Lipid emulsion treatment for local anesthetic systemic toxicity in pediatric patients: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is rare, but fatal; the current widely used treatment is lipid emulsion (LE). The goal of this study was to analyze and review case reports on LE treatment for LAST in pediatric patients. METHODS: We performed a systematic review using case reports on LE treatment for LAST in pediatric patients, searching PubMed and Scopus databases to March 2023 using the following keywords: ("local anesthetic toxicity" OR "local anesthetic systemic toxicity" OR LAST") AND ("newborn" OR "infant" OR "child" OR "children" OR "adolescent" OR "pediatric") AND ("lipid emulsion" OR "Intralipid"). RESULTS: Our search yielded 21 cases, revealing that nearly 43% patients with LAST were less than 1 year old, and most cases were caused by bupivacaine (approximately 67% cases). "Inadvertent intravascular injection" by anesthesiologists and "overdose of local anesthetics" mainly by surgeons were responsible for 52% and 24% cases of LAST, respectively. LAST occurred in the awake state (52%) and under general anesthesia (48%), mainly causing seizures and arrhythmia, respectively. Approximately 55% of patients received LE treatment in <10 minutes after LAST, mainly improving cardiovascular symptoms. A 20% LE (1.5 mL/kg) dose followed by 0.25 mL/kg/minutes dose was frequently used. LE and anticonvulsants were mainly used in the awake state, whereas LE with or without vasopressors was mainly used under general anesthesia. LE treatment led to full recovery from LAST in 20 cases; however, 1 patient died due to underlying disease. CONCLUSION: Consequently, our findings reveal that LE is effective in treating pediatric LAST.

Functional neurologic disorder as a rare complication of dental local anaesthetics: two contrasting cases.

Adverse reactions to dental local anaesthetics are fortunately rare. However, when they occur, they can be severe and debilitating to the patient. Adverse reactions may be either prolonged anaesthesia, with or without dysaesthesia, or systemic reactions. Although these systemic reactions are commonly thought to be allergies, this is rarely the case. Much more commonly, these adverse systemic reactions are either cardiovascular or from the central nervous system. This paper describes two contrasting cases of functional neurologic disorder which illustrates the consequences and appropriate management. The responsibilities of the dentist who injected the local anaesthetic are outlined.

Retinal artery occlusion after ophthalmic surgery under regional anaesthesia: A narrative review.

Two recent cases of central retinal artery occlusion under otherwise uncomplicated sub-Tenon's block that resulted in significant visual loss after cataract surgery prompted us to undertake a literature review of such cases. We identified 97 cases of retinal artery occlusion after ophthalmic surgery under regional anaesthesia that had no immediate signs of block-related complications. These occurred after various intraocular (87%) and extraocular (13%) operations, across a wide range of ages (19-89 years) on patients with (59%) or without (39%) known risk factors. The anaesthetic techniques included 40 retrobulbar blocks, 36 peribulbar blocks, 19 sub-Tenon's blocks, one topical anaesthetic and one unspecified local anaesthetic. Different strengths of lidocaine, bupivacaine, mepivacaine and ropivacaine, either alone or in various combinations, were used. The details of the anaesthetic techniques were often incomplete in the reports, which made comparison and analysis difficult. Only nine cases had their cause (optic nerve sheath injury) identified, while the mechanism of injury was unclear in the remaining patients. Various mechanisms were postulated; however, the cause was likely to be multifactorial due to patient, surgical and anaesthetic risk factors, especially in those with compromised retinal circulation. As there were no definite risk factors identified, no specific recommendations could be made to avoid this devastating outcome. We have provided rationales for some general considerations, which may reduce this risk, and propose anaesthetic options for ophthalmic surgery on the fellow eye if required, based both on our literature review and our personal experience.

[Extensive transfixing skin necrosis after breast biopsy under local anesthesia: About four cases]. / Nécrose cutanée étendue transfixiante après biopsie mammaire sous anesthésie locale : rapport de quatre cas.

INTRODUCTION: Local anesthetics with adrenaline are widely used in routine practice and have long proven their benefits and safety. The rare complications due to their use mainly concern immuno-allergic and vascular mechanisms. DESCRIPTION: In this article, we present four similar cases of early transfixing skin necrosis occurring after radioguided breast biopsy under local anesthesia using epinephrine local anesthetics in the context of a diagnostic approach to breast cancer. DISCUSSION: Although the literature is comforting about the use of local anesthetics, even on the extremities, severe skin complications continue to be reported sporadically. The analysis and understanding of these phenomena would allow, in the long run, to avoid them and to reduce their importance. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of skin necrosis after breast biopsy under radiographic control is rare and seems to be related to the local anesthetic procedure. Although similar cases have been reported in the literature, it does not seem possible today to conclude on the exact physiopathology of these complications. A better knowledge of the pathophysiology of these complications would help to avoid their occurrence in the future.

A Prospective, Randomized Controlled, Single-Blinded Study to Assess the Effect of a 33-Gauge Needle Versus a 34-Gauge Needle on Pain Experienced During Injection of Local Anesthetic on the Face.

BACKGROUND: Most pain experienced by patients during Mohs micrographic surgery is associated with the initial injection. Previous studies have shown that a smaller gauge needle (33-gauge vs 30-gauge) is associated with less patient-reported pain. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate patient-reported pain levels following injection with a 33-gauge versus a 34-gauge needle.  Methods: During this prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blinded study, 480 patients were randomized into a 33-gauge versus a 34-gauge needle group. Pain levels following needle insertion were recorded using the validated numerical rating scale (VNRS)-11 scale.  Results: Injection of local anesthetic with a 34-gauge needle is associated with significantly less pain compared to a 33-gauge needle across all subgroups (P=0.007, average pain level 0.49 [34-gauge group] vs 0.79 [33-gauge group] rated on a 0-10 pain scale). Females, first-time Mohs patients, patients under age 65, patients with basal cell carcinoma, and those with tumor locations on the nose experienced the most pain reduction with the use of a 34-gauge needle.  Limitations: This was a single-blinded study; thus, the injector was able to see which needle was being used. This knowledge could have subconsciously affected the angle, speed, or force used to insert the needle. CONCLUSIONS: Injections with a 33-gauge and a 34-gauge needle are both tolerated well and associated with minimal pain. While the pain reduction associated with using a 34-gauge needle is statistically significant, the use of a 34-gauge needle may be most clinically relevant for certain patient subgroups. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(11): doi:10.36849/JDD.7689.

Safety and feasibility of sutureless pars-plana vitrectomy in sub-Tenon anesthesia (SAFE-VISA): a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: To determine the safety and feasibility of sutureless pars-plana vitrectomy (ppV) in sub-Tenon anesthesia. METHODS: In this prospective study. Pain and anxiety at various times after ppV using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and Wong-Baker-FACES scale as well as visual sensations during surgery were investigated. The surgeon evaluated motility, chemosis, overall feasibility. RESULTS: ppV was performed on 67 eyes (33 sub-Tenon anesthesia, 34 general anesthesia). Pain during surgery in sub-Tenon anesthesia was 1.8 ± 2.2 (0.0-8.0), anxiety was 2.3 ± 2.2 (0.0-8.5). There was a moderate correlation between pain and anxiety (R2 = 0.58). Comparing sub-Tenon and general anesthesia no difference in pain perception was found the day after surgery. 27.3% of patients saw details, 21.2% saw colors, 90.1% saw light/motion perception, 3.0% had no light perception. Median chemosis after surgery was 1.0 (IQR = 1.0). Median motility of the eye during surgery was 1.0 (IQR = 1.0), median grade was 1.0 (IQR = 1.0). 24.2% of patients showed subconjunctival hemorrhage during or after surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Sutureless pars-plana vitrectomy in sub-Tenon anesthesia was performed safely, with pain and anxiety levels tolerable for the patients and without the necessity for presence of an anesthesiologist. With 88.9% of patients willing to undergo vitreoretinal surgery in sub-Tenon anesthesia again, we recommend it as a standard option. Trial registration This study was approved by the Institutional Ethical Review Board of the RWTH Aachen University (EK 111/19). This study is listed on clinicaltrials.gov (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04257188, February 5th 2020).

Assessing CRNA Knowledge of Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity Treatment.

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a rare life-threatening adverse event. Due to the potential for devastating patient outcomes, it is crucial for anesthesia providers to understand appropriate LAST management. The primary aim of this study was to assess certified registered nurse anesthetist (CRNA) knowledge of the 2020 American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA) LAST treatment guidelines. The secondary aim was to determine whether there was a relationship between the frequency of CRNAs' exposure to perioperative local anesthetic use and their knowledge level. A quantitative descriptive study and national American Association of Nurse Anesthetists electronic survey solicited practicing CRNAs. Survey findings revealed knowledge scores averaging 47.3% among 184 respondents. Almost all (97.8%) recognized the importance of early lipid emulsion administration. Over half (54.3%) were unaware of the recommended epinephrine dosing during LAST. No relationship was found between knowledge level and CRNAs' exposure to local anesthetics. Those who reported having immediate access to written or electronic guidelines in the event of LAST had significantly higher knowledge scores than those without access (P = .049). Implementing cognitive aids may help bridge knowledge gaps identified in this study and ensure critical steps are not missed. Further studies examining the use of cognitive aids to improve CRNA knowledge of LAST management may be beneficial in the future.

Local Anesthetic Systemic Toxicity During Transversus Abdominis Plane Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine.

Local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST) is a rare but potentially fatal outcome associated with local anesthetic administration. Liposomal bupivacaine (LB; EXPAREL®) is a widely used local anesthetic with extended-release and liposomal formulation that carries an improved cardiac and central nervous system safety profile. However, there is limited data regarding LAST associated with liposomal bupivacaine. Here is described a case of local anesthetic systemic toxicity in a 68-year-old male who presented with obstructing sigmoid adenocarcinoma and underwent open sigmoidectomy with end descending colostomy. The operation was complicated by LAST following transversus abdominis plane block injection with liposomal bupivacaine resulting in cardiac arrest. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved following advanced cardiac life support and infusion of 20% I.V. fat emulsion. Given the widespread use of local anesthetics, providers must be aware of the pathophysiology, diagnosis, and immediate treatment of LAST.

Assessing the Impact of Programmed Intermittent Pulse Injection on Pelvic Floor Function Following Childbirth.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the impact of different administration timings of Programmed Intermittent Pulse Injection (PIEB) on pelvic floor function and postpartum rehabilitation in patients who underwent analgesic delivery and received postpartum rehabilitation nursing. Methods: An observational comparative study was conducted between January 2021 and October 2021. We enrolled 85 patients who received PIEB analgesia during delivery and postpartum rehabilitation nursing at our hospital. Among them, 39 women received PIEB (10 mL pulse dose) 60 minutes after analgesia, comprising group A. Additionally, 46 women received PIEB (15 mL pulse dose) 90 minutes after analgesia, forming group B. We assessed pain levels using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), recorded epidural drug dosage, counted the number of Patient-Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) compressions, noted cases of unilateral block, oxytocin (OT) usage, conversion to cesarean section, and adverse events (AEs). Furthermore, we evaluated pelvic floor muscle (PFM) recovery and assessed their quality of life using the World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL-100). Results: Group A exhibited a lower VAS score at 1 hour after analgesia compared to group B (P < .05), with no significant differences at other time points (P > .05). Group A had lower epidural drug dosages and fewer PCEA compressions than group B (P < .05). There were no significant differences in unilateral block incidence and OT use (P > .05). PFM recovery levels were similar in both groups (P > .05), but the WHOQOL-100 score after nursing was higher in group A compared to group B (P < .05). Conclusions: Administering PIEB with a 60-minute interval after analgesia can enhance the effectiveness and safety of the intervention.

Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity complicating intraoperative intercostal nerve blocks: What do clinicians need to know to prevent similar occurrence?

Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity is a life-threatening adverse event that may occur after administration of local anaesthetics through a variety of routes. Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity is always a potential complication and may occur with all local anaesthetics and in any route of administration. Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity primarily affects the central nervous system and the cardiovascular system and may be fatal. The following is a case of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity complicating surgeon-performed intraoperative intercostal nerve blocks at multiple levels, with a mixture of liposomal bupivacaine and bupivacaine hydrochloride in a patient who underwent video-assisted segmental lung resection for lung cancer under general anaesthesia. Local anaesthetic systemic toxicity presented with seizures and hypotension. The patient was successfully managed and fully recovered. This case illustrates the importance of awareness regarding the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of local anaesthetic systemic toxicity among medical professionals who administer local anaesthetics.

A preliminary study on the assessment of pain using figures among patients administered with dental local anesthesia for mandibular third molar extraction.

The aim of this study was to clarify or determine any possible association between pain reports with a visual analogue scale (VAS) and a figures based scale. This research was a preliminary study aimed at developing a new pain scale without any verbal description. Healthy Japanese patients aged 20 to 39 years who received anesthetic injections for mandibular third molar extraction at our department were enrolled. Regarding pain from dental local anesthetic injections, we recorded figures selected by participants (among options of a circle, triangle, square, bar, and cross), and VAS scores. Overall, 29 men and 31 women participated in the study. Pain caused by local dental anesthesia tended to remind both men and women of the triangle among the suggested figures. Furthermore, patients who chose a cross also reported higher VAS scores than those who chose other figures. Acute pain caused by local dental anesthesia was associated with triangles, and patients who selected a cross were associated with higher VAS scores. The results of this study provide clinicians with important information for dental practice, and could prove useful in developing new pain scales.

Topical ropivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% and lidocaine hydrochloride 2% significantly reduce corneal sensitivity without short-term negative side effects in horses.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate corneal sensitivity and acute side effects following application of ropivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% and lidocaine hydrochloride 2% on the healthy equine cornea. ANIMALS STUDIED: Eight healthy adult horses. PROCEDURE: A randomized, masked, crossover study design was utilized. Baseline Semiquantitative Preclinical Ocular Toxicology (SPOT) scores and corneal touch thresholds (CTT) using a Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer were recorded and measured, respectively, for eight healthy adult horses before medication application. Commercially available eyewash was used as a negative control. Ropivacaine hydrochloride 0.5% or lidocaine hydrochloride 2% solution was sprayed on a randomly selected eye, and the contralateral eye received eyewash. CTT was measured in both eyes at 1, 5, 15, 25, 35, 45, 55, 65, and 75 min post-application. Post-application SPOT scores were recorded immediately following the trial. Linear mixed model statistical analyses (mean ± standard error) were performed (p < .05). RESULTS: Mean eyewash CTT (3.41 cm ± 0.464) was significantly different from ropivacaine-treated (1.44 cm ± 0.562) (p = .008) and lidocaine-treated eyes (1.75 cm ± 0.562) (p = .024); CTT was not significantly different between drug groups (p = .88). Time to maximum anesthesia was not significantly different between ropivacaine (13.25 min ± 3.353) and lidocaine (16.25 min ± 3.353) (p = .40). No side effects were appreciated as confirmed by SPOT. CONCLUSIONS: Ropivacaine and lidocaine similarly decreased corneal sensitivity when applied topically without clinically evident short-term ocular side effects. Lidocaine may be preferable in clinical settings due to its large, multi-use vials and similar effects to ropivacaine.

Physiology of pregnancy and oral local anesthesia considerations.

Background: Safe and effective local anesthesia is a prerequisite for emergency oral surgeries and most dental treatments. Pregnancy is characterized by complex physiological changes, and increased sensitivity to pain. Pregnant women are particularly vulnerable to oral diseases, such as caries, gingivitis, pyogenic granuloma and third molar pericoronitis. Maternally administered drugs can affect the fetus through the placenta. Therefore, many physicians and patients are reluctant to provide or accept necessary local anesthesia, which leads to delays in the condition and adverse consequences. This review is intended to comprehensively discuss the instructions for local anesthesia in the oral treatment of pregnant patients. Methodology: An in-depth search on Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library was performed to review articles concerned with maternal and fetal physiology, local anesthetic pharmacology, and their applications for oral treatment. Results: Standard oral local anesthesia is safe throughout the pregnancy. At present, 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine is considered to be the anesthetic agent that best balances safety and efficacy for pregnant women. Maternal and fetal considerations must be taken into account to accommodate the physiological and pharmacological changes in the gestation period. Semi-supine position, blood pressure monitoring, and reassurance are suggested for high-risk mothers to reduce the risk of transient changes in blood pressure, hypoxemia, and hypoglycemia. For patients with underlying diseases, such as eclampsia, hypertension, hypotension, and gestational diabetes, the physicians should use epinephrine cautiously and control the dose of anesthetic. New local anesthesia formulations and equipment, which contribute to minimizing injection pain and relieving the anxiety, have and are being developed but remain understudied. Conclusions: Understanding the physiological and pharmacological changes during pregnancy is essential to ensure the safety and efficiency of local anesthesia. Optimal outcomes for the mother and fetus hinge on a robust understanding of the physiologic alterations and the appropriate selection of anesthetic drugs and approaches.