Association of Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Size With Long-term Patient Outcomes: The KP-TAA Study.

Importance: The risk of adverse events from ascending thoracic aorta aneurysm (TAA) is poorly understood but drives clinical decision-making. Objective: To evaluate the association of TAA size with outcomes in nonsyndromic patients in a large non-referral-based health care delivery system. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Kaiser Permanente Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm (KP-TAA) cohort study was a retrospective cohort study at Kaiser Permanente Northern California, a fully integrated health care delivery system insuring and providing care for more than 4.5 million persons. Nonsyndromic patients from a regional TAA safety net tracking system were included. Imaging data including maximum TAA size were merged with electronic health record (EHR) and comprehensive death data to obtain demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medications, laboratory values, vital signs, and subsequent outcomes. Unadjusted rates were calculated and the association of TAA size with outcomes was evaluated in multivariable competing risk models that categorized TAA size as a baseline and time-updated variable and accounted for potential confounders. Data were analyzed from January 2018 to August 2021. Exposures: TAA size. Main Outcomes and Measures: Aortic dissection (AD), all-cause death, and elective aortic surgery. Results: Of 6372 patients with TAA identified between 2000 and 2016 (mean [SD] age, 68.6 [13.0] years; 2050 female individuals [32.2%] and 4322 male individuals [67.8%]), mean (SD) initial TAA size was 4.4 (0.5) cm (828 individuals [13.0% of cohort] had initial TAA size 5.0 cm or larger and 280 [4.4%] 5.5 cm or larger). Rates of AD were low across a mean (SD) 3.7 (2.5) years of follow-up (44 individuals [0.7% of cohort]; incidence 0.22 events per 100 person-years). Larger initial aortic size was associated with higher risk of AD and all-cause death in multivariable models, with an inflection point in risk at 6.0 cm. Estimated adjusted risks of AD within 5 years were 0.3% (95% CI, 0.3-0.7), 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4-1.3), 1.5% (95% CI, 1.2-3.9), 3.6% (95% CI, 1.8-12.8), and 10.5% (95% CI, 2.7-44.3) in patients with TAA size of 4.0 to 4.4 cm, 4.5 to 4.9 cm, 5.0 to 5.4 cm, 5.5 to 5.9 cm, and 6.0 cm or larger, respectively, in time-updated models. Rates of the composite outcome of AD and all-cause death were higher than for AD alone, but a similar inflection point for increased risk was observed at 6.0 cm. Conclusions and Relevance: In a large sociodemographically diverse cohort of patients with TAA, absolute risk of aortic dissection was low but increased with larger aortic sizes after adjustment for potential confounders and competing risks. Our data support current consensus guidelines recommending prophylactic surgery in nonsyndromic individuals with TAA at a 5.5-cm threshold.

Incidence and Mortality Rates of Thoracic Aortic Dissection in Korea - Inferred from the Nationwide Health Insurance Claims.

BACKGROUND: Aortic dissection (AD) is one of the most catastrophic diseases and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study is to investigate the hospital incidence and mortality rates of thoracic AD in Korea using a nationwide database. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide population-based study using the health claims data of the National Health Insurance Service in Korea. From 2005 to 2016, adult patients newly diagnosed with AD were included. All patients were divided into the following four subgroups by treatment: type A surgical repair (TASR), type B surgical repair (TBSR), thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), and medical management (MM). The incidence rate, mortality rate, and risk factors of in-hospital mortality were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 18,565 patients were newly diagnosed with AD (TASR, n = 4,319 [23.3%]; TBSR, n = 186 [1.0%]; TEVAR, n = 697 [3.8%]; MM, n = 13,363 [72.0%]). The overall AD incidence rate was 3.76 per 100,000 person-years and exhibited a gradual increase during the study period (3.29 to 4.82, P < 0.001). The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 10.84% and remained consistent (P = 0.57). However, the in-hospital mortality rate decreased in the TASR subgroup (18.23 to 11.27%, P = 0.046). An older age, the female sex, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: The incidence of thoracic AD has gradually increased in Korea. The in-hospital mortality in the TASR subgroup decreased over the decade, although the overall mortality of AD patients did not change.

Paradigm for Detecting Silent Thoracic Aneurysm Disease.

Thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) pose a serious detection challenge owing to their clinically silent nature. Only a small fraction of TAAs cause symptoms in patients. However, the mortality burden of this disease in the population is significant, given the high lethality of such complications as aortic rupture and dissection. Widespread screening for TAA has not been shown to be cost-effective. Therefore, currently most patients with a TAA are identified incidentally during an imaging study conducted for other reasons. Once a TAA diagnosis is established, prophylactic surgical treatment can safely be performed for aneurysms of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending or thoracoabdominal aorta, thus preventing aneurysm-related death. To facilitate early detection of TAA, recent studies have identified several "associates" of TAA that may be useful in making a timely diagnosis. These "associates" include intracranial aneurysm, aortic arch anomalies, abdominal aortic aneurysm, simple renal cysts, bicuspid aortic valve, temporal arteritis, a positive family history of aneurysm disease, and a positive thumb-palm sign, among others. Although for many of these "associates" the underlying mechanism that would explain the association remains to be elucidated, the clinical correlation is strong enough to suggest screening patients with these findings for TAA. This article introduces the "Guilt by Association" paradigm for detection of silent thoracic aortic disease based on detection of clinical markers associated with this condition.

Aortic dilatation and dissection in Turner syndrome: what we know, what we are unclear about and what we should do in clinical practice?

Aortic dilatation and aortic dissection are increasingly recognised in patients with Turner syndrome (TS). Risk factors for aortic dissection include aortic dilatation, bicuspid aortic valves, coarctation of aorta and pregnancy. The risk of death due to aortic dissection in pregnancy in TS is 2%, which is approximately 100 times higher than the general population, as maternal mortality is extremely low. Ongoing cardiovascular monitoring is recommended, although there remain several unanswered questions in relation to cardiovascular imaging especially the choice of modality for detection of vascular, valvular abnormalities and measurements of aortic dimensions. Due to the relative short stature of patients with TS, aortic dimensions need to be defined by aortic measurements adjusted for body surface area, known as aortic sized index (ASI). The relationship of ASI and other risk factors with aortic dissection is only beginning to be clarified. Clinical management and monitoring of such patients should be delivered by a group of clinicians familiar with the issues unique to TS patients in a multidisciplinary fashion. All clinicians including the non-specialists need to have a low threshold of suspecting aortic dissection in these adolescents and young adults. This up to date review, including a summary of all 122 published cases of TS patients with aortic dissection, aims to provide a summary of recent publications on characteristics of aortic dissection and aortic dilatation in TS to highlight gaps in knowledge and propose possible clinical monitoring pathway of cardiovascular health in children and adults with TS. Cardiovascular assessment and risk counselling is especially crucial during the period of transition of adolescents with TS, although life long monitoring by expert cognizant to the issues specific in TS is essential.

High prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients with chronic low back pain.

Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most common symptoms in outpatient clinics, and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is one of the causes of LBP. In the present study, we examined the prevalence of chronic LBP in patients with aortic aneurysm. The study included 23 patients with AAA and 23 patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA); all of them visited a regional center hospital in Akita, Japan. A total of 207 hypertension patients were also enrolled as a control. Chronic LBP was defined in patients who visited the orthopedic outpatient clinic for the LBP treatment for more than three months. The prevalence of chronic LBP in the AAA group (52.2%) was significantly higher than that in the TAA (17.4%, P < 0.05) or hypertension patients (11.6%, P < 0.01). The rate of a trigger point (TP) injection was significantly higher in the AAA group or the TAA group than that in hypertension patients (P < 0.01, P < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the AAA and TAA groups. The TP injection represents an injection of local anesthesia to the low back muscles. We also evaluated the involvement of various factors in LBP caused by AAA, such as age, gender, blood pressure, the existence of dissection, and the maximum diameter of AAA, but none of them showed significant relationship to LBP. The prevalence of LBP is high in AAA patients, and doctors who treat chronic LBP should be aware of AAA as a potential cause of LBP.