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the outcomes of ileal interposition for the management of ureteral obstruction from tumor and ureteral stricture following treatment for abdominopelvic malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective database analysis was performed for all cases of ileal interposition performed by 5 surgeons from January 2013 to December 2020. Patients were ≥18 years of age and included if undergoing ileal interposition in either the primary setting of a surgical procedure for tumor extirpation or in the delayed setting. RESULTS: In total, 23 patients who underwent repair of 27 ureteral units were included. The mean age was 60.2 years. Median follow-up was 21.6 months. The most common primary diagnoses were urothelial (35%), colorectal (31%), and cervical (22%) cancer. The etiologies of ureteral obstruction were malignant in 48% and ureteral stricture in 52%. Types of repairs included unilateral interposition in 13 patients, bilateral interposition in 1 patient, interposition to an ileal conduit in 3 patients, and interposition with cystoplasty in 6 patients. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean preoperative (Creatinine 1.05 mg/dL, Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate 77 ml/min/1.73 m2) renal function and postoperative (Creatinine 1.26 mg/dL, Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate 67 mL/min/1.73 m2) renal function at the most recent follow-up (P = .024). Eight minor (grade 1-2) and 6 major (grade ≥3) complications developed for a minor and major complication rate of 35% and 26%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ileal interposition is successfully utilized as a reconstructive technique at the time of enbloc resection involving the ureter and to address ureteral stricture in the delayed setting.

Efficacy of Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis for Secondary Upper Extremity Lymphedema: Treatment Strategies with Effects of Compression Therapy Discontinuation and Site-Specific Evaluation of the Upper Extremity.

Background: Lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA) has recently become a mainstream surgical treatment for lymphedema and is a useful treatment option in addition to conservative therapies such as compression therapy, exercise therapy, and lymphatic drainage. We performed LVA with the goal of stopping compression therapy and report the effect of LVA on secondary lymphedema of the upper extremities. Methods and Results: The participants were 20 patients with secondary lymphedema of the upper extremities categorized as stage 2 or 3 according to the International Society of Lymphology classification. We measured and compared the upper limb circumference at six locations before and 6 months after LVA. Significant decreases in circumference after surgery were observed at 8 cm proximal to the elbow, the elbow joint, 5 cm distal to the elbow, and the wrist joints, but not at 2 cm distal to the axilla or the dorsum of the hand. At more than 6 months postoperatively, eight patients who had been wearing compression gloves were no longer required to wear them, and three patients who had been wearing both sleeves and gloves were no longer required to wear them. Conclusions: LVA is effective in the treatment of secondary lymphedema of the upper extremities, particularly in improving elbow circumference, and is one of the treatments that contributes significantly to the improvement of quality of life. For severe cases with limited range of motion of the elbow joint, LVA should be performed first. Based on these results, we present an algorithm for upper extremity lymphedema treatment.

Vesicourethral Anastomotic Stenosis Following Radical Prostatectomy: Risk Factors, Natural History, and Treatment Outcomes.

PURPOSE: Vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy is a complication with significant adverse quality-of-life implications. Herein, we identify groups at risk for vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis and further characterize the natural history and treatment patterns. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Years 1987-2013 of a prospectively maintained radical prostatectomy registry were queried for patients with the diagnosis of vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis, defined as symptomatic and inability to pass a 17F cystoscope. Patients with follow-up less than 1 year, preoperative anterior urethral stricture, transurethral resection of prostate, prior pelvic radiotherapy, and metastatic disease were excluded. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis. Functional outcomes were characterized. RESULTS: Out of 17,904 men, 851 (4.8%) developed vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis at a median of 3.4 months. Multivariable logistic regression identified associations with vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis including adjuvant radiation, BMI, prostate volume, urine leak, blood transfusion, and nonnerve-sparing techniques. Robotic approach (OR 0.39, P < .01) and complete nerve sparing (OR 0.63, P < .01) were associated with reduced vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis formation. Vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis was independently associated with 1 or more incontinence pads/d at 1 year (OR 1.76, P < .001). Of the patients treated for vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis, 82% underwent endoscopic dilation. The 1- and 5-year vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis retreatment rates were 34% and 42%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patient-related factors, surgical technique, and perioperative morbidity influence the risk of vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis after radical prostatectomy. Ultimately, vesicourethral anastomotic stenosis is independently associated with increased risk of urinary incontinence. Endoscopic management is temporizing for most men, with a high rate of retreatment by 5 years.

[Research progress of combined surgical treatment of lymphedema based on vascularized lymph node transfer].

Objective: To summarize the research progress of combined surgical treatment of lymphedema based on vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT), and to provide systematic information for combined surgical treatment of lymphedema. Methods: Literature on VLNT in recent years was extensively reviewed, and the history, treatment mechanism, and clinical application of VLNT were summarized, with emphasis on the research progress of VLNT combined with other surgical methods. Results: VLNT is a physiological operation to restore lymphatic drainage. Multiple lymph node donor sites have been developed clinically, and two hypotheses have been proposed to explain its mechanism for the treatment of lymphedema. But it has some inadequacies such as slow effect and limb volume reduction rate less than 60%. To address these inadequacies, VLNT combined with other surgical methods for lymphedema has become a trend. VLNT can be used in combination with lymphovenous anastomosis (LVA), liposuction, debulking operation, breast reconstruction, and tissue engineered material, which have been shown to reduce the volume of affected limbs, reduce the incidence of cellulitis, and improve patients' quality of life. Conclusion: Current evidence shows that VLNT is safe and feasible in combination with LVA, liposuction, debulking operation, breast reconstruction, and tissue engineered material. However, many issues need to be solved, including the sequence of two surgeries, the interval between two surgeries, and the effectiveness compared with surgery alone. Rigorous standardized clinical studies need to be designed to confirm the efficacy of VLNT alone or in combination, and to further discuss the subsistent issues in the use of combination therapy.

Blind loop mucocele of a side-to-end colorectal anastomosis as a rare cause of large bowel obstruction.

Large bowel obstruction (LBO) after colorectal surgery draws wide differentials. To our knowledge, LBO due to blind colonic limb mucocele of a side-to-end colorectal anastomosis has not yet been described. We report a man in his late 50s presenting with pain, abdominal distension and constipation. He had extensive surgical history; notably, a side-to-end colorectal anastomosis was fashioned following Hartmann-type colostomy reversal. CT and MRI suggested a mucus-filled short blind colonic segment compressing the anastomotic site and causing LBO. Flexible sigmoidoscopy under general anaesthesia showed external rectal compression and lumen narrowing. Transrectal needle aspiration of the blind segment yielded 145 mL of mucoid fluid. The patient's symptoms improved and he was discharged with outpatient Gastrografin enema and flexible sigmoidoscopy which confirmed successful blind segment emptying. This case highlights that blind colonic loop mucoceles in colorectal anastomosis can rarely cause obstruction, and endoscopic management is feasible when accurate diagnosis is confirmed on imaging.

[Autologous Breast Reconstruction in Conjuction with Lymphatic Microsurgery in Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema]. / Autologe Brustrekonstruktion und lymphorekonstruktive Chirurgie nach Mastektomie bei Mammakarzinom-assoziiertem LymphödemAutologe Brustrekonstruktion in Kombination mit lymphorekonstruktiver ChirurgieCombined Surgical Treatment of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema and Autologous Breast Reconstruction After Mastectomy.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema of the upper extremity is the most significant non-oncological complication of tumour therapy, leading to functional impairment and impacting patients' quality of life. Autologous breast reconstruction per se effectively reduces incidence and stage of lymphedema after breast cancer treatment by surgical angiogenesis. In addition, modern surgical techniques for treating lymphedema are effective in reducing limb volume, circumference and functional impairment, and improving patients' quality of life, body image, integrity and local immunocompetence. Reconstructive surgery, including lymphovenous anastomoses (LVA) and vascularised lymph node transfer (VLNT), have been shown to rearrange or restore lymphatic flow and prevent stage progression. For patients with breast cancer-related lymphedema after mastectomy, autologous breast reconstruction in conjunction with lymphatic microsurgery using VLNT, LVA or a combination of these procedures offers the option of holistic and single-stage restoration in modern senology. Extensive scar release in the axilla is a crucial component of the surgical technique, aiming to prepare the recipient bed for the VLN transplant and to allow for the functional recruitment of remaining lymph vessels of the upper extremity. This article presents the indications, preoperative diagnostic evaluation, surgical techniques and precautions, complications and results of combined lymphatic and breast restoration.

Terapia descongestiva como complemento a la cirugía de anastomosis linfáticovenosas y transferencia de linfonodos vascularizados: Una revisión de la literatura / Decongestive therapy as an adjunct to lymphatic-venous anastomosis surgery and vascularized lymph node transfer: A review of the literature

Resumen Introducción: El linfedema es una enfermedad inflamatoria crónica que afecta cerca de 250 millones de personas en el mundo. El tratamiento tradicional es la terapia descongestiva. Últimamente, existe la opción de complementar el tratamiento tradicional con procedimientos quirúrgicos fisiológicos como anastomosis linfáticovenosas y transferencia de linfonodos vascularizados. Sin embargo, la evidencia del uso de la terapia descongestiva en los cuidados pre y posoperatorios en estas cirugías es limitada. Objetivo: Evaluar el uso de terapia descongestiva como complemento a la cirugía de linfedema mediante anastomosis linfáticovenosas y transferencia de linfonodos vascularizados. Materiales y Método: Se realizó una revisión de la literatura en las siguientes bases de datos: Cochrane, Pubmed y Google académico, utilizando los siguientes términos mesh: "anastomosis, surgical", "lymphedema", "perioperative care", "microsurgery", "rehabilitation", "therapy", "lymph nodes", "bypass", "lymphedema and microsurgery". Se incluyó aquellos artículos que describían el uso de la terapia descongestiva en los cuidados pre- y posoperatorios. Resultados: Se identificó un total de 201 artículos y 12 fueron incluidos en el análisis. La evidencia reporta que las terapias más usadas en el cuidado pre- y posoperatorio son compresión, drenaje linfático manual y tratamientos personalizados. Sin embargo, la mayoría de los autores hace una descripción vaga de las terapias mencionadas. Discusión y Conclusión: La evidencia respecto al uso de terapia descongestiva como tratamiento complementario es débil. Los expertos recomiendan su uso, sin embargo, se necesitan futuras investigaciones que describan el uso de cada uno de sus componentes como complemento de procedimientos quirúrgicos fisiológicos para el manejo del linfedema.

Background: Lymphedema is a disease that affects about 250 million people around the world. The traditional treatment is decongestive therapy. In the past years, there is the option to complementing the traditional treatment with physiological surgical procedures such as lymphatic-venous anastomosis (LVA) and vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT). However, the evidence for the use of decongestive therapy in pre- and post-operative care in these surgeries is limited. Aim: To evaluate the use of decongestive therapy as a complement to lymphedema surgery such a lymphatic-venous anastomosis and transfer of vascularized lymph nodes. Materials and Method: A literature review was carried out in the following databases: Cochrane, Pubmed and Academic Google, using the following mesh terms: "anastomosis, surgical", "lymphedema", "perioperative care", "microsurgery", "rehabilitation", "therapy", "lymph nodes","bypass", "lymphedema and microsurgery". "Those articles that described the use of decongestive therapy in pre- and post-operative care were included. Results: 201 articles were identified and 12 were included in the analysis. The evidence reports that the most used therapies in pre- and post-operative care are compression, manual lymphatic drainage and personalized treatments. However, most of the authors give a vague description of the mentioned therapies. Discussion and Conclusion: The evidence regarding the use of decongestive therapy as a complementary treatment is weak. Experts recommend its use; however, future research is needed to describe the use of each of its components as a complement to physiological surgical procedures for the management of lymphedema.

Which cava anastomotic techniques are optimal regarding immediate and short-term outcomes after liver transplantation: A systematic review of the literature and expert panel recommendations.

BACKGROUND: It has long been debated whether cava anastomosis should be performed with the piggyback technique or cava replacement, with or without veno-venous bypass (VVB), with or without temporary portocaval shunt (PCS) in the setting of liver transplantation. OBJECTIVES: To identify whether different cava anastomotic techniques and other maneuvers benefit the recipient regarding short-term outcomes and to provide international expert panel recommendations. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Central. METHODS: A systematic review following PRISMA guidelines and recommendations using the GRADE approach derived from an international expert panel (CRD42021240979). RESULTS: Of 3205 records screened, 307 publications underwent full-text assessment for eligibility and 47 were included in qualitative synthesis. Four studies were randomized control trials. Eighteen studies were comparative. The remaining 25 were single-center retrospective noncomparative studies. CONCLUSION: Based on existing data and expert opinion, the panel cannot recommend one cava reconstruction technique over another, rather the surgical approach should be based on surgeon preference and center dependent, with special consideration toward patient circumstances (Quality of evidence: Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong). The panel recommends against routine use of vevo-venous bypass (Quality of evidence: Very Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong) and against the routine use of temporary porto-caval shunt (Quality of evidence: Very Low | Grade of Recommendation: Strong).

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in elderly patients - is advanced age a contraindication?

AIM: We aimed to determine pouch function and retention rate for restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC) in elderly patients. METHODS: We identified patients over 50 years old subjected to IPAA for confirmed pathological UC from 1980 until 2016. Patients were grouped according to age: 50-59, 60-69 and 70+ years. Short and long-term outcomes and quality of life (QOL) were compared among the groups. RESULTS: Six hundred and one patients were identified (399 (66.4%) between 50-59 181 (30.1%) between 60-69, and 21 (3.5%) over 70 years of age). More males were in the 70+ arm, and more two-stage procedures were performed in this group. Wound infection increased with age (P = 0.023). There was a trend of more fistula and pouchitis in the 70+ patients (P = 0.052 and P = 0.055, respectively). Pouch failure rate increased with age, and it was statistically significant in the 70+ cohort (P = 0.015). Multivariate stepwise logistic regression showed that pelvic sepsis (HR 4.8 (95% CI 1.5-15.4), P = 0.009), fistula (HR 6.0 (95% CI 1.7-21.5), and mucosectomy with handsewn anastomosis (HR 4.5 (95% CI 1.4-14.7)), were independently associated with pouch failure. No difference was observed in the QOL among the groups, but pouch function was better for patients younger than 60 years. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients with UC, IPAA may be offered with reasonable functional outcomes, and ileal pouch retention rates, as an alternative to the permanent stoma. Stapled anastomosis increases the chance of pouch retention and should be recommended as long as the distal rectum does not carry dysplasia.

Schwannoma de nervio facial con reanimación facial con Neurotizacion Hipoglosofacial / SCHWANNOMA OF THE FACIAL NERVE WITH FACIAL RESUSCITATION WITH FACIAL HYPOGLOSSAL NEUROTIZATION

El schwannoma es una patología rara del nervio facial. Su diagnóstico preoperatorio es dificultoso dado que no tiene síntomas ni signos patognomónico de la enfermedad. La disección del nervio facial en su tronco y sus ramas con electroestimulacion es la forma de quirúrgica de sospecharlo intraoperatoriamente. La descompresión parcial o exeresis completa deberá ser considerado de acuerdo a la experiencia del equipo quirúrgico en reconstrucción nerviosa. La reparación del nervio facial como primera opción debe el injerto inmediato o sutura termino terminal. La neurotización es un procedimiento quirúrgico que le provoca al paciente simetría facial con manejo de oclusión ocular y manejo de comisura bucal, debe ser realizado antes del año de la injuria nerviosa. La rehabilitación del nervio facial necesita de un equipo multidisciplinario y la colaboración permanente del paciente para conseguir los objetivos propuestos.

Schwannoma is a rare pathology of the facial nerve. Its preoperative diagnosis is difficult since it has no symptoms or pathognomonic signs of the disease. The dissection of the facial nerve in its trunk and its branches with electrostimulation is the surgical way to suspect it intraoperatively. Partial decompression or complete exeresis should be considered according to the experience of the surgical team in nerve reconstruction. The repair of the facial nerve as a first option should be the immediate graft or end-to-end suture. Neurotization is a surgical procedure that causes the patient facial symmetry with management of ocular occlusion and management of the corner of the mouth, it must be performed within a year of the nerve injury. The rehabilitation of the facial nerve requires a multidisciplinary team and the permanent collaboration of the patient to achieve the proposed objectives.

Safety of Small Circular Staplers in Double Stapling Technique Anastomosis for Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although smaller circular staplers are easier to insert and less likely to involve the vagina and levator ani muscles when performing double stapling technique anastomosis, surgeons often consider that larger circular staplers would be safer in reducing the risk of postoperative anastomotic strictures. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the safety of using 25-mm circular staplers compared with 28/29-mm staplers in the double stapling technique anastomosis regarding the development of anastomotic strictures and other complications. DESIGN: This is a retrospective observational study. SETTING: This study was conducted at a single comprehensive cancer center. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients undergoing curative colorectal resection with double stapling technique anastomosis for stage I to III sigmoid colon and rectal cancer between 2013 and 2016 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence of anastomotic complications (strictures, leakage, and bleeding) was compared between the 25- and 28/29-mm circular staplers. Predictors for anastomotic strictures were investigated with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Small (25-mm) staplers were used in 186 (22.8%) of 815 eligible patients. The 25-mm staplers were associated with use in female patients, splenic flexure take down, high tie of the inferior mesenteric artery, and low anastomosis. Overall anastomotic complications (11.8% vs 13.7%, p = 0.51), strictures (5.9% vs 3.3%, p = 0.11), leakage (2.7% vs 3.8%, p = 0.47), and bleeding (4.8% vs 7.6%, p = 0.19) were not different between the 25- and 28/29-mm staplers. From multivariable logistic regression, independent predictors of anastomotic strictures included diverting ostomy and anastomotic leakage, but not small circular stapler use. Most of the 32 anastomotic strictures were successfully treated without surgical intervention (finger dilation, n = 25; endoscopic intervention, n = 5). LIMITATIONS: This was a single-center retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: Use of 25-mm circular staplers for double stapling technique anastomosis is safe and does not increase the risk of anastomotic strictures and other anastomotic complications in comparison with larger staplers. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B576. SEGURIDAD DE ENGRAPADORAS CIRCULARES PEQUEAS EN ANASTOMOSIS, CON TCNICA DE DOBLE ENGRAPADO PARA CNCER DE RECTO Y COLON SIGMOIDE: ANTECEDENTES:Aunque las engrapadoras circulares más pequeñas son más fáciles de insertar y menos probable que involucren a la vagina y los músculos elevadores del ano, cuando se realiza una anastomosis con técnica de doble engrapado, frecuentemente los cirujanos consideran que las engrapadoras circulares más grandes, serían más seguras para disminuir los riesgos de estenosis anastomóticas postoperatorias.OBJETIVO:El estudio se dirigió para investigar la seguridad en el uso de engrapadoras circulares de 25 mm, en comparación con engrapadoras de 28/29 mm, en anastomosis con técnica de doble engrapado, en relación al desarrollo de estenosis anastomóticas y otras complicaciones.DISEÑO:Estudio observacional retrospectivo.AJUSTE:Centro oncológico integral único.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron pacientes consecutivos sometidos a resección colorrectal curativa, con anastomosis y técnica de doble engrapado, para cáncer de recto y colon sigmoide en estadios I-III entre 2013 y 2016.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se compararon las incidencias de complicaciones anastomóticas (estenosis, fugas y sangrados) entre las engrapadoras circulares de 25 y 28/29 mm. Los predictores para estenosis anastomóticas se investigaron con regresión logística multivariable.RESULTADOS:Entre un total de 815 pacientes elegibles, se utilizaron engrapadoras de 25 mm en 186 (22,8%). Las engrapadoras de 25 mm se asociaron con el uso en pacientes femeninas, descenso del ángulo esplénico, ligadura alta de arteria mesentérica inferior y anastomosis baja. Complicaciones anastomóticas generales (11,8% vs. 13,7%, p = 0,51), estenosis (5,9% vs. 3,3%, p = 0,11), fugas (2,7% vs. 3,8%, p = 0,47) y sangrado (4,8% vs. 7,6%, p = 0,19). No hubo diferencia entre las engrapadoras de 25 y 28/29 mm. En la regresión logística multivariable, predictores independientes de estenosis anastomóticas incluyeron ostomía derivativa y fuga anastomótica, pero no incluyeron el uso de engrapadoras circulares pequeñas. La mayoría de las 32 estenosis anastomóticas se trataron con éxito sin intervención quirúrgica (dilatación del dedo, n = 25; intervención endoscópica, n = 5).LIMITACIONES:Fue un estudio retrospectivo de un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:El uso de engrapadoras circulares de 25 mm para la anastomosis con técnica de doble engrapado, es seguro y no aumenta el riesgo de estenosis anastomóticas y de otras complicaciones anastomóticas, cuando son comparadas con engrapadoras más grandes. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B576. (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz-Healy).

Safety and efficacy of side-to-end anastomosis versus colonic J-pouch anastomosis in sphincter-preserving resections: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The application of side-to-end anastomosis (SEA) in sphincter-preserving resection (SPR) is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the safety and efficacy of SEA with colonic J-pouch (CJP) anastomosis, which had been proven effective in improving postoperative bowel function. METHODS: The protocol was registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42020206764. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched. The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the safety or efficacy of SEA in comparison with CJP anastomosis. The outcomes included the pooled risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous variables and weighted mean differences (WMDs) for continuous variables. All outcomes were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CI) by STATA software (Stata 14, Stata Corporation, TX, USA). RESULTS: A total of 864 patients from 10 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. Patients undergoing SEA had a higher defecation frequency at 12 months after SPR (WMD = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.14-0.26; P < 0.01) than those undergoing CJP anastomosis with low heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, P = 0.54) and a lower incidence of incomplete defecation at 3 months after surgery (RR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09-0.86; P = 0.03). A shorter operating time (WMD = - 17.65; 95% CI, - 23.28 to - 12.02; P < 0.01) was also observed in the SEA group without significant heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, P = 0.54). A higher anorectal resting pressure (WMD = 6.25; 95% CI, 0.17-12.32; P = 0.04) was found in the SEA group but the heterogeneity was high (I2 = 84.5%, P = 0.84). No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of efficacy outcomes including defecation frequency, the incidence of urgency, incomplete defecation, the use of pads, enema, medications, anorectal squeeze pressure and maximum rectal volume, or safety outcomes including operating time, blood loss, the use of protective stoma, postoperative complications, clinical outcomes, and oncological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: The present evidence suggests that SEA is an effective anastomotic strategy to achieve similar postoperative bowel function without increasing the risk of complications compared with CJP anastomosis. The advantages of SEA include a shorter operating time, a lower incidence of incomplete defecation at 3 months after surgery, and better sphincter function. However, close attention should be paid to the long-term defecation frequency after SPR.

Arterial only anastomosis associated with modified Baudet technique in ear replantation: Case reports and literature review.

BACKGROUND: Total ear amputation is a relatively rare trauma with an absolute indication for surgical treatment. Numerous techniques for auricular reconstruction have been described. When local and general conditions allow microsurgical replantation, this must be the first choice. We propose the association of microsurgical techniques with some modification (modified Baudet technique) to obtain higher survival rate of the reimplanted stump. METHODS: This study included cases of 3 male patients with total ear amputation, the injuries and their mechanism (workplace accident) being identical. Chief complaints were pain, bleeding, important emotional impact due by an unaesthetic appearance. The established diagnosis was traumatic complete ear amputation (grade IV auricular injury according to Weerda classification). Microsurgical replantation was performed only with arteriorraphy, and no vein anastomosis. Cartilage incisions and skin excisions were made to enlarge the cartilage-recipient site contact area. Medicinal leeches were used to treat venous congestion, to which systemic anticoagulant therapy was added. RESULTS: The results showed the survival of the entire replanted segment in all cases, with good function and esthetical appearance. Patients were fully satisfied with the final outcome. CONCLUSION: Microsurgical replantation is the gold standard, for the surgical treatment of total ear amputation. We believe that cartilage incisions and the increased surface of contact between cartilage and recipient site has an adjuvant role in revascularization of the amputated stump (with only arterial anastomosis) and the use of hirudotherapy helps to relieve early venous congestion.

Sacral neuromodulation for the prevention of a permanent stoma in patients with severe defecation disorder following intersphincteric resection.

PURPOSE: Severe defecation disorder occurs frequently in coloanal anastomosis for low rectal cancer, and may affect quality of life. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has been reported to be successful after rectal resection, but there are no results for patients treated with intersphincteric resection (ISR). METHODS: A retrospective single-center study of SNM was performed for patient with defecation disorder following ISR. Pre- and post-treatment bowel frequencies, fecal incontinence episodes, and Wexner, LARS and FIQL scores were assessed to evaluate the efficacy. A good response was defined as ≥ 50% reduction of bowel frequency per day or fecal incontinence episodes per week. RESULTS: 10 patients (7 males, mean age 67.5 years) underwent SNM. All patients had severe fecal incontinence with a median Wexner score of 15 (13-20) and a median LARS score of 41 (36-41). The Wexner score improved after SNM, but not significantly (p = 0.06). LARS and FIQL scores significantly improved after SNM (p = 0.02, p = 0.01). At the end of follow-up, the good response rate was 40%. Three cases without a good response required creation of a permanent stoma. CONCLUSION: Seven out of 10 patients did not require a permanent colostomy after SNM. SNM should be considered before performing a permanent colostomy.

[Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic double-flap technique in digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction tumors larger than 5 cm].

Objective: To investigate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic double-flap technique (Kamikawa) in digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) leiomyoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with the maximum diameter >5 cm. Methods: A descriptive case-series study was used to retrospectively analyze the data of patients with EGJ leiomyoma and GIST undergoing laparoscopic-assisted proximal gastrectomy and double-flap technique (Kamikawa) at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from September 2017 to March 2019. All the tumors invaded the cardia dentate line, and the maximum diameter was >5 cm. After the exclusion of patients requiring emergency surgery and complicating with severe cardiopulmonary diseases, a total of 4 patients, including 3 males and 1 female with age of 29-49 years, were included in this study. After laparoscopic-assisted proximal gastrectomy, the residual stomach was pulled out of the abdominal cavity and marked with methylene blue at the proximal end 3~4 cm from the anterior wall of the residual stomach in the shape of "H". The gastric wall plasma muscular layer was cut along the "H" shape, and the space between the submucosa and the muscular layer was separated to both sides along the longitudinal incision line to make the seromuscular flap. The residual stomach was put back into the abdominal cavity. Under laparoscopy, 4 stitches were intermittently sutured at the upside of "H" shape and 4-5 cm from the posterior wall of the esophageal stump. The stump of the esophagus was cut open, and the submucosa and mucosa were cut under the "H" shape to enter the gastric cavity. The posterior wall of the esophageal stump was sutured continuously with the gastric stump mucosa and submucosa under laparoscopy. The anterior wall of the esophageal stump was sutured continuously with the whole layer of the residual stomach. The anterior wall of the stomach was sutured to cover the esophagus. The anterior gastric muscle flap was sutured and embedded in the esophagus to complete the reconstruction of digestive tract. The morbidity of intraoperative complications and postoperative reflux esophagitis and anastomosis-related complications were observed. Results: All the 4 patients completed the operation successfully, and there was no conversion to laparotomy. The median operative time was 239 (192-261) minutes, the median Kamikawa anastomosis time was 149 (102-163) minutes, and the median intraoperative blood loss was 35 (20-200) ml. The abdominal drainage tube and gastric tube were removed, and the fluid diet was resumed on the first day after surgery in all the 4 patients. The median postoperative hospitalization time was 6 (6-8) days. Postoperative pathology revealed 3 leiomyomas and 1 GIST. There were no postoperative complications such as anastomotic leakage or stenosis, and no reflux symptoms were observed. The median follow-up time was 22 (11-29) months after the operation, and no reflux esophagitis occurred in any of the 4 patients by gastroscopy. Conclusion: For >5 cm EGJ leiomyoma or GIST, double-flap technique (Kamikawa) used for digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy is safe and feasible.

Ileal Neoappendicostomy in the Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in Children.

INTRODUCTION: An antegrade colonic enema (ACE) via an appendicostomy has been shown to be effective in the management of functional bowel problems. In cases with a missing appendix, a neoappendicostomy may be considered. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of clinical outcomes in children who underwent ileal neoappendicostomy for ACE. Medical records were reviewed for data on demography, intra- and postoperative complications. A follow-up questionnaire on stoma problems, ACE-related problems, bowel function, patient satisfaction, well-being, and effect on daily activities was performed. RESULTS: Ten patients were included at an average age of 10.6 years at surgery. In half of the patients, minor postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade 2 or less) were found. Nine patients answered the questionnaire with a mean follow-up of 57 months. Despite complaints of stomal leakage, difficulties with catheterization, and pain during irrigation, they reported a high grade of satisfaction, improvements in well-being, and bowel function and the achievement of continence. CONCLUSION: Ileal neoappendicostomy may be an alternative to ACE in children with severe and medically intractable constipation and or/and fecal incontinence where the appendix is missing or not available.

Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic double-flap technique in digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction tumors larger than 5 cm / 中华胃肠外科杂志

Objective: To investigate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic double-flap technique (Kamikawa) in digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy for esophagogastric junction (EGJ) leiomyoma and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) with the maximum diameter >5 cm. Methods: A descriptive case-series study was used to retrospectively analyze the data of patients with EGJ leiomyoma and GIST undergoing laparoscopic-assisted proximal gastrectomy and double-flap technique (Kamikawa) at the Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Guangdong Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from September 2017 to March 2019. All the tumors invaded the cardia dentate line, and the maximum diameter was >5 cm. After the exclusion of patients requiring emergency surgery and complicating with severe cardiopulmonary diseases, a total of 4 patients, including 3 males and 1 female with age of 29-49 years, were included in this study. After laparoscopic-assisted proximal gastrectomy, the residual stomach was pulled out of the abdominal cavity and marked with methylene blue at the proximal end 3~4 cm from the anterior wall of the residual stomach in the shape of "H". The gastric wall plasma muscular layer was cut along the "H" shape, and the space between the submucosa and the muscular layer was separated to both sides along the longitudinal incision line to make the seromuscular flap. The residual stomach was put back into the abdominal cavity. Under laparoscopy, 4 stitches were intermittently sutured at the upside of "H" shape and 4-5 cm from the posterior wall of the esophageal stump. The stump of the esophagus was cut open, and the submucosa and mucosa were cut under the "H" shape to enter the gastric cavity. The posterior wall of the esophageal stump was sutured continuously with the gastric stump mucosa and submucosa under laparoscopy. The anterior wall of the esophageal stump was sutured continuously with the whole layer of the residual stomach. The anterior wall of the stomach was sutured to cover the esophagus. The anterior gastric muscle flap was sutured and embedded in the esophagus to complete the reconstruction of digestive tract. The morbidity of intraoperative complications and postoperative reflux esophagitis and anastomosis-related complications were observed. Results: All the 4 patients completed the operation successfully, and there was no conversion to laparotomy. The median operative time was 239 (192-261) minutes, the median Kamikawa anastomosis time was 149 (102-163) minutes, and the median intraoperative blood loss was 35 (20-200) ml. The abdominal drainage tube and gastric tube were removed, and the fluid diet was resumed on the first day after surgery in all the 4 patients. The median postoperative hospitalization time was 6 (6-8) days. Postoperative pathology revealed 3 leiomyomas and 1 GIST. There were no postoperative complications such as anastomotic leakage or stenosis, and no reflux symptoms were observed. The median follow-up time was 22 (11-29) months after the operation, and no reflux esophagitis occurred in any of the 4 patients by gastroscopy. Conclusion: For >5 cm EGJ leiomyoma or GIST, double-flap technique (Kamikawa) used for digestive tract reconstruction after proximal gastrectomy is safe and feasible.

Exploring optimal examination to detect occult anastomotic leakage after rectal resection in patients with diverting stoma.

BACKGROUND: When considering "early stoma closure", both standardized inclusion/exclusion criteria and standardized methods to assess anastomosis are necessary to reduce the risk of occult anastomotic leakage (AL). However, in the immediate postoperative period, neither have the incidence and risk factors of occult AL in patients with diverting stoma (DS) been clarified nor have methods to assess anastomosis been standardized. The aim of this study was to elucidate the incidence and risk factors of occult AL in patients who had undergone rectal resection with DS and to evaluate the significance of computed tomography (CT) following water-soluble contrast enema (CE) to detect occult anastomotic leakage. METHODS: This was a single institutional prospective observational study of patients who had undergone rectal resection with the selective use of DS between May and October 2019. Fifteen patients had undergone CE and CT to assess for AL on postoperative day (POD) 7, and CT was performed just after CE. Univariate analysis was performed to assess the relationship between preoperative variables and the incidence of occult AL on POD 7. RESULTS: The incidence of occult AL on postoperative day 7 was 6 of 15 (40%). Hand-sewn anastomosis, compared with stapled anastomosis, was a significant risk factor. Five more cases with occult AL that could not be detected with CE could be detected on CT following CE; CE alone had a 33% false-negative radiological result rate. CONCLUSIONS: Hand-sewn anastomosis appeared to be a risk factor for occult AL, and CE alone had a high false-negative radiological result rate. When considering the introduction of early stoma closure, stapled anastomosis and CT following CE could be an appropriate inclusion criterion and preoperative examination, respectively.