A Quality Improvement (QI) initiative in diagnostic stewardship of urine culture in an era of Laboratory Information Systems (LIS).

Standard urine culture is the gold standard for diagnosing urinary tract infections (UTIs) but fails to differentiate true UTI from asymptomatic bacteriuria, which is important to prevent the overuse of antibiotics. Correlation with the presence or absence of pyuria can be helpful in giving a hint of the true situation. With the help of Laboratory Information System (LIS), patients' urinalysis reports can be conveniently accessed and compared simultaneously with appropriate reports. In our study, a quality improvement initiative was planned for appropriate reporting of urine culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing using information obtained through LIS.

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Standard versus Expanded Cultures to Diagnose Urinary Tract Infections in Women.

PURPOSE: We compared urinary tract infection (UTI) symptom resolution rates at 7-10 days in symptomatic women randomized to treatment based on standard urine culture (SUC) versus expanded quantitative urine culture (EQUC) results. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Women ≥18 years old who responded "yes" to "do you feel you have a UTI?" agreed to urethral catheterization and followup. Symptoms were assessed using the validated UTI Symptom Assessment (UTISA) questionnaire. Culture method was randomized 2:1 (SUC:EQUC); antibiotics were prescribed to women with positive cultures. The primary outcome, UTI symptom resolution, was determined 7-10 days following enrollment on all participants regardless of treatment. RESULTS: Demographic data were similar between groups. Of the SUC and EQUC groups 63% and 74% had positive cultures (p=0.10), respectively. Of participants with positive cultures 97% received antibiotics. Primary outcome data were provided by 215 of 225 participants (SUC 143 [95%], EQUC 72 [97%]). At the primary outcome assessment, 64% and 69% in the SUC and EQUC groups, respectively, reported UTI symptom resolution (p=0.46); UTISA scores improved from baseline in the EQUC arm compared to the SUC arm (p=0.04). In the subset of women predominated by non-Escherichia coli (76), there was a trend toward more symptom resolution in the EQUC arm (21%, p=0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Symptom resolution was similar for the overall population (E. coli and non-E. coli) of women treated for UTI symptoms based on SUC or EQUC. Although the sample size limits conclusions regarding the utility of EQUC in women with non-E. coli uropathogens, the detected trend indicates that this understudied clinical subset warrants further study.

Assessment of the comparability of CLSI, EUCAST and Stokes antimicrobial susceptibility profiles for Escherichia coli uropathogenic isolates.

BACKGROUND: As many clinical laboratories convert between Stokes, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) methods, the problem of comparing differently derived sets of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) data with each other arises, owing to a scarcity of knowledge of inter-method comparability. The purpose of the current study was to determine the comparability of CLSI, EUCAST and Stokes AST methods for determining susceptibility of uropathogenic Escherichia coli to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, trimethoprim, cephradine/cephalexin, ciprofloxacin and nitrofurantoin. METHODS: A total of 100 E. coli isolates were obtained from boric acid urine samples from patients attending GP surgeries. For EUCAST and CLSI, the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was used and results interpreted using the respective breakpoint guidelines. For the Stokes method, direct susceptibility testing was performed on the urine samples. RESULTS: The lowest levels of agreement were for amoxicillin-clavulanate (60%) and ciprofloxacin (89%) between the three AST methods, when using 2017 interpretive guidelines for CLSI and EUCAST. A comparison of EUCAST and CLSI without Stokes showed 82% agreement for amoxicillin-clavulanate and 94% agreement for ciprofloxacin. Discrepancies were compounded by varying breakpoint susceptibility guidelines issued during the period 2011-2017, and through the inclusion of a definition of intermediate susceptibility in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the discrepancies generated through using different AST methods and different interpretive guidelines may result in confusion and inaccuracy when prescribing treatment for urinary tract infection.

Preoperative urine culture is unnecessary in asymptomatic men prior to prostate needle biopsy.

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical utility of preoperative urine cultures in asymptomatic men undergoing prostate needle biopsy (PNB). METHODS: One hundred fifty asymptomatic men had urine cultures obtained 14-days prior to PNB. As per study protocol, positive cultures were not treated. Antibiotic prophylaxis prior to PNB included ciprofloxacin 500 mg the night before and morning of the biopsy. Repeat urine cultures were obtained immediately prior to PNB with colony-forming units (CFUs) annotated. Infectious complications post-biopsy were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 150 men, six patients (4%) had evidence of asymptomatic bacteriuria with > 10,000 CFU/mL on office urine culture. Repeat urine cultures on morning of biopsy in all 150 patients noted a mean bacterial count of 55 CFU/mL (range 0-1000). All six patients with positive office urine cultures had < 100 CFU/mL at time of PNB. Following biopsy, four patients (2.7%) developed an infectious complication including two with sepsis and two with culture-positive UTIs. The causative organism in all cases was quinolone-resistant E. coli. None of the six patients with preoperative positive urine cultures developed an infectious complication following PNB. CONCLUSIONS: In this prospective observational study, under 5% of asymptomatic men had positive office cultures prior to PNB. Furthermore, repeat urine culture on the morning of biopsy showed resolution in these patients, and none developed post-biopsy infectious complications. Routine office urine culture in the asymptomatic male prior to PNB was unnecessary.

Asymptomatic Bacteriuria in Noncatheterized Adults.

Asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) is a common finding and frequently detected in premenopausal nonpregnant women, institutionalized patients, patients with diabetes mellitus, and the ambulatory elderly population. Despite clear recommendations regarding diagnosis and management of ASB in these populations from the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), there remains an alarming rate of antimicrobial overuse. This article reviews definitions of ASB, epidemiology of ASB, literature surrounding ASB in diabetic patients, risk factors of ASB, microbiologic data regarding bacterial virulence, use of ASB strains for treatment of symptomatic urinary tract infection, and approaches to addressing translational barriers to implementing IDSA recommendations regarding diagnosis and management of ASB.

Diagnosis and management of urinary tract infection in older adults.

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is a commonly diagnosed infection in older adults. Despite consensus guidelines developed to assist providers in diagnosing UTI, distinguishing symptomatic UTI from asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) in older adults is problematic, as many older adults do not present with localized genitourinary symptoms. This article summarizes the recent literature and guidelines on the diagnosis and management of UTI and ASB in older adults.

Bacteriuria amongst pregnant women in the Buea Health District, Cameroon: prevalence, predictors, antibiotic susceptibility patterns and diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Bacteriuria is associated with significant maternal and foetal risks. However, its prevalence is not known in our community. OBJECTIVES: This study was carried out to determine the prevalence and predictors of bacteriuria in pregnant women of the Buea Health District (BHD) as well as the antibiotic sensitivity patterns of bacterial isolates. It also sought to determine the diagnostic performance of the nitrite and leucocyte esterase tests in detecting bacteriuria in these women. METHODS: An observational analytic cross-sectional study was carried out amongst pregnant women attending selected antenatal care centres in Buea. We recruited 102 consenting pregnant women for the study. Demographic and clinical data were collected using structured questionnaires. Clean catch midstream urine was collected from each participant in sterile leak proof containers. Samples were examined biochemically, microscopically and by culture. Significant bacteriuria was defined as the presence of ≥108 bacteria/L of cultured urine. Identification and susceptibility of isolates was performed using API 20E and ATB UR EU (08) (BioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France). RESULTS: Significant bacteriuria was found in the urine of 24 of the 102 women tested giving a bacteriuria prevalence of 23.5% in pregnant women of the BHD. Asymptomatic bacteriuria was detected in 8(7.8%) of the women. There was no statistically significant predictor of bacteriuria. Escherichia coli were the most isolated (33%) uropathogens and were 100% sensitive to cefixime, cefoxitin and cephalothin. The nitrite and leucocyte esterase tests for determining bacteriuria had sensitivities of 8%, 20.8% and specificities of 98.7% and 80.8% respectively. CONCLUSION: Bacteriuria is frequent in pregnant women in the BHD suggesting the need for routine screening by urine culture. Empiric treatment with cefixime should be instituted until results of urine culture and sensitivity are available. Nitrite and leucocyte esterase tests were not sensitive enough to replace urine culture as screening tests.

[Experience of use of prolit septo in the complex treatment of patients with urolithiasis].

The efficacy of phytogenic drug prolit septo in the complex treatment of patients with urolithiasis complicated by infectious-inflammatory process was evaluated. The effects of prolit septo were assessed by a comparative evaluation of the results of microbiological analysis of urine in 14 patients of main group and 12 patients of control group. Patients in both groups were matched by sex, age, and results of raiological, clinical, biochemical and microbiological methods of examination. For the treatment of 11 patients of the main group, prolit septo was applied in combination with standard anti-bacterial treatment, 3 patients received monotherapy with prolit septo within 3-6 weeks. The drug was administered at a dose of 1200 mg (2 capsules) 3 times a day. Twelve patients of the control group received only standard treatment. The duration of treatment in both groups was 1-2 weeks. It was found that combined therapy with prolit septo is more effective than standard antibacterial treatment. Against the background of combined therapy the disappearance of bacteriuria was noted in 54.5% of patients of main group compared with 8.3% of patients of control group.

The postoperative bacteriuria score: a new way to predict nosocomial infection after prostate surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Urinary tract infections are the leading nosocomial urologic infections and may be a cause of added morbidity and costs, and sometimes sepsis. The aim of this study was to design a predictive score for these complications after prostate surgery. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective survey. SETTING: Eleven French urology centers. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) during a 3-month period. RESULTS: The overall incidence of postoperative bacteriuria was 25.0% (95% confidence interval, 17.7%-29.5%). Almost all patients (95.7%) received antibiotic prophylaxis. A predictive postoperative bacteriuria score (POBS), with a 6-point scale of 0 to 5, was constructed on the basis of independent risk factors identified in multivariate analysis of a test sample of patients (n=135) and tested in a validation sample (n=73). Significantly more infections occurred in patients with a POBS of 2 or higher (87 [8%] vs 48 [50%]; P<.0001). With the test sample, this yielded a sensitivity of 77%, a specificity of 77%, a positive predictive value of 50%, a negative predictive value of 92%, and a global accuracy of 77%. CONCLUSIONS: POBS could be used to distinguish patients at risk of developing infection after TURP. This information might be useful for implementing selective prevention measures or for adjustment for differences in nosocomial infection rates when comparing data between urology centers.

[Recurrent urinary tract infections]. / Infecciones urinarias recurrentes.

Recurrent urinary tract infections (RUTI) are a frequent clinical problem in sexually active young women, pregnant or postmenopausal women and in patients with underlying urological abnormalities. The present chapter reviews RUTI based on their classification: relapses, which usually occur early (< 1 month), are caused by the same microorganism and are associated with underlying urological abnormalities, and reinfections, which usually occur later and are caused by a new distinct microorganism (or by the same microorganism usually located in the rectum or uroepithelial cells). The pathogenesis of RUTI is reviewed and the risk factors associated with RUTI in premenopausal women (usually related to sexual activity), postmenopausal women (in whom estrogen deficiency has a significant effect on the vaginal Lactobacillus flora), and in pregnant women are discussed. Likewise, an extensive review of the distinct therapeutic strategies to prevent RUTI is provided: self-treatment of cystitis, continuous antibiotic prophylaxis, postcoital antibiotic prophylaxis, topical vaginal estrogens, Lactobacillus, cranberry juice, intravesical administration of non-virulent E. coli strains and vaccines, among others. Several diagnostic-therapeutic algorithms are included. These algorithms are based on the type of urinary infection (relapse-reinfection), on the type of patient (young, postmenopausal, or pregnant women) and on the number of episodes of RUTI.

Resistencia a ciprofloxacino de E. coli aisladas de urocultivos del Servicio de Urología del Hospital DR. Sótero del Río / Resistance to Ciprofloxacino between the E. coli isolated from urine cultures taken in the Servicio de Urología del Hospital Sótero del Río

El Ciprofloxacino es una valiosa y eficaz herramienta en el tratamiento de las infecciones del tracto urinario (ITU). El objetivo de este trabajo es el análisis descriptivo de la resistencia antibiótica a Ciprofloxacino de las E. Coli aisladas de urocultivos solicitados en el Servicio de Urología del Hospital Dr. Sótero del Río (HSR), relacionándola con la ½Presión Antibiótica¼ ejercida por dicho Servicio durante el mismo período y comparándola con los estándares americanos. Se seleccionaron todos los urocultivos con >100.000 colonias, cuyo germen aislado fuera E. Coli durante el período enero 2002 y junio 2003, solicitados en el Servicio de Urología del HSR. De éstos, se seleccionaron todas las cepas de E. Coli con resistencia, al menos intermedia a Ciprofloxacino. Con la información obtenida se midió la ½Presión Antibiótica¼. Existe una alta resistencia de E. Coli en relación con bajas dosis de Ciprofloxacino indicadas en el Serviciode Urología del HSR. Esto podría explicarse por el uso ambulatorio indiscriminado de Ciprofloxacino.

[Four-glass or two glass test for chronic prostatitis]. / 4- oder 2-Gläserprobe bei der chronischen Prostatitis?

Chronic pelvic pain syndrome is still an important clinical problem. The NIH prostatitis classification introduced in 1998 for diagnosis and treatment measures is based on extended microbiological analysis of urine and expressed prostate secretion (4-glass test). In 1997 J.C. Nickel proved that the culture and microscopic examination of urine before and after prostatic massage leads to the same results as the 4-glass test. In our prospective study on 143 patients with a diagnosis of chronic prostatitis, we analyzed this statement and came to the same results. We therefore recommend replacing the expensive and time-consuming 4-glass test by a simple preprostatic and postprostatic massage urine culture. Further examinations should only be performed in special cases.

Diagnosis, treatment and registration of urinary tract infections in geriatric patients.

Bacteriuria (> or = 10(5) CFU/ml) is a very common phenomenon in elderly people, occurring twice as frequently in women than in men. There are symptomatic and asymptomatic types of bacteriuria. Risk factors include: a decrease in the estrogen level in women after the menopause, catheterisation, urinary bladder dysfunction, hypertrophy of the prostate gland, diabetes, neurological illnesses. The diagnosis of bacteriuria is based on quantitative urine culture (positive result--> or = 10(5) CFU/ml bacteriae). The most frequent pathogens are: E. coli, enterococci, staphylococci, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Proteus mirabilis. The antimicrobial therapy is not advised for asymptomatic bacteriuria. In the case of symptomatic bacteriuria it is advised to take urine for culture and to perform sensitivity testing as well as blood culture and to start a "blind therapy". In order to use the antimicrobial treatment effectively, the most frequently occurring pathogens should be registered and their sensitivity patterns in the given hospital recognised.

[Significance of bacterial prostatic colonization for nosocomial urinary tract infections after transurethral prostate resection]. / Die Bedeutung der bakteriellen Prostatabesiedlung für nosokomiale Harnwegsinfektionen nach transurethraler Prostataresektion.

Nosocomial urinary tract infections (UTI) are frequent complications after transurethral prostatectomy. The resection itself, postoperative catheterization and the prostate are possible causes of these infections. In this prospective study we investigated the influence of bacterial prostatic colonization on the incidence of postoperative urinary tract infections and inflammatory complications. In 78 patients we observed in 42 cases (53.8%) a bacterial prostatitis. In 14 patients (17.9%) we found nosocomial UTI's and in 12 patients (15.4%) inflammatory complications. The incidence of postoperative UTI's increase significantly in patients with positive prostate-cultures. On the other hand we only found corresponding prostate- and postoperative urine-cultures in less than 50%. The presented data are not sufficient to conclude the kind of relevance of bacterial prostatic colonization for postoperative UTI's in transurethral prostatectomy. Under consideration of the significant increase of nosocomial UTI's in patients with positive prostate cultures a perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis seems to be required in general.

[Urinary tract infections--causes, differential diagnosis and treatment]. / Harnwegsinfektionen--Ursachen, Differentialdiagnose und Behandlung.

Infections of the urinary tract occur quite frequently in patients of both sex in the practice as well as in the hospital. They are caused mainly by bacteria. However, virus- and significant fungus-infections of the kidney and the urinary tract are observed due to acquired immuno-suppression or induced by the physician. The current knowledge about this problem is still insufficient. Obtaining a careful history, the physical examination and biochemical analysis are still of great value for a successful treatment. Besides the drug therapy, the physiological immunological mechanisms should be activated by unspecific procedures. If they are the only risk factor, urinary tract infections including chronic courses never lead to kidney failure necessitating a dialysis.