Combined microneedling with topical vitamin D3 or bimatoprost versus microneedling alone in the treatment of alopecia areata: A comparative randomized trial.

INTRODUCTION: Alopecia areata (AA) is a challenging disease with variable treatment outcomes. Hair follicles express vitamin D receptors. Therefore, vitamin D3 may be promising for AA treatment through immunomodulatory mechanisms. The efficacy of bimatoprost in scalp AA treatment was reported by few studies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of microneedling (MN) with topical vitamin D3 versus MN with bimatoprost in comparison with MN alone in the treatment of localized AA. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients with localized AA were divided into three groups. The first group: 25 patients were treated with MN alone. The second group: 25 patients treated with MN combined with topical vitamin D3. The third group: 25 patients treated with MN combined with bimatoprost solution. The response was evaluated clinically and dermoscopically. RESULTS: At the end of the study, all groups showed a statistically significant decrease in the SALT score compared to the baseline. The clinical response (regrowth scale): vitamin D and bimatoprost groups showed a statistically significant higher regrowth scale compared to MN alone group (p-value = 0.000). After treatment, hair regrowth was significantly higher in MN combined with bimatoprost than in MN combined with topical vitamin D3. However, after 3 months of follow-up, there was no statistically significant difference between both groups. Side effects were mild and transient in all groups. CONCLUSION: Topical vitamin D3 and bimatoprost combined with MN are safe and effective therapeutic options for localized AA.

Ocular Surface Disease in Glaucoma Patients Randomized to Benzalkonium Chloride-Containing Latanoprost and Preservative-Free Bimatoprost.

Purpose: To investigate the influence of benzalkonium chloride (BAK) on ocular surface disease (OSD) in glaucoma patients receiving ocular-hypotensive agent. Methods: Patients were randomized to receive BAK-containing latanoprost (Xalatan) or preservative-free bimatoprost (Lumigan PF). Intraocular pressure (IOP), basal Schirmer's test, noninvasive keratograph tear-breakup time (TBUT), conjunctival redness score (R score), OSD index (OSDI), and corneal Oxford staining were recorded and compared between the 2 groups at 1-month and 4-month visits. The influence of BAK was analyzed by a generalized estimating equation model. Results: We enrolled 74 and 76 eyes treated with latanoprost and bimatoprost, respectively. The IOP decreased in both groups, although greater reduction was observed for latanoprost (13.95 vs. 15.42 mmHg, P = 0.0264). There was a significantly negative association between tear flow and latanoprost use (ß = -0.763, P = 0.0243). The first and average TBUT did not show intergroup differences, but the area with unstable tear film increased with latanoprost use and showed marginal significance at 4-month visit (9.33% vs. 5.94% P = 0.055). In both groups, OSDI decreased, whereas Oxford stain increased over time, and R scores showed improvement after transient increase in the first month. The bimatoprost group had significantly worse conjunctival hyperemia, whereas a negative association with conjunctival hyperemia was revealed for latanoprost use (R score-bulbar nasal: ß = -0.045, P = 0.0423). Conclusions: BAK-containing latanoprost was associated with decreased tear secretion and may be associated with tear-film instability, whereas bimatoprost was associated with worse conjunctival hyperemia. Ocular surface side effects should be considered when prescribing BAK-containing medication to glaucoma patients.

Efficacy of bimatoprost for the treatment of primary open-angle glaucoma: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Bimatoprost has been reported to treat primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) effectively. However, up-to-date, no systematic review has specifically addressed the efficacy and safety of bimatoprost for the treatment of POAG. Therefore, this study will propose to appraise the efficacy and safety of bimatoprost for the treatment of POAG. METHODS: We will perform a systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHI, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure from inception up to the March 1, 2020. We will include randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for evaluating the efficacy and safety of bimatoprost for the treatment of POAG. Primary outcome is the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction from baseline to the endpoint, and change in best corrected visual acuity. Secondary outcomes are contrast sensitivity, rate of progression of glaucoma, quality of life, and incidence of adverse events. Study quality will be examined by Cochrane Collaboration tool, and strength of evidence will be evaluated by Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation tool. RESULTS: This proposed study will outline the current RCTs to assess the efficacy and safety of bimatoprost for the treatment of POAG. CONCLUSION: The findings of this study will confirm whether bimatoprost is beneficial to patients with POAG. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: INPLASY202040118.